{"id":9412,"date":"2016-08-09T10:51:44","date_gmt":"2016-08-09T17:51:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=9412"},"modified":"2016-08-09T10:51:44","modified_gmt":"2016-08-09T17:51:44","slug":"trump-vs-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/trump-vs-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump vs. Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"

Can Trump get out of the trap of running against himself? <\/span><\/p>\n

By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online<\/em><\/div>\n
\n

D<\/span>onald Trump is not so much running against Hillary Clinton as against the inner demons of Donald Trump.<\/p>\n

The 2016 election still should easily be his to win.<\/p>\n

Americans do not historically like the twelve-year regnum of any party.<\/p>\n

The termed-out incumbent Democratic president can win approval ratings of 50 percent only by staying quiet, out of the public eye, and doing as little governing as possible. Whenever Obama emerges from his hip cocoon and talks off his teleprompter, he reminds us that he is typically petulant, untruthful, and rambling. Witness his latest pathetic assurances that sending cash on pallets at night to obtain simultaneous release of hostages was not ransom. Even the obsequious pajama-boy D.C. press corps did not quite buy that. As so often, Obama\u2019s soft-spoken prevarication comes across as being as coarse as Trump\u2019s crudity.
\n<\/p>\n

Hillary Clinton is the weakest Democratic candidate since her moral superior Jimmy Carter in 1980. She reminds us of her liabilities daily, whether lying repeatedly that the FBI director had not systematically stated she had been untruthful about her unlawful e-mails, or, in a screeching voice, proclaiming her determination to raise taxes on the middle class \u2014 not to reduce the $600 billion deficit but to add more entitlements. Is a young lathe worker or forklift driver to pay more so that a Bernie Sanders supporter can get free tuition? Next, she seemed to have fallen into a bizarro world when she remarked, \u201cThe Trump kids have killed a lot of animals.\u201d Pundits forget that at any given moment, a \u201cshort-circuited\u201d Hillary Clinton can say anything \u2014 or do anything, such as discussing the fate of a soon-to-be-doomed Iranian scientist on an unsecured e-mail server. Never Trumpers often fail to appreciate that Hillary is quite capable of trumping Trump in controversy and self-destructiveness \u2014 with the force multiplier that she is not a potential public servant but someone who has been almost nothing but one.<\/p>\n

Half the public hates the political and media elite of the Eastern corridor and their West Coast bookends in Hollywood and the tech industry. A David Brooks takedown of Trump or another Hillary endorsement from a Silicon Valley billionaire seems free Trump publicity. Is the working class reassured of Hillary\u2019s credentials by a Warren Buffett endorsement or a nod from Meg Whitman?<\/p>\n

The news cycle of the next 100 days also favors Trump: weekly more of the same of Islamic-inspired international terrorism, coupled with Chamberlain-like, politically correct Western appeasement. Black Lives Matter, with the sanction of the Democratic party, will only grow more brazen. (But how does one top disrupting a moment of silence for slain policemen or using a bullhorn to segregate journalists by race?)<\/p>\n

There is little long-term optimism to make us forget the daily news disasters. Permanent near-zero interest rates, unsustainable new debt, Obamacare, insidious overregulation, record labor-force non-participation, and tax hikes will keep the economy stagnant \u2014 if we are lucky. An entire forgotten population of the former working American public has simply disengaged from the economy and turned to government support, help from friends and family, drugs and drink, or apathetic hopelessness. They almost seem the majority in my hometown.<\/p>\n

Abroad, the world is in shambles, mostly as a result of the Obama-Clinton-Kerry foreign policy, which ignited the Middle East, empowered Vladimir Putin, ignored Chinese aggrandizement, appeased Iran, turned off allies, and was humiliated in its attempted outreach to \u201cspecial\u201d friends like Recep Erdogan. If we get to November without a major international crisis or a regional shooting war, it will be a miracle.<\/p>\n

The EU is unwinding, unable to deal with the latest financial and immigration manifestations of the perennial \u201cGerman problem\u201d of the last 150 years. NATO resembles the British and French alliance of the late 1930s: impressive in its serial assurances of mutual assistance, creepy in the reality of its moral impotence.<\/p>\n

Despite a media blackout, the Clinton Foundation \u2014 currently never praised or even mentioned by either Clinton \u2014 is revealed as little more than a pay-to-play enterprise of dubious legality, designed to dose family members with freebies and keep political flunkies employed between elections. Around late 2015 Bill Clinton suddenly resigned his honorary university chancellorship and quit quid-pro-quo speaking on the premise that he was doing nothing wrong and so thought it wise to stop doing nothing wrong.<\/p>\n

All of the above would have ensured that almost any<\/em> Republican could take at least 45 percent of the vote, regardless of the shortcomings of the candidate or campaign.<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s strategy, then, should have been clear and easily attainable. He could have found the remaining 6 percent of the electorate necessary to win in the key swing states by simply doing two things: concentrate on all of the above issues, and do so with his accustomed energy and outside-the-box candor.<\/p>\n

In practical terms, that should have meant that Trump \u2014 every speech, every day, every hour \u2014 would remind Americans that Hillary Clinton is an inveterate fabricator and utterly corrupt, with a record as secretary of state that has led to disaster abroad. He would have reviewed the moribund economy, reminded his audiences that the existing political and media status quo has no solutions, given that it was largely culpable for the problem. He would then have allowed the public to take in the tragic daily news cycle \u2014 more terrorists, more attacks on police, more disclosures about Clinton corruption, more leaks about Obama\u2019s ineptness \u2014 as he confirmed his diagnoses of the malady.<\/p>\n

To the degree that the fixtures of the old international financial and political elite \u2014 from Hank Paulson, Meg Whitman, Brent Scowcroft, and Mitt Romney to Barack Obama and Fran\u00e7ois Hollande \u2014 were outraged at his crass populism and blasted him as unfit, Trump would only benefit, reminding his supporters why such elites logically hated his candidacy.<\/p>\n

To ensure that he picked up the necessary final margin of support, he could have easily appealed directly to black voters, pointing out that the Obama agenda has only left them poorer and more estranged from the wealth and power of America. He might even have reminded them that the Democratic party is run by wealthy liberals who find exemption for their own apartheid existences through abstract and empty progressive boilerplate.<\/p>\n

Trump might have also convinced some in Hispanic audiences that unchecked illegal immigration was a cynical tool of the Democratic party whose effects fell most heavily not on Mark Zuckerberg\u2019s neighborhood or on the Sidwell Friends School in Washington, D.C., but on poor schools, entry-level workers, and crime-infested barrios. Juan Hernandez, not Chelsea Clinton, is more likely to be hit by a driver who flees the scene of the accident without license, registration, or insurance, just as Gracie Lopez\u2019s children, not those of Univision\u2019s Jorge Ramos, will struggle in schools in which half the students do not know English. The point would have been not to appease identity groups so as to win 50 percent of their vote, but to speak the truth and thus win 15 percent of the black vote and 30 percent of the Hispanic vote, which would have translated into close wins in states like Colorado, Nevada, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n

All of the above was doable and could have ensured Trump the election, despite the unethical and historically unprecedented entrance into the campaign of a contrite Barack Obama, the institutional prejudices of the media, the usual big-city voter fraud, and even the withdrawal of the Republican elite who could not countenance Trump\u2019s innate vulgarity, swashbuckling style, and demagogic appeal to the white working classes. We are, after all, in a war between the National Enquirer<\/em> and NPR, Marlboro Man against Pajama Boy, Clint Eastwood versus Tom Hanks, amateurish fantasies opposed to established, polished lying.<\/p>\n

Instead, here we are with less than 90 days before the election, and Trump may be lucky if he finishes within 5 percentage points on Election Day.<\/p>\n

To negate Trump\u2019s advantages, the Democrats had a simple strategy: bring out the demonic Trump. Hillary Clinton would simply lie about her e-mail records ad nauseam. In possum style, she would snore about the economy. She would avert her eyes from the world order\u2019s breaking apart. She would ignore the populist furor with a corrupt Washington and media establishment.. Against this stultifying backdrop, the ego-driven Trump would be allowed to grab the headlines, and the headlines would be petty and embarrassing.<\/p>\n

Democrats would seed the summer and autumn election battlefields with new and updated models of politically correct IEDs. They used this technique very effectively in 2012 to render a decent Mitt Romney as a tax-cheating, greedy Wall Street vulture, who ignored his regular garbageman, beat up kids in prep school, and strapped his terrified dog to his car top. Four years earlier the Democrats had blown John McCain to smithereens and left him little more than a closet racist and an adulterous and senile coot, who could not remember how many estates he owned nor the shenanigans of his pill-popping spouse. To avoid the rain of shrapnel, Romney had to battle both the moderator and his opponent in a presidential debate while contextualizing his own personal success and fortune. McCain, meanwhile, swore off referring to the racist personal pastor of Barack Obama and to Obama\u2019s own litany of \u201ctypical white person\u201d and \u201cget in their face.\u201d We forget that long before the wild man Trump, the most un-Trumpian, sober and judicious McCain and Romney were flattened by bogus charges against their spouses and false claims, respectively, of adultery and tax-cheating \u2014 and were completely unable to defend themselves from such smears and slanders.<\/p>\n

Instead of staying on a winning message and avoiding the subterranean traps, Trump on cue tramped right through this progressive minefield. The explosive result was predictable. He wasted precious hours rudely taking on a Mexican-American judge \u2014 who, to be fair, had foolishly joined a \u201cLa Raza\u201d lawyers\u2019 organization (imagine a white counterpart as a member of a local legal organization with \u201cThe Race\u201d in its name) \u2014 or jousting with a Gold Star family, indifferent to the fact that the father was an immigration lawyer who logically would oppose Trump\u2019s immigration moratoria.<\/p>\n

So when all these mines went off, Trump in theory always had some sort of legitimate counter-argument: Yes, Megyn Kelly was not commensurate in her sexism questions, in that she did not ask Hillary Clinton to account for her own sexist past, whether laughing over aspects of a case involving a rapist client, or demonizing Bill\u2019s victims of coerced sex. And, yes, it was also a fact that bombastically inviting Putin to find Hillary\u2019s missing 30,000 e-mails could not be a breach of security if they were truly about yoga and Chelsea\u2019s wedding.<\/p>\n

But such legitimate counter-arguments against explosive devices do not matter. Words are not as loud as Semtex and C-4. As Trump blew himself up on these mines, campaign time was irrevocably lost.<\/p>\n

No one was asking Trump to go mute when Obama or Clinton attacked him in unprecedented fashion. The key instead was circumspection. Strike back quickly and only at major targets, to create deterrence against future smears, and then after 30 seconds get back on topic \u2014 and never step on a Democratic landmine out of curiosity whether it would really blow up. Translated, that means ignore assorted journalists eager for five minutes of cable-news attention, political flunkies, private citizens \u2014 both heroes and scoundrels \u2014 grieving widows, the disabled, the underage, and the elderly \u2014 in other words, all the cover plates that supposedly moral progressives use to mask their explosives.<\/p>\n

Is it too late for Trump? So far, what he has thrown away in the polls Hillary so often seems to give back.<\/p>\n

Because he is a postmodern candidate for whom established decorum doesn\u2019t seem to apply, and because the nation and the world are in chaos, no one quite can calibrate his powers of resilience. And so we are left only with a probability rather than a certainty: The odds are even that Trump\u2019s self-destructive recklessness and narcissistic crudity (which so far seem not to have turned off 40 to 45 percent of the voters) are so embedded in his DNA that he will likely fall prey to each new Khan family and Judge Curiel trap, and not win over the necessary additional 5 to 6 percent of the electorate.<\/p>\n

So is character really fate? Or is there any<\/em> chance that the outer Trump\u2019s business savvy and heralded self-interest might half tame his inner Trump to avoid subterranean mines, to keep him on message, and to relax and ride the wave of the disastrous daily news fare to the White House?<\/p>\n

If there is, it will be largely because in summer 2016 enough voters see the current reality of polished lying and corruption in the White House and at the head of the Democratic ticket as more dangerous than the potential of a crude counterpart on the 2017 horizon.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Can Trump get out of the trap of running against himself? By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Donald Trump is not so much running against Hillary Clinton as against the inner demons of Donald Trump. The 2016 election still should easily be his to win. Americans do not historically like the twelve-year regnum […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1092,1091,1090,154,31,187,46,196,262,185],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2rO","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":11026,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-real-russian-disaster\/","url_meta":{"origin":9412,"position":0},"title":"The Real Russian Disaster","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Donald Trump has said a lot of silly stuff about Russia, from joking about Vladimir Putin helping to find Hillary\u2019s deleted emails, to na\u00efve musings about the extent of Russian interference into Western democratic elections. But far more important than what he has said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Donald Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Donald Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/donald-trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9445,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/trump-up-hillary-down-obama-out\/","url_meta":{"origin":9412,"position":1},"title":"Trump Up, Hillary Down, Obama Out","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 8, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Without traditional battle lines to fight over, Hillary Clinton is lying low while a frenetic Donald Trump talks nonstop. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online In most presidential elections, the two candidates spar over issues. The president campaigns for his party\u2019s nominee in hopes of continuing his legacy.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11425,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-truths-behind-our-current-political-turmoil\/","url_meta":{"origin":9412,"position":2},"title":"The Truths Behind Our Current Political Turmoil","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Are there any guiding principles that can make sense of the sensational news that now overwhelms the senses seemingly every hour? What is common to blaring headlines about the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination hearings, an anti-Trump \u201cresistance\u201d buried deep in the permanent bureaucracy,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Donald Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Donald Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/donald-trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9390,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ten-reasons-why-trump-could-win\/","url_meta":{"origin":9412,"position":3},"title":"Ten Reasons Why Trump Could Win","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"With four more months until Election Day, be prepared for chills and spills. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Hillary Clinton has outspent Donald Trump in unprecedented fashion. Her endorsements bury Trump\u2019s. The Obama administration is doing its best to restore her viability. The media are outdoing their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9426,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-nine-lives-of-donald-j-trump\/","url_meta":{"origin":9412,"position":4},"title":"The Nine Lives of Donald J. Trump","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 Whatever his faults, a Trump victory is preferable for the Republic. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Seasoned Republican political handlers serially attack Donald Trump and his campaign as amateurish, incompetent, and incoherent. The media somehow outdid their propaganda work for Barack Obama and have signed on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11012,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-paradoxes-of-the-mueller-investigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":9412,"position":5},"title":"The Paradoxes of the Mueller Investigation","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review They are numerous, and none of them are good news for President Trump\u2019s opponents. Special Counsel Robert Mueller has indicted 13 Russian nationals for allegedly conspiring to sow confusion in the 2016 presidential election. The chance of extraditing any of the accused from Vladimir\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Donald Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Donald Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/donald-trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9412"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9412"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9412\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9413,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9412\/revisions\/9413"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}