{"id":6174,"date":"2013-07-05T15:05:37","date_gmt":"2013-07-05T15:05:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=6174"},"modified":"2013-07-05T15:05:37","modified_gmt":"2013-07-05T15:05:37","slug":"obamas-bluster-pulpit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-bluster-pulpit\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama’s Bluster Pulpit"},"content":{"rendered":"

The president’s saber-rattling in the Middle East makes America look weak and puts the world in danger<\/h1>\n

by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n

Defining Ideas<\/em><\/p>\n

At the turn of the century, Teddy Roosevelt famously advised statesmen to \u201cspeak softly and carry a big stick.\u201d Roosevelt assumed that the antithesis of his advice\u2014loud threats without commensurate consequences\u2014might be more attractive for politically-minded leaders than often unpopular and difficult action. Also implicit in Roosevelt\u2019s advice was the presumption that if bluster or impotence could be dangerous for a leader, each multiplied the other in combination.<\/p>\n

We still quote Roosevelt\u2019s warning over a century later because, given universal human nature, most Presidents and Prime Ministers prefer bluster to concrete consequences\u2014believing they can achieve policy objectives on the cheap through words rather than deeds.<\/p>\n

For instance, during the 444-day Iranian hostage crisis of 1979-81, President Jimmy Carter, before both a domestic and world stage, lectured, coaxed, and appeased the Iranian theocrats. He sometimes threatened them, and sometimes ruled out the use of force. All the while, he could never quite decide whether the deposed Shah had been an ally, neutral, friend, enemy, or simple embarrassment. After April 1980, when Carter had finally dispatched an undermanned, poorly planned rescue mission that failed miserably, the Ayatollah Khomeini boasted to the world, \u201cAmerica can\u2019t do a damn thing.\u201d And it apparently could not. By 1980, an op-ed in the liberal Boston Globe criticized a Carter speech with the headline, \u201cMore Mush From the Wimp.\u201d<\/p>\n

In contrast, in August 1981, Ronald Reagan, without much flamboyance, carefully warned the striking Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization that their union demands were unrealistic, their strike contrary to federal law, and that they would all be summarily dismissed unless they returned to the work. The union, which had endorsed Reagan in the 1980 election, thought the mild-mannered new president was bluffing. Most Americans did too. But he wasn\u2019t. Over 11,000 union strikers were fired\u2014and for years banned from working as government air traffic controllers. The union was decertified. Reagan was willing to face air travel disruption and furious criticism to establish the larger principle that public unions should not bully the federal government. Here or abroad, he was rarely again thought to be bluffing.<\/p>\n

Most presidents are more resolute than Jimmy Carter and less firm than Reagan. George W. Bush, for example, meant what he said about the unpopular surge of troops into Iraq, which eventually quelled the violence of 2007-08. Yet in July 2003, when he taunted jihadists with, \u201cBring \u2019em on\u201d at the start of the Iraqi insurgency, such braggadocio was not always followed by firm consequences. For example, the April 2004 abrupt pullback from the siege of Fallujah only fuelled greater violence.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, after nearly five years in office, both President Obama\u2019s foreign rivals and his domestic critics bet that his often saber-rattling rhetoric is mostly show. The more animated it sounds, the more observers assume that presidential tough talk will yield to American indecisiveness.<\/p>\n

Take the issue of Iranian nuclear proliferation. On five occasions, Obama has thundered that the Iranian effort to produce a nuclear weapon was unacceptable. He had announced deadlines for Iran to desist by September 2009, again by October, and then at year\u2019s end in 2009. His fourth deadline for Iran to come clean was supposed to be January 2010. A fifth soon followed. Since then, Obama has repeatedly stated that Iran\u2019s proliferation was \u201cunacceptable.\u201d One wonders why, and to whom?<\/p>\n

By early 2012, Obama maintained that he doesn\u2019t bluff, yet by September 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton seemed troubled enough by the empty rhetoric to remind the world that, \u201cThe United States of America is not setting deadlines.\u201d Almost immediately after, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland added the qualifier that, \u201cit is not useful to be\u2026 setting deadlines one way or the other [or] red lines.\u201d<\/p>\n

The same, predictable pattern followed with the unrest in Syria. In early April 2011, a month after an uprising against the dictatorship of Bashar Assad began, Obama ordered Assad to stop the \u201cabhorrent violence committed against peaceful protesters.\u201d A few days later, Obama tried again, advising Assad to \u201cchange course now.\u201d<\/p>\n

By July, Obama had announced that the Syrian president had \u201clost legitimacy.\u201d Later in August 2011, Obama talked of a transition to democracy in Syria. The same month, Obama upped his rhetoric even further by now demanding that Assad leave, \u201cFor the sake of the Syrian people, the time has come for President Assad to step aside.\u201d Then for most of the next year, Obama met with foreign leaders, and summarized his talks with demands that the Syrian government cease its violence, that Assad leave, and that any use of chemical weapons would earn a swift American response.<\/p>\n

By March 2012, Obama gathered the Group of Eight at Camp David, where they collectively announced an ultimatum for political change in Syria. In July 2012, U.S. Ambassador to the\u00a0United Nations<\/a>\u00a0Susan Rice announced that the Russian and Chinese vetoes of a U.N. Security Council resolution on Syria were both \u201cdangerous and deplorable.\u201d<\/p>\n

The same month, Obama again threatened Assad, predicting that the dictator would be held accountable should he make the \u201ctragic mistake\u201d of using chemical weapons. For much of 2012, more redlines were drawn over the Syrian use of WMD. In a December\u00a03 speech at the National Defense University, Obama summed up, \u201cI want to make it absolutely clear to Assad and those under his command, the world is watching. The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable. And if you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable.\u201d<\/p>\n

But by April 2013, in response to rumors of chemical weapons use, Obama was still warning that the Syrians use of WMD would be a \u201cgame changer.\u201d Since then, Obama has further warned Syria about chemical weapons while debating whether the sporadic use of them constituted defiance of one of the redlines he drew.<\/p>\n

The terrorist detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, like the Iranian nuclear program and the Assad regime, also earns frequent presidential tough talk.\u00a0In January 22, 2009, the newly inaugurated President Obama promised to close Guant\u00e1namo Bay within one year: to \u201crestore the standards of due process and the core constitutional values that have made this country great even in the midst of war, even in dealing with terrorism.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yet in the summer of 2009, Obama granted a six-month extension to his newly formed Guant\u00e1namo closing commission.\u00a0That delay lasted for nearly two years, as the President signed various executive orders, creating new review processes for detainees, \u201cto establish, as a discretionary matter,\u00a0a process to review on a periodic basis the executive branch\u2019s continued, discretionary exercise of existing detention authority in individual cases.\u201d<\/p>\n

By April 2011, Obama ordered terrorist mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed back to Guantanamo. In the words ofThe Washington Post,\u00a0<\/em>that decision marked \u201cthe effective abandonment of the president’s promise to close the military detention center.\u201d\u00a0If, in January 2013, the State Department finally closed the office of the envoy for shutting down the prison at\u00a0Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Obama nonetheless reiterated in his recent Berlin speech that he would\u00a0be \u201credoubling our efforts to close the prison at Guantanamo.\u201d<\/p>\n

After years of such bluster about Guantanamo, Iran, and Syria, few are any longer listening. Former President Bill Clinton, for example, before a supposedly private audience, recently complained that the president risks appearing like \u201ca total wuss\u201d over his inaction in Syria. The president frequently adds familiar emphatics like \u201cmake no mistake about it,\u201d \u201cin point of fact,\u201d and \u201clet me be perfectly clear\u201d that in paradoxical fashion serve as tip-offs that consequences will not follow his tough rhetoric.<\/p>\n

More recently, both China and Russia feel comfortable ignoring American requests to extradite the 29-year-old leaker Edward Snowden, who fled to their respective jurisdictions after making public the National Security Agency\u2019s most sensitive protocols. Apparently neither took seriously Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama when both blustered for his immediate return, and then, when rebuffed, downplayed Snowden\u2019s significance.<\/p>\n

It was not Neville Chamberlain alone who earned Winston Churchill\u2019s disdain for empty talk. Much earlier in 1936, Churchill had found that the government of Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin had proven impotent. As Churchill put it,\u201cSo they go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all powerful to be impotent. So we go on preparing more months and years\u2014precious, perhaps, vital, to the greatness of Britain, for the locusts to eat.\u201d His point was that empty bluster is worse even than silence, assuring the enemy of habitual inaction, while lulling domestic constituencies to believe that readiness is assured.<\/p>\n

What accounts for the great divide between Obama\u2019s version of Stanley Baldwin\u2019s lion roars and his pussy-cat follow ups? Obama\u2019s teleprompted eloquence is not the culprit. Jimmy Carter was a dismal speaker and yet gave the same empty moral sermons and serial threats to his perceived enemies. In contrast, Ronald Reagan was a stellar speaker who preferred action to talk.<\/p>\n

Obama\u2019s background as a long-time student, lawyer, law lecturer, and politician has led him to live in a world of words rather than of those concrete consequences found more often in the private sector or in the landscape of the self-employed. Obama also talks grandly of world citizenry and the primacy of the United Nations as global negotiator. Accordingly, his speeches do not appreciate that friction and disputes are innate to human character.<\/p>\n

Nor does the president grasp that one party to an argument is usually more culpable than the other, and encouraged in its aggression by a perceived lack of consequences. In the world of Barack Obama, what the Nobel Committee says\u2014awarding Obama with a Peace Prize for his good intentions rather than past diplomatic achievements\u2014should have some currency with a Bashar Assad, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or Vladimir Putin.<\/p>\n

For Obama, disagreement is a product of misunderstanding or miscommunication, and therefore resolved when reasonable people assemble to talk out and split their differences, particularly if encouraged by a sonorous megaphone. The president seems oblivious that the Iranian theocracy is a mostly evil regime that wishes to stockpile nuclear weapons to carve out a greater Middle East theocratic hegemony at the expense of Western allies, or that Bashar Assad assumes, perhaps rightly, that he can cling to power by killing tens of thousands of his opponents, or that foreign leaders are not so much concerned that Guantanamo Bay is shut down as they are observant of whether its continuance or closure follow immediately from Obama\u2019s promises.<\/p>\n

After five years of empty loquacity and procrastination, the world\u2014in scary places like Iran, Syria, Russia, China, and North Korea\u2014has caught on that when Obama pontificates about a redline or a deadline, these are mere suggestions for further discussion and hardly guaranteed by the power of an unpredictable and dangerous United States.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The president’s saber-rattling in the Middle East makes America look weak and puts the world in danger by Victor Davis Hanson Defining Ideas At the turn of the century, Teddy Roosevelt famously advised statesmen to \u201cspeak softly and carry a big stick.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[536],"tags":[12,249,1033,293,88,222,1041,1016,76],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1BA","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":7146,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/loud-weak-war\/","url_meta":{"origin":6174,"position":0},"title":"Loud + Weak = War","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 25, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"China and Russia are no more impressed with empty bluster today than Japan was in 1941. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online\u00a0 The Roosevelt administration once talked loudly of pivoting to Asia to thwart a rising Japan. As a token of its seriousness, in May 1940 it moved the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "China"","block_context":{"text":"China","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/china\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/477px-Franklin_Roosevelt_signing_declaration_of_war_against_Japan-238x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6491,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-box-canyon\/","url_meta":{"origin":6174,"position":1},"title":"Obama’s Box Canyon","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 17, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Our Hamlet-in-cheif wanted simultaneously to act and not act. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online The Syrian fiasco arose from two mutually contradictory desires. Barack Obama sincerely wanted Bashar Assad to stop killing his own people. Barack Obama also really was not willing to use force to ensure that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Syria"","block_context":{"text":"Syria","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/syria\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4465,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/blood-for-oil-no-oil-money-for-bloody-terrorists\/","url_meta":{"origin":6174,"position":2},"title":"Blood for Oil?: No Oil Money for Bloody Terrorists","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 8, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Even in the face of spreading reform in the Middle East, Americans remain divided over the wisdom of removing Saddam Hussein and then staying on to foster democracy in Iraq. But petroleum should not be part of that controversy. Nevertheless, the most persistent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "March 2005"","block_context":{"text":"March 2005","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2005\/march-2005\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7058,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ukraine-and-our-useless-outrage\/","url_meta":{"origin":6174,"position":3},"title":"Ukraine and Our Useless Outrage","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 27, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"The history of Obama's foreign-policy posturing bodes ill for the future of Ukraine. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online\u00a0 Don\u2019t step over the line and re-militarize the Rhineland. Absorbing Austria would cross a red line. Breaking up Czechoslovakia is unacceptable. Get out of Poland by the announced deadline. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Ukraine"","block_context":{"text":"Ukraine","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/europe\/ukraine\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Viktor_Yanukovych_27_April_2010-1-217x300.jpeg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7839,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-foreign-policy-of-empty-words\/","url_meta":{"origin":6174,"position":4},"title":"Obama\u2019s Foreign Policy of Empty Words","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 10, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen force threatens, talk is no good.\u201d\u00a0 by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine That line from John Ford\u2019s classic The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance contains wisdom everyone from peasant to king knew before our modern age and its smug\u00a0illusions. Go back 2,400 years, and you can hear it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/1393766471000-AP-Obama-Budget-001-450x337.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6345,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-middle-east-mess\/","url_meta":{"origin":6174,"position":5},"title":"Obama’s Middle East Mess","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 19, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"When we don't support our potential allies and encourage constitutional rule, Egypt is the result. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online \u00a0 In Egypt the Obama administration has managed to alienate the military, secular constitutionalists, the Islamists, and the proverbial street all at once. How and why? First, we\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Middle East"","block_context":{"text":"The Middle East","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6174"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6174"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6175,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6174\/revisions\/6175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}