{"id":9832,"date":"2017-02-07T10:09:36","date_gmt":"2017-02-07T18:09:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=9832"},"modified":"2017-02-14T15:35:06","modified_gmt":"2017-02-14T23:35:06","slug":"californias-polarization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/californias-polarization\/","title":{"rendered":"California\u2019s Polarization"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>by <a class=\"node node-5358 entityreference\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hoover.org\/profiles\/richard-sousa\">Richard Sousa<br \/>\n<\/a>Monday, February 6, 2017<\/p>\n<p>With all due respect, I believe my colleague Sam Abrams has it all wrong. He argues that when examining California voter registration data at the county level, the polarization along party lines and the partisanship in the state are not as deep as commonly portrayed. He is, however, using the wrong metrics and drawing the wrong conclusions.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In the wake of the 2016 election, much has been made of the Democratic Party\u2019s decline throughout the country. California, with its landslide vote for Hillary Clinton, Democrats in every statewide elected position, and a Democratic supermajority in the state legislature, is seen as one of the party\u2019s few beacons.<\/p>\n<p>After analyzing party registration data by county, Abrams says not so fast. I disagree.<\/p>\n<p>It may be true that \u201call politics is local.\u201d But a political party\u2019s power is measured not at the county seat but in state capitals and in Washington. Further, for all the emphasis pollsters put on voter registration, it is the voters\u2019 revealed preferences\u2014whom they actually vote for\u2014that matter, not how they register. Nowhere was that more evident than in President Trump\u2019s election when the polls were so terribly wrong.<\/p>\n<p>In statewide elections California has been a one-party state since the mid-1990s. If we see Governor Schwarzenegger\u2019s 2008 election an aberration (as I do), California has not elected a Republican as governor since Pete Wilson won in 1994. In the last two elections, Governor Brown defeated his Republican opponent by 20 and 12 percentage points.<\/p>\n<p>There are currently no Republicans holding statewide offices, and since 1998 only three Republicans have been elected to a statewide office: Bill Jones as secretary of state in 1998, Steve Poizner as insurance commissioner in 2002, and Schwarzenegger.<\/p>\n<p>One-sided voting\u2014both Republican and Democratic\u2014dominated the recent elections that sent our representatives to Washington. California has seated two Democrats as US senators since 1992; Pete Wilson was the last Republican voted into the US Senate and that was in 1988. No political party in California had sent such an uninterrupted flow of senators to Washington in the state\u2019s history. The continued success of the Democrats was ensured by the returns from California\u2019s top-two primary that resulted in two Democrats running for California\u2019s US senate seat in 2016.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats dominate California\u2019s fifty-three-seat US House of Representatives delegation, but, regardless of which party representative won, the 2016 election results were one-sided. Forty-five of the races pitted a Democratic against a Republican candidate. In twenty-nine of those races, the winner received at least 60 percent of the vote (according to political scientists, the landslide or polarized level). In another eleven races, the winner received at least 55 percent of the vote\u2014a margin of more than 10 percentage points, meeting the more relaxed threshold for a landslide. Only five of California\u2019s House seats were truly competitive in 2016.<\/p>\n<p>In the state legislature, the picture is bleak for Republicans. Democrats hold twenty-seven of the forty seats in the California Senate and fifty-five of eighty in the state assembly. The Democrats have held the majority in both houses since 1997 and now hold supermajorities (that is, at least two-thirds of the seats) in both houses, allowing Democrats to pass most legislation without any Republican votes.<\/p>\n<p>The pattern of landslides (regardless of party) holds for California\u2019s state legislature as well. In 2016\u2019s eighty assembly seat races, only fifty-nine were up for grabs. The other twenty-one were single-party races, pitted a major party candidate against a minor party candidate, or had only one candidate.<\/p>\n<p>Of the fifty-nine contested seats, forty-four (three-quarters) were won in landslides; in another nine races, the margin of victory was more the 10 percentage points. Only six of the eighty seats were competitive. We find similar results in the twenty state senate races. Only three of the races between members of the two major parties were decided by fewer than 10 percentage points.<\/p>\n<p>Voter registration data do not portray as much partisanship but the data do display an interesting pattern. Since 2000 the percentage of registered Democrats in California has stayed at roughly 44 percent; those registered as Republicans, however, has fallen from 35 percent to 26 percent. The gap was filled not by registrations for minor parties but by those expressing no party preference. In the 2000 to 2016 period, that proportion rose from 14 percent to 24 percent of the registered voters.<\/p>\n<p>Surveys conducted by the Public Policy Institute of California report that there are few truly independent voters in California. Nearly three-quarters of those who register with no party affiliation lean either Republican or Democratic. With that in mind, a closer look at the California voter registration data supports the polarized view.<\/p>\n<p>If nearly a quarter of the registrants do not identify a party, it is difficult to reach the 60 percent polarization threshold. Achieving that level requires 80 percent of those declaring to side with one party. It is not surprising that only four of California\u2019s fifty-three congressional districts are defined as polarized.<\/p>\n<p>When examining data only for those who registered as either a Democrat or a Republican, thirty-five of the congressional districts are polarized and eleven of the remaining eighteen show at gap of at least 10 percentage points between the parties. By this measure, only seven Congressional seats were at risk of flipping from one party to the other in 2016\u2014and none did.<\/p>\n<p>Divisive issues abound and are intensified in a state as diverse and large as California. California voters could be self-selecting geographically into homogenous groups: beachgoers, mountain men, city slickers, farmers, chip designers. Or geography may be defining the issues that unite them: water rights, immigration, environmental issues, overcrowded cities, crime. Or, as Victor Hanson notes, the party differences align not as much as by geography as by income, housing prices, unemployment, and children\u2019s test scores.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of party, there is little expectation for change in representation of Californians in the capitals. The two major parties are entrenched ideologically and geographically. Arnold Schwarzenegger was able to bridge the partisan gap for a few years, but it not clear that, presently, there is a leader or an issue (not even \u201cdump Trump\u201d) that can inspire California voters to debate the issues not the ideology.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hoover.org\/research\/californias-polarization\">http:\/\/www.hoover.org\/research\/californias-polarization<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Richard Sousa Monday, February 6, 2017 With all due respect, I believe my colleague Sam Abrams has it all wrong. He argues that when examining California voter registration data at the county level, the polarization along party lines and the partisanship in the state are not as deep as commonly portrayed. He is, however, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1099,16,31,1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2yA","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10231,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-fusion-party\/","url_meta":{"origin":9832,"position":0},"title":"The Fusion Party","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson National Review The Democrats are following the lead of the progressive media \u2014 together, they now form the anti-Trump brigade. Is there a Democratic-party alternative to President Trump\u2019s tax plan? Is there a Democratic congressional proposal to stop the hemorrhaging and impending implosion of Obamacare? Do\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Bill Clinton&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Bill Clinton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/bill-clinton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3751,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/more-bark-than-bite\/","url_meta":{"origin":9832,"position":1},"title":"More Bark Than Bite?","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 20, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Will the Democrats' new control of the House and Senate shake things up that much abroad? They certainly will have plenty of opportunities to alter the present American course of fighting terrorists, the war in Iraq and our overall foreign policy. For over\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;November 2006&quot;","block_context":{"text":"November 2006","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2006\/november-2006\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9645,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/beware-the-law-of-unintended-consequences\/","url_meta":{"origin":9832,"position":2},"title":"Beware the Law of Unintended Consequences","author":"Megan Ring","date":"December 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Moderation and humility help politicians avoid results contrary to what they earnestly want. The mix of politics and culture is far too complex to be predictable. Even the best-laid political plans can lead to unintended consequences, both good and bad \u2014 what we\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Trump&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10128,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/will-2020-be-another-1972-for-democrats\/","url_meta":{"origin":9832,"position":3},"title":"Will 2020 Be Another 1972 for Democrats?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/National Review Going hard to the left was the wrong lesson to learn from their narrow loss in 1968, and they could repeat the mistake. Forty-nine years ago, Vice President Hubert Humphrey was the Democratic candidate for president. The year 1968 was a tumultuous one that saw\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Democrats&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Democrats","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/democrats\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3877,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/democratic-hares-no-match-for-steady-republican-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":9832,"position":4},"title":"Democratic Hares: No Match for Steady Republican Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 25, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Despite their dreams of recapturing one or both houses of Congress this November, the Democrats seem determined to reprise their poor showings in 2002 and 2004. Now, as then, they are dozing in the campaign's homestretch, like Aesop's hare, lulled by rosy predictions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;September 2006&quot;","block_context":{"text":"September 2006","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2006\/september-2006\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12301,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/corona-meltdowns\/","url_meta":{"origin":9832,"position":5},"title":"Corona Meltdowns","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness As the coronavirus outbreak begins to reach its zenith, it remains unclear whether the measures taken to stem its tide will prove sufficient, insufficient, or an overreaction. What is certain, however, is that a number of individuals and entities have behaved shamefully and demonstrated\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9832"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9832"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9832\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9855,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9832\/revisions\/9855"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}