{"id":6824,"date":"2013-12-10T14:56:26","date_gmt":"2013-12-10T22:56:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=6824"},"modified":"2013-12-10T14:56:26","modified_gmt":"2013-12-10T22:56:26","slug":"how-presidents-lie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/how-presidents-lie\/","title":{"rendered":"How Presidents Lie"},"content":{"rendered":"

It’s nothing new for a president to lie to us, but Obama’s style is unique.<\/h3>\n

by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online<\/a>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

In the past there have been all sorts of presidential fibbing. Some chief executives make promises that they know they probably cannot or will not keep. Before his reelection for his third term in the midst \"450px-Revolving_Door\"of a world war, Franklin Roosevelt swore that he would never send American boys to fight in a foreign war. In just a little over a year, he did just that. Lyndon Johnson likewise before the 1964 election said he would not send troops to Vietnam. But once reelected, he sent nearly 200,000 troops to fight the North Vietnamese; by the time he left office, over a half-million Americans were deployed in Vietnam.<\/p>\n

In 1988 presidential candidate George H. W. Bush pledged that he would not raise taxes and did so emphatically: \u201cRead my lips \u2014 no new taxes!\u201d But in 1990 he flipped and agreed to tax hikes.<\/p>\n

Barack Obama has offered all sorts of similar empty pledges,\u00a0like promising to close the federal detention center at Guantanamo Bay within a year of taking office. It is still open. Obama also promised to halve the deficit by the end of his first term. Instead he doubled it. Ditto Obama\u2019s promises on the good things to follow Cash for Clunkers, on the shovel-ready jobs that would follow the stimulus, and on the summer of recovery to be spawned by massive borrowing. At your own job, if you promise the boss that you will do something and then don\u2019t, you\u2019re likely to get fired; when presidents do the same, it\u2019s called politics.<\/p>\n

VIRTUAL\u00a0PAST<\/strong>
\nSometimes\u00a0presidents fib about their behavior \u2014 usually to hide embarrassing information or to exaggerate past accomplishments. Bill Clinton, for example, claimed that he never had sexual relations with Monica\u00a0Lewinsky. That was about as true as his assertion that although he had smoked marijuana, he never inhaled the drug. Obama too has fudged on lots of things about his past, notably his relationships with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright and the famously unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers. Obama suggested that he scarcely knew either shady character, but he somehow named his book\u00a0The Audacity of Hope<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>from a slogan of the former, and he had a campaign fundraiser in the house of the latter.<\/p>\n

Most recently, his yarn that he had never met his paternal uncle, Omar Obama \u2014 an illegal immigrant who has been charged with almost hitting a police car while driving intoxicated \u2014 proved absolutely false. Obama had actually stayed at Omar\u2019s home for three weeks while he was preparing to attend Harvard Law School and had spoken with him after that. Many of the details that Obama has related about his parents, his former girlfriends, his life in college, and his legal and legislative career are not just inexact but cannot be true.<\/p>\n

IN THEORY, IT COULD BE TRUE<\/strong>
\nThen there is presidential wishful thinking that turns out to be untrue. George W. Bush reiterated that intelligence proved Saddam Hussein had stocks of\u00a0WMD\u00a0even though they soon proved nonexistent. Barack Obama swore over 20 times that Obamacare\u00a0would not result in canceled insurance coverage or mean losing your doctor, but it would save the average family $2,500 a year in premiums. All those fantasy guarantees proved not just false, but beyond the realm of logic. Similarly, Obama, along with other members of his administration, alleged that an Internet video had incited rioters to storm American facilities in Benghazi, resulting in the death of our ambassador and three other Americans. That yarn also was demonstrably untrue. Yet the president has never renounced it or explained why the producer of the video was summarily jailed for a minor parole violation.<\/p>\n

HOCUS-POCUS<\/strong>
\nDeliberate distortion is a sort of lying as well. Richard Nixon had so many explanations for Watergate and the subsequent cover-up that the public never knew which was operative at any given time. Clinton will be forever remembered for unabashedly offering of his escapades with Monica, \u201cIt depends upon what the meaning of the word \u2018is\u2019 is.\u201d<\/p>\n

Obama bragged that he had overseen record domestic oil and gas production. In fact, he did his best to stop most new federal oil and gas leases; vast increases in energy development came mostly on private lands and despite, not because of, Obama\u2019s efforts. Is he proud that the private sector is lowering gasoline prices and lessening dependence on foreign oil, or angry that we are burning more fossil fuels rather than building more Solyndras?<\/p>\n

When the IRS scandal was disclosed, Obama railed to the press that it was \u201coutrageous.\u201d Once the outrage died down, Obama started blaming the scandal mostly on the media and claiming that they had made up something out of nothing. But Obama says so many things so often that it is hard to keep any of his assertions straight. The result again is not just that no one believes that he stopped the revolving door, banned lobbyists from administration jobs, or ushered in a new era of civility, but that no one believes that he expected us to believe any of this nonsense. When Obama speaks, listeners now assume two things: The teleprompted cadences will still sound good, and almost nothing of what they hear can possibly be accurate.<\/p>\n

PINK LINES<\/strong>
\nA final category of presidential untruth is the empty blusters and threats. Ronald Reagan swore that he would not be intimidated by the Hezbollah terrorists who blew up the Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. But he offered only half-hearted retaliation for the mass murder of Americans, and not long afterwards, he withdrew U.S. troops. In the same way Obama warned\u00a0Bashar\u00a0Assad\u00a0about \u201cgame changers\u201d and \u201cred lines\u201d should he use\u00a0WMD. When\u00a0Assad\u00a0did just that, Obama pledged to intervene, then pledged maybe to intervene, then pledged not to intervene, then just outsourced the embarrassment to Vladimir Putin.<\/p>\n

What is different about Obama? Rarely, when caught, do presidents simply lie about their original dissimulation. Barack Obama, in contrast, when asked about his faux red line in Syria, simply denied ever issuing it (\u201cI didn\u2019t set a red line\u201d).<\/p>\n

Unlike presidents who paid high prices rather quickly for their dissimulations, Obama kept getting away with serial deception. The result was similar to a reckless bluffer at the poker table who keeps upping the ante each time he wins with a bad hand \u2014 only to lose his enormous pile of bluffed winnings when finally called out. Obama was empowered by a compliant public and a press invested in his progressive agenda. He assumed that while others had had to atone for deception, he did not, given his utopian talk about lowering the seas and cooling the planet, his landmark racial profile, and his youthful charisma and scripted eloquence. Being hip and progressive, he assumed, exempted him from an accounting. Yet unless the economy is booming, even a cool president does not necessarily recover once the public ceases believing what he says. After five years of 7-plus percent unemployment, almost no GDP growth, and record debt, Obama now enjoys few extenuating offsets when he serially misleads.<\/p>\n

When the president speaks now, few listen. He realizes that and so, like Richard Nixon, must add emphatics as a substitute for honesty. But by now we know ad nauseam all the banal intensifiers \u2014 \u201cmake no mistake about it,\u201d \u201cI am not kidding,\u201d \u201cin point of fact,\u201d and \u201clet me be perfectly clear.\u201d<\/p>\n

Obama is playing a strange game: The more he speaks untruthfully, the more he resorts to emphatic intensifiers that instead confirm that he is speaking untruthfully. In turn, Obama\u2019s audiences play an even stranger game: The more they hear their president speak, the more they are impressed that he can sound so sincere in being so nonchalantly insincere and mellifluously misleading. When I first heard, \u201cYou can keep your doctor and your health plan,\u201d I thought, \u201cThat can\u2019t be true; he knows it can\u2019t be true; and the American people must know it can\u2019t be true\u201d \u2014 and, then, I shrugged: \u201cBut he\u2019s hit upon a winning lie.\u201d<\/p>\n

And so he did \u2014 until now.<\/p>\n

NRO\u00a0contributor<\/em>\u00a0Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. His latest book is\u00a0<\/em>The Savior Generals<\/a><\/span>, published this spring by Bloomsbury Books.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It’s nothing new for a president to lie to us, but Obama’s style is unique. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online\u00a0 In the past there have been all sorts of presidential fibbing. Some chief executives make promises that they know they probably cannot or will not keep. Before his reelection for his third term […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[11,536],"tags":[57,74,1028,726,40,901,222,320,76],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1M4","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2168,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/afghan-mythologies\/","url_meta":{"origin":6824,"position":0},"title":"Afghan Mythologies","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 9, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services As President Obama decides whether to send more troops to Afsghanistan, we should remember that most of the conventional pessimism about Afghanistan is only half-truth. Remember the mantra that the region is the \"graveyard of empires,\" where Alexander the Great, the British in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "November 2009"","block_context":{"text":"November 2009","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2009\/november-2009\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5119,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-meaning-of-tet\/","url_meta":{"origin":6824,"position":1},"title":"The Meaning of Tet","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 1, 2001","format":false,"excerpt":"1968 Tet Offensive, Vietnam War by Victor Davis Hanson American Heritage A historian argues that in Vietnam America's cause was just, its arms effective, and its efforts undermined by critics back home -- and that this is how things must work in a free society. MORE THAN 2,000 YEARS AGO,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "2001"","block_context":{"text":"2001","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2001\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2083,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/are-we-to-be-led-in-war-by-a-tiger-or-a-kitten\/","url_meta":{"origin":6824,"position":2},"title":"Are We to Be Led in War by a “Tiger” or a Kitten?","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 11, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson NRO's\u00a0The Corner I\u00a0agree with many here that the decision to send more troops to Afghanistan\u00a0is positive news. And, yes, we should be thankful to President Obama that (for now) Generals Petraeus and McChrystal have at least 18 months and greater resources to secure the country before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "December 2009"","block_context":{"text":"December 2009","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2009\/december-2009\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7900,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/bomb-occupy-or-neither\/","url_meta":{"origin":6824,"position":3},"title":"Bomb, Occupy, or Neither?","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 2, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Blowing apart a problem for a while is different from ending it for good. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Wars usually end only when the defeated aggressor believes it would be futile to resume the conflict. Lasting peace follows if the loser is then forced to change\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Terrorism"","block_context":{"text":"Terrorism","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/war-on-terror\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/pic_giant_1001214_SM_Hornets-Over-Iraq_0-500x291.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4656,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/do-we-really-need-more-troops-in-iraq\/","url_meta":{"origin":6824,"position":4},"title":"Do We Really Need More Troops In Iraq?","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 23, 2004","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson (A later version of this essay appears in the current issue ofCommentary Magazine.) How many American troops should be posted in Iraq, beyond the present spike of 135,000\u2014a number that was itself raised from the informally agreed-upon level of 115,000? Critical Consensus This question of numbers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "June 2004"","block_context":{"text":"June 2004","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2004\/june-2004\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9674,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/has-trump-nominated-too-many-military-leaders-or-not-enough\/","url_meta":{"origin":6824,"position":5},"title":"Has Trump Nominated Too Many Military Leaders\u2014Or Not Enough?","author":"Megan Ring","date":"December 15, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0By Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Choosing military men for top cabinet spots is not unprecedented, nor is it foolish given how Washington insiders have performed. President-elect Donald Trump is being faulted for supposedly appointing too many retired generals to cabinet-level jobs and \u201cmilitarizing\u201d the government. Former lieutenant general Michael\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Jim Mattis"","block_context":{"text":"Jim Mattis","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/jim-mattis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6824"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6824"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6824\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6826,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6824\/revisions\/6826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}