{"id":8555,"date":"2015-07-21T06:24:23","date_gmt":"2015-07-21T13:24:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=8555"},"modified":"2015-07-21T22:34:32","modified_gmt":"2015-07-22T05:34:32","slug":"obama-and-trump-two-of-a-kind","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-and-trump-two-of-a-kind\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama and Trump: Two of a Kind"},"content":{"rendered":"

Outwardly they couldn\u2019t be more different. But take a closer look.<\/em> <\/span><\/h3>\n
by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
\"Photo
Photo via NRO<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

P<\/span>resident Obama is said to feel liberated, in the sense that he can finally say what, and do as, he pleases \u2014 without much worry any more over political ramifications, including presidential and congressional elections. Obama\u2019s lame-duck presidency has now devolved into the progressive bully pulpit that his base always longed for. Of course, his editorializing and executive orders may worry Hillary Clinton \u2014 much as Donald Trump\u2019s pronouncements do his more circumspect Republican rivals.<\/p>\n

Trump is a celebrity who tweets and phones his praise of and insults to comedians, athletes, and media kingpins. But so does Obama love the celebrity world. He is comfortable with Jay Z and Beyonc\u00e9, picks the Sweet Sixteen on live television, and has reminded us that he\u2019s the LeBron of the Teleprompter, who won\u2019t choke under the spotlights. Both see pop culture and the presidency as a fitting together perfectly.<\/p>\n

Would the Chicago community-organizing cadre be that much different from the Trump Manhattan clique? Isn\u2019t big-city know-how key to \u201cfundamentally transforming\u201d the country? Is there that much difference between Trump\u2019s golden name tags and Obama\u2019 faux Greek columns, vero possumus<\/em>, \u201cWe are the ones we have been waiting for,\u201d and cooling the planet and lowering the seas?<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Would not Trump perhaps agree with this Obama assertion from 2008: \u201cI think that I\u2019m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters. I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I\u2019ll tell you right now that I\u2019m gonna think I\u2019m a better political director than my political director.\u201d Both men seem to believe that the presidency is dependent on ratings, something like The Apprentice<\/em>: \u201cIf I don\u2019t have this done in three years, then there\u2019s going to be a one-term proposition.\u201d<\/p>\n

In his current unbridled commentary and without worry over party politics, Obama has perhaps gone the full Trump \u2014 though in the opposite fashion of tossing out politically correct themes of the progressive Left, which lead to little concrete action. So Obama is Trump\u2019s doppelg\u00e4nger. The two see the world in similarly materialist \u2014 though, again, opposite \u2014 terms: Trump wants net worth to be the litmus test of political preparation (\u201cThe point is that you can\u2019t be too greedy<\/a>\u201d), even as Obama professes that big money is a Romney-like 1 percent disqualification. Obama\u2019s infamous communalistic quotes to the effect that you didn\u2019t build that, at some point you\u2019ve made enough money, and this is no time to profit are just bookends to Trump\u2019s money-is-everything ideas that he built everything, he\u2019s never going to make enough money, and it is always time to profit.<\/p>\n

On matters of race, liberals seem to like the fact that Obama no longer lectures so much about pathologies endemic in black communities, but now focuses on institutionalized bias, as if he is tired of scripted talk about the preservation of the family, the need for education, and the avoidance of illegitimacy and drug use. It is far easier to reduce all that down to institutional racism and legacy unfairness, much as Trump waves his hands about the next complex issue \u2014 trade, China, immigration, veterans\u2019 affairs \u2014 and tells his audiences that a distant \u201cthey\u201d and \u201cthem\u201d are the problem. The respective bases both love the message that someone else did it to us.<\/p>\n

The media rightly notice Trump\u2019s first-person \u2014 I, me, my, mine \u2014 overload, but that too is Obama\u2019s favorite kind of pronoun. The president often refers to his \u201cteam\u201d in narcissistic terms, as if the West Wing were a sort of Trump Tower. It is said that Trump is tasteless and gets into tit-for-tat squabbles or tosses out gross quips that are unpresidential. One wonders when Trump will make jokes about the Special Olympics, or about siccing lethal drones on the would-be suitors of his daughters. In any case, Trump handled NBC\u2019s Katy Tur in the same manner in which Obama dispensed with CBS\u2019s Major Garrett.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Trump was blasted for editorializing on the tragedy of Kate Steinle\u2019s murder at the hands of a seven-time felon and five-time-deported illegal alien. But that habit of seeking political resonance in individual tragedies bears the Obama imprimatur. Although the Steinle tragedy did not offer Obama the correct political calculus, he has sought to channel Ferguson, Baltimore, and mass school shootings as fuel for his own political agenda. So far Trump has not quite descended to the level of the president\u2019s use of a racial affinity with Trayvon Martin, although his quip about prisoners of war like John McCain being less than heroic comes close.<\/p>\n

More importantly, like Trump, Obama does not worry over inconsistency or bombast, and has no hesitation about insisting on things that not only are not, but perhaps could not be, true. Obamacare would, Obama assured the nation, lower premiums and deductibles, reduce the deficit, and allow Americans to keep their current doctors and plans, but in fact it did no such things. Obama repeatedly warned his supporters that our immigration law was unquestioned settled law, duly enacted by Congress, and that no president could unilaterally override it \u2014 a strange Freudian foretelling of exactly what the president would soon do. Reset with Russia was the proper corrective to George W. Bush\u2019s alienation of Vladimir Putin \u2014 only it was not, and instead ensured new levels of Russian\u2013American alienation. The post-Saddam Iraq was a great achievement; the country was now secure and self-reliant enough for American troops to leave \u2014 and then it just wasn\u2019t, after we skedaddled. How exactly did the \u201cjayvee\u201d ISIS team punch above its weight as the varsity? \u201cGuantanamo will be closed no later than one year from now.\u201d That was six years ago, and Guantanamo is still in business.<\/p>\n

Talks with Iran were originally supposed to have been predicated on anywhere, anytime inspections, no enrichment within Iran, real-time snap-back sanctions, and tough protocols about weapon purchases and subsidies for terrorists \u2014 until they really were not. Red lines were game changers, only they weren\u2019t \u2014 and they weren\u2019t even Obama\u2019s own red lines, but the U.N.\u2019s. Chlorine gas did not count as a WMD: it wasn\u2019t really a weaponized chemical agent at all. Trump\u2019s inconsistencies and contradictions so far are no more dramatic.<\/p>\n

Trump understandably envisions world leaders and foreign policy itself as World Presidents\u2019 Organization meetings of business pros like himself, who horse-trade to win their own constituents the better deal. Wheeler-dealers like Trump, we are to believe, are thus the most successful occupants of the Oval Office, especially when energized by savvy and innate charisma. The problem supposedly with our foreign policy is that bureaucrats and diplomats were never negotiators and dealers, and so got taken to the cleaners by far more clever and conniving foreign operators.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

But again, is Obama so different a spirit? He feels that his own winning charm and community-organizing skills can succeed with revolutionary leaders, in a way the political skills of a George W. Bush never could. Relations with Turkey hinged on a \u201cspecial friendship\u201d with Erdogan. Apparently, Obama felt that neo-Ottomanism, anti-Israel rhetoric, and increasing Islamization were mere proof of inevitable revolutionary turmoil, a good thing, but one that could be capitalized on only by someone like himself, who long ago was properly ideologically prepped. Ditto Obama\u2019s mythography of the Cairo speech before an audience that, on the White House\u2019s insistence, included members of the Muslim Brotherhood, or his outreach to Cuba and Iran (note his past silence about the 2009 green demonstrations in Iran). So if Obama has won over the world\u2019s one-time pariahs, maybe Trump can try the same first-person methodologies to coax the more business-minded prime ministers to our side. The self-absorbed idea of Trump outfoxing a Chinese kleptocrat is similar to that of Obama hypnotizing an Iranian theocrat.<\/p>\n

Donald Trump believes he can oversell America abroad in the manner of Chamber of Commerce boosterism; isn\u2019t that the twin to Obama underselling the country in the fashion of a wrinkled-browed academic? Both are stern moralists: America is too often shorted, and so Trump is angry over the sins of omission. For Obama, past genocide, racism, and imperialism vie as sins of U.S. commission.<\/p>\n

Would a Trump bragging tour be all that much different from an Obama apology tour? If, in politically incorrect style, it is implied that all immigrants are likely to be criminals, is that any sloppier or more politically motivated than the politically correct assumption that all are dreamers? Threatening to charge Mexico per illegal immigrant seems about as sensible as leaving the border wide open and nullifying existing immigration law.<\/p>\n

There is no need to elect Donald Trump; we\u2019ve already had six years of him.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Outwardly they couldn\u2019t be more different. But take a closer look. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online President Obama is said to feel liberated, in the sense that he can finally say what, and do as, he pleases \u2014 without much worry any more over political ramifications, including presidential and congressional elections. Obama\u2019s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[46],"tags":[997],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2dZ","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1809,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-too-little-too-late\/","url_meta":{"origin":8555,"position":0},"title":"Obama–Too Little, Too Late","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 1, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services The United States may very well owe a crushing $20 trillion by 2020. And thus President Obama last week named a bipartisan commission to find ways to address our national debt. Such a Periclean response might sound sincere and worthwhile. But it comes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "March 2010"","block_context":{"text":"March 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/march-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8118,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-a-one-man-revolution\/","url_meta":{"origin":8555,"position":1},"title":"Obama, a One-Man Revolution","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"In his \u201cfourth quarter,\u201d he feels free to ignore popular opinion, the rule of law, and Congress. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Until now there were two types of peaceful American change. One was a president, like Franklin D. Roosevelt or Ronald Reagan, working with Congress to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Politics"","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"pic_giant_122514_SM_Barack-Obama-G","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/pic_giant_122514_SM_Barack-Obama-G-500x292.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":3256,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-obama-enigma\/","url_meta":{"origin":8555,"position":2},"title":"The Obama Enigma","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 28, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Lame-duck Republican President Bush's dismal poll ratings have descended to those of Harry Truman's when he left office. The Democratic majority in Congress will probably widen after the election. Republican nominee John McCain has not run a dynamic campaign. Gen. Colin Powell, George\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "October 2008"","block_context":{"text":"October 2008","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2008\/october-2008\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2030,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-new-maiestas\/","url_meta":{"origin":8555,"position":3},"title":"Obama’s New Maiestas","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 19, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Ricochet.com There are a lot of disturbing \u2014 and ironic \u2014 things about the new Obama effort (AttackWatch.com) to monitor, hunt down, and attack his critics. It used to be a classically liberal idea that conservatives and liberals would debate policies, put their views out, and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Left"","block_context":{"text":"The Left","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/politics\/liberalism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1871,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-versus-obama\/","url_meta":{"origin":8555,"position":4},"title":"Obama versus Obama","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 27, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Will the real Barack Obama please stand up? by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online There is little need any more to offer consistent opposition to Barack Obama, since he himself is already running hard against the many previous incarnations of Barack Obama.\u00a0 The first one we met was Barack\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "January 2010"","block_context":{"text":"January 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/january-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":994,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/when-elections-fail-jihad\/","url_meta":{"origin":8555,"position":5},"title":"When Elections Fail, Jihad","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 31, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Jihad Watch The Obama administration supports \"democracy\" and \"self determination\" in the Middle East \u2014 two euphemisms that, in the real world, refer to \"mob-rule\" and \"Islamic radicalization,\" respectively. Yet, as\u00a0Jimmy Carter\u00a0recently put it: \"I don't have any problem with that [an \"Islamist victory\" in Egypt], and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Islam"","block_context":{"text":"Islam","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/islam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8555"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8555"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8555\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8557,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8555\/revisions\/8557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}