by Raymond Ibrahim<\/p>\n
FrontPage Magazine<\/em><\/p>\n During a Homeland Security committee hearing last month on the “Radicalization of Muslim-Americans,” Texas Congressman Al Green (D) criticized the hearings as biased and unfair to Muslims, suggesting that the only way to justify them is if Congress would also conduct a “hearing on the radicalization of Christians<\/a>.”<\/p>\n Though his position may seem balanced, in fact, it reveals a dangerous mix of irrationality, moral relativism, and emotionalism \u2014 all disastrous traits in a US Congressman. Consider some of Green’s assertions:<\/p>\n I don’t think that most people oppose hearings on radicalization. I do not, not \u2014 N-O-T \u2014 oppose hearings on radicalization. I do oppose hearings that don’t focus on the entirety of radicalization\u2026. [W]hy not have a hearing on the radicalization of Christians?… People who see the hearings and never hear about the hearing on the radicalization of Christianity have to ask themselves, “Why is this missing?”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Fair question \u2014 “Why not have a hearing on the radicalization of Christians?” Before responding, we must acknowledge that the word “radicalization<\/a>” simply means “to go to the root or origin of something,” in this case, religion: a Muslim radical goes to the root teachings of Islam; a Christian radical goes to the root teachings of Christianity. Accordingly, there are certainly “Christian radicals” in America. The question is, do they pose the same risks to America as Muslim radicals?<\/p>\n Green and all moral relativists naturally do not want to pursue such a question, opting to pretend that any form of “radicalization” \u2014 regardless of the “root teachings” \u2014 is evil. They are certainly not interested in determining the fundamentals of Christianity and Islam, and whether they are equally prone to violence, terrorism, conquest, etc. While this is not the place to contrast modern Christianity’s apolitical and largely passive nature with modern Islam’s political and largely aggressive nature \u2014 a theme elaborated\u00a0here<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 suffice it to say that, while thousands of modern-day Muslim leaders are on record quoting Islamic scriptures to\u00a0justify violence and hate<\/a>, one is hard pressed to find examples of modern Christian leaders preaching violence and hate \u2014 and justifying it through scripture.<\/p>\n The Saudi Grand Mufti, the highest religious official of Saudi Arabia, Islam’s holiest nation,\u00a0called on the destruction of all regional churches<\/a>, quoting Islamic texts. Can Green find an example of an equally authoritative Christian leader calling for the destruction of mosques \u2014 and supporting it through the Bible?<\/p>\n Green went on to ask “Why don’t we go to the next step and ask, how is it that a blue-eyed, blonde-haired, white female in the United States of America can become radicalized to the point of wanting to do harm to this country? We don’t have that type of hearing. That’s the problem.”<\/p>\n Thus, not only does the Congressman irrationally conflate the teachings of all religions together, he also conflates religion with race (and gender) implying that the only reason there are hearings on Muslim radicalization is because Muslims are not white, whereas those “equally-dangerous” blue-eyed, blond-haired female Christian “radicals” are apparently getting a free pass to terrorize America.<\/p>\n This logic is flawed on many levels. Islam is not a race; there are Muslims of all colors, just like there are Christians of all colors. Moreover, there are indeed “blue-eyed, blond-haired” terrorists in the world, including females \u2014 yet these, too, are overwhelmingly Muslim. It is dishonest for Green to try to take the focus off of Islamic radicalization and pin it on that all-purpose bogeyman, “racism.”<\/p>\n Regardless, this argument of Islam as a race is popular and was, for example, used by Congresswoman\u00a0Jackie Speier<\/a>, who also called these hearings “racist.” Likewise, a former\u00a0American soldier\u00a0<\/a>discussing the Fort Hood shootings lamented that “When a white guy shoots up a post office, they call that going postal. But when a Muslim [namely, Nidal Hasan] does it, they call it jihad.”<\/p>\n Notice the confusion; as if a “white guy” and a “Muslim” represent different races. Of course, if a person of any color goes on a random shooting spree, it would be racist to pin it on his race. But if a person of any color goes on a shooting spree \u2014 while waving the Koran, screaming the jihadi paean “Allahu Akbar!” or otherwise rationalizing his actions in Islamic terms, as did\u00a0Nidal Hasan<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 then we are talking about a shooting spree motivated by a learned ideology or worldview that has nothing to do with the murderer’s race.<\/p>\n From beginning to end, Green \u2014 like his congressman colleague Keith Ellison, whose objection to these hearings culminated in a\u00a0teary-eyed breakdown<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 relied on emotionalism to make his point: he opened his statement by offering the Islamic greeting\u00a0assalama alikum<\/em>\u00a0to Muslims present, dreamily observing: “Isn’t it wonderful that the grandson of a Christian minister can sit on the Homeland Security Committee and say\u00a0assalama alikum<\/em>?” \u2014 a meaningless point that does not change the fact that in Islam, Muslims are only allowed to say “Peace upon you” to fellow Muslims,\u00a0never to non-Muslim infidels<\/a>, who by nature are deemed undeserving Muslim well-wishing.<\/p>\n Finally, Green concluded his sanctimonious attack by saying “I do know what it feels like to look like a Muslim in the minds of some people and to be demeaned in a public venue\u2026. I look forward to the day that we’ll have that hearing that deals with the radicalization of Christians in America” \u2014 again, all meaningless race-related rhetoric and moral relativism, the sole value of which is to obfuscate the issue at hand: the real threat of “radicalization of Muslim-Americans.”<\/p>\n \u00a92012 Raymond Ibrahim<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Raymond Ibrahim FrontPage Magazine During a Homeland Security committee hearing last month on the “Radicalization of Muslim-Americans,” Texas Congressman Al Green (D) criticized the hearings as biased and unfair to Muslims, suggesting that the only way to justify them is if Congress would also conduct a “hearing on the radicalization of Christians.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[225,33,227],"tags":[192,1036,1017,30,1042,156,1018],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-ar","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3402,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/weeping-and-other-hysterics-have-muslim-apologists-nothing-more-to-offer\/","url_meta":{"origin":647,"position":0},"title":"Weeping and Other Hysterics: Have Muslim Apologists Nothing More to Offer?","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 29, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Hudson New York From Congressman\u00a0Keith Ellison's\u00a0emotional breakdown to CongresswomanJackie Speier's\u00a0accusations of \"racism,\" the hearings on Muslim radicalization have made it clear that those who oppose the hearings have little of substance to offer. Still, the tactics used by such apologists \u2014 namely, appeals to emotionalism and accusations\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3818,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/can-american-values-radicalize-muslims\/","url_meta":{"origin":647,"position":1},"title":"Can American Values Radicalize Muslims?","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 21, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim PJ Media Recent comments by US officials on the threat posed by \"radicalized\" American Muslims are troubling, both for their domestic and international implications. Attorney General\u00a0Eric Holder\u00a0states that \"the threat has changed \u2026 to worrying about people in the United States, American citizens \u2014 raised here, born\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Religion"","block_context":{"text":"Religion","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/religion\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4080,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/egypt-on-the-brink-bradley-reveals-instability-in-modern-egypt\/","url_meta":{"origin":647,"position":2},"title":"Egypt on the Brink: Bradley Reveals Instability in Modern Egypt","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 22, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Middle East Quarterly A review of\u00a0Inside Egypt: The Land of the Pharaohs on the Brink of a Revolution\u00a0by John R. Bradley (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009). To the general reader,\u00a0Inside Egypt\u00a0is a good introduction to some of the problems rife in the most populous, Arabic-speaking country. From\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Egypt"","block_context":{"text":"Egypt","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/egypt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1480,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-two-faces-of-the-ground-zero-mosque\/","url_meta":{"origin":647,"position":3},"title":"The Two Faces of the Ground Zero Mosque","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 27, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim PJ Media Depending on whether Islamists address Americans or fellow Muslims, the same exact words they use often relay diametrically opposed meanings. One example: when Americans hear Muslims evoke \"justice,\" the former envision Western-style justice, whereas Muslims naturally have Sharia law justice in mind. Islamists obviously use\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4090,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/radical-muslims-in-america-all-the-benefits-and-still-turning-to-jihad\/","url_meta":{"origin":647,"position":4},"title":"Radical Muslims in America: All the Benefits and Still Turning to Jihad","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 16, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Hudson New York Recent remarks by Attorney General\u00a0Eric Holder\u00a0on the threat posed by \"radicalized\" American Muslims are revealing \u2014 not just because of what they say regarding the domestic situation, but for their international implications as well. According to Holder: \u201c[T]he threat is real, the threat is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Terrorism"","block_context":{"text":"Terrorism","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/war-on-terror\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":994,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/when-elections-fail-jihad\/","url_meta":{"origin":647,"position":5},"title":"When Elections Fail, Jihad","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 31, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Jihad Watch The Obama administration supports \"democracy\" and \"self determination\" in the Middle East \u2014 two euphemisms that, in the real world, refer to \"mob-rule\" and \"Islamic radicalization,\" respectively. Yet, as\u00a0Jimmy Carter\u00a0recently put it: \"I don't have any problem with that [an \"Islamist victory\" in Egypt], and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Islam"","block_context":{"text":"Islam","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/islam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=647"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":648,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647\/revisions\/648"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}