{"id":8255,"date":"2015-03-03T08:31:27","date_gmt":"2015-03-03T16:31:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=8255"},"modified":"2015-03-03T08:31:27","modified_gmt":"2015-03-03T16:31:27","slug":"finding-the-great-republican-hope","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/finding-the-great-republican-hope\/","title":{"rendered":"Finding the Great Republican Hope"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 class=\"article_title\"><em>The GOP can\u2019t win in 2016 by thinking inside the box.<\/em><\/h3>\n<div class=\"blog_author\">by Victor Davis Hanson\u00a0\/\/ <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/article\/414708\/finding-great-republican-hope-victor-davis-hanson?target=author&amp;tid=900280\" target=\"_blank\">National Review Online<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"print_text\">\n<figure id=\"attachment_8256\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-8256\" style=\"width: 453px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"8256\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/finding-the-great-republican-hope\/pic_fb_030315_debate\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/pic_FB_030315_debate.jpg?fit=600%2C600&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"600,600\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"pic_FB_030315_debate\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;Photo via NRO&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/pic_FB_030315_debate.jpg?fit=500%2C500&amp;ssl=1\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/pic_FB_030315_debate.jpg?fit=600%2C600&amp;ssl=1\" class=\" wp-image-8256\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/pic_FB_030315_debate.jpg?resize=453%2C453&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"Photo via NRO\" width=\"453\" height=\"453\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/pic_FB_030315_debate.jpg?resize=500%2C500&amp;ssl=1 500w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/pic_FB_030315_debate.jpg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/pic_FB_030315_debate.jpg?resize=250%2C250&amp;ssl=1 250w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/pic_FB_030315_debate.jpg?w=600&amp;ssl=1 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 453px) 100vw, 453px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-8256\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo via NRO<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span class=\"drop\">T<\/span>he usual criteria for political success \u2014 plenty of New York and Washington IOUs, youthful vigor, good looks, glibness, access to lots of money \u2014 aren\u2019t sufficient any longer to galvanize the Republican party or get out the conservative vote. Instead, the next Republican nominee should meet four criteria that are rarely mentioned.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"article_subhead\">MEDIA OGRE<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\nBeing liked by the media is no plus. In the 2008 primaries the media preferred John McCain as a reasonable moderate, at least compared with the primary alternatives, and in 2012 they preferred Mitt Romney. Once the primaries were over, both candidates reverted to their prior demonic status among journalists.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>So why not nominate a Republican who never addresses a celebrity journalist as \u00a0\u201cCandy,\u201d or \u201cKatie,\u201d or \u201cBrian,\u201d or \u201cGeorge,\u201d but instead politely says Mr. this or Ms. that, avoiding any suggestion of either intimacy or paranoid dislike. Distanced formality is the key with the media.<\/p>\n<p>The candidates\u2019 own desire to appear accommodating to the press has led mostly to media contempt. For a while in 2008 we were treated to wild charges that John McCain had had an affair; debate moderator Candy Crowley interrupted the give-and-take to join sides with Barack Obama. Romney\u2019s sins were supposedly impolite behavior as a high-schooler and putting a pet in a cage on his car roof. He also did not say hello often enough to his trash collector. The next nominee should not just expect to be disliked by the New York\/Washington-nexus press, but must learn to welcome that disdain as honorific rather than cower before it. Here the key would be to question the premise and motive of typical gotcha questions rather than to give the sort of logical answers that will be selectively edited to appear pejorative. By and large, journalists are more bullies than geniuses. They tend to be toadyish, not principled and courageous. Playing by their rules and seeking their approval are suicidal for any conservative candidate.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"article_subhead\">COMBATIVE<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\nBeing combative \u2014 and liking it \u2014 is critical. One can be combative without being obnoxious. Any Republican who seriously wishes to balance the budget, close the border and end illegal immigration, reform the tax code, address government unions, revisit entitlements, and restore muscularity abroad must be prepared to be hated. Millions of Americans are invested in the present tax-and-spend government, in big deficits and huge debt, in open borders, and in paying no federal income taxes. They will not quietly concede such advantages, but will smear and slander any who seek to reform the system and, by extension, the unsustainable policies that nonetheless are popular with millions. The preferred candidate will have to put up with shouting union protesters, be amused by op-eds alleging callous cruelty, and expect violent disruptions when he speaks \u2014 as proof of his steady success. <em>Wanting to be liked is a prescription for disaster<\/em>. Every time an accommodating Republican candidate tries to reach out, his generosity is seen as weakness to be taken advantage of, not magnanimity to be reciprocated.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"article_subhead\">EXPERIENCE RUNNING THINGS<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\nIt is an old canard that governors make better presidents than senators. Instances of former governors who were successful as presidents and others who were utter failures are both easy to adduce. Still, there is something to be said for having managed something \u2014 something other than a government staff or bureau \u2014 and for not being either a lawyer or a senator. Neither of those latter jobs offers much experience in balancing a budget, hiring good people and firing bad, making a profit, and building things, as opposed to critiquing or nuancing them. So, this time around, we might look for three additional diverse criteria in a candidate: no Ivy League degree, no tenure as a U.S. senator, and no law degree. Ivy League lawyers and Washington insiders like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry know little about foreign policy, less about the economy \u2014 and nothing about the law.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"article_subhead\">A MAN OR WOMAN OF THE PEOPLE<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\nIn 2008 the elitist Barack Obama turned John McCain into an old fuddy-duddy who could not remember how many houses his billionaire wife had purchased \u2014 unfair but effective. In 2012 we heard ad nauseam not about Obama\u2019s elite tastes, his pompous golfing, or his obsession with entertainers, professional jocks, and other celebrities, but only about Mitt Romney\u2019s cars, his elevators, and his wife\u2019s purebred mounts. Of course, that was demagoguery, given that the backbone of the present Left is blue 1-percenter counties and billionaire megadonors. Nonetheless, nominating someone who did not marry into a fortune or make hundreds of millions on Wall Street might offer a pleasant change. Let Hillary suffer the wages of political dynasty, cashing in, and a multimillion-dollar Clinton stock portfolio. Even scenes of George W. Bush in 2004 cutting brush on his ranch trumped John Kerry windsurfing in spandex. Cannot the Republicans \u2014 who now represent the middle classes much more than the 1 percent \u2014 find a candidate from modest circumstances who cannot be smeared as a product of privilege when he demands collective sacrifice, balanced budgets, and entitlement reform? To beat Hillary, one must be the un-Hillary.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">*\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *<\/p>\n<p>Where do these quirky requirements leave us? Right now, with someone more like Scott Walker than Jeb Bush. And I\u2019ll leave it at that until we see more action in the arena in the months ahead.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The GOP can\u2019t win in 2016 by thinking inside the box. by Victor Davis Hanson\u00a0\/\/ National Review Online The usual criteria for political success \u2014 plenty of New York and Washington IOUs, youthful vigor, good looks, glibness, access to lots of money \u2014 aren\u2019t sufficient any longer to galvanize the Republican party or get out [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[247,11,185],"tags":[992],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-299","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9415,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/hillarys-neoliberals\/","url_meta":{"origin":8255,"position":0},"title":"Hillary\u2019s Neoliberals","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 22, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Some Republicans have cultural and political affinities that are pulling them away from Trump and toward Clinton. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/National Review Online Many elections redefine political parties. The rise of George McGovern\u2019s hard-left agenda in 1972, followed later in the decade by Jimmy Carter\u2019s evangelical liberalism, drove centrist\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Campaign 2016&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Campaign 2016","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/campaign-2016\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2228,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-lefts-selective-outrage\/","url_meta":{"origin":8255,"position":1},"title":"The Left&#8217;s Selective Outrage","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 11, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPage Magazine You know liberals are edging toward a full Jonestown-style meltdown when someone as smart as New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman starts losing it. Last week Friedman worked himself up into a paranoiac frenzy over the tone of some of the criticism Obama and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Bruce S. Thornton&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9181,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/hillary-vs-trump-godzilla-vs-king-kong\/","url_meta":{"origin":8255,"position":2},"title":"Hillary Vs. Trump: Godzilla Vs. King Kong?","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 22, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Works and Days by PJ Media When and if it comes down to a vote for one of just two candidates in the remaining Republican primaries, a majority may still vote for Ted Cruz, which at this point I think is the far wiser course.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Trump&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"king_kong_godzilla_trump_hillary_article_banner_3-20-16-1.sized-770x415xc","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/king_kong_godzilla_trump_hillary_article_banner_3-20-16-1.sized-770x415xc-500x269.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9605,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-trump-won\/","url_meta":{"origin":8255,"position":3},"title":"Why Trump Won","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 14, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ Defining Ideas \u00a0 Throughout the course of the 2016 election, the conventional groupthink was that the renegade Donald Trump had irrevocably torn apart the Republican Party. His base populism supposedly sandbagged more experienced and electable Republican candidates, who were bewildered that a \u201cconservative\u201d would dare to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;The Clintons&quot;","block_context":{"text":"The Clintons","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-clintons\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9622,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/trumps-bizarre-winning-formula\/","url_meta":{"origin":8255,"position":4},"title":"Trump\u2019s Bizarre Winning Formula","author":"Megan Ring","date":"November 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Reformulating the Republican message, Donald Trump was able to exploit political mistakes that the Democrats have made. The Democratic party handed Donald Trump a rare opportunity to make radical changes to the electoral map that could last for years to come. First,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Trump&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5699,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/iraq-a-convenient-scapegoat\/","url_meta":{"origin":8255,"position":5},"title":"Iraq a Convenient Scapegoat","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 4, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Bring up Iraq \u2014 and expect to end up in an argument. Conservatives are no different from liberals in rehashing the unpopular war, which has become a sort of whipping boy for all our subsequent problems. The Wall Street Journal\u00a0columnist Peggy Noonan recently\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Iraq&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Iraq","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/iraq\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8255"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8255"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8255\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8257,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8255\/revisions\/8257"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}