Angry Reader

6. For the next 80 days, has the chameleon-like Kamala Harris now become a temporary MAGA candidate, as she expropriates Trump’s positions from border security to no taxes on tips? Does the media care to ask the new 80-day MAGA Harris why she has renounced many of her once emphatic beliefs? Facts: Both President Biden […]

5. After the precedents of 2020 and 2024, is the future orthodox protocol for any Democratic nominee now to avoid all interviews and ex tempore speaking, and stick to teleprompted speeches and scripted responses only? Is the fear that a transparent progressive messenger with an overt and honest left-wing message will double down on it

3. Would the media prefer to help her win but lose further credibility themselves by failing to ask why she has disowned her last three decades of leftist agendas, or to reclaim some of their reputations and thereby risk her losing?  Facts: Harris was a prosecutor and Attorney General of California whereby she prosecuted crimes

As for your “fact-checking attachments,” what follows is a systematic reply to your distortions and often incoherence. As readers will see, both your letter and fact-checking illustrate not just your blinkered partisanship and confusion, but a certain childish mean-spiritedness that seeks to silence those with whom you disagree and apparently cannot refute through the force

Two, you know almost nothing of the multifold requirements of a tenured Hoover senior fellow that transcend public commentary. And since you would apparently wish to see me gone from the Hoover Institution, you should learn what fellows are expected to do and how writing a column fits into their job description. (I mention what

From: Michael Dernburg Subject: The Creepy, Weird, and Dangerous Aspects of the 2024 Campaign I find the publication on Hoover’s web site by Victor Davis Hanson from Aug 15, 2024 regarding “The Creepy, Weird, and Dangerous Aspects of the 2024 Campaign” particularly offensive because this writing violates the mission of the Hoover Institute [sic]; that

Yes, when Democrats controlled the White House and the Senate, the nation between 1960 and 1990 experienced the most leftwing court in memory. I don’t recall any serious conservative effort to pack or change the court. Almost every conservative justice in that era after being appointed drifted leftward; again, I don’t recall any such trending

From An Angry Reader, Part One: You place the lying, phony, anti-Democracy Donald J Trump along with the maniacal J D Vance as the potential saviors of the US? Lies and more lies. And you have the hubris to claim that Kamala can’t get a word out of her mouth because she is so stupid.

Victor, I cannot reconcile the facts surrounding the Biden surrender/Harris surge regarding the Democrat presidential candidate except to suspect this did not unfold per the desire of the party elites. Perhaps I am lacking factual understanding but here’s my perception of the facts: * The majority of the party recognized Biden could not beat Trump,

Subject: Proposed deal That was actually a pretty good deal you suggested. I’m afraid the trust level Putin holds for the west is near zero. No cease fire until an agreement is reached, according to Russia. Besides, given Russian superiority on the battlefield, I suspect they want Odessa. Some say Russian troops up to the