{"id":6683,"date":"2013-10-29T11:13:16","date_gmt":"2013-10-29T18:13:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=6683"},"modified":"2013-10-29T11:21:50","modified_gmt":"2013-10-29T18:21:50","slug":"questions-rarely-asked-and-never-answered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/questions-rarely-asked-and-never-answered\/","title":{"rendered":"Questions Rarely Asked–and Never Answered"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0PJ Media<\/a>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

It Can\u2019t Happen Here?<\/b><\/p>\n

What does it take to warn Americans about unchecked pension growth, socialized medicine, vast increases in \"Photoentitlements, higher taxes, and steady expansion of government? In other words, what is it about\u00a0Detroit<\/a>,\u00a0Italy<\/a>, or\u00a0Greece<\/a>\u00a0that we do not understand?<\/p>\n

In the last five years, the Obama administration has raised taxes on the top income rates, implemented Obamacare, added millions to the disability and food stamp roles, grown the size of the federal work force, run up the national debt, and vastly expanded the money supply, along with insuring near zero interest rates. Are there any historical examples where these redistributive efforts have brought long-term tranquility and prosperity?<\/p>\n

To put it another way, does anyone ask basic questions about human nature anymore? If one gives more incentives to obtain government support while unemployed, why would not fewer people be working? If the food stamp, unemployment, and disability rolls are markedly up, and if it is almost impossible to verify that recipients are also not working for unreported cash wages (we hear mostly of government efforts to add more to these programs, rather than to audit those already on them), why would one seek a \u201cregular\u201d job that would lose such subsidies and make all one\u2019s income reportable? (We know two basic truths about the IRS in the age of Obama: first, it goes after political opponents in partisan fashion, and second, it gives away billions of dollars in federal income tax rebate credits to those who did not deserve them.)<\/p>\n

If you allow illegal immigrants to enjoy full government subsidies, driver\u2019s licenses, in-state tuition discounts, sanctuary cities, participation on juries, and all without fear of deportation, then why (a) would people not flock here illegally from Mexico, and (b) why after arriving would they go through the hassle of seeking citizenship when residency provides almost all the same benefits?<\/p>\n

If Obamacare is structured to ensure health insurance in extremis without paying a premium upfront, why would anyone buy it \u2014 as opposed to simply purchasing it only after an illness or operation, and paying a small fine? (Do life insurance companies allow us to purchase $1 million policies after open heart surgery, and if not, why not?) And if young people often choose to play the very good odds that they won\u2019t get sick, or at least not terribly sick, and therefore do not need health insurance until after their ordeal, how could a plan be predicated on luring millions of young people (a poorer cohort than either the middle-aged or elderly) to buy something they would not often need in order to pay for others who would pay less for something they would constantly need?<\/p>\n

The problem with socialism (cf. Detroit to Athens) is not just that it destroys individual initiative and creates a dispirited and montonous sameness to everything, but that\u00a0its architects usually find exemption<\/a>\u00a0from the ramifications of their own ideology and thereby are more emboldened to implement it.<\/p>\n

Unions, pet businesses, and D.C. insiders will all receive waivers or subsidies to excuse them from the full wrath of Obamacare \u2014 and, therefore, they foist it on others. The\u00a0Wall Street Journal\u2019s\u00a0<\/i>credo of \u201ccomprehensive immigration reform\u201d is predicated on the assumption that none of the opinion writers live either along the border or in areas that have experienced huge influxes of illegal immigrants (e.g., their children are not in the public schools of a Tulare or central Los Angeles. They do not try to ranch in southern Arizona; they do not drive in rural Tulare County. And they are not lower middle-class residents of California trying to pay steep taxes for very little in return).<\/p>\n

How did it happen that the United States chose to follow\u00a0the path of socialism<\/a>\u00a0at precisely the time that it was imploding the world over?<\/p>\n

Do Scandals Exist?<\/b><\/p>\n

Is there still a notion of scandal? If\u00a0EPA director Lisa Jackson\u2019s fake email con and the Pigford payouts\u00a0were small beer, what were the scandals about Benghazi, the IRS, the AP, and the NSA?<\/p>\n

Does anyone care that every presidential pronouncement about the Affordable Care Act was false? We have reached a new point where either the media is an appendage of government, or the public is too weary to care about the conduct of its government \u2014 to the degree that this administration could do pretty much\u00a0anything<\/i>.<\/p>\n

If running up $6 trillion in debt and disrupting one-sixth of the U.S. economy with Obamacare are pass\u00e9, what would not be? Tapping a German chancellor\u2019s phone? Turning the entire Persian Gulf into an anti-American enclave? Reducing the president\u2019s word abroad into the stuff of jest? Arbitrarily deciding not to enforce \u201csettled law\u201d?<\/p>\n

Zero Interest and Debt<\/b><\/p>\n

Can anyone recall in our recent memories a period in which the Federal Reserve essentially ended real interest rates (almost non-existent interest that does not match the rate of low inflation)? We understand the logic behind quantitative easing, given that only with about 2% interest on federal obligations can the government service the huge $17 trillion debt (our service costs on the debt are actually less than during the 1990s in inflation-adjusted dollars when the debt was a third of the present amount). Is the theory that the deserving poor who are debtors should pay their undeserving rich creditors very little?<\/p>\n

But how does that work out in fact? Debtors are paying high interest, from 7-8% on many student loans to 15-20% on credit cards \u2014 especially those who cannot take advantage of cheaper mortgage loans. Yet why save, when passbook accounts pay about 1% or less? Are you to turn to the stock market with your $1,000 and risk another 2008? Or dabble in real estate and ditto the same?<\/p>\n

Would it be better to have worked 30 years at the DMV and be receiving a California state pension, or to have owned a small business and scrimped to have put away $3 million in savings? In terms of monthly income, perhaps the state pension is preferable.<\/p>\n

Cool Non-Liability<\/b><\/p>\n

In our \u201csue anyone\u201d America, we are told that companies are responsible, even indirectly, for the unintended but pernicious effects of their products. We not only sue tobacco companies for the bad lungs of the smoker, who on his own free will plays poker with cancer, but also the fast food outlet whose coffee when spilled burns inattentive buyers. By that litigious standard, why are there no suits against Apple for its iPhone \u2014 an insidious device far more addictive than opiates, an impairment to driving far more deleterious than two martinis, and at a monthly cost as disruptive to household finances as habitual visits to the casino?<\/p>\n

In the last week, on five occasions I have dodged two swerving semi-trucks on State #99, a motorist who made a rolling stop into a pedestrian walkway and almost hit my bicycle, and two drivers going no more than 40 mph in the fast left freeway lane. The common denominator? They were all texting on their phones. According to liberal legal minds, isn\u2019t Silicon Valley guilty of hawking one of the most dangerous consumer items of the last fifty years?<\/p>\n

Uncivil Liberties<\/b><\/p>\n

How did Barack Obama become\u00a0the most anti-civil liberties president in history<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 to almost complete silence? Well aside from the fact that Obama embraced, or more often expanded, all the Bush-Cheney anti-terrorism protocols (e.g., preventative detention, Guantanamo, renditions, the Patriot Act, etc.), he has droned ten times more suspects than did Bush.<\/p>\n

Do we remember Obama\u2019s own reference to Bush\u2019s occasional use of bombing and predators in Afghanistan, when he called for more ground troops so that the U.S. had \u201cenough troops that we\u2019re not just air raiding villages and killing civilians which is causing enormous problems there\u201d?<\/p>\n

When was the last time a president got caught tapping the private phones of French elites, a German chancellor, or a Brazilian head of state? When has an Associated Press reporter found his communications monitored? Has any president since Richard Nixon been accused of politicizing the IRS to go after supposedly partisan enemies? What might have been the media response had George Bush monitored the communications of our key allies? Never in recent U.S. history has a president so impaired the concept of civil liberties \u2014 and to the complete silence of the media that proclaims itself the very champion of the First Amendment.<\/p>\n

In sum, we have become so inured to recent distortions in reality, that we assume aberration is the new normal \u2014 or we are too busy texting to care.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0PJ Media\u00a0 It Can\u2019t Happen Here? What does it take to warn Americans about unchecked pension growth, socialized medicine, vast increases in entitlements, higher taxes, and steady expansion of government? In other words, what is it about\u00a0Detroit,\u00a0Italy, or\u00a0Greece\u00a0that we do not understand? In the last five years, the Obama administration has […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[146,11,47,619],"tags":[12,900,42,1064,268,88,40,527,67],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1JN","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":845,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/freedom-or-fairness-in-2012\/","url_meta":{"origin":6683,"position":0},"title":"Freedom or Fairness in 2012?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 11, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services This should prove to be an ideological election about the economy. Not all campaigns are so clear-cut. Sometimes moderate Republicans raise taxes (as George H. W. Bush did); at other times, pragmatic Democrats cut spending (as Bill Clinton did). But this year, Mitt\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Debt and Deficits"","block_context":{"text":"Debt and Deficits","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/politics\/debt-and-deficits\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":307,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/let-obama-be-obama\/","url_meta":{"origin":6683,"position":1},"title":"Let Obama Be Obama","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 2, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services After his party's devastating setback in the 2010 midterm elections, Barack Obama was re-elected earlier this month by painting his Republican opponents as heartless in favoring lower taxes for the rich. They were portrayed as nativists for opposing the Dream Act amnesty for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Obama Administration"","block_context":{"text":"Obama Administration","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/obama-administration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2542,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-1-0-2-0-3-0\/","url_meta":{"origin":6683,"position":2},"title":"Obama 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 . . .","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 12, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson NRO's\u00a0The Corner One of the reasons the president did not sound convincing in his press conference yesterday is that he has taken so many positions on the debt andtaxes\u00a0that it is hard know what his current one is, or whether to take it seriously, much less\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Debt and Deficits"","block_context":{"text":"Debt and Deficits","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/politics\/debt-and-deficits\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":115,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/when-big-deficits-became-good\/","url_meta":{"origin":6683,"position":3},"title":"When Big Deficits Became Good","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 16, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services As a senator and presidential candidate, Barack Obama said that he detested budget deficits. In 2006, when the aggregate national debt was almost $8 trillion less than today, he blasted George W. Bush's chronic borrowing and refused to vote for upping the debt\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Debt and Deficits"","block_context":{"text":"Debt and Deficits","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/politics\/debt-and-deficits\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3230,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/make-haste-slowly-president-obama\/","url_meta":{"origin":6683,"position":4},"title":"Make Haste Slowly, President Obama?","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 10, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Festina lente.\u00a0Make haste slowly. That was the motto of the revolutionary minded young Augustus who soon grasped that he needed to build upon Rome's past, rather than dismantle it. Amid the celebration of the historic victory of Barack Obama, the country should now\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "November 2008"","block_context":{"text":"November 2008","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2008\/november-2008\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":649,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/what-romney-needs-to-do\/","url_meta":{"origin":6683,"position":5},"title":"What Romney Needs to Do","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 13, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online About half the country disapproves of the job the president is doing. Most Americans think he has not handled the economy well. Yet a majority also believe that the tough times are still George W. Bush\u2019s legacy, and, further, that Mitt Romney would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Election 2012"","block_context":{"text":"Election 2012","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/obama-administration\/election-2012\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6683"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6683"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6683\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6686,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6683\/revisions\/6686"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}