Wokeness and Warring in Geopolitics

Victor Davis Hanson and cohost Jack Fowler discuss the economic and political fate of Europe, wokeness as geopolitics, and the current state of the Ukraine war.

Share This

9 thoughts on “Wokeness and Warring in Geopolitics”

  1. Hello Victor Davis Hanson,

    The American 1% is pretty evil as well, Mother Russia is ironic with the woke seeing they can not define a woman? She is the mother. Thank you for this podcast and this always reminds me of the movie Smoke Signals- “Hey Hey Victor”
    Thank you Marie

  2. Comment From Canada: First I’ll say that Mr. Fowler and Prof. Hanson , for me, represent they very best of American Culture, clear eyed problem solvers, realistic and kind.
    The comment: Its more of an observation.
    I spent two years working in Frankfurt and experienced daily what the good Professor observed. Generally speaking I was initially perceived as American there. As soon as it was clear I was Canadian the attitude would shift 180 degrees. This always bothered me, a lot . Canadians and Americans are pretty much exactly the same thing. Where I live (eastern Ontario) is indistinguishable from Vermont or Upstate NY or Pennsylvania. Culturally, visually, you name it. I’m as comfortable in Rochester or Burlington as Kingston or Ottawa.
    My take is, it’s the cool kids factor. The Americans are the cool kids. We Canadians are the cool kids without Aircraft Carriers. The anecdote: In a restaurant with some American colleagues and the waiter had to launch into the euro-weenie tirade about Israel, the US and so on. Culminating with “America has no Culture!!!” So I asked the guy if his jeans were Levis or Wranglers. He didn’t get it. But we did.
    the Hockey Metaphor, The USA is like Boston Bruin Brad Marchand. All the pundits have nasty things to say about him,every player in the NHL wants him on the team. Eternally grateful that Canadians are on the same team as you guys.
    PS I work for the Military, not supposed to comment, if you don’t mind and you get to this,call me Kilroy

  3. It would be interesting to hear VDH explain the roles non-combative or neutral European countries played in WW11. Eg: Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Sweden, Croatia, Serbia, Turkey etc.
    As I read & listen to Victor’s analysis of WW11 I am surprised to hear that politically most were Third Reich supporters.
    Is that true and what does that say about the ECM today.
    From the sour grape
    Rich Barber

  4. On Germany: I was an American Airlines frequent flyer and wife and I used some of my “miles” to fly to Europe. AA flew into Hamburg, so that’s where we started. This was 1989 when the Berlin wall fell. We traveled through Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Norway. Germany was the least accommodating country to English speakers. The Hamburg visitors office didn’t have anyone who spoke English when we were there. We felt much more at home in the other countries we visited. I would hardly put Germany in the ‘welcomes Americans’ group.

  5. VDH’s remarks with respect Germany and the loss of two wars is shockingly accurate. On visits to Mexico City, for example, many times I have met Mexican nationals of German descent who, after several shots of tequila, let me know–and I mean very directly–that the US F—– up everything that could have been. IMHO, it is time for the US to pull out of NATO completely, or, let the EU subsidize us, instead of the other way around.

  6. I wish Victor would counter balance his seeming disgust with Germany with a brief sketch of Martin Luther’s solitary confrontation with the powers that be in his day. It seems appropriate with the approach of All Hallows Eve/Reformation Day – October 31. Has he and Jack forgotten that 53% of the US trace their lineage to Germany?

  7. A remarkable VDH rant – and Victor does not deny his aversion to Germany. In many aspects he might be correct, but, sorry to say, many arguments look like a rationalization less like an analysis.
    One of the key differences is VDH holding Germany accountable as the main culprit for WW1. This is not convincing. I remember him founding Germany’s guilt for WW1 with the hard peace Treaty of Brest-Litowsk. He took an event of 1917 as the determining event for outbreak of the war years before – 1914 – this is not a scientific method.
    And, the last 10 years shed some more light on the details of the developments leading into the ‘Great War’, especially with the works of historians Christopher Clark, Sean McMeekin and his Hoover collegue Niall Ferguson – all of them broadening the picture by no longer ignoring the roles of a revanchistic, aggressive France, an imperialistic Russia, keen on Austrian territories as well as the Dardanelles and even of a weary titan Great Britain who all are as well – if not considerably more – to blame for the ‘primordial catastrophe of the 20th century’ than Imperial Germany – as well as for the emergence of German nationalism.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.