{"id":8902,"date":"2015-12-31T10:00:42","date_gmt":"2015-12-31T18:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=8902"},"modified":"2015-12-31T10:00:42","modified_gmt":"2015-12-31T18:00:42","slug":"our-superstitious-president","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/our-superstitious-president\/","title":{"rendered":"Our Superstitious President"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ PJMedia<\/em><\/p>\n

\"Photo<\/a>
Photo via Townhall.com<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

President Obama talks a lot about the scientific method. On climate change, he has often invoked the idea of a great divide between those on the progressive left, such as himself, who believe in \u201csettled science\u201d and thus a looming man-caused climatological disaster, and those, presumably on the Neanderthal Right, who are slaves to superstition, ideology, prejudice, and self-interest\u2014and thus deny that the planet is rapidly warming due to inordinate human-induced releases of excessive carbon.<\/p>\n

Obama\u2019s view of science is reductionist. It relies on count-em-up numbers: if more university professors (not known to be an especially independent or courageous cohort) believe in dangerous man-caused climate change than doubt it or its seriousness, and if climate change fits a larger progressive agenda, then it becomes factual.<\/p>\n

Would we assume thereby that Newton, Galileo, and Darwin were all exemplars of groupthink, and worked through consensus and collegiality, especially with the support of status-quo institutions and universities, in advancing majority-held theories?<\/p>\n

When Obama signed legislation in his first weeks in office enabling human stem cell research, he pontificated that his act was about ensuring \u201cthat scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.\u201d Aside from the fact that there were and are methodologies of harvesting stem cells without resort to embryonic protocols, the president\u2019s entire approach to science, data, and the inductive method is to privilege ideology and subordinate facts.<\/p>\n

In short, Obama is the most anti-science, anti-factual president in modern memory.<\/p>\n

The president has warned the nation, usually on the most inappropriate and untimely occasions, of the American tendency to succumb to Islamophobia. But to support such an assumed pathology, the president adduced no evidence that Americans are more likely to target Muslims than other groups.<\/p>\n

If we were to rely on \u201cscientific\u201d research, there is statistical evidence that in general hate crimes in the U.S. are rare, and that in particular they tend to focus on Jews. The most recent survey (2014) of the FBI\u2019s Uniform Crime Reporting Program shows 58% of hate crimes were directed at Jews, while just 16% were against Muslims. Thus, if the president felt that there was a real danger of American citizens or residents harming others due to their religions, then obviously he would warn us not to attack Jews, who suffer more hate crimes than all other religious groups\u00a0combined.<\/em><\/p>\n

As a student of science, Obama should incorporate such findings in his pop editorializing and not, for example, sloppily characterize the deliberate sorting and murdering of four Jews in a Paris\u00a0delicatessen as if it were a random attack on\u00a0\u201ca bunch of folks\u201d (e.g.,\u00a0\u201cviolent, vicious zealots who behead people or randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris\u201d).<\/p>\n

If Obama really wished to address hate crimes in more precise scientific fashion, he would ask for data concerning not just the most likely group to suffer such attacks, but the most likely group statistically to commit them. But then again there is an anti-scientific resistance to investigating the matter further, given the likely results that would suggest an unwelcome reality.<\/p>\n

The president also insists that the government in reaction to the San Bernardino terrorist attacks must now rush to make it illegal for anyone on the no-fly lists to buy guns. Is there any scientific evidence that such a move would have much effect in preventing or abating terrorism? Or is such a call based on folklore and ideologically driven superstition?<\/p>\n

Over 800,000 are on the terrorist watch list, and about 64,000\u00a0of them are additionally on the no-fly list. Aside from the facts that both lists grow and do not seem to shrink, and that reasons are not always provided for adding names to the lists, there is no evidence that those included in the past on the no-fly list so far have been the perpetrators of post-9\/11 terrorist attacks. Banning guns to those on a no-fly list may in theory be wise, but there is no scientific evidence to suggest that it would be. If\u00a0one were to consult other various lists of the major terrorist operations in the U.S. since 9\/11\u2014and they range in number from 50-60 depending on the criteria used\u2014the vast majority were committed by those who self-identified as acting on behalf of Islam.<\/p>\n

In rejecting the Keystone pipeline, the president ignored the scientific conclusions of his own State Department\u2019s body of expert consultants who found no major negative impact to the climate by building the pipeline. In fact, statistically it is likely far less deleterious to the environment to ship oil-sand products by pipeline through the United States than to transport it by existing rail and truck. The Keystone cancellation was emblematic of making scientific decisions based on ideology, not facts.<\/p>\n

NASA, as its name implies, by all accounts is a scientific government agency devoted to the exploration of the upper atmosphere and space. Its mission is not, as its Director Charles Bolden understood his mandate from President Obama, a sociological one: \u201cAnd third, and perhaps foremost<\/em>, (emphasis added) he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math and engineering.\u201d Once the U.S. again has its own rockets, such outreach may be a nice thing to do. But \u201cfeel good\u201d is not the \u201cforemost\u201d mission of that government scientific organization. Envision the next present promising to use NASA to ensure that Christian nations \u201cfeel good\u201d about past Christian \u201ccontributions to science, math, and engineering.\u201d Almost instantaneously we would hear\u2014and rightly so\u2014charges leveled against an anti-science president subverting for ideological purposes and a \u201cpolitical agenda\u201d an historic government scientific enterprise.<\/p>\n

Most climatologists do not connect the California drought with global warming. To the degree that we can ascertain a cause, given the paucity of weather-related data in California dating much before 1850, scientists point to the\u00a0El Ni\u00f1o effect. Slight changes in east-central Pacific Ocean temperatures have historically affected the formation and trajectories of West Coast storms. To the degree temperature per se is the culprit, our present drought is largely a result of oceanic temperatures being too cool<\/em>\u2014in other words, too little of an El Ni\u00f1o effect.<\/p>\n

Yet Obama flew into the Central Valley of California, Ground Zero of the drought, pronounced climate change the culprit, promised federal monies for that purpose, and flew out. Aside from politicizing a natural disaster for contemporary political advantage, anti-science also plays a role in the drought. Activists and government officials, state and federal, did not calibrate rising state population with increased needs for water storage and transfers.<\/p>\n

Instead, in an ideological and anti-science frenzy, they suspended completing the California Water Project and Central Valley Project infrastructure, and embraced romantic but unproven theories about diverting contracted irrigation water to reintroduce salmon to the San Joaquin River and to restore delta smelt populations to assumed normal levels. Both anti-scientific efforts failed to increase those populations, but only after the wastage of several million acre-feet of precious water. Releasing scarce storage water in a drought\u2014contrary to the initial aims of the Central Valley and California Water Projects of flood control, irrigation, recreation, and power generation\u2014on the theory of altering fish populations is about as anti-scientific and anti-human as one can get.<\/p>\n

If one were to characterize the Obama administration approach to the natural world, it is precisely an historical effort to privilege ideology over facts. In matters of gun control, Obama ignores how, where, and why most Americans are killed by guns because the facts do not fit a preconceived narrative. In matters of the Affordable Care Act, the administration made unscientific claims about affordability, budgetary consequences, coverage, and access that were quickly proven contrary to available evidence.<\/p>\n

In reaction to the Benghazi killings, the Obama team advanced a narrative about a right-wing video maker prompting such \u201cspontaneous\u201d violence that contradicted eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, and the social media testimonies of the attackers and the reports of the attacked. Then there is the matter of racial violence such as Michael Brown\u2019s death in Ferguson. The president evoked it as an example of police excess, even though his own Justice Department found no culpability on the part of the officer in question and the narrative of an innocent victim crying out “hands up, don\u2019t shoot” to be an entire fabrication. For political and ideological purposes, the Obama Justice Department supports flawed studies theorizing that one in four females on campus will be a victim of sexual violence during her college years\u2014a theory debunked by facts as often as it is resurrected for its electoral utility.<\/p>\n

Obama does not believe in science because science is blind. In today\u2019s political climate, disinterested inquiry is a mortal sin. We live in an age in which aims that are declared socially just require any means necessary to achieve them\u2014even if that ensures a denial of the scientific method and facts themselves.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ PJMedia President Obama talks a lot about the scientific method. On climate change, he has often invoked the idea of a great divide between those on the progressive left, such as himself, who believe in \u201csettled science\u201d and thus a looming man-caused climatological disaster, and those, presumably on the Neanderthal […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2jA","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9299,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-myth-of-progress\/","url_meta":{"origin":8902,"position":0},"title":"The Myth Of Progress","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 12, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Defining Ideas President Obama is fond of using the phrase \u201cthe arc of the moral universe,\u201d a line derived from Martin Luther King Jr\u2019s longer quote, \u201cThe arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.\u201d King, in fact, lifted the often-used\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Defining Ideas"","block_context":{"text":"Defining Ideas","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/defining-ideas\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7090,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-anti-empirical-left\/","url_meta":{"origin":8902,"position":1},"title":"The Anti-Empirical Left","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 6, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Science is ignored when it doesn't support politically correct policy. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online President Obama entered office promising to restore the sanctity of science. Instead, a fresh war against science, statistics, and reason is being waged on behalf of politically\u00a0correct politics. After the Sandy Hook tragedy,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Global Warming"","block_context":{"text":"Global Warming","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/global-warming-2\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/599px-Aristotelesarp-300x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":12008,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/impeachment-coup-analytics\/","url_meta":{"origin":8902,"position":2},"title":"Impeachment Coup Analytics","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness Aside from the emotional issue that Democrats, NeverTrumpers, and celebrities loathe Donald Trump, recently Representative Al Green (D-Texas) reminded us why the Democrats are trying to impeach the president rather than just defeat him in the 2020 general election. \u201cTo defeat him at the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2228,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-lefts-selective-outrage\/","url_meta":{"origin":8902,"position":3},"title":"The Left’s Selective Outrage","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 11, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPage Magazine You know liberals are edging toward a full Jonestown-style meltdown when someone as smart as New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman starts losing it. Last week Friedman worked himself up into a paranoiac frenzy over the tone of some of the criticism Obama and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3729,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/talking-to-iran-moral-and-strategic-mistake\/","url_meta":{"origin":8902,"position":4},"title":"Talking to Iran: Moral and Strategic Mistake","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 18, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services One of the many bizarre recommendations in the recently released report from the bipartisan Iraq Study Group is the call to talk with Iran. A formal dialogue with the present Iranian leadership is, for a number of reasons, as misguided as it is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "December 2006"","block_context":{"text":"December 2006","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2006\/december-2006\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8347,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/l-ron-obama-and-the-church-of-progressivism\/","url_meta":{"origin":8902,"position":5},"title":"L. Ron Obama and the Church of Progressivism","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S.Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine The HBO documentary about Scientology, \u201cGoing Clear,\u201d is a must-see. Not so much because it exposes Scientology as a moneymaking, totalitarian cult, something most people already have known for 50 years. More useful is the film\u2019s description of Scientology\u2019s ideas, techniques, and tactics, for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Religion"","block_context":{"text":"Religion","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/religion\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/obama1.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8902"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8902"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8902\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8904,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8902\/revisions\/8904"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}