![\"Photo](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/ov.jpg?resize=470%2C264&ssl=1\")
What are the roots of Barack Obama\u2019s foreign policy? Some focus on the man and his flaws of character, particularly his inability to learn from his mistakes and to adjust his ideas to changing facts on the ground. Others see more sinister motives, an animus against the United States that drives policies diminishing America\u2019s power and influence. Old bad ideas like one-world internationalism and the power of diplomacy to resolve conflicts have played a major role. And of course, domestic political considerations enter into his foreign policy calculations.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Whatever the origins, the end result of Obama\u2019s foreign policy has been a weakening of America\u2019s global clout and respect, one unseen since the Carter administration. One way to make sense of these serial disasters is to see them as the predictable result of a schizophrenic foreign policy that has indulged simultaneously stealth isolationism and \u201cmoralizing internationalism,\u201d as historian Corelli Barnett called it.<\/p>\n
Isolationism is the default attitude of Americans toward relations with other nations. From the beginning, protected by two oceans, our citizens assumed they could keep their distance from the dynastic power-struggles rending Europe. These sentiments are frequently expressed in the speeches of early presidents. In his First Inaugural Address Jefferson noted that the U.S. was \u201cKindly separated by nature and a wide ocean from the exterminating havoc of one quarter of the globe.\u201d Given that advantage, he counseled \u201cpeace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.\u201d John Quincy Adams in 1821similarly declared the U.S. a \u201cwell-wisher to the freedom and independence of all,\u201d but it \u201cgoes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course even then, the U.S. could not remain aloof from an increasingly globalized economy that implicated us in world affairs. The War of 1812 was in part an extension of the Napoleonic Wars and involved disputes over international trade and the dominance of Great Britain\u2019s fleets over the \u201cwide ocean\u201d Jefferson thought would protect us. Yet even as economic globalization and new technologies shrank the world and implicated America even further in its affairs, isolationism remained a powerful political force. After World War I, when 2 million Americans served abroad, isolationist sentiment kept the Senate from ratifying the Versailles Treaty and involving America in the League of Nations. Most American shared the sentiments of Theodore Roosevelt, who wrote in 1919, \u201cI do not believe in keeping our men on the other side to patrol the Rhine.\u201d<\/p>\n
Idealistic internationalism, however, particularly the active promotion of democracy, has been another powerful strain of American foreign policy. Woodrow Wilson, of course, was the staunch promoter of this ideal. In his 1917 speech asking Congress for a declaration of war against the Central Powers, Wilson famously said the U.S. must help \u201cto vindicate the principles of peace and justice in the life of the world,\u201d for \u201cpeace can never be maintained except by a partnership of democratic nations.\u201d Thus \u201cthe world must be made safe for democracy. Its peace must be planted upon the tested foundations of political liberty.\u201d American citizens \u201care but one of the champions of the rights of mankind. We shall be satisfied when those rights have been made as secure as the faith and the freedom of nations can make them.\u201d<\/p>\n
Such idealism was seemingly vindicated in World War II by our success in destroying the tyrannies of Nazism, fascism, and Japanese racist imperialism; and by the role our money and occupying forces played in reconstructing Germany and Japan and creating the global economic order. The half-century Cold War against a nuclear armed Soviet Union, through marked by outbursts of isolationism, eventually was won, once again proving America to be the world\u2019s \u201cindispensible nation,\u201d the \u201csheriff\u201d necessary to police the global economy\u2019s \u201cshopkeepers,\u201d as Robert Kagan puts it.<\/p>\n
This international idealism transcends party. In the heady days of the collapse of the Soviet Union, President George H.W. Bush in his 1991 State of the Union address extolled the \u201cnew world order,\u201d one \u201cwhere diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind\u2013\u2013peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law.\u201d His son George W. Bush sounded the same Wilsonian notes in the 2002 National Security Strategy, in which the foreign policy of the U.S. would be the promotion of the \u201csingle sustainable model for national success: freedom, democracy, and free enterprise,\u201d for \u201cthese values of freedom are right and true for every person, in every society.\u201d Thus the U.S. will strive \u201cto extend the benefits of freedom across the globe. We will actively work to bring the hope of democracy, development, free markets, and free trade to every corner of the world.\u201d<\/p>\n
Barack Obama came into office endorsing this same idealist rhetoric, though he has preferred multilateral diplomacy to force. Leftist ideology has always been internationalist, assuming a moral responsibility on the part of the developed nations to spend its money and diplomatic persuasion on uplifting those countries still mired in political thuggery and material squalor. Thus the rich nations have a \u201cresponsibility to protect,\u201d as the U.N. calls it, even at the expense of national sovereignty. The involvement of Samantha Power\u2013\u2013whose work on genocide gave impetus to this doctrine\u2013\u2013in Obama\u2019s administration, currently as U.N. Ambassador, testifies to his endorsement of this internationalist ideal.<\/p>\n
More important Obama\u2019s own speeches have revealed the idealist side of his foreign policy personality. In his now infamous Cairo speech of 2009, he said, \u201cI do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things: the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed; confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice; government that is transparent and doesn\u2019t steal from the people; the freedom to live as you choose. These are not just American ideas; they are human rights. And that is why we will support them everywhere.\u201d<\/p>\n
Obama\u2019s reaction to the brief-lived \u201cArab Spring\u201d revolts reprised this idealism. Speaking in 2012 at the U.N., he endorsed \u201cthe notion that people can resolve their differences peacefully; that diplomacy can take the place of war; that in an interdependent world, all of us have a stake in working towards greater opportunity and security for our citizens.\u201d And echoing George W. Bush, he asserted, \u201cFreedom and self-determination are not unique to one culture. These are not simply American values or Western values\u2013\u2013they are universal values.\u201d Democracy \u201cis more likely to bring about the stability, prosperity, and individual opportunity that serve as a basis for peace in our world.\u201d<\/p>\n
Obama\u2019s interventions abroad have seemingly reflected this idealism. His participation in the overthrow of Libya\u2019s Muammar Gaddafi, ostensibly because he threatened to slaughter some of his opponents, or his numerous statements about the need of Syria\u2019s Bashar al Assad \u201cto go\u201d or the \u201cred line\u201d he drew against the use of chemical weapons, are just two examples of the \u201cresponsibility to protect\u201d that reflects modern \u201cmoralizing internationalism.\u201d<\/p>\n
So much for Obama\u2019s idealistic side. But what he has discovered is that enforcing such idealism requires massive violence and an open-ended occupation in order to create stability and a just political-social order. Yet Obama campaigned on ending two wars that he rightly judged Americans were sick of, and that his leftist proclivities considered \u201cunjust\u201d and neo-imperialist versions of the Vietnam War, the left\u2019s enduring example of American power-hunger and greed disguised as liberation. Hence Obama has shown the isolationist side of his foreign policy personality\u2013\u2013must ruinously by rushing for the exit in Iraq with now obvious baleful consequences\u2013\u2013 while masking it with a patina of moralizing internationalism.<\/p>\n
Syria is the most recent example. Having blustered about \u201cred lines\u201d but unwilling to act vigorously enough to enforce them, he gambled on isolationist sentiment\u2013\u2013one CNN poll found 70% of Americans opposed to military strikes against Assad\u2013\u2013 and in 2013 asked Congress for a resolution authorizing such strikes. The effort failed, and Obama was off the hook until Assad\u2019s grisly depredations and the rise of ISIS raised the political cost of inaction. But true to his schizophrenia, he authorized what have been in effect symbolic actions: a bungling half-a-billion-dollar \u201ctraining program\u201d for Syrian rebels produced a handful of fighters and has just been deep-sixed; and the air campaign against ISIS has averaged 11 sorties a day, a third of which don\u2019t even drop their bombs.<\/p>\n
As we have learned since 9\/11, idealism requires brute military force and a willingness to stay in the region indefinitely. But military action with some very few exceptions in order to succeed needs boots on the ground to kill the enemy and then the occupation of territory. Obama\u2019s aversion to force and the deployment of troops abroad preclude such action. Hence the schizophrenia: the \u201cresponsibility to protect\u201d incoherently coexisting with the aversion to going abroad \u201cin search of monsters to destroy.\u201d<\/p>\n
Obama may be acting from ideology or cold political calculation. But it should be pointed out that many Americans are equally schizophrenic. A recent poll revealed that 57% of Americans favor sending in ground troops to fight ISIS, but 85% fear that \u201cintervention in Iraq and Syria will lead to a long and costly involvement.\u201d In other words, \u201cdo something\u201d to stop the brutality disturbing our breakfasts, but keep the cost in time, money, and American lives low. But the use of mass violence cannot be that finely calibrated, its outcomes, costs, and consequences precisely foreseen. The attempt to do so by mixing idealism with isolationism, as Obama has shown, is a recipe for foreign policy failure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
An analysis of a recipe for serial disasters. by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine What are the roots of Barack Obama\u2019s foreign policy? Some focus on the man and his flaws of character, particularly his inability to learn from his mistakes and to adjust his ideas to changing facts on the ground. Others see […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[842,22,46,196],"tags":[1041],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2gN","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":8260,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/bad-ideas-breed-bad-foreign-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":8729,"position":0},"title":"Bad Ideas Breed Bad Foreign Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 4, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine Barack Obama\u2019s foreign policy will go down in U.S. history as one of the most dangerously inept ever. Created by equal amounts of ignorance, arrogance, and partisan politics, the president\u2019s policies have left behind a world in which rivals and enemies are on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/201113jobs.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":8351,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-foreign-policy-primer-for-obama-and-rand-paul\/","url_meta":{"origin":8729,"position":1},"title":"A Foreign Policy Primer for Obama\u2013\u2013and Rand Paul","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 20, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine The president who thinks there\u2019s such a thing as an \u201cAustrian\u201d language is advising Rand Paul to \u201cbone up on foreign policy.\u201d It\u2019s now official: the Obama administration has become a recurring skit on Saturday Night Live. This is the same Barack Obama\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/rand-paul1-500x271.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7839,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-foreign-policy-of-empty-words\/","url_meta":{"origin":8729,"position":2},"title":"Obama\u2019s Foreign Policy of Empty Words","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 10, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen force threatens, talk is no good.\u201d\u00a0 by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine That line from John Ford\u2019s classic The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance contains wisdom everyone from peasant to king knew before our modern age and its smug\u00a0illusions. Go back 2,400 years, and you can hear it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/1393766471000-AP-Obama-Budget-001-450x337.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":8077,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/hillarys-bad-politics-and-worse-ideas\/","url_meta":{"origin":8729,"position":3},"title":"Hillary\u2019s Bad Politics and Worse Ideas","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 10, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine Once again Hillary Clinton has given the Republicans some suicidal soundbites they should stash away for 2016 in the likely event she is the Democratic candidate for president. A review of some of her recent statements reveals that Clinton is not just entitled,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141124111023-hillary-clinton-new-hampshire-story-top-450x344.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2545,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-libya-venture-and-double-standards\/","url_meta":{"origin":8729,"position":4},"title":"Obama’s Libya Venture and Double Standards","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 10, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPage Magazine The champion of shameless chutzpah has always been the guy who murders his parents then throws himself on the mercy of the court because he\u2019s an orphan. But White House spokesman Jay Carney might be the new champ, given his response to the House\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Libya"","block_context":{"text":"Libya","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/libya\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7978,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/election-day-whats-at-stake\/","url_meta":{"origin":8729,"position":5},"title":"Election Day: What\u2019s at Stake","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 5, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine The election and reelection of Barack Obama have seemingly realized the progressive dream of transforming America from its traditional Constitutional order to one more similar to Europe\u2019s\u2013\u2013an activist rather than a limited federal government, one whose power and reach extend into the market\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/votejpeg-42b1d7963e761260-500x320.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8729"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8729"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8729\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8731,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8729\/revisions\/8731"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}