{"id":7974,"date":"2014-11-04T07:57:07","date_gmt":"2014-11-04T15:57:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=7974"},"modified":"2014-11-04T07:57:07","modified_gmt":"2014-11-04T15:57:07","slug":"sizing-america-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/sizing-america-up\/","title":{"rendered":"Sizing America Up"},"content":{"rendered":"

In today\u2019s foreign-relations climate, even a Jimmy Carter would seem like a godsend.<\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n
by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online<\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\"(Pool
(Pool Image\/Getty)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

A<\/span> weak, lame-duck Barack Obama, who has now eroded a once exuberant Democratic party, will be even weaker in the next two years.<\/p>\n

If Democratic senators who had been his stalwart supporters \u2014 voting with him over 97 percent of the time \u2014 campaigned on not wanting any connection with Obama, one can imagine what our enemies abroad think of him. If Obama adopted policies of neo-appeasement when he enjoyed a 65 percent approval rating in 2009, one can imagine his approach when his positives dip below 40 percent. But there is no need for imagination when Ali Younesi, the senior adviser to the Iranian president, bluntly dismisses Obama as \u201cthe weakest of U.S. presidents\u201d and sums up his six years in office as \u201chumiliating.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

What is dangerous about Younesi\u2019s cruel dismissal of Obama is not that an Iranian high official despises an American president, but that such venom follows an extraordinary effort by Barack Obama to reach out to Tehran. Obama ran in 2008 on a promise to hold face-to-face talks with the Iranian theocracy. He kept mum in the spring of 2009 when a million anti-Khomeini Iranians hit the streets. He leaked occasional unhappiness at any Israeli idea of preempting the Iranian nuclear program. He ignored his own serial \u201cdeadlines,\u201d demanding that Iran stop further uranium enrichment. He lifted the comprehensive sanctions to stop enrichment. And he is now stealthily courting Iran as a de facto ally in the American war against the Islamic State.<\/p>\n

Given Obama\u2019s ending of the special relationship with Israel (has a high Obama-administration official ever dubbed Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Fidel Castro, Hugo Ch\u00e1vez, Vladimir Putin, or Kim Jong-un \u201ca chickens\u2014\u201d or trashed any of them in an open-mike putdown?), there is little likelihood that any state will move to preempt the Iranians\u2019 effort to develop a bomb (for the politically obsessed Obama there would be no political upside any longer, given that after today there will be no more general elections during his tenure).<\/p>\n

Accordingly, it is more than likely that in the next two years Iran will become a nuclear power. That fact will immediately change the Middle East. Iran\u2019s getting a bomb will ensure that Iraq and Lebanon become its clients, encourage radical Shiite movements in the Gulf, and push Gulf monarchies and other Sunni \u201cmoderates\u201d into even more openly supporting radical terrorist Sunni groups, as they pool resources to obtain their own nuclear deterrent.<\/p>\n

By deliberately having a high administration official leak disparaging slurs against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu \u2014 from slandering the war veteran as \u201ca chickens\u2014\u201d to claiming that he suffers from Asperger\u2019s syndrome (in the spirit of the president\u2019s earlier joke about the Special Olympics) \u2014 the Obama administration is green-lighting more Palestinian adventurism in the Middle East. Just as our special relationship with Recep Erdogan encouraged Turkey to whip up hostility, so too the constant harangue against Israel will convince militants that another intifada or rocket barrage against Israel is tacitly not opposed by the Obama administration. After all, if two high officials can, without consequences, smear Netanyahu to a useful journalist, why would not radical Palestinians believe that with a wink and a nod the Obama administration is supporting their \u201ccause\u201d against a supposedly cowardly and autistic Israel?<\/p>\n

By cutting defense expenditures to a projected level below 3 percent of GDP, while demonstrating his lack of interest in NATO, Obama has all but ended the alliance. When Americans spend less than 3 percent on defense, then the Europeans will assume that they can regress to 1 percent.<\/p>\n

Our special relationship with Recep Erdogan\u2019s Islamist Turkey has been all one-way. Turkey no longer extends its bases for joint American-Turkish contingencies, but it has invoked Article IV of the NATO charter three of the four times it has been used. Any war that Turkey might find itself in, whether real or rhetorical, against Greece, Greek Cyprus, Armenia, the Kurds, or Israel would find most Americans sympathizing with Turkey\u2019s enemies. No American would wish to die on behalf of an Islamist Turkey crushing weaker and mostly pro-Western peoples.<\/p>\n

Privately, NATO members must hope that if Vladimir Putin moves against the Baltic States, none of the bullied will cite Article V. If they did, the call probably would not be honored, at least to any great degree, which would lead to the formal end of NATO. Indeed, NATO\u2019s future is more in Putin\u2019s hands than in Obama\u2019s.<\/p>\n

The new triangulation with Putin by once staunchly pro-Western nations in Eastern Europe is a reminder that friendship with Putin is preferable to neglect from Obama. The Eastern Europeans provide a blueprint of what to expect of our Pacific allies. An increasingly aggressive China will take the role of Putin, assuming that such a window of opportunity for profitable aggrandizement may not open again. Japan, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, and perhaps even Australia and New Zealand will keep asking Washington for reassurances that they remain safely within the U.S. defense perimeter and that their seas and airspace will remain sacrosanct. If these reassurances are not given, they will quietly consider either going nuclear or making the necessary concessions to China to salvage a Potemkin autonomy.<\/p>\n

The complete pullout from Iraq in 2011, with the subsequent empowerment of the Islamic State, is a model for Afghanistan in 2015. The Taliban is currently as quiet as the Islamic State was in 2010, patiently waiting to overwhelm the country and dish out the customary savage reprisals. Such a reckoning will cement the notion that partnering with the U.S. is about the most dangerous thing that a Middle Eastern country can do.<\/p>\n

The deer-in-the-headlights Obama reactions to the Ebola crisis and the so-called lone-wolf Islamist terrorists remind the world that a particular sort of political correctness overrides American realism about even our national security. When the U.S. government seems less concerned with protecting its own citizens and more worried about losing its politically correct multicultural fides, then most of our enemies assume, even if wrongly, that they are not going to face an angry, unpredictable, and devastating response to their aggression.<\/p>\n

Trivialities can become iconic: Obama once shut down U.S. travel into Tel Aviv\u2019s Ben Gurion airport, but did not curtail U.S. connecting flights to and from Liberia \u2014 the common denominator not being security worries as much as multicultural politics. Just as the Obama administration was confused about the Islamic State (from \u201cjayvee\u201d to \u201cmanageable problem\u201d to existential threat), confused about the Free Syrian Army (from \u201camateurs\u201d to the foundation of our ground strategy against the Islamic State), confused about post-American Iraq (\u201csecure,\u201d \u201cstable,\u201d \u201cgreatest achievement\u201d), and confused about Ebola (little chance of infection in the U.S., no need to restrict flights, need to restrict arrivals to targeted airports, no quarantines, some quarantines, etc.), so too our enemies will believe that we are confused about their intent and actions.<\/p>\n

The danger from Islamist terror in the next two years is not that Obama might not reply strongly to it (he might well, given a Republican Congress and overwhelming public sentiment), but that he has clumsily given indications (the apology tour, the mythographies about Islam, the loud remonstrations with Israel, the surreal euphemisms about jihadist violence, the inane commentary about Islamism from CIA Director John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, the outreach to Hamas, etc.) that he envisions \u201croot causes\u201d that prompt understandable violence. Such impressions, again whether legitimate or not, will only encourage more terrorist attempts in the upcoming two years, which will ultimately demand risky responses, in a fashion that transcends Obama\u2019s preference for drone executions.<\/p>\n

Six years of open borders, coupled with fraudulent statistics about enforcement, have changed the American Southwest. For all practical purposes, there is no longer a secure southern border or a definable notion of U.S. citizenship. For the sake of adding to the pool of future Obama constituents, we are losing the very notion of an autonomous United States with a sacrosanct legal system and national sovereignty. If Mexico were shorn of its romance, then its behavior would be seen more as that of a belligerent than as that of a friend. Its policy toward the United States is patently anti-American: ship across the border its own impoverished peoples against U.S laws, thereby winning billions of dollars in remittances, transferring billions of dollars in social-services costs from Mexico to the U.S., creating a powerful pro-Mexican expatriate constituency inside the U.S., and avoiding needed social reform at home by exporting potential dissidents. Unless we end illegal immigration, adopt meritocratic, ethnically blind, and more limited legal immigration, and return to assimilationist practices, a new buffer state neither quite Mexican nor quite American will replace much of the present landscape of the Southwest.<\/p>\n

Finally, an additional $7 trillion<\/em> of national debt, continued $600 billion\u2013plus budget deficits after <\/em>tax hikes and sequestration, huge increases in entitlements and government regulations, and the failed stimuli of zero interest rates, big deficits, and government expansion all suggest to enemies that at some point soon the U.S. will not have the wherewithal to defend its interests even if it wished to. Or is it worse than that? The move to European social democracy by intent ensures that there will be fewer dollars for defense, as in Europe \u2014 and that, in the eyes of the Obama administration, is a good thing, consistent with an overriding therapeutic view of human nature. Hard powers like the Chinese, Iranians, jihadists, and Russians all welcome the new U.S. preference for EU-like soft power.<\/p>\n

After the election we will be entering one of the most dangerous phases of U.S. foreign relations since the late 1970s. The problem is not just that there are no Ronald Reagans around, but that even a Jimmy Carter would now seem like a godsend.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In today\u2019s foreign-relations climate, even a Jimmy Carter would seem like a godsend. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online A weak, lame-duck Barack Obama, who has now eroded a once exuberant Democratic party, will be even weaker in the next two years. If Democratic senators who had been his stalwart supporters \u2014 voting […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[28,59,167,846,154,285,46,196],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-24C","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1589,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/our-chief-confessor\/","url_meta":{"origin":7974,"position":0},"title":"Our Chief Confessor","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 2, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services The first duty of national leaders is to worry about the self-interest of their own countries; utopian internationalism can come later. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, despite her soaring European Union rhetoric, is relearning that lesson. German voters in a recent parliamentary election rebuked\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "June 2010"","block_context":{"text":"June 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/june-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7721,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/our-russia-experts\/","url_meta":{"origin":7974,"position":1},"title":"Our Russia Experts","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 30, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online - The Corner One of the more depressing things in watching Vladimir Putin is the manner in which Russian \u201cexperts\u201d at home have for years now all but cheered him on. In the latest\u00a0Nation\u00a0magazine, Stephen Cohen has written one of the most\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Russia"","block_context":{"text":"Russia","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/europe\/russia\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8176,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-does-have-a-strategy\/","url_meta":{"origin":7974,"position":2},"title":"Obama Does Have a Strategy","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 3, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Once you see what he is trying to accomplish, it all makes sense. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online The Wise People of American foreign policy \u2014 Madeleine Albright, General Jack Keane, Henry Kissinger, General James Mattis, George Shultz, and others \u2014 recently testified before Congress. Their candid\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Obama Administration"","block_context":{"text":"Obama Administration","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/obama-administration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"(Win McNamee\/Getty)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/pic_giant2_020315_SM_Barack-Obama-G-500x292.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9797,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/when-normalcy-is-revolution\/","url_meta":{"origin":7974,"position":3},"title":"When Normalcy Is Revolution","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Trump\u2019s often unorthodox style shouldn\u2019t be confused with his otherwise practical and mostly centrist agenda. By 2008, America was politically split nearly 50\/50 as it had been in 2000 and 2004. The Democrats took a gamble and nominated Barack Obama, who became the first\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2861,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/europe-got-obama-now-what\/","url_meta":{"origin":7974,"position":4},"title":"Europe Got Obama–Now What?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 6, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services \"Yes, we can!\" Germans shouted in unison with candidate Barack Obama at their Victory Column in Berlin this past summer. To judge by the crowds and European media, most Europeans were as ecstatic about the coming of the Obama presidency as they were\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "April 2009"","block_context":{"text":"April 2009","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2009\/april-2009\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10602,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/allegations-of-foreign-election-tampering-have-always-rung-hollow\/","url_meta":{"origin":7974,"position":5},"title":"Allegations of Foreign Election Tampering Have Always Rung Hollow","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Blaming foreign influence on an election loss has become a habitual practice for unsuccessful presidential candidates, but such allegations have never rung true. On her current book tour, Hillary Clinton is still blaming the Russians (among others) for her unexpected defeat in last year\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "George W. Bush"","block_context":{"text":"George W. Bush","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/george-w-bush\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7974"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7976,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974\/revisions\/7976"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}