{"id":9374,"date":"2016-07-05T12:26:18","date_gmt":"2016-07-05T19:26:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=9374"},"modified":"2016-07-05T12:26:18","modified_gmt":"2016-07-05T19:26:18","slug":"washingtons-hollow-men","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/washingtons-hollow-men\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington\u2019s Hollow Men"},"content":{"rendered":"

The government\/media power elite are spectacularly ignorant of the American people. <\/span><\/p>\n

by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/National Review Online<\/p>\n

We are the hollow <\/em>men<\/em>
\nWe<\/em> are the stuffed <\/em>men<\/em>
\nLeaning<\/em> together<\/em>
\nHeadpiece<\/em> filled with straw. Alas!<\/em>
\nOur dried voices, when<\/em>
\nWe whisper together<\/em>
\nAre quiet and meaningless<\/em>
\nAs wind in dry grass<\/em>
\nOr rats\u2019 feet over broken glass<\/em>
\nIn our dry cellar<\/em><\/p>\n

Shape without form, shade without colour,<\/em>
\nParalysed force, gesture without motion.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u2014 T. S. Eliot<\/p>\n

I<\/span>n Merced or Dayton, if an insurance agent, eager to help his wife facing indictment, barged into a restaurant where the local DA is known to lunch, he would almost certainly be told to get the hell out.<\/p>\n

But among the Washington elite, the scenario is apparently quite different. The two parties, in supposedly serendipitous fashion, just happen to touch down at the same time on the Phoenix corporate tarmac, with their private planes pulling up nose to nose. Then the attorney general of the United States and her husband, in secrecy enforced by federal security details, welcome the ex-president onto her government plane. Afterward, and only when caught, the prosecutor and the husband of the person under investigation assure the world that they talked about everything except Hillary Clinton\u2019s possible indictment, Loretta Lynch\u2019s past appointment by Bill Clinton and likely judicial future, or the general quandary of 2016.<\/p>\n

There has been a lot of talk since Brexit and the rise of Donald Trump of the corrosive power and influence of the \u201celite\u201d and the \u201cestablishment.\u201d But to quote Butch Cassidy to the Sundance Kid, \u201cWho are those guys?\u201d<\/p>\n

In the case of the ancient Romans or of the traditional British ruling classes, land, birth, education, money, government service, and cultural notoriety were among the ingredients that made one an establishmentarian. But our modern American elite is a bit different.<\/p>\n

Residence, either in the Boston\u2013Washington, D.C., or the San Francisco\u2013Los Angeles corridor, often is a requisite. Celebrity and public exposure count \u2014 e.g., access to traditional television outlets (as opposed to hoi polloi Internet blogging). So does education \u2014 again, most often a coastal-corridor thing: Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Berkeley, Stanford, etc.<\/p>\n

Net worth, whether made or inherited, helps. But lots of billionaires, especially Midwestern sorts, are not part of the elite, in that their money does not necessarily translate into much political or cultural influence \u2014 or influence of the right sort. (Exceptions are Chicago traders who bundle millions for Hillary.)<\/p>\n

Especially influential are the revolving-door multimillionaires, especially from big banks and Wall Street \u2014 the Tim Geithners, Jack Lews, Hank Paulsons, and Robert Rubins, but also the lesser flunkies of the Freddie\/Fannie Clintonite crowd, a Franklin Raines (raking in $90 million) or a Jamie Gorelick ($26 million), all of whom came into the White House and its bureaucracies to get rich, but who always seem shocked when the public does not like their incestuous trails of bailouts, relief plans, favorable regulations, etc.<\/p>\n

Creepy too are the satellite grifters like \u201cinvestment banker\u201d Rahm Emanuel \u2014 who somehow, between the White House and the House of Representatives, made off with $16 million for his financial \u201cexpertise\u201d \u2014 or Chelsea Clinton, who made her fortune ($15 million?) largely by being a \u201cconsultant\u201d for a Wall Street investment group (her fluff job at NBC News was small potatoes in comparison). The locus classicus<\/em>, of course, is the Clinton power marriage itself, which invested nearly 40 years of public service in what proved to be a gargantuan pay-for-play payoff, when they parlayed Hillary\u2019s political trajectories into a personal fortune of well over $100 million. Give them credit: From the early days, when they would write off as IRS deductions gifts of their used underwear, they ended up 30 years later getting paid $10,000 to $60,000 a minute for their Wall Street riffs.<\/p>\n

The nexus between Big Government, Big Money, Big Influence, and Big Media is sometimes empowered by familial journalistic continuity (e.g., John Dickerson, son of Nancy Dickerson) or a second generation of fashion\/glitz and media (Gloria Vanderbilt and Anderson Cooper), but again is increasingly expressed in the corridor \u201cpower couple,\u201d the sorts who receive sycophantic adulation in New York and Washington monthly magazines. The Andrea Mitchell\/Alan Greenspan power marriage was hailed as a threefer of media, government, and money. What was so strange, however, was just how often wrong were Mitchell in her amateurishly politicized rants and Greenspan in his cryptic Delphic prophecies \u2014 and always in areas of their supposedly greatest expertise.<\/p>\n

Take also the Obama Cabinet. When we wonder how Susan Rice could go on television on five occasions in a single day to deceive about Benghazi; or John Kerry \u2014 in the middle of a war whose results Obama would come to call a \u201cstable\u201d and \u201cself-reliant\u201d democratic Iraq \u2014 could warn American youth that the punishment for poor school performance was \u201cto get stuck in Iraq\u201d; or Jay Carney (now senior vice president of global corporate affairs at Amazon) and Josh Earnest could both repeatedly mislead the country on Benghazi, the reason may be not just that they felt their influence, status, and privilege meant they were rarely responsible for the real-world consequences of their own rhetoric, but that they had forgotten entirely the nature of middle-class America, or never really knew it at all.<\/p>\n

I get the impression that members of the D.C. elite do not wait in line with a sick kid in the emergency room on a Saturday night, when the blood flows and the supporters of rival gangs have to be separated in the waiting room; or that they find dirty diapers, car seats, and dead dogs tossed on their lawns, or wait two hours at the DMV, or are told that their journalistic assignment was outsourced to India, or read public-school teachers\u2019 comments on their kids\u2019 papers that were ungrammatical and misspelled to the point of being incomprehensible. The elite seems to be ignorant that, about 1975, Bedford Falls flyover country started to become Pottersville.<\/p>\n

In forming perceptions about Benghazi, the Iran deal, globalization, or illegal immigration, it is sometimes hard to know who is making policy and who is reporting and analyzing such formulations \u2014 or whether they are one and the same. National Security Advisor Susan Rice is married to former ABC television producer Ian Cameron. Ben Rhodes, who drew up the talking-points deceptions about Benghazi and seemed to boast of deceiving the public about the Iran deal, is the brother of CBS News president David Rhodes. Will 60 Minute<\/em>s do one of its signature hit pieces on Ben Rhodes?<\/p>\n

Secretary of State John Kerry \u2014 who famously docks his yacht in Rhode Island in order to avoid paying Massachusetts taxes on it \u2014 is married to Teresa Heinz, the billionaire widow of the late senator and catsup heir John Heinz. Former Obama press secretary Jay Carney married Claire Shipman, senior national correspondent for ABC\u2019s Good Morning America<\/em>; his successor, Josh Earnest, married Natalie Wyeth, a veteran of the Treasury Department. Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton\u2019s \u201cbody woman,\u201d is married to creepy sexter Anthony Weiner; perhaps she was mesmerized by his stellar political career, his feminist credentials, and his tolerant approach to deviancy? And on and on it goes.<\/p>\n

These Christiane Amanpour\/Jamie Rosen or Samantha Power\/Cass Sunstein types of connections could be explored to the n<\/em>th degree, especially their moth-to-the-flame progressive fixations with maximizing privilege, power, and class. But my purpose is not to suggest some conspiratorial cabal of D.C. and New York insiders, only to note that an increasing number of government and media elites are so entangled with each other, leveraging lucrative careers in politics, finance, and the media, and doubling their influence through marriage, that they have scant knowledge of and less concern for the clingers who live well beyond their coastal-corridor moats. And so when reality proves their preconceptions wrong \u2014 from Benghazi to Brexit \u2014 they have only outrage and disdain to fall back on.<\/p>\n

Sometimes their smug isolation is the stuff of caricature. Mark Zuckerberg waxes poetically on about the illiberality of building border walls (e.g., \u201cI hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as others\u201d), but he is now simultaneously involved in three controversies involving either hyper-private security patrols or walls or both as he seeks to use his fortune to create Maginot Lines around his Palo Alto, San Francisco, and Hawaii properties to keep the wrong sort of people quite distant.<\/p>\n

I should end by returning to Hillary Clinton, whose insider arc from the cattle-futures con to quarter-million-dollar Wall Street chats to the e-mail scandal shares the common and persistent theme of influence peddling, greed, and lying, while she lectures Americans about the need for trust, fairness, and transparency. Or perhaps I should finish with Chelsea, a chip off the old blockess, who became instantly rich as she decried the culture\u2019s overemphasis on wealth, and whose husband\u2019s hedge fund is tottering, after disastrously investing in Greek bailout bonds \u2014 at a time when his mother-in-law and Sidney Blumenthal were exchanging classified speculations over whether German banks would guarantee Greek debt and hence investors\u2019 money.<\/p>\n

But I conclude on a much more sober, judicious, and appropriately unimpeachable D.C. figure, the rightly revered Thomas Pickering, career diplomat, bipartisan Council on Foreign Relation fixture, co-chairman of blue-ribbon investigative committees, and perhaps heir to the itinerant fixers of a bygone age, such as Sumner Welles, John McCloy, and Clark Clifford. Pickering \u2014 multilingual, veteran of hazardous diplomatic posts, confidant to presidents of both parties, and octogenarian \u201cwise man\u201d \u2014 was asked by the State Department to conduct its internal investigation of the Benghazi debacle, as chairman of the Benghazi Accountability Review Board.<\/p>\n

Four of the five members of this board, including Pickering, were apparently recommended by Hillary Clinton\u2019s own State Department team in good Quis custodiet custodes?<\/em> style. No one would dare suggest that Pickering, appointed as an undersecretary of state and an ambassador by Bill Clinton, and a well-known Clinton friend, might have various conflicts of interest in investigating fully the allegations that Hillary Clinton refused to beef up security at the consulate in Benghazi, or falsely claimed in public that the loss of four Americans was the result of an inflammatory video, just hours after she confided in e-mail communications that it was a preplanned al-Qaeda attack.<\/p>\n

Instead, Pickering decided that Clinton would never appear before his committee and declared that he was not interested in a gotcha finding; yet somehow Clinton aide Cheryl Mills found a way to review the board\u2019s findings before publication. In the end, the State Department chastised and put on leave lowly subordinates for seemingly working within the security parameters established by the sacrosanct secretary of state.<\/p>\n

Nor would anyone suggest that the temperate and esteemed Pickering, as a vice president of Boeing from 2001 to 2006, and then a consultant to Boeing from 2006 to 2015, had any special financial interest in promoting the Clinton, and then the Kerry, outreach to Iran. Indeed, Pickering testified before Congress and wrote elegant op-eds about why the Iran non-enrichment accord was a good deal \u2014 but without ever quite telling the country that a liberated Iran was also considering a $25 billion purchase of aircraft (with potential dual use as military transports) from Boeing \u2014 which just happened to be Pickering\u2019s quite generous corporate client.<\/p>\n

Is it all that strange that when Washington fixtures write outraged op-eds about the \u201cfascistic\u201d Donald Trump or the \u201cself-harming\u201d Brexit voters, no one seems to listen any more? Does a Hank Paulson \u2014 former assistant to John Erhlichman, former CEO of Goldman Sachs (which has given over $800,000 to Hillary\u2019s campaigns as well as $675,000 in speaking fees), former Treasury secretary, and of some $700 million in net worth \u2014 ever sense that his assurances that Hillary is presidential and not corrupt are not believable? Or that the effect of his politicking is analogous to angrily waving a Mexican flag at a Trump rally?<\/p>\n

In a sense, these revolving-door apparatchiks and incestuous couples are bullies, who use their megaphones to disparage others who are supposedly blinkered and ignorant to the point of not believing that a videomaker caused the attacks in Libya, not trusting the Iranians, being skeptical about the theory of sanctuary cities, missing the genius of the European Union, not seeing the brilliant logic in allowing in 12 million immigrants from southern Mexico and Central America under unlawful auspices, panicking about $20 trillion in debt, and incapable of appreciating the wonders of outsourcing.<\/p>\n

In matters of deception, ostentatious vulgarity never proves as injurious as the hubris of the mannered establishment. So what I resent most about the Washington hollow men is not the sources and methods through which they parlay wealth, power, and influence, or the values they embrace to exercise and perpetuate their privilege and sense of exalted self, but the feigned outrage that they express when anyone dares suggest, by word or vote, that they are mediocrities and ethical adolescents \u2014 and really quite emotional, after all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The government\/media power elite are spectacularly ignorant of the American people. by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/National Review Online We are the hollow men We are the stuffed men Leaning together Headpiece filled with straw. Alas! Our dried voices, when We whisper together Are quiet and meaningless As wind in dry grass Or rats\u2019 feet over broken […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1091,1090,23,47,46,262,185],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2rc","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9915,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/is-the-american-elite-really-elite\/","url_meta":{"origin":9374,"position":0},"title":"Is the American Elite Really Elite?","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review The public no longer believes that privilege and influence should be predicated on titles, brands, and buzz. \u00a0 Establishment furor over the six-week-old Trump administration is growing. \u00a0 Outraged New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman recently compared Trump\u2019s victory to disasters in American history\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Clintons"","block_context":{"text":"The Clintons","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-clintons\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1489,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/pity-the-postmodern-cultural-elite\/","url_meta":{"origin":9374,"position":1},"title":"Pity the Postmodern Cultural Elite","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 23, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media I\u00a0think most of our problems transcend politics, which is increasingly a reflection of an elite, insider culture that is completely at odds with the majority of the country that it oversees. So what is a cultural elite? It is a sloppy term that might\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "July 2010"","block_context":{"text":"July 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/july-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10386,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/10386-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":9374,"position":2},"title":"From an Angry Reader: Hello\u2026","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"From an Angry Reader: Hello Dr. Hanson, While it's hard to argue with \"be happy day by day\", our current form of capitalism - which Hoover seems to endorse - makes that near impossible. Over the last 30 years, Friedman's nutty idea of maximizing shareholder value as the only responsibility\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Angry Reader"","block_context":{"text":"Angry Reader","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/angry-reader\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10355,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/freedom-and-tyranny-the-meaning-of-independence-day\/","url_meta":{"origin":9374,"position":3},"title":"Freedom and Tyranny: The Meaning of Independence Day","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 5, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"A reflection amidst the barbecues and fireworks and the paeans to patriotism. By Bruce Thornton \/\/ Front Page Mag Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. The Fourth of July is not just another day off from work. Nor is it just the celebration\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tyranny"","block_context":{"text":"Tyranny","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/tyranny\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4524,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/gay-old-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":9374,"position":4},"title":"Gay Old Times?","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 18, 2004","format":false,"excerpt":"Oliver Stone perpetuates a classical myth by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Magazine The consensus about Oliver Stone's\u00a0Alexander\u00a0is that the film's splashy gay motifs could not overcome the stilted dialogue, ludicrous Irish-brogue and Count Dracula accents, and excruciating minutes of dead screen time devoted to model-like poses, secretive eye contact,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "December 2004"","block_context":{"text":"December 2004","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2004\/december-2004\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9371,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/anti-brexit-elites-arent-the-ones-who-suffer-from-their-policies\/","url_meta":{"origin":9374,"position":5},"title":"Anti-Brexit Elites Aren\u2019t the Ones Who Suffer from Their Policies","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/National Review Online Following the Brexit, Europe may witness even more plebiscites against the undemocratic European Union throughout the continent. The furor of ignored Europeans against their union is not just directed against rich and powerful government elites per se, or against the flood of mostly young\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Europe"","block_context":{"text":"Europe","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/europe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9374"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9374"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9374\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9375,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9374\/revisions\/9375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}