{"id":7749,"date":"2014-08-07T07:33:48","date_gmt":"2014-08-07T14:33:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=7749"},"modified":"2014-08-07T07:35:42","modified_gmt":"2014-08-07T14:35:42","slug":"the-end-of-nato","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-end-of-nato\/","title":{"rendered":"The End of NATO?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Major existential problems mean the organization may soon unravel.<\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n
by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online<\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\"Photo
Photo via Dreamstime<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Istanbul<\/i>\u00a0\u2014 April marked the 65th birthday of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, formed at the height of the Cold War to stop the huge post-war Red Army from overrunning Western Europe.<\/p>\n

NATO in 1949 had only twelve members, comprising Western Europe, Canada, and the United States. Its original mission was simple. According to the alliance\u2019s first secretary general, Lord Hastings Ismay, NATO was formed \u201cto keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a0Western Europeans were terrified of the Soviet Union, which had just gobbled up all of Eastern Europe. They feared that the American army would go home after World War II, just as it had after World War I, consistent with its isolationist past. And the war-torn democracies were scared that Germany might quickly rebound to prompt yet another European war for the fourth time in less than a century.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Sixty-five years later, the Cold War has been won and has now been over for a quarter-century. Germany is quite up. The Russians are not so out. America seems not to want to be in anywhere.<\/p>\n

Those paradoxes prompt some questions. Is NATO even needed in the 21st century? Can it survive its new agendas and missions?<\/p>\n

Article 5 of the NATO charter calls for all members of the organization to come to the aid of a fellow member if it is attacked. Article 4 is a watered-down version that obligates NATO members to consult on mutual defense when asked by a threatened member.<\/p>\n

Oddly, these two articles were never put into play during the nuclear dangers of the Cold War. They have been invoked only fairly recently \u2014 mostly for terrorist attacks, Middle East crises, and fear of Russian president Vladimir Putin.<\/p>\n

\u00a0An aging and tired NATO now suffers from three existential problems. Perhaps none are fatal in isolation. But when they are taken together, it is easy to see how NATO might soon unravel or be rendered irrelevant.<\/p>\n

First, the military weakness of Europe has long meant that for all practical purposes, NATO is ATO \u2014 the American Treaty Organization. The European Union may have a gross domestic product and population larger than the United States, but on average its members spend far less than half of what America budgets for defense.<\/p>\n

American protection of Europe has made Europeans reluctant to sacrifice some of the good life for their own defense. Being rich and weak is a dangerous combination. Worse, the subsidy has created European feelings of resentment toward the more powerful American big brother.<\/p>\n

Second, Putin has compromised many NATO members through Russia\u2019s many lucrative gas and oil deals. What would happen if Russia spread its aggression from Georgia, Ukraine, and Crimea to other former Soviet republics? Tiny NATO member Estonia, with its large Russian minority, would seem a likely next candidate for Putin\u2019s machinations.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Russian intervention in Estonia probably would not prompt NATO to invoke Article 5. Or, if it did, it is dubious whether all NATO members would go to war to save an independent Estonia, which is nestled right next to St. Petersburg.<\/p>\n

It is said that Putin fears provoking NATO. More likely he will soon seek to wreck it by deliberately bullying weak and distant NATO members like Estonia, over whose independence Europeans are unlikely to start a war.<\/p>\n

Third, the expansion from twelve to the current 28 members vastly complicated the alliance\u2019s responsibilities \u2014 and vulnerabilities. To paraphrase Frederick the Great, protecting everything now means often protecting nothing. Turkey is now becoming an obvious problem.<\/p>\n

Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is in his eleventh year of undermining Turkish democracy and Islamicizing the country. Erdogan is a friend of anti-American and soon-to-be-nuclear Iran. He despises democratic Israel and is unashamedly pro-Hamas.<\/p>\n

Erdogan also has had various beefs with war-torn neighbors Syria and Iraq. Occasionally he has intervened against semi-autonomous and pro-American Kurdistan.<\/p>\n

Turkey still has territorial disputes with fellow NATO member Greece in the Aegean and over Cyprus. Erdogan still resents being turned down for European Union membership.<\/p>\n

If Erdogan\u2019s growing rivalries ever escalated into real wars, it is likely that many NATO members would more readily sympathize with his enemies. Yet Erdogan has exercised Article 4 more than any other NATO member.<\/p>\n

NATO is not fully supported financially or militarily by its own members. Its expansion has created obligations that it has no intention of honoring, nor the ability to do so. And it has members whose politics and policies are becoming antithetical to the original idea of defending the liberal values of democratic Western Europe.<\/p>\n

One day soon we will wake up and NATO will have simply vanished with a whimper.<\/p>\n

\u00a9 2014 Tribune Media Services, Inc.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Major existential problems mean the organization may soon unravel. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Istanbul\u00a0\u2014 April marked the 65th birthday of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, formed at the height of the Cold War to stop the huge post-war Red Army from overrunning Western Europe. NATO in 1949 had only twelve members, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[848,167,846,154,99],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-20Z","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9257,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/is-nato-worth-preserving\/","url_meta":{"origin":7749,"position":0},"title":"Is NATO worth preserving?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 25, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Tribune Media Services Donald Trump recently ignited another controversy when he mused that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was obsolete. He hinted that it might no longer be worth the huge American investment.In typical Trump style, he hit a nerve, but he then offered few details\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8011,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-end-of-nato-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":7749,"position":1},"title":"The End of NATO","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 14, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Defining Ideas Declaring the North Atlantic Treaty Organization dead has been a pastime of analysts since the end of the Cold War. The alliance, today 28-members strong, has survived 65 years because its glaring contradictions were often overlooked, given the dangers of an expansionist and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Defining Ideas"","block_context":{"text":"Defining Ideas","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/defining-ideas\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11616,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/strategika-issue-56-the-defense-of-europe\/","url_meta":{"origin":7749,"position":2},"title":"Strategika Issue 56: The Defense of Europe","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"European Defense Please read a new essay by my colleague, Angelo M. Codevilla\u00a0in Strategika. Europe was never a full partner in its own defense. The very question\u2014Will Europe ever fully partner with the U.S., or will the European Union and NATO continue to downplay the necessity of military readiness?\u2014is no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Europe\"","block_context":{"text":"Europe","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/tag\/europe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11660,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/strategika-issue-56-the-defense-of-europe-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":7749,"position":3},"title":"Strategika Issue 56: The Defense of Europe","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"European Defense Please read a new essay by my colleague, Angelo M. Codevilla\u00a0in Strategika. Europe was never a full partner in its own defense. The very question\u2014Will Europe ever fully partner with the U.S., or will the European Union and NATO continue to downplay the necessity of military readiness?\u2014is no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Europe"","block_context":{"text":"Europe","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/europe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11284,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/natos-challenge-is-germany-not-america\/","url_meta":{"origin":7749,"position":4},"title":"NATO\u2019s Challenge Is Germany, Not America","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review As the most populous and most affluent of European nations, Germany insidiously dominates Europe During the recent NATO summit meeting, a rumbustious Donald Trump tore off a thin scab of niceties to reveal a deep and old NATO wound \u2014 one that has predated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Germany"","block_context":{"text":"Germany","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/germany\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10699,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/nato-for-the-21st-century-ensuring-liberal-democracy-in-europe\/","url_meta":{"origin":7749,"position":5},"title":"NATO For the 21st Century: Ensuring Liberal Democracy In Europe","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"NATO was originally founded after World War II to ensure that liberal democracy survived in Europe. While the fall of the Soviet Union may have led many to question whether NATO was still necessary, its mission remains vital and relevant. NATO should resist the temptation to expand its geographic focus.\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7749"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7749"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7749\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7753,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7749\/revisions\/7753"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7749"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7749"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7749"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}