{"id":820,"date":"2012-04-19T23:22:06","date_gmt":"2012-04-19T23:22:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com.108-166-28-151.mdgnetworks.com\/wordpress\/?p=820"},"modified":"2013-04-17T17:03:15","modified_gmt":"2013-04-17T17:03:15","slug":"why-nato-still-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-nato-still-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"Why NATO Still Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n

Defining Ideas<\/em><\/p>\n

Germany\u2019s financial dominance may be worrisome, but is it a threat to European peace?<\/p>\n

The first Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the sober and judicious British Lord Ismay, famously remarked that the purpose of the controversial new postwar alliance would be \u201cto keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.\u201d<\/p>\n

Over the next sixty-six years of NATO\u2019s existence, most in the Atlantic Alliance assumed that the first commandment was obvious, the second one was taken for granted, and the third would soon be irrelevant. No longer.<\/p>\n

With the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, few worry anymore about an invasion from a shrinking Russia. America\u2019s recent loud announcements of a shift in strategic focus to Asia, coupled with continual cutbacks in troop levels within Europe, reflect, in trans-Atlantic terms, a new American desire to \u201clead from behind.\u201d We saw that shift in the recent Libyan war, when the Obama administration outsourced America\u2019s historic leading role in NATO to a militarily weak Great Britain and France, while predicating the legitimacy of the alliance\u2019s intervention on United Nations directives (which were almost immediately exceeded when found bothersome to operations).<\/p>\n

The alliance has recently not fared too well elsewhere. The effort in Afghanistan was to be the Obama administration\u2019s \u201cgood war\u201d (compared to Iraq) that would showcase NATO solidarity. Instead, we saw bickering European nations seeking to either evade or end their participation in the war. Note that Germany did not participate in Libya, and at home is facing fierce opposition to the continued presence of its shrinking contingent in Afghanistan.<\/p>\n

Consequently, if Russia is by default out, and America is now only sort of in, how about the once forgotten third NATO axiom \u201cto keep the Germans down\u201d? After all, to read the southern Mediterranean newspapers today is to learn of the near-hatred directed at German bankers, who are now dubbed the new \u201cGautleiters\u201d of an ascendant \u201cFourth Reich\u201d that is supposedly doing by finance what it could not do in two lost World Wars. As Germans assume de facto financial control of Europe, images of Germans wearing swastikas are becoming daily fare in the popular Athenian press. Given how politically correct Europe is, it is eerie to watch how quickly all the old stereotypes reemerge in the popular culture, from the uncivilized Volk across the Rhine, which was never tamed by the Romans, to the \u00dcbermenschen who goose walk wherever they please.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
America\u2019s active participation in NATO is now more critical than ever.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

As the European Union begins to unravel, 120 million in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain owe trillions of Euros mostly to some 80 million Germans. Human nature being what it is, the debtors are not about to apologize for their own unsustainable entitlements, tax avoidance schemes, bloated bureaucracies, and dismal productivity, much less even to explain their debts. Most likely, two or three of the four debtor nations will default, tear apart the European Union, and blame the ensuing mess on German greed and imperiousness.<\/p>\n

For Germany, the stereotype of the lazy Mediterranean is now as frequently assumed as it is rarely so crassly expressed. The anger in popular German culture is best summed up as something like, \u201cThey all want to enjoy what Germans have without working like Germans.\u201d The old resentments of the late 1930s \u2014 that the weaker in Europe seek to find ways to tie down the stronger Germany \u2014 are resurfacing. Fortunately so far, we have a circumspect Angela Merkel and a booming German economy, not an Austrian corporal amid hyperinflation, whipping up the masses smarting from recent military defeat.<\/p>\n

Of course, few in Germany are likely to confess that there was a sort of rigged German mercantilism at work over the last twenty years: the task of bringing southern and eastern European members up to Western European standards fell to German, Austrian, Scandinavian, and French banks lending the Mediterranean bloc enough money to buy mostly German goods and services \u2014 everything from Mercedes heavy equipment to Siemens electronics. All these dubious debts were then to be covered by a suitably large collective European Union.<\/p>\n

German financial dominance might be worrisome, but it is not\u00a0ipso facto<\/em>\u00a0a threat to European peace \u2014 yet. The worry instead is that a historically rich and economically powerful Germany will eventually translate its money into political influence and military superiority \u2014 and Europe will either give way or erupt. The Franco-Prussian War was roughly coterminous with the unification of Germany. After World War I, the myth of a \u201cstab in the back\u201d \u2014 that an undefeated German army was still on the offensive on the soil of foreign countries \u2014 ensured that Germans never came to grips with the looming truth that another six months of war would have destroyed their country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Russia is not quite out, America is not quite in, and Germany is on the rise.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The crime of Versailles, then, was not so much punitive treatment of a defeated Germany, but a failure to occupy the country, monitor forced democratization, and decouple more than a few parts of East Prussia from the German Empire \u2014 a mistake not repeated after World War II, when anti-Versailles accords led to permanent US bases in the country, a new democracy, and a division of Germany into two countries, with sizable losses of territory to Poland, France, and Czechoslavakia. More than a half-century of peace followed.<\/p>\n

In short, the common threat of the Soviet Union to NATO members, the stand-off between East and West Germany, and, later, the creation of the European Union all seemed in serial fashion to have put an end for good to the perennial \u201cGerman problem\u201d \u2014 a supposedly politically-incorrect artifact of a long ago Neanderthal age that had once believed in nefarious things like \u201cnational character\u201d and \u201cblood and soil.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yet today, Germany is as unified as it was between 1871\u20131945, a far more volatile period in European history than was the era between 1946 to the present. The European Union is dissolving. There are really no traditional means of deflecting natural German ambitions except for NATO, which finesses a great deal of historical anomalies that otherwise might soon loom large. Why, for example, is the richest, most scientifically advanced, and largest European country not nuclear, while a far weaker France and Great Britain are \u2014 especially given emerging threats like a soon-to-be nuclear Iran?<\/p>\n

Why should Germany be punished for its productivity and thrift when its debtors are forgiven for their siestas and profligacy? Why did Germany at its own expense \u2014 perhaps at a cost of as much as $2 trillion \u2014 rebuild Eastern Germany, while the entire European Union, Germany most prominently, was charged with subsidizing southern and eastern European modernization?<\/p>\n

With Russia not quite out, America not quite in, and Germany quite up, European disunity looms large, especially given not just the failure of the European Union, but the bitter acrimony and vast social dislocations that will accompany its implosion \u2014 turmoil that might make the Balkan nightmare of the 1990s look tame in comparison. In that context, keeping non-nuclear German defense integrated within NATO and assuring its continued protection with a sizable US presence on the ground are as critical now as in 1946. Oil-rich Russia is out, but not entirely down, and it offers Germany far more trade advantages than does most of Europe, which in the future cannot pay for what it would like to keep borrowing. Like it or not, eastern Europe is sandwiched between a Russia and Germany that have more in common trade-wise than either has with what lies in between.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Expect two or three of Europe’s debtor nations to default.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

There are other growing NATO worries. Greece is not just the most notorious of the insolvent EU debtor nations, and the most notably angry at present German lenders and past occupiers, but it is also the most vulnerable. It traditionally offered NATO key bases aimed at keeping the southern European flank safe from the Soviets, once eager to seek influence in North Africa, the Middle East, and the Mediterranean.<\/p>\n

That now defunct role always masked less remembered historical flashpoints.<\/p>\n

Greece\u2019s historical rivalry with its former Ottoman occupier Turkey was adjudicated by having both countries inside NATO. That way, their shared rivalries in Cyprus, around the Greek islands, and in the airspace over the Aegean remained incidents rather than wars \u2014 although they nonetheless nearly fought each other over Cyprus in 1974.<\/p>\n

Now? The old fault lines are returning. A large, ascendant, and increasingly Islamist Turkey no longer has a desire to join the dissolving European Union and acts far more like a friend to Iran and the Palestinians than an ally to the nations within NATO. There is a lot of history here, too. Germany has traditionally been a friend of Turkey and an enemy of Greece. The result now is that without a strong NATO, a broke and weak Greece remains the object of ridicule from most of Europe, and will soon be unable to sustain its own military at levels to achieve deterrence. If Turkey were tomorrow to move into Cyprus, or against a disputed Aegean island, or claim oil finds in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean, Greece could do nothing and most likely would find Germany siding with its historical ally rather than a despised debtor. NATO alone could manage to put a veneer of unity over a growing disunity between its members.<\/p>\n

The role of NATO \u2014 and America\u2019s participation in it \u2014 is now more critical than ever, both to protect a relatively disarmed and insolvent Europe from foreign pressures \u2014 but, even more importantly, to help protect twenty-first-century Europeans from themselves.<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a92012 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson Defining Ideas Germany\u2019s financial dominance may be worrisome, but is it a threat to European peace?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[154],"tags":[12,115,1015,1050,331,1047,169,1032,1056,1037,1030,1072],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-de","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9257,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/is-nato-worth-preserving\/","url_meta":{"origin":820,"position":0},"title":"Is NATO worth preserving?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 25, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Tribune Media Services Donald Trump recently ignited another controversy when he mused that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was obsolete. He hinted that it might no longer be worth the huge American investment.In typical Trump style, he hit a nerve, but he then offered few details\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8011,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-end-of-nato-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":820,"position":1},"title":"The End of NATO","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 14, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Defining Ideas Declaring the North Atlantic Treaty Organization dead has been a pastime of analysts since the end of the Cold War. The alliance, today 28-members strong, has survived 65 years because its glaring contradictions were often overlooked, given the dangers of an expansionist and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Defining Ideas"","block_context":{"text":"Defining Ideas","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/defining-ideas\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7749,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-end-of-nato\/","url_meta":{"origin":820,"position":2},"title":"The End of NATO?","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 7, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Major existential problems mean the organization may soon unravel. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Istanbul\u00a0\u2014 April marked the 65th birthday of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, formed at the height of the Cold War to stop the huge post-war Red Army from overrunning Western Europe. NATO in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The World"","block_context":{"text":"The World","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/pic_giant_080714_SM_NATO-Flag-DT-500x291.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":11284,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/natos-challenge-is-germany-not-america\/","url_meta":{"origin":820,"position":3},"title":"NATO\u2019s Challenge Is Germany, Not America","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review As the most populous and most affluent of European nations, Germany insidiously dominates Europe During the recent NATO summit meeting, a rumbustious Donald Trump tore off a thin scab of niceties to reveal a deep and old NATO wound \u2014 one that has predated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Germany"","block_context":{"text":"Germany","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/germany\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10360,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/lord-ismay-nato-and-the-old-new-world-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":820,"position":4},"title":"Lord Ismay, NATO, and the Old-New World Order","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review \u00a0 What has become of the prescient post-WWII dictum \u2018Russians out, Americans in, Germans down\u2019? \u00a0 The accomplished and insightful British general Hasting Ismay is remembered today largely because of his famous assessment of NATO, offered when he was the alliance\u2019s first secretary general.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "EU"","block_context":{"text":"EU","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/eu\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11616,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/strategika-issue-56-the-defense-of-europe\/","url_meta":{"origin":820,"position":5},"title":"Strategika Issue 56: The Defense of Europe","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"European Defense Please read a new essay by my colleague, Angelo M. Codevilla\u00a0in Strategika. Europe was never a full partner in its own defense. The very question\u2014Will Europe ever fully partner with the U.S., or will the European Union and NATO continue to downplay the necessity of military readiness?\u2014is no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Europe\"","block_context":{"text":"Europe","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/tag\/europe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/820"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=820"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/820\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":822,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/820\/revisions\/822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}