{"id":9415,"date":"2016-08-22T12:36:46","date_gmt":"2016-08-22T19:36:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=9415"},"modified":"2016-08-22T12:36:46","modified_gmt":"2016-08-22T19:36:46","slug":"hillarys-neoliberals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/hillarys-neoliberals\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary\u2019s Neoliberals"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Some Republicans have cultural and political affinities that are pulling them away from Trump and toward Clinton. <\/span><\/p>\n

By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/National Review Online<\/div>\n
\n

M<\/span>any elections redefine political parties.<\/p>\n

The rise of George McGovern\u2019s hard-left agenda in 1972, followed later in the decade by Jimmy Carter\u2019s evangelical liberalism, drove centrist Democrats into the arms of Richard Nixon and later Ronald Reagan.<\/p>\n

These so-called neoconservatives (\u201cnew conservatives\u201d) grew tired of liberals\u2019 perceived laxity about fighting the Cold War. In foreign policy, the neoconservatives were best known for supporting idealistic nation-building abroad. They distrusted the rise of what would become political correctness and ever more government. They worried about violent crime and higher taxes. So decades ago, these Democrats joined the Republican party.<\/p>\n

Since the 1980s, the neoconservatives have made up the elite of their newly adopted party \u2014 despite their unease with the conservative orthodoxy of border enforcement, fierce resistance to gun control, and opposition to abortion.<\/p>\n

Now, a few neoconservatives are reinventing themselves again and returning to the Democrats to support Hillary Clinton. We could call them \u201cneoliberals.\u201d<\/p>\n

They believe that socialist Bernie Sanders made the hard-Left Clinton seem like an acceptable centrist. As neoliberals, they hope that beneath her opportunistic embrace of Obamism, Clinton still could recalibrate herself as more of a Democrat of the 1990s, a period when her husband, President Bill Clinton, championed balancing the budget while intervening abroad.<\/p>\n

Neoliberals \u2014 along with some members of the conservative establishment \u2014 consider Republican party nominee Donald Trump to be toxic. Many of them are supporting Clinton because they do not like Trump\u2019s idea of building a wall on the Mexican border to stop illegal immigration. Nor do they appreciate Trump\u2019s slogans about \u201cputting America first\u201d when negotiating trade deals, conducting alliances, and avoiding optional foreign interventions. They hate Trump\u2019s crude, take-no-prisoners invective more than Hillary\u2019s polished and refined lying.<\/p>\n

The 2016 neoliberals were never very culturally conservative. So they are certainly not bothered by Clinton\u2019s pro-choice advocacy. They do not mind her promotion of gun control, and they are open to global warming agendas and soft multiculturalism. They see Clinton as preferable to Trump and his unapologetic nationalism. Many of the neoliberal converts supported the Obama\u2013Clinton intervention in Libya and oppose Trump\u2019s get-tough trade stance on China.<\/p>\n

Neoliberals also find themselves more in the same class \u2014 defined by income, education, and cultural tastes \u2014 with Clinton\u2019s elite Democrats than with Trump\u2019s new army of lower-middle-class cultural and economic populists.<\/p>\n

Neoliberals get along well with the small elite class that fuels the Clinton machine \u2014 similarly wealthy, well-educated grandees on Wall Street and in Silicon Valley, along with those in big media, academia, the arts, and the top echelons of state and federal bureaucracies.<\/p>\n

Democrats no longer win over the middle classes, who lack the culture of the elite and the romance of the distant and subsidized poor. NASCAR and the NRA are anathemas to Democrats and were never popular with neoconservatives either.<\/p>\n

Will the old neoconservatives\/new neoliberals who support Clinton instead of Trump ever come back to the Republican party after the election?<\/p>\n

It depends on three unknowns.<\/p>\n

If Trump loses big, the neoliberals will remind Republican Trumpers that they had warned them about their populist folly. The neoliberals will seek to expunge populists and to rebuild a defeated Republican party in their own image as an improved version of the conservative establishment represented by the likes of Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush.<\/p>\n

They may re-emerge as old Republican neoconservatives who will promote unfettered free trade, democracy-building abroad, and \u201ccomprehensive immigration reform\u201d while downplaying social issues.<\/p>\n

If Trump squeaks by, then the neoliberals certainly will be orphaned for good. As apostates, they will not be welcomed back as neoconservatives by the Republican winners, nor will they be seen by Democrats as converts having any further political value.<\/p>\n

But if Trump loses by a point or two, the neoliberals will likely stay with the winning Clinton team. They will claim some credit for helping her just get over the top \u2014 even as they are blamed by irate Trumpers as traitors for sabotaging what otherwise could have been a winning new Republican strategy.<\/p>\n

Apart from opportunistic careerism, the subtext to this realignment is a larger issue of culture, education, and class. A mostly urban, highly educated, and high-income globalized elite often shares more cultural and political affinities with their counterparts on the other side of the aisle than they do with the lower-middle and working classes of their own parties.<\/p>\n

Just as Hillary Clinton may feel more comfortable with the old neoconservatives, Trump supporters have little in common with either Clintonites or neocons.<\/p>\n

Clinton versus Trump is a war of NPR, CBS, and the New York Times<\/em> against the National Enquirer<\/em>, conservative talk radio, and the Drudge Report<\/em>. Clinton supporters such as former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, onetime Bush officials Hank Paulson and Brent Scowcroft, and billionaire Meg Whitman certainly have nothing in common with Republican Trump supporters such as Mike Huckabee and Rush Limbaugh.<\/p>\n

Culture, not just politics, is rapidly destroying \u2014 but also rebuilding \u2014 traditional political parties.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Some Republicans have cultural and political affinities that are pulling them away from Trump and toward Clinton. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/National Review Online Many elections redefine political parties. The rise of George McGovern\u2019s hard-left agenda in 1972, followed later in the decade by Jimmy Carter\u2019s evangelical liberalism, drove centrist Democrats into the arms of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1091,1090,145,31,187,185],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2rR","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9605,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-trump-won\/","url_meta":{"origin":9415,"position":0},"title":"Why Trump Won","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 14, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ Defining Ideas \u00a0 Throughout the course of the 2016 election, the conventional groupthink was that the renegade Donald Trump had irrevocably torn apart the Republican Party. His base populism supposedly sandbagged more experienced and electable Republican candidates, who were bewildered that a \u201cconservative\u201d would dare to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Clintons"","block_context":{"text":"The Clintons","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-clintons\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4507,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/idealism-and-its-discontents-thinking-on-the-neoconservative-slur\/","url_meta":{"origin":9415,"position":1},"title":"Idealism and Its Discontents: Thinking on the Neoconservative Slur","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 21, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Neo- is a prefix that derives from the Greek adjective\u00a0veos\u00a0\u2014 \"new\" or \"fresh\" \u2014 and in theory it is used inexactly for those conservatives who once were not \u2014 or for those who have reinterpreted conservatism in terms of a more idealistic foreign\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "January 2005"","block_context":{"text":"January 2005","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2005\/january-2005\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9576,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/has-clinton-topped-nixon\/","url_meta":{"origin":9415,"position":2},"title":"Has Clinton topped Nixon?","author":"Megan Ring","date":"November 3, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ Town Hall | Another day, another Hillary Clinton bombshell disclosure. This time the scandal comes from disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner's laptop computer, bringing more suggestions of Clinton's sloppy attitude about U.S. intelligence law. Meanwhile, seemingly every day WikiLeaks produces more evidence of the Clinton Foundation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Nixon"","block_context":{"text":"Nixon","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/nixon\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9423,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wheres-the-letter-from-democratic-security-officials-opposing-hillary\/","url_meta":{"origin":9415,"position":3},"title":"Where’s The Letter From Democratic Security Officials Opposing Hillary?","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 22, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson\/\/Town Hall A group of 50 conservative foreign policy elites and veteran national security officials of prior Republican administrations recently wrote an open letter denouncing Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. They cited especially his lack of character and moral authority -- and his \"little understanding of America's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Campaign 2016"","block_context":{"text":"Campaign 2016","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/campaign-2016\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":823,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/target-ann-romney\/","url_meta":{"origin":9415,"position":4},"title":"Target: Ann Romney","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 19, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Recently a Democratic operative, Hilary Rosen, was furious that Mitt Romney had made reference to his wife\u2019s opinions on women\u2019s issues and the economy. So Rosen blurted out on a cable news show that Ann Romney \u201chasn\u2019t worked a day in her life.\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Women"","block_context":{"text":"Women","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/women\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3291,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/no-we-cant\/","url_meta":{"origin":9415,"position":5},"title":"No We Can’t","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 17, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"The Democratic left wing has been determined to lose America's wars. by Bruce S. Thornton City Journal Review of\u00a0Party of Defeat: How Democrats and Radicals Undermined America\u2019s War on Terror Before and After 9-11, by David Horowitz and Ben Johnson (Spence, 224 pp.) From the days of ancient Athens, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Reviews"","block_context":{"text":"Reviews","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/opinion\/reviews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9415"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9415"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9415\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9416,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9415\/revisions\/9416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}