The gangster state of North Korea became a nuclear power in 2006\u201307, despite lots of foreign aid aimed at precluding just such proliferation \u2014 help usually not otherwise accorded such a loony dictatorship. Apparently the civilized world rightly suspected that, if nuclear, Pyongyang would either export nuclear![\"481px-Trident_C4_first_launch\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/481px-Trident_C4_first_launch.jpg?resize=240%2C300&ssl=1\")
material and expertise to other unstable countries, or bully its successful but non-nuclear neighbors \u2014 or both.<\/p>\n
The United States has given billions of dollars in foreign aid to Pakistan, whose Islamist gangs have spearheaded radical anti-American terrorism. Ever since a corrupt Pakistan went nuclear in 1998, it has been able to extort such foreign-aid payouts \u2014 on fears that one of its nukes might end up in the hands of terrorists.<\/p>\n
By any measure of economic success or political stability, without nuclear weapons Pakistan would not warrant either the cash or the attention it wins.<\/p>\n
An observant Iran appreciates three laws of current nuclear gangbanging:<\/p>\n
1. Nuclear weapons earn a reputation.<\/p>\n
2. The more loco a nuclear nation sounds, the more likely it is that civilized states will fear that it is not subject to nuclear deterrence, and so the more likely that they will pay bribes for it to behave. Gangbangers always claim they have nothing to lose; their more responsible intended targets have everything to lose.<\/p>\n
3. As of yet there are no 100 percent effective nuclear-defense systems that can guarantee non-nuclear powers absolute safety from a sudden attack. The nuclear gangbanger, not the global police, currently has the upper hand.<\/p>\n
Again, the actual bombs are not the problem. We do not worry about a nuclear but democratic Israel or France. We are not even bothered by a hostile but non-nuclear Cuba or Venezuela. The combination of a bomb with a rap sheet is what changes all diplomatic and strategic considerations.<\/p>\n
It would be hard to contain a nuclear Iran with bribes, as we have so far handled Pakistan \u2014 and in the past North Korea as well. In both cases, we have had some help. Nuclear neighbor India assists in warning Pakistan to behave. A nervous Chinese overlord is amused by North Korean troublemaking \u2014 but only up to the point at which North Korea might threaten China\u2019s vital export markets.<\/p>\n
In contrast, only one of Iran\u2019s two enemies \u2014 Israel \u2014 is nuclear. Its wealthier,\u00a0Sunni Saudi Arabian rival is not.<\/p>\n
When Iran goes nuclear, one of two things will follow. Either its Arab rivals will buy nuclear weapons from Pakistan to ensure that Iran does not bully them for political concessions \u2014 on matters of oil production and pricing, autonomy for Shiite minorities, and an end to non-belligerency with Israel \u2014 or the Sunni powers will accept Iran\u2019s hegemony in order to win exemption from its episodic lunatic threats of Armageddon. Either way, the Middle East will become a far more dangerous place.<\/p>\n
There is yet another side to the nuclear gangbangers: the reaction of non-nuclear democratic civilized states that must live with their occasional existential threats.<\/p>\n
Australia, Japan, the Philippines, South Korea, and Taiwan have the expertise, but so far have not had the need, to become nuclear states. Up to now, they have all felt that America\u2019s power was overwhelming\u00a0and its security guarantees were ironclad.<\/p>\n
In addition, nuclear China and Russia were not so threatening after the end of the Cold War. The expense, the odium, and the memories of horrific wars made nuclear proliferation unimaginable.<\/p>\n
All that could soon change. The one constant in American foreign policy over the last five years is that the administration\u2019s game changers, red lines, and deadlines proved mostly negotiable. Meanwhile, China is beginning to translate its economic success into military adventurism, in the same manner as imperial Japan did in the late 1920s and early 1930s.<\/p>\n
The more nuclear powers there are, the less resistance there is to the addition of a new one. War would not necessarily be inevitable in the China Sea should there soon be five or six nuclear powers with a presence in the region, rather than the present China, U.S., and North Korea. But the odds of conflict would increase \u2014 and the ability of the United States to ensure calm would diminish even further.<\/p>\n
So far we have talked of democratic nuclear powers containing, coaxing, or bribing outlaw nuclear gangsters to be reasonable \u2014 or threatening military force to disrupt their nuclear programs before they come on line.<\/p>\n
Yet just as likely looms the sudden growth in the nuclear family of responsible powers, who at present have no sure source of deterring nuclear renegades. Would a rich but non-nuclear Germany always count on a retrenching U.S., a fickle nuclear France, bribes, or diplomacy to convince theocratic Iran to turn its missiles in a different direction? And if Iran has a bomb, why not Turkey? Or, for that matter, Brazil?<\/p>\n
In such a nuclear club of 20 or more, rather than the present nine nuclear powers, border disputes, religious rivalries, ideological antagonisms, and terrorism could all escalate not just to regional wars, but to the end of 21st-century culture itself.<\/p>\n
Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and the author, most recently, of \u00a0<\/em>The Savior Generals<\/a><\/span>. You can reach him by e-mailing\u00a0author@victorhanson.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a9 2013 Tribune Media Services, Inc.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Hostile countries with nuclear capabilities have the upper hand on the global police. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online\u00a0 The gangster state of North Korea became a nuclear power in 2006\u201307, despite lots of foreign aid aimed at precluding just such proliferation \u2014 help usually not otherwise accorded such a loony dictatorship. Apparently the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[393],"tags":[1063,1034,912,1071,169,1076,1074,162],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1Md","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5808,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/irans-north-korean-furture\/","url_meta":{"origin":6833,"position":0},"title":"Iran’s North Korean Furture","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 16, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services The idea of a nuclear Iran \u2014 and of preventing a nuclear Iran \u2014 terrifies security analysts. Those who argue for a preemptive strike against Iran cannot explain exactly how American planes and missiles would take out all the subterranean nuclear facilities without\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "North Korea"","block_context":{"text":"North Korea","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/north-korea\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10716,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/who-gets-to-have-nuclear-weapons-and-why\/","url_meta":{"origin":6833,"position":1},"title":"Who Gets to Have Nuclear Weapons \u2014 and Why?","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review \u00a0 The rules used to be controlled by two big powers, but not anymore. \u00a0 Given North Korea\u2019s nuclear lunacy, what exactly are the rules, formal or implicit, about which nations may have nuclear weapons and which may not? \u00a0 It is complicated. \u00a0\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "China"","block_context":{"text":"China","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/china\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4135,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-no-nukes-for-iran\/","url_meta":{"origin":6833,"position":2},"title":"Why No Nukes for Iran?","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 17, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"The rules of the game. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online How many times have we heard the following whining and yet received no specific answers from our leaders? \"Israel has nuclear weapons, so why single out Iran?\" \"Pakistan got nukes and we lived with it.\" \"Who is to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "February 2006"","block_context":{"text":"February 2006","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2006\/february-2006\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3080,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/adios-pakistan\/","url_meta":{"origin":6833,"position":3},"title":"Adios, Pakistan","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 19, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson NRO's\u00a0The Corner \u201cI don\u2019t care if someone is giving us money; we are not a purchasable commodity. We cannot be bought. We can live in hunger, but we won\u2019t compromise our national interests.\u201d \u2013 Bashir Bilour, a Pakistani senior minister, in angry response following an al-Qaeda\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Pakistan"","block_context":{"text":"Pakistan","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/pakistan\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":864,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/irans-win-win-win-bomb\/","url_meta":{"origin":6833,"position":4},"title":"Iran’s Win, Win, Win Bomb","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 3, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Iran, if not stopped, will join the nuclear club, probably within two or three years. It may be stupid to try to preempt Iran; it may be even stupider not to try. But the stupidest assumption of all is that either Iran is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Iran"","block_context":{"text":"Iran","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/iran\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11097,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/washingtons-fantasies-are-not-peoples-reality\/","url_meta":{"origin":6833,"position":5},"title":"Washington\u2019s Fantasies Are Not People\u2019s Reality","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness The Beltway\u2019s sober and judicious foreign-policy establishment laments Donald Trump\u2019s purported dismantling of the postwar order. They apparently take the president\u2019s words as deeds and their own innate dislike of him as disinterested analysis. But is the world really imploding after 70 years of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Vladimir Putin"","block_context":{"text":"Vladimir Putin","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/vladimir-putin\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6833"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6833"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6833\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6835,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6833\/revisions\/6835"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}