by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
National Review Online<\/em><\/p>\n Barack Obama has a habit of trying to energize his legislative agenda by stoking the fires of emotionally charged current events \u2014 and in ways usually illogical and incoherent. The shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords and the horrible mass murders at Sandy Hook Elementary School were cited as reasons for rapid enactment of new gun-control laws \u2014 even though the proposed tougher registration rules would not have prevented either mayhem.<\/p>\n Tightening up the process for legal acquisition of firearms would not much hinder the mentally ill from getting their hands on guns. And the various measures needed to stop a crazy Adam Lanza or Jared Lee Loughner would be mostly intolerable for liberal or conservative civil libertarians \u2014 incarcerating far more of the mentally unhinged, censoring the depiction of gratuitous and violent use of guns in video games and films, confiscating the vast pools of semi-automatic rifles and handguns owned by private citizens. No matter. Sandy Hook and the shooting of Gabby Giffords were still arguments to shame opponents \u2014 in the president\u2019s words, \u201clying\u201d opponents \u2014 into accepting the administration\u2019s proposals.<\/p>\n Furthermore, the politically driven distortion of recent gun violence was aimed not just at passing gun-control legislation, but also at demonizing opponents for the 2014 elections. That is why President Obama\u2019s political guru, David Axelrod, almost immediately floated the idea that the catalyst for the Boston violence was \u201ctax day,\u201d in a not-so-subtle insinuation that just maybe some right-wing tea-party types had set off the bombs. That theme soon metamorphosed among the Left into charges that right-wing-inspired sequestration had curbed law-enforcement vigilance and that right-wing opposition to laws against acquiring explosives had enabled the bombers.<\/p>\n In President Obama\u2019s State of the Union Address this February, he cited current inclement weather to argue for renewed efforts to implement some type of cap-and-trade taxes and to grant more subsidies of \u201csustainable energy\u201d (e.g., wind and solar): \u201cHeat waves, droughts, wildfires, and floods \u2014 all are now more frequent and intense. We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen, were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science \u2014 and act before it\u2019s too late.\u201d<\/p>\n Such weather hysteria brings to mind candidate Obama\u2019s bizarre claim in May 2007 that the tornado in Greensburg, Kan., killed 10,000 people. (\u201cIn case you missed it, this week, there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died \u2014 an entire town destroyed.\u201d) The tornado actually killed ten or eleven people. In that particular abuse of current events, Obama was not trying to hype global warming; he was trying to blame incumbent president George Bush \u2014 as if the supposed dearth of Kansas National Guardsmen (you see, according to Obama, most of them had been sent off to Iraq) meant that 10,000 innocent people had perished for want of emergency attention.<\/p>\n Note that despite the psychodramatic \u201cbefore it\u2019s too late\u201d reference to Superstorm Sandy, recent weather data show that the planet has not heated up in the last 15 years, despite a vast increase in the worldwide levels of carbon releases into the atmosphere. Moreover, the fact that the United States, almost alone among industrial countries, is beginning to cut its rate of carbon emissions is due almost entirely to the transition from coal to natural gas for generating electricity. Yet natural gas is a sort of politically incorrect fuel not usually seen as green enough for environmentalists.<\/p>\n In other words, there is no scientific support for Obama\u2019s inference that in the last decade and a half increasing human-produced carbon emissions have heated up the planet, much less caused a scientifically demonstrable spike in extreme weather. The only germane contemporary fact is precisely the one the president usually omits: Perhaps the greatest green boon in a half-century is the advent of fracking on private lands, which has led to a huge increase in the availability of clean-burning cheap natural gas that is insidiously replacing far dirtier-burning coal \u2014 despite, not because of, administration policies.<\/p>\n Of course, references to current events can cut two ways \u2014 and in a manner that might have the president crying foul against anyone other than himself who dares to tap into anger over contemporary horrors. Citing Superstorm Sandy was a futile effort to scare up support for cap-and-trade, and the incessant citing of the murdered children of Sandy Hook still did not make the case that Obama\u2019s proposed gun control would have saved them, but the Boston bombing might, in fact, remind us that something is indeed wrong with American immigration policy \u2014 right in the middle of a rush to push through \u201ccomprehensive immigration reform.\u201d<\/p>\n The checkered immigrant family of the two Boston bombers is a tragic advertisement of almost everything wrong with our current immigration policy. The idea of life-saving asylum doesn\u2019t make any sense when supposed refugees, like both of the Tsarnaev parents, can return to live safely in Russia. The elder of the suspected bombers, Tamerlan, himself had likewise just spent six months in a supposedly deadly homeland \u2014 for what exact reasons we can only speculate. Do our immigration authorities really believe that Russia is so dangerous for Muslims that they must be allowed unquestioned admission to the United States, but not so dangerous that they cannot from time to time choose to revisit their deadly place of birth?<\/p>\n Can a resident alien no longer be summarily deported for breaking the laws of his host country \u2014 in the case of the skilled boxer Tamerlan, for domestic violence against his non-boxing wife, or, in the case of his mother, for shoplifting over $1,600 in merchandise?<\/p>\n Does being on public assistance years after arrival in this country, like the Tsarnaev family, no longer qualify a resident alien for deportation?<\/p>\n Does being investigated by the FBI for apparently loud and public expressions of support for anti-American radical jihadists not mean much?<\/p>\n In short, if a Tamerlan Tsarnaev cannot be deported, then perhaps no resident alien can be under any circumstances.<\/p>\n I am sure that in theory there are all sorts of laws to the effect that asylum seekers must prove that they would be in constant peril in their homelands (cf. Obama\u2019s Aunt Zeituni and Uncle Onyango), that they must become self-sufficient residents of the United States (cf. Aunt Zeituni and Uncle Onyango), that they must not break American laws (cf. Aunt Zeituni and Uncle Onyango), and that they must not promote anti-American activity. But what do such theoreticals matter if, for reasons of laxity or political correctness or connectedness, these statutes are ignored \u2014 and, in the Boston case, ignored to a degree that led to murder and mayhem on a vast scale?<\/p>\n These paradoxes will resonate with those skeptical of comprehensive immigration reform. We expect boilerplate and loud administration assertions of border security, well-publicized benchmarks for self-sufficiency, grand talk of the avoidance of crime, and continued emphasis on long-term residence, but \u2014 once\u00a0de facto<\/em>\u00a0amnesty is conceded \u2014 all these requirements, like most of current immigration law, will not be worth the paper they are written on.<\/p>\n One final thought about the political use and abuse of contemporary horror. This generation of Americans has a propensity to prefer the showy and dramatic \u2014 but ultimately irrelevant \u2014 response to crises as psychosocial compensation for the fear or inability to embrace a useful, but difficult or controversial, remedy. We don\u2019t dare deal with the felony, so we strut about addressing the misdemeanor. When deranged shooters strike, go after the NRA, but do not get near Hollywood, the mental-health industry, or the illegally obtained handguns of the inner city.<\/p>\n When a hurricane strikes, provide more borrowed money for failed wind and solar programs, but do not dare promote fracking on public lands, which might radically reduce carbon emissions. Talk loudly of immigration reform, but only in the therapeutic sense of granting amnesties to the deserving, and never in the tragic sense of deporting the undeserving. As with the parents of wayward adolescents, saying yes wins smiles and saying no does not.<\/p>\n We know this much about this therapeutic and dishonest age: When the next horrific act occurs, one of two things will follow. Either we will rush to pass laws that will make us feel good but do nothing to address the existential crisis. Or we will be silent about enacting reforms of our existing flawed laws that might have prevented the horror, but would make us feel far too uncomfortable.<\/p>\n \u00a92013 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Barack Obama has a habit of trying to energize his legislative agenda by stoking the fires of emotionally charged current events \u2014 and in ways usually illogical and incoherent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[603,59,11,536],"tags":[12,852,291,405,35,327,1031,849,462],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1vU","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5887,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-dangers-of-politically-inspired-moral-outrage-from-sandy-hook-to-what-next\/","url_meta":{"origin":5822,"position":0},"title":"The Dangers of Politically Inspired Moral Outrage–From Sandy Hook to What Next?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 18, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson NRO's\u00a0The Corner It is a bad idea to demonize your opponents with epithets such \u201cshameful\u201d and \u201clying,\u201d given that the case was not made that proposed gun-control legislation would have prevented a Sandy Hook. To prevent these school-shooting horrors might require either armed guards in schools,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Human Rights"","block_context":{"text":"Human Rights","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/american-culture\/human-rights\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5900,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-psychodramas-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":5822,"position":1},"title":"Obama’s Psychodramas","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 23, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Unlike Sandy Hook and gun control, the Tsarnaev case teaches real lessons about immigration. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Barack Obama has a habit of trying to energize his legislative agenda by stoking the fires of emotionally charged current events \u2014 and in ways usually illogical and incoherent.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Immigration"","block_context":{"text":"Immigration","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/immigration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7090,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-anti-empirical-left\/","url_meta":{"origin":5822,"position":2},"title":"The Anti-Empirical Left","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 6, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Science is ignored when it doesn't support politically correct policy. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online President Obama entered office promising to restore the sanctity of science. Instead, a fresh war against science, statistics, and reason is being waged on behalf of politically\u00a0correct politics. After the Sandy Hook tragedy,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Global Warming"","block_context":{"text":"Global Warming","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/global-warming-2\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/599px-Aristotelesarp-300x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5806,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/confessions-of-a-counter-revolutionary\/","url_meta":{"origin":5822,"position":3},"title":"Confessions of a Counter-Revolutionary","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 16, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media \u201cCounter-revolutionary\u201d is an apt term for these days: President Obama has promised to make a fundamental transformation, a veritable revolution in American society and culture. Those who oppose such an ongoing agenda are suspected of all sorts of racism, nativism, misogyny, homophobia, and general\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Global Warming"","block_context":{"text":"Global Warming","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/global-warming-2\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1666,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/global-warming-rip\/","url_meta":{"origin":5822,"position":4},"title":"Global Warming–RIP?","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 1, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Not long ago, candidate Obama promised to cool the planet and lower the rising seas. Indeed, he campaigned on passing \u201ccap-and-trade\u201d legislation, a radical, costly effort to reduce America\u2019s traditional carbon energy use. The theory was that new taxes and greater regulations would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Energy"","block_context":{"text":"Energy","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/energy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9353,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/politics-not-personalities-will-likely-determine-the-presidential-election\/","url_meta":{"origin":5822,"position":5},"title":"Politics, Not Personalities, Will Likely Determine the Presidential Election","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 16, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The candidates may be unconventional, but their political agendas fall along a conventional divide. By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online At first glance, 2016 sizes up as no other election year in American history. For more than 30 years, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have been high-profile\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5822"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5822"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5822\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5824,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5822\/revisions\/5824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}