{"id":9390,"date":"2016-07-19T10:53:00","date_gmt":"2016-07-19T17:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=9390"},"modified":"2016-07-19T10:53:00","modified_gmt":"2016-07-19T17:53:00","slug":"ten-reasons-why-trump-could-win","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ten-reasons-why-trump-could-win\/","title":{"rendered":"Ten Reasons Why Trump Could Win"},"content":{"rendered":"

With four more months until Election Day, be prepared for chills and spills. <\/span><\/p>\n

By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

H<\/span>illary Clinton has outspent Donald Trump in unprecedented fashion. Her endorsements bury Trump\u2019s. The Obama administration is doing its best to restore her viability. The media are outdoing their 2008 liberal prejudices. And yet in John Connally delegate fashion, Clinton\u2019s vast expenditures of $100 million plus have so far earned her only a tiny, if any, lead in most recent polls. If each point of approval is calibrated by dollars spent, Trump\u2019s fly-by-night campaign is ahead.<\/p>\n

Nor has Trump matched Clinton\u2019s organization or voter-registration efforts. He certainly has blown off gifts from a number of Clinton gaffes and misfortunes, usually by gratuitously riffing on off-topic irrelevancies, from the Trump University lawsuit to the genocidal Saddam Hussein\u2019s supposedly redeeming anti-terrorist qualities. Pollsters, gamers, insiders \u2014 everyone, really \u2014 have written his political epitaph for over a year. Rarely have conservative voices at mainstream-media outlets vowed not to support the Republican nominee. And yet the longer he stays viable, the more likely it is that Trump has a real chance at winning the presidency, which may already be a veritable 50\/50 proposition. So why is the supposedly impossible at least now imaginable?
\n<\/p>\n

1. Not a Typical Populist<\/strong><\/p>\n

When critics are not slurring Trump as Hitler or Mussolini, they write him off, in sloppy fashion, as a dangerous populist \u2014 at worst an hysterical, demagogic Huey Long, at best a quirky Ross Perot: in other words, a flash in the pan who capitalizes on occasional but brief surges of Neanderthal isolationism, protectionism, nativism, xenophobia, and collective insecurity among the lower middle classes.<\/p>\n

That diagnosis is rehashed groupthink. By any definition, Trump is not<\/em> a classical populist. His traction derives from opposing unchecked and cynical illegal<\/em> immigration, not diverse and measured legal immigration. And he is rebelling not so much against a flabby, sclerotic status quo as against a radical, even revolutionary regime of elites who are now well beyond accustomed norms. It is hardly radical to oppose the Confederate doctrine of legal nullification in more than 300 sanctuary cities, or a de facto open border with Mexico, or doubling the national debt in eight years, or ruining the nation\u2019s health-care system with the most radical reconstruction in the history of American health-care policy, or systematically running huge trade deficits with an autocratic China that does not adhere to international norms of free trade and predicates expanding political and military power in the South China Sea on its commercial mercantilism. Trump seemed incendiary in the primaries, but as he is juxtaposed to the official Clinton extremist agenda, he will likely be reinterpreted increasingly as more mainstream \u2014 a probability enhanced by his selection of Mike Pence as his running-mate.<\/p>\n

2. Obama Nihilism<\/strong><\/p>\n

Do not underestimate the volatility of Barack Obama\u2019s popularity. As long as Obama keeps silent and out of the limelight, he nears 50 percent in approval ratings. The moment he returns to the fray (and he always does, as a June bug to a patio light), he instinctively reverts to his natural divisive and polarizing self, as evidenced in his disastrous reactions to the Dallas police shootings, and his politically suicidal post-Dallas courting of Al Sharpton (who used to call on supporters to \u201coff\u201d police) and of the architects of Black Lives Matter. It is likely that Obama, to cement a hard progressive legacy in the next four\u00a0months, will only double down on his gratuitous pandering, and therefore will see his poll numbers return to the low or mid-40s. That may help Trump seem an antidote rather than an obsequious continuance.<\/p>\n

3. Two Sorts of Elitists<\/strong><\/p>\n

Both Trump and Clinton are elitists in an anti-elitist year. But elitism is not all the same. The popular furor is not directed at the rich per se, but rather at the perception of cultural snobbishness and hypocrisy among those who romanticize the always-distant poor, as they favor the always-proximate rich, and caricature the despised middle class that lacks the taste of the latter and the appeal of the former. Trump\u2019s in-your-face tastes and brashness are vulgar in the pure Roman sense,<\/em> and his accent and demeanor are not those of the cultural elite, or even of the dignified Mitt Romney\u2013type moneyed bluestockings. In contrast, Hillary, like Obama, talks down to Americans on how they ought to think, speak, and act. Trump seems to like them just as they are. In turn, middle-class hatred of the elite is not aimed at Trump\u2019s garish marble floors or the narcissistic oversized gold letters plastered over the entrances to his buildings, but rather at the rarified self-righteous. Like it or not, Trump can square the ridiculous circle of a raucous billionaire as man of the people far better than Hillary can handle the contradictions of a Wall Street\u2013created crony multimillionaire pandering to the Sanders socialists.<\/p>\n

4. Election Formulas <\/strong><\/p>\n

It is not assured that Clinton can replicate Obama\u2019s formula of record-high minority-voter turnout and bloc voting. More importantly, in a few key states Trump may win 25 to 28 percent of the Latino vote and perhaps 10 percent of the black vote, while Clinton might not capture even 35 percent of the so-called white vote. A surprisingly high minority of blacks and Hispanics do not feel Trump is a nativist or xenophobe, given that illegal immigration is often perceived as putting a strain on scarce social services, imperiling already poor schools, and driving down both wages and the availability of entry-level jobs. Trump\u2019s El Jefeism plays well when juxtaposed to Clinton\u2019s suburban namby-pamby falsity or her unhinged demonization of coal miners and gun owners. The numbers of minority voters in key states who quietly vote Trump need not be great, but rather only must top by 2 or 3 percentage points the disastrous McCain and Romney levels of 2008 and 2012, given the likely historic percentage of white voters that Trump may win.\u00a0Media elites are in denial over this possibility. Racial hyphenation and bloc voting, along with prophecies of continual white irrelevance, should by their reckoning have long ago doomed Trump in the general election.<\/p>\n

5. Crimes and Misdemeanors<\/strong><\/p>\n

Trump struggles with embarrassing misdemeanors, Clinton with high crimes. She may be delighted at not having been indicted, but FBI Director Comey confirmed to the nation that she was an inveterate liar, paranoid, conspiratorial, and incompetent. That she was not charged only made the FBI seem absurd: offering a damning hooved, horned, pitchforked, and forked-tailed portrait of someone mysteriously not a denizen of Hell. Add in the Clinton Foundation syndicate and the fact that lies are lies and often do not fade so easily, and Hillary in the next 15 weeks may average one \u201cliar\u201d and \u201ccrooked\u201d disclosure each week \u2014 at a rate that even the Trump tax returns and Trump University cannot keep up with.<\/p>\n

6. Four Months until the Election<\/strong><\/p>\n

The tumultuous news cycle \u2014 Dallas, Paris, Turkey, Baton Rouge \u2014 creates anxieties and a general sense that the nation and indeed the world are in chaos \u2014 and without any guidance from the White House. Such a vague foreboding that something has to give to avert catastrophe may favor Trump abroad and at home \u2014 especially if he can muzzle himself in times of enormous gift-giving from the Clinton campaign. Obama is a lame-duck president who is perceived as weak, vacillating, and ambiguous about his own country\u2019s role in the world \u2014 a world that includes Russia, ISIS, China, North Korea, and Iran. The odds are even that at least one of the above in the next few months will feel that it has a rare opportunity to readjust the regional status quo, or at least will have a psychological impetus to try something stupid to humiliate Obama and the U.S. as payback for seven years of his empty sanctimoniousness. Either way, Trump could benefit, given that Hillary is a perceived tool of Obama\u2019s therapeutic foreign policy. Tragically, at home, in the next few months ISIS may re-emerge, and racial relations are not likely to ameliorate, as Hillary straddles a politically correct tiger that she can neither dismount nor safely ride. Self-described leftists are cannibals who always end up devouring their own, given the never-enough trajectory of their equality-of-result creed.<\/p>\n

7. Extremism <\/strong><\/p>\n

Trump seems extremist in speech, but as the campaign wears on, Hillary may confirm that she is more extremist in fact. It may well be that voters would prefer a brash-talking pragmatist to sober and judicious ideologues. Sloppy talk about temporarily limiting immigration from the Middle East is not so injurious as contrived efforts never to utter the phrase \u201cradical Islam.\u201d Clinton, Obama, and Sanders have moved the Democratic party radically to the left; Trump in some areas has pushed the Republican party to the center. The voter terrified of ISIS, record debt, the spiraling cost of his health care, perceived U.S. decline, and the seemingly violent racial Balkanization of the country \u2014 but not terrified of gay marriage or tough trade talks with China \u2014 may find Clinton, not Trump, the true radical.<\/p>\n

8. Polls<\/strong><\/p>\n

If the polls are off a bit in this warped election year, they are more likely to err on Hillary\u2019s side. Republicans who will vote for Hillary or no one rather than Trump will do so in part out of perceived moral principles, and thus they will not be so shy in showcasing their not-in-my-name ethos. But those who see themselves more as pragmatists, who will eventually hold their nose and vote for the embarrassing Trump, are more likely, in Brexit style, to keep quiet about it and stay under the polling radar.\u00a0I think that to be truly ahead on Election Day Hillary will have to top Trump by 1 or 2 points in the polls \u2014 even with traditional Democratic massaging of voter rolls.<\/p>\n

9. Converts and Apostates<\/strong><\/p>\n

The relative closeness of polling in key swing states already suggests that the Reagan Democrats and other Trump converts may either be more numerous than the Never Trump establishment or at least more numerous outside of coastal, and electorally irrelevant, blue states like California and New York \u2014 and thus more significant as swing-state adjudicators. In addition, traditional media, in which Never Trump views are most frequently aired, are themselves growing ossified and do not reach voters to the same degree as outlets like the Drudge Report, Breitbart News, and talk radio. In my rural California community, when I meet pro-Trump welders, farmers, and tractor drivers of all races and backgrounds, I try to ask them just one question: Did you vote for Romney? So far 0 percent of that cohort of probably over 100 Central Valley residents said they had turned out for Romney in 2012. Again, the new Trump voters may not be numerous nationwide, but they may be able to swing one or two purple states. Also, it may be more likely that a Never Trumper will weaken and quietly vote Trump in November as he grows aghast at the weekly Clinton circus. The Trump buffooneries may well be more than matched by Clinton\u2019s ideological insanities.<\/p>\n

10. The Screech-Owl Factor<\/strong><\/p>\n

For all his lack of discipline, the media-seasoned Trump is still the better and more robust campaigner. His liabilities \u2014 bouts of outer-space incoherence, unfamiliarity with basic issues, sloppiness in diction, a personal cruel streak \u2014 are balanced by a TV host\u2019s sense of audience, timing, and cadence.<\/p>\n

Hillary is the far more disciplined politico, but she is not so much uncharismatic as downright off-putting. Even on those rare occasions when she listens to her new voice-coach handlers and speaks quietly and deliberately, she still comes off not as reassuring, much less engaging, but rather as artificially trying her best not to revert to her natural screech-owl elocution. Heartfelt recklessness can sometimes wear better than packaged sobriety.<\/p>\n

*\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *<\/p>\n

Finally, it is suicidal to descend into the muck to battle Trump. Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz all tried and failed, despite the fact that they had every moral justification in hitting back in like kind. Elizabeth Warren is trying to be an anti-Trump street-fighter; but her incoherent venom suggests that Harvard Law professors should stick to academic jousting in the faculty lounge.<\/p>\n

Brawlers know the rules of the street far better than establishmentarians. The Senate is not The Apprentice<\/em>, and politics is not New York real estate. Ask the trash-talking Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg if she came out on top in dueling with Trump \u2014 or whether she virtually destroyed a quarter-century\u2019s reputation in minutes and ended up no better than an elderly version of Rosie O\u2019Donnell in a Supreme Court Justice costume. Hillary is stepping up her crude attacks on Trump. But as in the past, such hits are more likely to make the Trump mode suddenly seem normal, and to make Trump a target of those who claim they are more sober and judicious but in extremis prove no more measured than Trump himself.<\/p>\n

We have a long way to go till November 8, and the odds are still with Hillary\u2019s establishment money, influence, power, and media. There will be dozens of Trump meltdowns and gaffes to come and always more slams at \u201ccrooked\u201d Hillary. And never count out what narcissists like Bill Clinton and Barack Obama \u2014 or Vladimir Putin \u2014 might do, or Obama\u2019s Chicago-like warping of the electoral process. Nonetheless, for a variety of reasons, an unlikely Donald Trump has become a liberal\u2019s worst nightmare, not so much for what he says or represents, but because he still could win \u2014 and win in a way, along with the Congress and the prospect of a new Supreme Court, that we have not witnessed in 80 years.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With four more months until Election Day, be prepared for chills and spills. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Hillary Clinton has outspent Donald Trump in unprecedented fashion. Her endorsements bury Trump\u2019s. The Obama administration is doing its best to restore her viability. The media are outdoing their 2008 liberal prejudices. And yet […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1092,1091,1090,23,31,46,185],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2rs","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9366,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-long-trump-summer\/","url_meta":{"origin":9390,"position":0},"title":"A Long Trump Summer","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"When have voters faced a choice between two such unpalatable, unprincipled candidates? By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Before summer is over, we may see things now scarcely imagined that will make Brexit seem anticlimactic. Trump\u2019s Attack Mode I think the following is an accurate statement: No major\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "UK"","block_context":{"text":"UK","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/uk\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11026,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-real-russian-disaster\/","url_meta":{"origin":9390,"position":1},"title":"The Real Russian Disaster","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Donald Trump has said a lot of silly stuff about Russia, from joking about Vladimir Putin helping to find Hillary\u2019s deleted emails, to na\u00efve musings about the extent of Russian interference into Western democratic elections. But far more important than what he has said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Donald Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Donald Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/donald-trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9441,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-trump-bump\/","url_meta":{"origin":9390,"position":2},"title":"The Trump Bump","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 8, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online No one knows how long Trump can stay on message. (He turns out to be an effective teleprompted speaker who, unlike Obama, can go off the script for brief moments without stuttering and seeming confused.) No one knows how long he can\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9534,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/this-election-year-features-more-than-one-presidential-race\/","url_meta":{"origin":9390,"position":3},"title":"This Election Year Features More Than One Presidential Race","author":"Megan Ring","date":"October 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Town Hall A presidential campaign is figuratively called a \"race.\" Two runners sprint toward the Election Day finish line for the prize of the presidency. But the 2016 presidential campaign has spawned lots of weird races. The first sprint is one between embarrassments and scandals.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10163,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/how-to-blow-an-election-in-five-easy-steps\/","url_meta":{"origin":9390,"position":4},"title":"How to Blow an Election \u2014 in Five Easy Steps","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Counting the ways, and Comey is not among them. Hillary Clinton recently took \u201cfull responsibility\u201d for her 2016 loss. Only she didn\u2019t. Instead of explaining what the historian Thucydides once called the \u201ctruest causes\u201d (aitiai), she went on to list at least three pretexts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Democrats"","block_context":{"text":"Democrats","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/democrats\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9426,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-nine-lives-of-donald-j-trump\/","url_meta":{"origin":9390,"position":5},"title":"The Nine Lives of Donald J. Trump","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 Whatever his faults, a Trump victory is preferable for the Republic. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Seasoned Republican political handlers serially attack Donald Trump and his campaign as amateurish, incompetent, and incoherent. The media somehow outdid their propaganda work for Barack Obama and have signed on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9390"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9390"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9390\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9392,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9390\/revisions\/9392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}