{"id":8836,"date":"2015-12-03T13:26:02","date_gmt":"2015-12-03T21:26:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=8836"},"modified":"2015-12-03T13:26:02","modified_gmt":"2015-12-03T21:26:02","slug":"politics-and-what-remains-of-the-english-language","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/politics-and-what-remains-of-the-english-language\/","title":{"rendered":"Politics and What Remains of the English Language"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ PJ Media<\/p>\n

\"Photo<\/a>
Photo credit: EdDriscoll.com<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Here is a list of a few trendy words, overused, politicized, and empty of meaning, that now plague popular communications.<\/p>\n

\u201cIntersection\u201d<\/strong> How many times have we read a writer, columnist, pundit, or job applicant self-describe himself with this strange word? Here’s an example: \u201cJoe Blow is a social theorist working at the intersection of class oppression, racial stereotyping, and transgendered emergence.\u201d? Or: \u201cAmanda Lopez writes at the intersection of Latina identity, Foucauldian otherness, and social media.\u201d Most of the time \u201cintersection\u201d exists only in the grandiose mind of the writer. It is a patent though feeble attempt to become a threefer or fourfer on the race\/gender\/generic victim\/revolutionary activist scale. The intersected topics are individually irrelevant — and all the more so when cobbled together. \u00a0The use of “intersection” is a postmodern way of plastering bumper-sticker narcissisms without writing, \u201cI am an identity-studies person without much knowledge of literature, history, or languages, but am desperately trying to convey expertise of some sort by piling up a bunch of pseudo-disciplines that credential my victimhood activism.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cDiversity\u201d <\/strong> The noun was rebranded in the 1980s, and does not mean what it by nature should — \u201ca range\u201d or \u201cmultiplicity.\u201d No one furthers the goals of \u201cdiversity\u201d by ensuring plenty of conservatives, liberals, radicals and reactionaries on campus, or welcoming lots of Christian fundamentalists as well as atheists and Muslims. The word instead is a euphemism for non-white, non-male, non-heterosexual, non-Christian, and non-liberal. It is a relative and entirely political noun. The University of Missouri football team can both be 52% African-American and proof of diversity, even if African-Americans make up less than 12% of the population — in a way that all white and elderly Democratic primary candidates are honorifically diverse by virtue of their homogeneous left-wing politics.<\/p>\n

Three other observations: First, racial and ethnic diversity, without assimilation and integration into one culture, and when identity becomes essential rather than incidental to a nation (i.e. a salad bowl society rather than the melting pot), leads to Armageddon, whether in Austria-Hungary, the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, or Iraq.<\/p>\n

Second, the word gained careerist currency because of the bankruptcy of the idea of affirmative action, after it became impossible to explain and thus defend racial set-asides. Who can define the proper DNA that makes one deserving of admissions and employment reparations: 1\/4 African-American, but not Punjabi or Egyptian? Hmong, but not Japanese? Oaxacan, but not Castilian? Muslim, but not Mormon? An indigent Appalachian, but not Eric Holder\u2019s son? As a result, universities had to lump everybody deemed non-white together as they pleased and called the catch-all result \u201cdiversity\u201d — regardless of class, income, status or history. If one wishes someone non-white to be hired on the physics faculty, then a South Korean immigrant green-card-holding PhD counts as diversity, in a way that his son would not qualify for traditional affirmative-action status as an 18-year-old applicant to UC Berkeley. Diversity lowered the affirmative-action bar and the natural consequence of vagueness were the fantasies of Elizabeth Warren, Rachel Dolezal, Shaun King, and Ward Churchill — all professed to be diverse, but all without proper certifications of affirmative-action status.<\/p>\n

Third, no one outside the campus much believes in the inherent advantage of diversity\/diverse, as least as opposed to united: The Diverse States of America? Diverse Airlines? The Diversity Way? Diverse Technologies? The Diverse Auto Workers?<\/p>\n

\u201cPrivilege\u201d<\/strong> It certainly no longer means honor or pride (e.g., \u201cIt has been my privilege to know you\u201d), but has degenerated into a word of disparagement, used mostly with \u201cwhite,\u201d as in \u201cwhite privilege.\u201d And so privilege so often means nothing other than a way for mostly upper-middle-class white kids on campus to feel that they will have fewer problems if they \u201ccheck\u201d their privilege by reeducation-camp-style confessionals. There are perhaps 230 million \u201cwhite\u201d somebodies in the United States. The idea that a guy selling cars in Toledo has some intrinsic edge over Valerie Jarrett, Jorge Ramos, or Beyonc\u00e9 because he is slightly pinker is ridiculous. Don\u2019t take my word for it: when President Obama blasted the \u201cclingers,\u201d his subtext was that poor white uneducated and supposedly superstitious people did not and should not enjoy the privilege that he as an Ivy-League, arugula eating, and golf-putting elite enjoyed. Usually \u201cprivilege\u201d is a preemptory word: if you are wealthy or at least middle class and you do not wish to be assessed on your work and achievement, then you accuse others (usually rivals or superiors) of enjoying insidious \u201cprivilege\u201d which otherwise explains your own happiness over your perceived lack of parity. Privilege is always asserted, never defined or analyzed.<\/p>\n

\u201cSwag\u201d<\/strong> I mention this curious slang only because it has left street parlance. (Is it short for \u201cswagger,\u201d or some sort of acronym denoting sexual preference?)<\/p>\n

Swag certainly has left its Nordic root of \u201csagging\/rocking\u201d and entered the language of the First Family. One has swag apparently in the sense that although thoroughly conventional in dress, language, income, status and career, one still has found a demonstrable way to denote that he is authentic, as in cool, hip, in with it.<\/p>\n

Swag is supposedly attained by ever so slight adjustments in vocabulary, fashion, or comportment that do not threaten an otherwise studied conventionality. Swag is a reflection that one worries that he has lost the authenticity and legitimacy that helped him win conventionality, and from time to time feels it is career wise to swag his roots, both to fulfill psychological needs and to practice a studied otherness in case its easy demonstration might come in handy in the future. An otherwise slothful lion in the zoo has swag when he growls at an obtrusive onlooker. I suppose when I was farming and occasionally had to drive my decrepit Dodge 1974 pickup, with shovels, broken concrete pipes, valve castings, and bags of quickset in the back, into the faculty parking lot, I could be said to have had ag swag? Barack Obama is said to swag when he uses contrived street parlance when hanging with his basketball heroes.<\/p>\n

In other words, swag is essentially a neurotic tic.<\/p>\n

\u201cHurtful\u201d<\/strong> is a strange word that certainly does not fit any standard, identifiable definition of experiencing genuine mental anguish or physical pain, as in it would be hurtful when stung by 6 wasps, or it would be hurtful should someone call you a SOB and then dare you to do something about it. Instead, it has become an entirely subjective term, useful for the enhancement of victimhood leading to envisioned concessions. Again, hurtful is a generic, catch-all adjective. A teacher whose speech is declared \u201churtful\u201d is usually not able to be charged with being \u201cracist,\u201d \u201csexist\u201d or even \u201cobnoxious.\u201d Instead, hurtful is a word of first resort when there is no clear evidence that one has suffered racist or sexist attack, but is unhappy nonetheless for vague reasons. Presto, one finds another\u2019s speech or behavior hurtful, a charge that allows all sorts of fantasies and speculation. Did his teacher\u2019s unspecified \u201churtful\u201d behavior or language involve donning a Klan hood or employing \u201chomosexual\u201d instead of \u201cgay\u201d?<\/p>\n

Hurtful is a useful political adjective because de facto it implies damage done, in the passive rather than active sense. An \u201cobnoxious\u201d person radiates his toxicity, and a \u201chater\u201d projects his hatred. But hurtful (\u201cfull of hurt\u201d) is entirely, not partly, in the eye of the victim, who alone decides what particular speech or act hit the target and drew blood.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou are a nice girl\u201d does not qualify as obnoxious or hateful speech, at least as so recognized outside the minute confines of the media-studies department. But it is probably \u201churtful\u201d speech, since some one can argue that \u201cnice\u201d and \u201cgirl\u201d are proof of condescension and designed to hurt one by deliberately stereotyping her in some sort of subordinating fashion. In a nation of victims, almost anyone can find anything \u201churtful\u201d given that it requires no definition. The adjective is also passive-aggressive: a college student can confront a professor, unleash a string of obscene invectives, and then claim his attack was found to be \u201churtful\u201d because he had to make it. Storming the library, pushing around students, and insulting them could be \u201churtful.\u201dAfter all, why does an aggrieved group have to be forced to such heroic but nonetheless distressing dramatics?<\/p>\n

What Has Happened to Language?<\/strong><\/p>\n

This tiny vocabulary sampling reflects another recent epidemic of victimhood, as the English language is further squeezed and massaged to create reality from fantasy.<\/p>\n

First, over a half-century of institutionalized equal opportunity has not led to an equality of result. Particular self-identified groups feel collectively that they are less well off than others and are bewildered that this is still possible, since they can point to no law or custom that precludes their opportunity by race, class, or gender. Therefore, inventing a vocabulary of grievances is far more effective in gaining concessions than self-criticism and self-reliance are in winning parity.<\/p>\n

Second, in an affluent, leisured and postmodern society of $300 Jordan-label sneakers that sell out in hours, big-screen televisions at Walmart that become prizes for warring consumers on Black Friday, and over 50% of the population exempt from income taxes, it is becoming harder to define, in the material sense, oppression-driven victimhood. In such a world, even multi-billionaire Oprah has difficulty finding discrimination and so becomes reduced to whining about a perceived snub in a Swiss boutique that sells six-figure purses. Language is pressed into service to create victims where there are few, but where many are sorely needed, psychologically — and on the chance such a prized status might lead to a profitable trajectory otherwise impossible by pass\u00e9 notions of work and achievement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ PJ Media Here is a list of a few trendy words, overused, politicized, and empty of meaning, that now plague popular communications. \u201cIntersection\u201d How many times have we read a writer, columnist, pundit, or job applicant self-describe himself with this strange word? Here’s an example: \u201cJoe Blow is a social […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2iw","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":12119,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/what-is-the-middle-east-in-the-middle-of-anymore\/","url_meta":{"origin":8836,"position":0},"title":"What Is the Middle East In the Middle Of Anymore?","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness Since World War II, the United States has been involved in a series of crises and wars in the Middle East on the premise of protecting U.S., Western, or global interests, or purportedly all three combined. Since antiquity, the Middle East has been the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6679,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-launch-of-the-freedom-academy\/","url_meta":{"origin":8836,"position":1},"title":"The Launch of the Freedom Academy","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 29, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0PJ Media\u00a0 Today launches\u00a0the Freedom Academy\u00ae, a project some 18 months in the making. In the present age, we need a meeting place where people can rediscover what freedom entails and appreciate the origins and role of liberty. The majority of Americans yearn for a rebirth\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Civilization"","block_context":{"text":"Civilization","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/civilization\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3982,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-new-world-of-immigration\/","url_meta":{"origin":8836,"position":2},"title":"The New World of Immigration","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 29, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services In the dark of these rural spring mornings, I see full vans of Mexican laborers speeding by my farmhouse on their way to the western side of California's San Joaquin Valley to do the backbreaking work of weeding cotton, thinning tree fruit and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "May 2006"","block_context":{"text":"May 2006","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2006\/may-2006\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1837,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-fear-big-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":8836,"position":3},"title":"Why Fear Big Government?","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 10, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media Who is Afraid of Big Government? There is no reason to review all the standard reasons why the American people are terrified of an all-powerful federal or state government. The case has been made in thousands of elegant treatises and books, and is best\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "February 2010"","block_context":{"text":"February 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/february-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7765,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-quiet-mediterranean\/","url_meta":{"origin":8836,"position":4},"title":"A Quiet Mediterranean?","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 12, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"An unusual calm for history\u2019s constant cauldron. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online From the deck of a ship on the Mediterranean, the islands that pass by appear as calm as the weather. Huge yachts, not warships, are docked in island ports. I haven\u2019t seen a naval officer\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Culture"","block_context":{"text":"Culture","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/culture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"USS Nimitz underway in the Mediterranean Sea (Seaman Raul Moreno Jr.)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/pic_giant_081214_SM_Nimitz2-500x291.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1789,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-islamist-mindset-how-it-rationalizes-and-promotes-sex-sins\/","url_meta":{"origin":8836,"position":5},"title":"The Islamist Mindset: How it Rationalizes–and Promotes–‘Sex Sins’","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 12, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim PJ Media Is it inconsistent for Muslim \u201choly warriors\u201d to engage in voyeuristic acts of lasciviousness? Because would-be jihadists and martyrs have been known to frequent strip bars \u2014 such as the 9\/11 hijackers and Major\u00a0Nidal Hasan\u00a0[1], whose \u201clate-night jiggle-joint carousing stands at odds with the picture\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8836"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8836"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8836\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8843,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8836\/revisions\/8843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}