{"id":8405,"date":"2015-05-12T07:32:11","date_gmt":"2015-05-12T14:32:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=8405"},"modified":"2015-05-12T07:32:11","modified_gmt":"2015-05-12T14:32:11","slug":"the-first-and-a-half-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-first-and-a-half-amendment\/","title":{"rendered":"The First \u2014 and a Half \u2014 Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"
by Victor Davis Hanson\u00a0\/\/ National Review Online<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
\"Photo
Photo via NRO<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

F<\/span>ree speech and artistic and intellectual expression have been controversial Western traditions since the rise of the classical-Greek city-state. When our Founding Fathers introduced guarantees of such freedoms to our new nation, they were never intended to protect thinkers whom we all admire or traditionalists who produce beloved movies like The Sound of Music<\/em>.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The First Amendment to the Constitution instead was designed to protect the obnoxious, the provocative, the uncouth, and the creepy \u2014 on the principle that if the foulmouths can say or express what they wish and the public can put up with it, then everyone else is assured of free speech.<\/p>\n

Every time the West has forgotten that fact \u2014 from putting on trial cranky Socrates or incendiary Jesus to routinely burning books in the Third Reich \u2014 we have come to regret what followed. Censorship, of course, is never branded as extreme and dangerous, but rather as a moderate and helpful means to curb the hate speech of a bald, barefooted crank philosopher who pollutes young minds and introduces wacky and dangerous cults, or a hatemonger who whips innocent people in front of a temple in between his faked and hokey miracles, or traitorous Jews who scribble and call their first-grade art the equivalent of Rembrandt or their perverted sexual fantasies the stuff of Hegel. Banning free expression is never presented as provocative, but always the final act of an aggrieved and understandably provoked society.<\/p>\n

Lately, the West in general and America in particular seems to have forgotten the free-speech pillar of Western constitutional government. In 2012 an obscure Egyptian-born videomaker, Nakoula Nakoula, made an amateurish Internet video criticizing Islam. Innocence of Muslims <\/em>went global and viral. Violent demonstrations in the Islamic world followed. In an effort to placate Muslims, the Obama administration falsely blamed Nakoula\u2019s video for the storming of the American consulate in Benghazi. Leading the Obama pack was the opportunistic secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, who saw in Nakoula a convenient fall guy to explain away U.S. security lapses in Libya. In reality, the killing of Americans there was the preplanned work of an al-Qaeda terrorist affiliate that took advantage of absent-minded U.S. officials.<\/p>\n

No matter. President Obama scapegoated Nakoula at the United Nations \u2014 a majority of whose members ban free speech as a rule \u2014 with pompous promises that the prophet would not be mocked with impunity in the United States of America. Nakoula was suddenly arrested on a minor parole violation and jailed for over a year.<\/p>\n

No one seemed to care that the unsavory firebrand Egyptian had a constitutional right while legally resident in America to freely caricature any religion that he chose.<\/p>\n

The IRS under career bureaucrats like Lois Lerner targeted non-profit groups on the basis of their perceived political expression. The best strategy now for stifling free speech is to arbitrarily substitute the word \u201chate\u201d for \u201cfree\u201d \u2014 and then suddenly we all must unite to curb \u201chate speech.\u201d The effort is insidious and growing, from silly \u201ctrigger warnings\u201d in university classes about time-honored classics that trendy and mostly poorly educated race\/class\/gender activists now think contain hurtful language and ideas, to the common tactic of shouting down campus speakers or declaring them to be dangerous \u201cextremists\u201d who traffic in \u201chate speech\u201d if their politics are deemed insufficiently progressive.<\/p>\n

\"Cartoons<\/p>\n

M<\/span>ore recently, the anti\u2013sharia\u00a0law activist Pamela Geller organized a conference of cartoonists in Texas to draw caricatures of the prophet Mohammed \u2014 in the fashion of the Paris cartoonists who were killed at the offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo<\/em>.<\/p>\n

As in the French case, jihadists showed up to murder the cartoonists. This time, however, two brave and skilled local Texas policemen stopped their attempts at mass murder.<\/p>\n

What followed the botched assassination attempt, however, was almost as scary. Commentators \u2014 both left-wing multiculturalists and right-wing traditionalists, from talk radio and Fox News to MSNBC and Salon<\/em> \u2014 blasted Geller for supposedly stirring up religious hatred.<\/p>\n

Geller, and not the jihadists who sought to kill those with whom they disagreed, was supposedly at fault. Her critics could not figure out that radical Muslims object not just to caricatures and cartoons, but to any <\/em>iconographic representation of Mohammed. Had Geller offered invitations to artists to compete for the most majestic statue of the Prophet, jihadists might still have tried to use violence to stop it. Had she held a beauty pageant for gay Muslims or a public wedding for gay Muslim couples, jihadists would certainly have shown up. Had she offered a contest for the bravest Islamic apostates, jihadists would have galvanized to kill the non-believers. Had she organized a support rally for Israel, jihadists might well have tried to kill the innocent, as they did in Paris when they murderously attacked a kosher market.<\/p>\n

Geller\u2019s critics also do not understand that radical Islam has already cut a huge swath out of American free speech through more than a decade of death threats. Ever since 9\/11, they have largely succeeded by demanding special rules for public discourse about Islam in a way accorded no other religion. Disagree, and one is branded \u201cIslamophobic,\u201d as that now-ubiquitous buzzphrase \u201chate speech\u201d magically pops up. Of course, when other so-called artists have desecrated Christian images, they operated on the belief not just that they would not be harmed, but that, as in \u201cPiss Christ,\u201d they would actually be subsidized by the U.S. government.<\/p>\n

O<\/span>ne wonders what the current apologists would have said about Nazi book burning. Did not Freudian writers and modern artists grasp that their work would offend traditional National Socialists who sought only to bring back balance to artistic and literary expression? Why then would they continue to produce abstract paintings or publish Jungian theories about sexual repression, when they must have known that such works would only provoke blood-and-soil Nazis? And had Jews just left Germany en masse by 1935 or gone into hiding, would not Hitler have cooled his anti-Semitic rhetoric? Why did some Jews insist on staying in a clearly Aryan nation, when they must have known that their ideas \u2014 indeed, their mere presence \u2014 could only provoke Nazis to violence?<\/p>\n

Apparently there is no longer a First Amendment as our Founders wrote it, but instead something like an Orwellian Amendment 1.5.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Apparently there is no longer a First Amendment as our Founders wrote it, but instead something like an Orwellian Amendment 1.5, which reads: \u201cCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press \u2014 except\u00a0if someone finds some speech hurtful, controversial, or not helpful.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

Cowardice abounds. When artists and writers mock Mormonism in a Broadway play like the Book of Mormon <\/em>or use urine or excrement to deface Christian symbols, no Christian gang seeks to curb such distasteful expression \u2014 much less to kill anyone. Every religion but Islam knows that its iconography is fair game for caricature in the United States; none sanctions assassins. Jihadists seek to make this asymmetry quite clear to Western societies and thereby provide deterrence that gives Islam special exemption from Western satire and criticism in a way not accorded to other religions. And they are enabled by Westerners who prefer tranquility to freedom of expression.<\/p>\n

Among those who attack free expression the most loudly are progressives who do not like politically incorrect speech that does not further their own agendas. The term \u201cillegal alien,\u201d an\u00a0exact description of foreign nationals who entered and reside in the United States without legal sanction, is now nearly taboo. The effort to ban the phrase is not because it is hateful or inaccurate, but because it does not euphemistically advance the supposedly noble cause of\u00a0amnesties and open borders. Of course, the politically correct restrictionists have no compunction about smearing their critics with slurs such as xenophobe, racist, or nativist.<\/p>\n

If a Christian cake decorator does not wish to use his skills to celebrate gay marriage \u2014 an innovation that both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama opposed until very recently \u2014 on a wedding cake, then he is rendered a homophobe who must be punished for not using his artistic talents in the correct way.<\/p>\n

Note that we are not talking\u00a0about nondiscrimination concerning fundamental civil rights such as voting, finding housing, using\u00a0public\u00a0facilities, or purchasing standard merchandise. Meanwhile, are we really prepared to force gay bakers to decorate Christian wedding cakes with slogans that they find offensive or homophobic? Or to insist that an Orthodox Jewish baker must prepare a cake for a Palestinian wedding featuring a map of the Middle East without Israel? Or to require a black-owned catering company to cook ribs for a KKK group? Instead, radical gays demand the exclusive right to force an artist \u2014 and a cake decorator is an artist of sorts \u2014 to express himself in ways that they deem correct.<\/p>\n

Without free speech, the United States becomes just another two-bit society of sycophants, opportunists, and toadies who warp expression for their own careerist and political agendas. How odd that we of the 21st century lack the vision and courage of our 18th-century Founders, who warned us of exactly what we are now becoming.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson\u00a0\/\/ National Review Online Free speech and artistic and intellectual expression have been controversial Western traditions since the rise of the classical-Greek city-state. When our Founding Fathers introduced guarantees of such freedoms to our new nation, they were never intended to protect thinkers whom we all admire or traditionalists who produce beloved […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[225,145,11,230],"tags":[1003],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2bz","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":68,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-war-between-the-amendments\/","url_meta":{"origin":8405,"position":0},"title":"The War Between the Amendments","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 22, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services The horrific Newtown, Conn., mass shooting has unleashed a frenzy to pass new gun-control legislation. But the war over restricting firearms is not just between liberals and conservatives; it also pits the first two amendments to the US Constitution against each other. Apparently,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Political Culture"","block_context":{"text":"Political Culture","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/american-culture\/political-culture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":413,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-first-amendment-vs-multiculturalism\/","url_meta":{"origin":8405,"position":1},"title":"The First Amendment vs. Multiculturalism","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 8, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online The American Left used to champion free expression. We were lectured \u2014 correctly \u2014 that the price of being repulsed by occasional crude talk and art was worth paying. Only that way could Americans ensure our daily right to criticize those with greater\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Political Culture"","block_context":{"text":"Political Culture","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/american-culture\/political-culture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10777,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/10777-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":8405,"position":2},"title":"From an Angry Reader: So,\u2026","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"From an Angry Reader: So, let me get this this right; you have the freedom to express your First Amendment Rights (your opinion article), the neo-nazi can express their first amendment rights (as they did this weekend in Charlottesville), but \u201cmultimillionaire young players, mostly in their 20s\u201d cannot. If this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Angry Reader"","block_context":{"text":"Angry Reader","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/angry-reader\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11893,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/would-president-joe-biden-become-25th-amendment-material\/","url_meta":{"origin":8405,"position":3},"title":"Would President Joe Biden Become 25th Amendment Material?","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness Ispeculate only because since January 2017 our popular culture and intelligentsia have suggested President Trump is crazy and should be removed under the 25th Amendment. Apparently, accusations about the mental health of presidents and would-be presidents are now legitimate political attack strategies under the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "2020 Election"","block_context":{"text":"2020 Election","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/2020-election\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12450,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/putins-best-laid-plans-for-lifetime-rule\/","url_meta":{"origin":8405,"position":4},"title":"Putin’s best-laid plans for lifetime rule","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The following article is from my colleague Paul Roderick Gregory in The Hill Vladimir Putin\u00a0cannot afford to be an ex-president. Any successor will blame him for all that is wrong in Russia. There would be a mad dash to recoup (divide) his billions stashed offshore. He might even face international\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":96,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/second-term-reckonings\/","url_meta":{"origin":8405,"position":5},"title":"Second Term Reckonings","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 19, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media A\u00a0rule of the modern age: all confident, reelected presidents trip up in the second term. LBJ was sunk by Vietnam. Reagan faced Iran-Contra. Bill Clinton had his comeuppance with Monica. George W. Bush was overwhelmed with the Iraqi insurgency and Katrina. And Obama will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Political Culture"","block_context":{"text":"Political Culture","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/american-culture\/political-culture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8405"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8405"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8405\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8407,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8405\/revisions\/8407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8405"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8405"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8405"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}