{"id":8139,"date":"2015-01-14T09:16:12","date_gmt":"2015-01-14T17:16:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=8139"},"modified":"2015-01-14T09:16:12","modified_gmt":"2015-01-14T17:16:12","slug":"book-review-prime-directive-check-out-sci-phi-journal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/book-review-prime-directive-check-out-sci-phi-journal\/","title":{"rendered":"Book Review: Prime Directive- Check Out Sci Phi Journal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Prime Directive: Check Out Sci Phi Journal<\/em><\/h4>\n

by Craig Bernthal<\/p>\n

The shelves of drugstores and news stands used to be crowded with \u201cpulp\u201d science fiction magazines: Fantastic Stories, Astounding Science Fiction, Galaxy Science Fiction, Amazing Stories, Fantasy and Science Fiction,<\/em> all of which sold for very little and provided a lot of entertainment. Many of them started in the 1920s and featured wonderfully lurid covers of giant flies attacking battleships or luscious blonds being carted away or molested by robots, green aliens, or perhaps just posing in front of a rocket ship. They shared shelf-space with a similar array of detective, mystery, western, and romance publications. In the twenties or thirties, at the height of their popularity, some of these magazines sold up to a million copies per issue. America and Britain had some great writers who got their start in pulp fiction or wrote it: Isaac Asimov, Ray Bradbury, Raymond Chandler, Philip K. Dick, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Rudyard Kipling, Elmore Leonard and H. G. Wells, to name a few. Pulp fiction was a national writing workshop, providing an enormous market for new writers, and the product was not just formulaic. A great editor, like John W. Campbell of Astounding Science Fiction<\/em> provoked wonderful, imaginative stories. This scene has now been replaced by the insipid university MFA writing program, which aims to produce sensitive stories for liberal professors, and pulp has given way to innumerable English Dept. journals. What a bad trade! We no longer see the successors to Hemingway, Faulkner, Fitzgerald, or even Updike and Roth. American fiction has become the Oprah book club.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Given this, I am to happily announce the birth of a new venue for the un-MFA\u2019d story: Sci Phi Journal<\/em>, edited by Jason Rennie. You can buy Sci Phi<\/em> on Amazon for $3.99 an issue. It publishes bi-monthly, and the first three issues are out. (The cover art, by the way, is beautiful.) May it start a trend, a rebirth of the popular short story magazine, requiring an on-line drugstore to hold them all.<\/p>\n

The premise of Sci Phi Journal <\/em>is to present science fiction stories and essays about science fiction that are especially aimed at exploring philosophy, which of course includes politics. I was delighted to find so many good stories and essays in the first issues. I\u2019ve never read an anthology in which I thought every entry enjoyable, but I found enough here to keep me happy.<\/p>\n

Two stories and two essays represent that magazine at its best. First, the stories. Peter Sean Bradley, an attorney in Fresno, CA is an avid science fiction reader and reviewer. In \u201cGhosts,\u201d issue 2, Bradley imagines a world in which most of the \u201cpeople\u201d we interact with are algorithms whom we can see only with \u201cI\u201d glasses\u2014an extension of Google glasses\u2014that allow us to see and interact with a more of less fabricated world that corresponds with our desires. The hero\u2019s wife aborted the child that would have been their son, so now he has a relationship with an algorithmic son, 16, only visible through the glasses. The story grows out of a wedding between his half-sister and a shopping mall (yes, she\u2019s marrying a shopping mall, which is represented as human by another algorithm). The story is a Swiftian send-up of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy\u2019s proclamation in Planned Parenthood v. Casey<\/em>, that \u201cAt the heart of liberty is the right to define one\u2019s own concept of existence, of meaning. Of the universe, and of the mystery of human life. . .\u201d The story takes off from two contemporary reference point: the argument that we can define marriage in any way we want, and the proliferation of people living in the virtual world of headphones and cell phones, even as they navigate sidewalks and roads. Bradley asks, what if you put the shoe on the other foot and produced a universe to correspond with your meaning? The reversal demonstrates that Kennedy\u2019s statement is more fantastic than Bradley\u2019s story, and this is what science fiction at its best does for us: it changes our perspective just enough to show us the distortions in our own ideas and behavior. The story provokes pity in the reader, pity for the lonely solipsism which the protagonist realizes he is trapped in.<\/p>\n

Another story, among several that impressed me, was Lou Antonelli\u2019s \u201cOn the Spiritual Plain\u201d (issue 2), about a planet on which, because of its peculiar electro-magnetic characteristics, one\u2019s ghost (soul ? spirit?) becomes visible after death. Here the protagonist is a Methodist minister who first encounters the phenomenon when a workman is killed in an accident, and the ghost visits him. The story poses more questions than it attempts to answer, as the Methodist minister with the help of an alien \u201cshaman,\u201d for want of a better word, shepherds \u201cJoe McDonald\u2019s\u201d soul to a place where it can leave the planet and \u201cdissipate.\u201d The story does not attempt to make a statement about the afterlife, but is a poetic meditation on of the process of dealing with death. All of the stories have a \u201cFood for Thought\u201d section at the end, which draws one\u2019s attention to the philosophical issues involved. I have not decided yet whether these are more limiting than helpful. A good story speaks for itself in ways which only stories can speak. I found this story more evocative than the \u201cFood for Thought\u201d section that followed.<\/p>\n

In the essay section, which is about half of Sci Phi Journal<\/em>, one of my favorites was James Druley\u2019s \u201cStar Trek\u2019s<\/em> Prime Directive: Moral Guidelines, Exceptions, and Absolutes.\u201d The Prime Directive was a fecund producer of plot ideas for Star Trek<\/em> writers and clearly a reacton in the original Star Trek<\/em> to our Vietnam intervention and of our current concerns over colonialism and genocide. Simply stated, the Prime Directive tells Star Trek officers not to interfere with the development of less technologically developed societies. To quote Captain Picard, “The Prime Directive is not just a set of rules. It is a philosophy, and a very correct one. History has proven again and again that whenever mankind interferes with a less developed civilization, no matter how well intentioned that interference may be, the results are invariably disastrous.”<\/p>\n

Druley, who teaches Logic, Ethics, and World Religions at Reedley College, uses the Prime Directive, its development and exceptions, to present a beautifully clear and thorough lesson on absolute v. relative moral guidelines. Bringing in Kant and Hobbes, Druley argues that their grounding of an absolute ethics is too shallow to have a reliable impact on behavior. There must be a deeply felt, internalized component of any absolute morality. He then examines religious grounding, Ideal Observer theory, and suggests that God, as the Ideal observer, is the only sure foundation for ethics. Star Trek furnishes a narrative backdrop for discussing these issues, joining philosophical abstractions to the concreteness of narrative. This is a great way to teach basic philosophical issues.<\/p>\n

Finally, there is John C. Wright\u2019s essay, \u201cProphetic and Atropaic Science Fiction.\u201d Wright\u2019s main goal in this essay is to distinguish science fiction from prophecy, and he does it by using a pagan source, Oedipus,<\/em> and a biblical source, Jonah. Oedipus shows that no man escapes his fate and Jonah, the opposite, that man can use his free will to amend his life. They speak from two opposite moral perspectives. Science fiction is more on Jonah\u2019s side. It is a very American art form, optimistic about our chances of living better, decent lives if we work at it. Science fiction writers believed we would have moon bases by now (2001: A Space Odyssey<\/em>) or be exploring Mars; Wright notes that we have not done these things because they were out of reach, technologically, but because social engineers decided to spend the money otherwise, and here he becomes prophetic himself:<\/p>\n

The problem, not to put too fine a point on the question, was that we had too many social engineers, that is socialists, here on Earth, and their promotion of a vision of the unworkable worker\u2019s paradise composed of a collective they crave was at odds with the workable but imperfect free market democracy composed of individuals.<\/p>\n

The collective requires doubtful, fearful and effeminate men. It requires men conditioned to think that asking for permission from the state before acting is normal. It requires men who think of licking the boot of a bureaucrat as an annoying but necessary trifle; men who think nothing wrong with disarming themselves upon request; going into infinities of debt upon request; surrendering their children to be educated by incompetent ideologues upon request. . .<\/p>\n

If we are no longer pursuing the dreams of space exploration, it is perhaps because we are also no longer the kind of people who have the dreams that powered science fiction as a literary genre. You don\u2019t find paragraphs like these in America\u2019s Best Fiction<\/em> or America\u2019s Best Essays.<\/em> Sci Phi<\/em> promises a venue for marginalized conservative voices in at least one genre.<\/p>\n

Sci Phi<\/em> is a diamond in the rough. It needs better proofreading. It does have some stories that are clunkers. But its first issues are impressive and fun. If you are tired of the current state of American fiction, Oprah\u2019s book club, the MFA program mass-produced, academically orthodox sensitive read, then this may be for you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Prime Directive: Check Out Sci Phi Journal by Craig Bernthal The shelves of drugstores and news stands used to be crowded with \u201cpulp\u201d science fiction magazines: Fantastic Stories, Astounding Science Fiction, Galaxy Science Fiction, Amazing Stories, Fantasy and Science Fiction, all of which sold for very little and provided a lot of entertainment. Many of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[87,842,199],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-27h","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":896,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/weaponized-romanticism\/","url_meta":{"origin":8139,"position":0},"title":"Weaponized Romanticism","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 18, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Craig Bernthal Private Papers At the beginning of the 20th century, T. E. Hulme, in his great essay \u201cRomanticism v. Classicism\u201d defined Romanticism as \u201cspilt religion.\u201d It was religion unchanneled by any theology that acknowledged humanity\u2019s proclivity toward evil and its debilitating effects: warped perception and stupidity. Instead, what\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Craig Bernthal"","block_context":{"text":"Craig Bernthal","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/craig-bernthal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":639,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-positive-role-of-negative-feedback\/","url_meta":{"origin":8139,"position":1},"title":"The Positive Role of “Negative Feedback”","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 15, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Craig Bernthal Private Papers \u201cYou can always count on Americans to do the right thing \u2014 after they\u2019ve tried everything else.\u201d\u00a0 Winston Churchill One of Victor Hanson\u2019s most persuasive arguments about why democracies have an advantage over despotisms in fighting wars is that democracies are much more likely to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Education"","block_context":{"text":"Education","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/education\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5520,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-symphony-unheard\/","url_meta":{"origin":8139,"position":2},"title":"A Symphony Unheard","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 24, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"Go see\u00a0The Nativity Story by Craig Bernthal Private Papers Here is the plot and the theme: God creates the universe, not because he needs to, since he is complete in himself, but as an act of gratuitous love. Being omniscient as well as omnipotent, he knows before the initial instant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Craig Bernthal"","block_context":{"text":"Craig Bernthal","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/craig-bernthal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5368,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/paying-the-piper\/","url_meta":{"origin":8139,"position":3},"title":"Paying the Piper","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 13, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Craig Bernthal Private Papers Temperance is not high in the current list of American virtues. We are the 9th most obese people on earth, according to the World Health Organization, with 74% of American\u2019s over 15 identified as overweight.On the expressway, hulking pickups and humvees blast by sports cars.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Craig Bernthal"","block_context":{"text":"Craig Bernthal","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/craig-bernthal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":380,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-abortion-question-vice-presidential-responses-fall-short\/","url_meta":{"origin":8139,"position":4},"title":"The Abortion Question: Vice Presidential Responses Fall Short","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 31, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Craig Bernthal Private Papers Martha Raddatz: \u201cThis debate is, indeed, historic. We have two Catholic candidates, first time, on a stage such as this. And I would like to ask you both to tell me what role religion has played in your own personal views on abortion.\u201d A fair\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Women"","block_context":{"text":"Women","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/women\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5355,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/leaving-the-new-episcopal-church\/","url_meta":{"origin":8139,"position":5},"title":"Leaving the New Episcopal Church","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 17, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Craig Bernthal Private Papers Most Christians in America probably don\u2019t know much about what is happening in the Episcopal Church (TEC). It is very small in comparison with the Roman Catholic Church, the Southern Baptist Convention, or the new, \u201cnon-denominational\u201d neighborhood churches, whose campuses dwarf small towns; and TEC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Craig Bernthal"","block_context":{"text":"Craig Bernthal","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/craig-bernthal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8139"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8139"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8140,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8139\/revisions\/8140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}