{"id":8693,"date":"2015-09-29T11:50:32","date_gmt":"2015-09-29T18:50:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=8693"},"modified":"2015-09-29T11:50:32","modified_gmt":"2015-09-29T18:50:32","slug":"obamas-hope-and-change-foreign-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-hope-and-change-foreign-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama\u2019s Hope-and-Change Foreign Policy"},"content":{"rendered":"

President Obama applies the same principles abroad that he does at home.<\/em><\/h3>\n
by Victor Davis Hanson\u00a0\/\/ National Review Online<\/a><\/div>\n
\n

\"whats-the-three-headed-monster-challenging-obamas-foreign-policy\"A<\/span>t home President Obama is well known for his preference for perceived parity over liberty. Most of his domestic agenda \u2014Obamacare, executive-order amnesties, open borders, near-zero interest rates, quantitative easing, the piling up of $9 trillion in new debt, tax hikes, more regulations \u2014 is apparently aimed at shifting power and capital away from the upper middle class to the lower classes.<\/p>\n

From Obama\u2019s first appearance on the national scene, his rhetoric has been directed against those whom he perceives as the inordinately privileged \u2014 much more the supposedly uncouth upper middle class than the tasteful Martha\u2019s Vineyard Wall Streeters or the jeans-and-T-shirt Malibu super-rich.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Americans who did not favor his redistributionist vision were rhetorically reduced to clingers, nativists, the privileged unwilling to spread their wealth, leaches on government who didn\u2019t build their own businesses and who didn\u2019t realize they had already made enough money. Obama once suggested that he was for higher capital-gains taxes even if such tax hikes would discourage profitable activity and thus lead to lower revenues for the Treasury, simply for the sake of \u201cfairness\u201d \u2014 reminding us of Tocqueville\u2019s various warnings that many people would prefer parity even if meant less liberty and wealth for themselves.<\/p>\n

Obama sees the rest of the world as he does the United States \u2014 and thus in need of a redistribution in power that will bring greater fairness to the planet. Accordingly, under current U.S. foreign policy, the desire for supposed equality trumps most considerations of human rights, values, consensual government, and our own national interest.<\/p>\n

Take the current destruction of the Middle East. Most of the influence there for many decades has rested with Israel, a small but powerful nation with nuclear weapons and a vibrant economy, and the so-called moderate, Sunni-based authoritarian regimes \u2014 Egypt, Jordan, and the oil-exporting and plutocratic Gulf monarchies. Obama, however, apparently saw this as unfair. He sought as a counterweight to empower other Islamic nations and movements deemed more revolutionary and more deserving of American attention. By any sober measure, Turkey\u2019s Recep Erdogan is a fervent Islamist bent on eroding Turkish democracy; but to Obama, he was an avatar of hope and change who would steer Turkey away from its blinkered neo-colonial NATO alignments, even as, within Turkey, Erdogan empowered fundamentalism among the Anatolian underclass against the Westernized Ionian elite. Thus followed our \u201cspecial relationship\u201d with Erdogan \u2014 and unofficial American endorsement of his anti-democratic thuggery, anti-Semitism, and Islamism.<\/p>\n

Obama came a day late and a dollar short to the Arab Spring. But he got his licks in with the subsequent U.S. destruction of Moammar Qaddafi \u2014 a monster in rehab who had surrendered his WMD arsenal after the toppling of Saddam Hussein and was slowly handing off power to a transitional secularized and Westernized second generation of the family mafia. No matter \u2014 we bombed without congressional sanction, left the feuding terrorist cliques to wreck the country, and were hit at Benghazi \u2014 even as the Obama administration gave us the revealing new \u201clead from behind\u201d doctrine and Hillary Clinton\u2019s hubristic boast, \u201cWe came, we saw, he died.\u201d<\/p>\n

Egypt followed a similar script. Obama was romanced by Mohamed Morsi \u2014 the erstwhile anti-American president of Egypt, who as a young man had spent several years in California, first as a student at USC and then as an assistant professor at CSU Northridge. Obama apparently envisioned Egypt as soon to be run by somebody schooled in the modern American university\u2019s race\/class\/gender activism who would appreciate Obama\u2019s own Cairo Speech mythologies. If Egyptian theocracy replaced autocracy, so much the better, given that the former at least had a revolutionary authenticity that the latter lacked. The result, however, was the veritable destruction of Egypt until the unexpected coup by the now-shunned junta of General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.<\/p>\n

No one is terribly sorry that the Gulf monarchies are being ostracized by Obama. After all, they were the architects of the OPEC oil cartel and past masters at stealthily funding anti-Western terrorists. Their schizophrenic theocracies were sorry spectacles of what happens when high-tech consumerism meshes with seventh-century mores. Nonetheless, the Gulf monarchies remained anti-Communist in the Cold War, largely escaped the violence of much of the Middle East, talked tough about Israel rather than fighting her, and welcomed U.S. military bases. Now they are orphaned, not because they are corrupt, anti-democratic, or theocratic, but because they represent wealth, power, and influence in inordinate fashion in the Middle East.<\/p>\n

Ditto Israel. The Obama administration does not seem to care much that Israel is democratic and pro-Western and that it created a successful economy ex nihilo. Instead, it represents Westernism at the expense of revolutionary entities like the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, and perhaps now even Hezbollah. Thus, from the beginning of the Obama administration, its Middle East invective was aimed not at Iran, Hamas, or the Muslim Brotherhood, but at Israel in general and Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu in particular. Like the Kurds, whom Obama has largely neglected, Israel is simply too successful, too unlike the failures elsewhere in the Middle East, and too patently pro-American.<\/p>\n

Note that in June 2009 Obama forbore to support the one million Iranian reformers who hit the streets to protest the corrupt election engineering of the theocracy. Obama stayed mum throughout the year-long protests. In February 2009, in his first formal interview as president (with Al Arabiya<\/em>, no less), he had hinted that he alone possessed the bona fides to connect with Islam\u2019s authentic leaders. Obama apparently saw the Iranian reformers as retrograde neo-cons rather than legitimate revolutionaries who would appreciate his own unique radical credentials. Certainly Iran\u2019s minister of foreign affairs, Mohammad Javad Zarif \u2014 a Westernized dandy who sounds like the chairman of a Middle East Studies program on an American campus \u2014 seems to have appeared right out of central casting to charm Obama with his Anti-America-Lite obfuscations. The result is the Iranian nuke deal, a treaty that is apparently not a treaty, an accord that violates all the prerequisites that Obama himself set out prior to the talks, and a blueprint for any other Middle East nation to obtain nuclear weapons under the guise of promising not to obtain them.<\/p>\n

This approach to the Middle East is sort of like the art of community organizing in a large blue-state American city \u2014 constant turmoil punctuated by occasional equilibrium brought about by concessions from the more powerful. Iran\u2019s nuclear status, its newfound freedom from sanctions, its expanding revenue, and its recharged terrorist appendages will offer it parity in the Middle East. Sunni regimes and Israel will react, tensions will rise, and out of the turmoil will come some greater sense of social justice, in a new Middle East that is more authentic and therefore less pro-Western and especially less pro-American than the old one. The playing field is being leveled, and the Russian\u2013Syrian\u2013Iranian\u2013Hezbollah\u2013Hamas Axis has finally achieved some parity in the region.<\/p>\n

Obama tried the same with the Russian reset, until he grasped that Putin is a thug of the first order \u2014 an unapologetic neo-Tsarist reactionary who despises Obama as much for his weakness as for his social-justice sermonizing.<\/p>\n

In Europe, Obama has tried his best to undermine the old Churchillian U.S.\u2013U.K. special relationship. He has preferred the EU to NATO, and sees the present migration crisis as either nemesis for colonialism or a chance for Europe to look more like the world. The European leftist dream of enforced mass transit for populations living in apartment buildings surrounded by government-owned greenbelts, punctuated by solar and wind farms, in countries with their foreign policy subject to the U.N. \u2014 all overseen by a few elite grandees \u2014 is Obama\u2019s own.<\/p>\n

For a while Obama toyed with the idea that Communist China also was a revolutionary presence that for too long had been stereotyped as an aggressive and thuggish disrupter, pitted against one-dimensional and rather boring U.S. Cold War allies like Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. But after China\u2019s cyber-attacks and regional bullying, Obama sort of left the scene, baffled by what exactly he had helped to conjure up \u2014 as Japan rearmed, South Korea adopted a new muscular policy toward North Korea, and our Pacific allies began to understand that there might no longer be a U.S. nuclear umbrella.<\/p>\n

In Latin America, chaos was likewise good. Hundreds of thousands trekked to El Norte once Obama rendered U.S. immigration law null and void and began issuing amnesties \u2014 the ingredients of a future political reordering of the American Southwest. Communist Cuba is courted, while the ongoing destruction of Venezuela is ignored, as are the democratic efforts of the handful of Latin American countries that still cling to a belief in consensual government rather than a dictator\u2019s notions of revolutionary mob justice. The hope of the first decade of this century that the stability and prosperity of a consensually governed Chile might spread throughout the continent is mostly defunct.<\/p>\n

In sum, U.S. foreign policy has become something like Obamacare, immigration law, or the deficit. Obama stirs things up, speaks truth to power, champions the dispossessed, seems bewildered at the ensuing mess, then gradually disconnects from the growing chaos, but seems smug nonetheless over the fact that something \u2014 what exactly he doesn\u2019t know or care \u2014 is at last in play. Forward we go to the next injustice, ripe for chaos and thus hope and change.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

President Obama applies the same principles abroad that he does at home. by Victor Davis Hanson\u00a0\/\/ National Review Online At home President Obama is well known for his preference for perceived parity over liberty. Most of his domestic agenda \u2014Obamacare, executive-order amnesties, open borders, near-zero interest rates, quantitative easing, the piling up of $9 trillion […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[46,196],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2gd","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1778,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/our-reset-reset-foreign-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":8693,"position":0},"title":"Our Reset Reset Foreign Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 15, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Almost every element of Barack Obama's once-heralded new \"reset\" foreign policy of a year ago has either been reset or likely soon will be. Consider Obama's approach to the 8-year-old war on terror. Plans made more than a year ago to shut down\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "March 2010"","block_context":{"text":"March 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/march-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8311,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/tom-cotton-tragic-hero\/","url_meta":{"origin":8693,"position":1},"title":"Tom Cotton, Tragic Hero","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 26, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Despite the value of his open letter, he will become Obama\u2019s scapegoat when the Iran negotiations inevitably fail. by Victor Davis Hanson\u00a0\/\/ National Review Online The snarky quip attributed to 19th-century French foreign minister Charles Maurice de Talleyrand \u2014 \u201cIt was worse than a crime; it was a blunder\u201d \u2014\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Mainstream Media"","block_context":{"text":"Mainstream Media","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/american-culture\/mainstream-media\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"images (1)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/images-1.jpeg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7521,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/our-future-is-1979\/","url_meta":{"origin":8693,"position":2},"title":"Our Future Is 1979","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Obama\u2019s foreign-policy weakness encourages our enemies and disheartens our allies.\u00a0 by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online The final acts of the Obama foreign policy will play out in the next two years. Unfortunately, bad things happen when the world concludes that the American president has become weakened, distracted,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The World"","block_context":{"text":"The World","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo of Jimmy Carter holding cabinet meeting 1977 photo by US National Archives","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/375px-Jimmy_Carter_convenes_a_cabinet_meeting_-_NARA_-_175123.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1115,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-george-w-bush-fixation\/","url_meta":{"origin":8693,"position":3},"title":"The George W. Bush Fixation","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 22, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Barack Obama remains fixated by George W. Bush. For nearly two years, President Obama and his team have prefaced their explanations for the tough economy, tough finances and tough situation abroad with a \"Bush did it\" chorus. Apparently, they believed that most of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "November 2010"","block_context":{"text":"November 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/november-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9231,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/how-america-lost-its-groove\/","url_meta":{"origin":8693,"position":4},"title":"How America Lost Its Groove","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 8, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"President Obama, Vice President Biden, and Secretary of State Clinton all had a hand in it. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Deterrence is lost through lax foreign policy, an erosion of military readiness, and failed supreme command \u2014 often insidiously, over time, rather than dramatically, at once.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Europe"","block_context":{"text":"Europe","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/europe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8942,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/rendezvous-with-reality-in-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":8693,"position":5},"title":"Rendezvous with Reality in 2016","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Tribune Media Services Changes of administrations usually mark dicey times in American foreign policy. But transitional hazards will never be greater than in 2016. Over a span of just a few months in mid-1945, new president Harry Truman lost all trust in Soviet Union strongman\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via NRO","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/pic_giant_021915_SM_ISIS-Putin-Iran-500x292.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8693"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8693"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8693\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8694,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8693\/revisions\/8694"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8693"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8693"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8693"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}