{"id":5224,"date":"2005-08-06T20:20:15","date_gmt":"2005-08-06T20:20:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com.108-166-28-151.mdgnetworks.com\/wordpress\/?p=5224"},"modified":"2013-04-09T20:21:45","modified_gmt":"2013-04-09T20:21:45","slug":"the-myth-of-islam-busted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-myth-of-islam-busted\/","title":{"rendered":"The Myth of Islam Busted"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Review of\u00a0<em>The Myth of Islamic Tolerance: How Islamic Law Treats Non-Muslims,\u00a0<\/em>ed. Robert Spencer<\/h1>\n<p>by Bruce S. Thornton<\/p>\n<p><em>Private Papers<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: large;\">O<\/span>ne of the greatest impediments in our war against jihadist terrorism is the misinformation, half-truths, and outright lies about Islam entertained by many of our public intellectuals.<!--more--> Examples are easy to find; here&#8217;s one from the otherwise intelligent Gregg Easterbrook,\u00a0<i>Atlantic Monthly<\/i>\u00a0contributor and senior editor at\u00a0<i>The New Republic<\/i>, from his recent book\u00a0<i>The Progress Paradox<\/i>: \u201cMost Muslims are good-hearted, peace-loving people, just as are most Christians and Jews. A small minority of Muslims are vicious fanatics. But then the Christian ethos has spawned its share of hideous killers, among them the terrorist Timothy McVeigh, and this tells us nothing about the typical Christian.\u201d The obviously false analogy in the last sentence \u2014 McVeigh didn&#8217;t kill with the sanction of Christian theology or belief, which has no doctrine remotely close to jihad, and millions of Christians didn&#8217;t dance in the streets after the bombing in Oklahoma City \u2014 could stand as a textbook example of this logical fallacy.<\/p>\n<p>Such ignorance \u2014 on display everywhere in the media, especially among those eager to rationalize away the Islamic roots of the latest terrorist murder \u2014 makes a book like\u00a0<i>The Myth of Islamic Tolerance<\/i>\u00a0particularly important. Robert Spencer, in earlier books like\u00a0<i>Islam Unveiled<\/i>,\u00a0<i>Onward Muslim Soldiers<\/i>, and the recent\u00a0<i>The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades<\/i>, as well as on his invaluable website\u00a0<i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jihadwatch.org\/\" target=\"www.jihadwatch.org\">Jihad Watch<\/a><\/i>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.jihadwatch.org\/\" target=\"www.jihadwatch.org\">jihadwatch.org<\/a>), has already done yeoman&#8217;s work in documenting Islam&#8217;s fundamental intolerance, martial aggressiveness, and sanctioning of violence against non-Muslim infidels. The 58 essays in the current book attack root and branch the widespread Orwellian myth, recently given cinematic sanction in Kingdom of Heaven, that Islamic societies have been historically more tolerant and friendly to minorities than has been Western culture.<\/p>\n<p>Spencer sets the stage with an overview of the myth, its political uses, and its refutation by the simple facts of history and Islamic jurisprudence and theology. Politically, the myth provides psychic comfort for jaded Westerners, especially Europeans, who have made the devil&#8217;s bargain to accept large numbers of Islamic immigrants as a source of cheap labor: \u201cEuropean states eyeing the rapid growth of their Muslim populations console themselves with tales of old al-Andalus, reassuring one another that Islamic hegemony not only wasn&#8217;t all that bad \u2014 it was a veritable golden age.\u201d Thus European and American politicians cater to Islamic immigrants, whom they believe will assimilate into Western society, their \u201ctolerant\u201d and\u00a0 \u201cpeace-loving\u201d religion merely enriching the multi-ethnic tapestry.<\/p>\n<p>But as Spencer points out, and as history and Islamic doctrine show repeatedly, \u201cIslam doesn&#8217;t accept a position as just one among a community of disparate religions but must struggle to make itself supreme.\u201d Unable to prosecute militarily the divine mandate to expand the House of Islam until it encompasses the whole world, modern jihadists have been adept at manipulating the various cultural pathologies of the West. As Ibn Warraq points out in his Foreword, the old myth of the \u201cnoble savage,\u201d the habit of idealizing more primitive or alien non-Western cultures in order to castigate one&#8217;s own, has from the beginning of Western contact with Islam distorted the understanding of it. Later, Great Power geopolitical contests reinforced these European idealizations of Islamic societies, particularly the Ottoman Turks. The result has been centuries of mythic idealizations that continue to obscure the true nature of Islam, leading to the strange phenomenon we see nearly every day: non-Muslim Westerners \u201chastening,\u201d as Spencer puts it, \u201cto assure the public that the Islam of the terrorists is not the &#8216;true Islam,&#8217; which is, they maintain, a benign and tolerant thing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Eager to display their sensitivity to and tolerance of the cultural \u201cother,\u201d apologists like those Spencer liberally quotes end up arrogantly asserting that millions of practicing Muslims don&#8217;t understand their own religion. But of course the jihadists know what their religion teaches about non-Muslims: they are categorically inferior infidels, particularly the \u201cPeople of the Book,\u201d Jews and Christians, \u201crenegades who have rejected this final revelation [of Muhammad] out of corruption and malice and who have exchanged truth for falsehood.\u201d They are accursed, and as such, it is the duty of every Muslim \u201cto fight them,\u201d in the words of the Qur&#8217;an, \u201cuntil persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah.\u201d In a later verse this injunction is specifically directed against Jews and Christians: \u201cFight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya [a special tax on non-Muslims] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As for those fantasies of intercultural harmony entertained by many Western multiculturalists, consider this verse from the Qur&#8217;an: \u201cO ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors. They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turn to them (for friendship) is of them.\u201d As Spencer reminds us, \u201cThis is the Qur&#8217;an that pious Muslims cherish and memorize in its entirety; it is for them their primary guide to understanding how they should make their way in the world and deal with other people. It is nothing short of staggering that the myth of Islamic tolerance could have gained such currency in the teeth of the Qur&#8217;an&#8217;s open contempt and hatred for Jews and Christians and incitements to violence against them.\u201d Spencer&#8217;s survey of the Hadith, the words and deeds attributed to Muhammed and second in authority to the Qur&#8217;an; the interpretations of the Hadith and Qur&#8217;an by centuries of Islamic jurisprudence; and the writings of modern Islamic radicals like Sayyid Qutb, the premier theorist of modern jihad, testifies to a consistent tradition of intolerance towards non-Muslims and the divine sanction to subdue them to Islam.<\/p>\n<p>The subsequent essays in\u00a0<i>The Myth of Islamic Tolerance<\/i>\u00a0elaborate with precise detail the more specific consequences of Islamic doctrine for religious minorities living in Muslim countries. All are valuable and repay careful reading; the Herculean efforts of David G. Littman over the years to force the United Nations to acknowledge the abuse of non-Muslims&#8217; human rights in Islamic nations should be more widely known and acknowledged. As important as these documents are, the 18 essays and presentations by historian Bat Ye&#8217;or offer the most exhaustive and meticulous documentation of Islamic intolerance and oppression of\u00a0 \u201cdhimmi,\u201d those non-Muslims subjected not just to a tax (the \u201cjizya\u201d) but to institutionalized oppression and humiliation, a whole host of repressive restrictions covering dress, public behavior, and the practice of their religion. The particulars of dhimmitude as documented by Bat Ye&#8217;or are strikingly similar to the Jim Crow laws in the segregated South, and served a similar purpose: to remind Jews and Christians every day of their inferiority to Muslims, and to reinforce the dhimmi&#8217;s precarious position, since the \u201ccovenant\u201d by which Muslims allowed the dhimmi to keep their lives could be revoked at any time, whereupon the dhimmi could be justly plundered and slaughtered.<\/p>\n<p>As well as documenting this practice in Islamic history and jurisprudence, Bat Ye&#8217;or&#8217;s essays also detail how the dynamic of dhimmitude continues to inform relations between Europe and Islam today, as seen particularly in the scapegoating and marginalization of Israel, the one nation comprising former dhimmi who have shaken off their inferior status and thus challenged the Islamic confidence in its own divinely sanctioned superiority: \u201cIsrael&#8217;s struggle is none other than a fight to destroy a dhimmi archetype that has bewitched the Arab consciousness with a destructive and nostalgic dream of hegemony, irreconcilable with principles of decolonization or with the rights and liberties of peoples.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the myth of Islamic tolerance is itself an expression of the dhimmi mentality already characterizing many Westerners, their acceptance of their culture&#8217;s crimes and inferiority codified in multiculturalism and currently facilitating jihadist terrorism. In this regard the late Edward Said&#8217;s Orientalism stands as one of the most pernicious and influential peddlers of virulent anti-Westernism, in this instance one tarted up in the sort of postmodern jargon that impresses badly educated humanities professors. Said was the consummate academic hustler, a Westernized Egyptian child of privilege who invented a Palestinian refugee persona that gratified the American university&#8217;s insatiable appetite for oppressed victims \u201cof color\u201d (see the article by Justus Reid Weiner in the September 1999 issue of\u00a0<i>Commentary<\/i>). The logical, historical, and philosophical sins of Orientalism have been noted by Bernard Lewis (reprinted in<i>\u00a0Islam and the West<\/i>) and Keith Windschuttle (<i>New Criterion<\/i>, January 1999), and to this list should be added Ibn Warraq&#8217;s devastating critique. Warraq is the brave author of\u00a0<i>Why I Am Not a Muslim<\/i>, a devastating exposure of Islam&#8217;s intolerant and illiberal principles and practices. His careful demolition of Said&#8217;s dishonest and intellectually incoherent book is alone worth the price of\u00a0<i>The Myth of Islamic Tolerance<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>For as Warraq makes clear, Said&#8217;s book has indirectly sanctioned Islamic terrorism by giving an apparent scholarly justification for blaming the problems of the Middle East on Western colonial and imperial sins rather than on flaws in Islam and Arab regimes, the social, cultural, economic, and religious dysfunctions that prevent them from accommodating themselves to the modern world. And it has reinforced among many American intellectuals the bad habit of cultural self-loathing that leeches away moral support for any action that would defend America&#8217;s interests and security. Finally, Orientalism has contributed to the corruption of Middle Eastern studies in the West as manifested in the politically and ideologically skewed \u201cscholarship\u201d that has obscured the truth of Islam, a sampling of which can be read in Daniel Pipes&#8217;s \u201cJihad and the Professors,\u201d another gem reprinted in Spencer&#8217;s book. As Warraq concludes, \u201cSaid has much to answer for.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The eagerness of Western intellectuals to betray their professional duty to seek truth, and their zeal for idealizing a culture which wouldn&#8217;t tolerate their existence for five seconds, are both from the perspective of the jihadists evidence that the West is a spiritually bankrupt dhimmi culture ripe for submission to Islamic hegemony. Unfortunately, too many of our leaders who otherwise understand the nature of the enemy endorse many of the same myths exploded in this indispensable volume; just listen to one of Tony Blair&#8217;s closest aides, in a 2004 report on counter-terrorism: Britain&#8217;s strategy should be \u201cto prevent terrorism by tackling its underlying causes, to work together to resolve regional conflicts to support moderate Islam and reform and to diminish support for terrorists by influencing relevant social and economic issues.\u201d Meanwhile government-subsidized mosques were preaching jihad and creating the bombers who murdered over 50 Londoners. If we are to prevail in the struggle against jihad, we must first acknowledge the truth about the enemy and his motivations.\u00a0<i>The Myth of Islamic Tolerance<\/i>\u00a0is a good place to start.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Review of\u00a0The Myth of Islamic Tolerance: How Islamic Law Treats Non-Muslims,\u00a0ed. Robert Spencer by Bruce S. Thornton Private Papers One of the greatest impediments in our war against jihadist terrorism is the misinformation, half-truths, and outright lies about Islam entertained by many of our public intellectuals.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[87,22,771],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1mg","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5393,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/epistle-to-the-muslims\/","url_meta":{"origin":5224,"position":0},"title":"Epistle to the Muslims","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 27, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Christian leaders abase themselves before Islam by Bruce S. Thornton City Journal On November 18, the\u00a0New York Times\u00a0ran a full-page ad entitled \u201cA Christian Response to\u00a0A Common Word Between Us and You.\u201d\u00a0A Common Word\u00a0is an October letter from 138 Muslim scholars and clerics \u201cto leaders of Christian churches, everywhere.\u201d It\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Bruce S. Thornton&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5380,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/muslim-moderates\/","url_meta":{"origin":5224,"position":1},"title":"Muslim &#8220;Moderates&#8221;","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 6, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"What's in a word? by Bruce S. Thornton Private Papers The war against Islamic jihad continues to be compromised in the West by the dominant narrative that supposedly makes sense of the conflict. In this scenario, the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful moderates, while the jihadists exploit a distortion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Bruce S. Thornton&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":813,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/robert-spencer-asks-did-muhammad-exist\/","url_meta":{"origin":5224,"position":2},"title":"Robert Spencer Asks: Did Muhammad Exist?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 29, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPage Magazine A review of Robert Spencer\u2019s\u00a0Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam\u2019s Obscure Origins\u00a0(Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2012). One of the jihadists\u2019 most potent psychological weapons is the double standard Muslims have imposed on the West. Temples and churches are destroyed and vandalized, Christians murdered and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Reviews&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Reviews","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/opinion\/reviews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5233,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/jihad-is-knocking-another-episode-in-the-war-between-christendom-and-islam\/","url_meta":{"origin":5224,"position":3},"title":"Jihad Is Knocking: Another Episode in the War between Christendom and Islam","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 9, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton Private Papers The slaughter in London is another grisly wake-up call that likely will go as unheeded as earlier ones. Already the standard narrative is being trotted out: evildoers created by what the\u00a0New York Times\u00a0predictably called the \u201croot causes of terrorism\u201d: autocracy, or economic stagnation, or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Bruce S. Thornton&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8182,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/more-delusional-apologetics-for-islam\/","url_meta":{"origin":5224,"position":4},"title":"More Delusional Apologetics for Islam","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 4, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine It\u2019s pretty embarrassing when the on-line comments about an article are more logical and knowledgeable than the article. Such is the case with a Wall Street Journal\u00a0op-ed last week that argued Muslim violence does not reflect traditional Islamic doctrine, but is merely a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Turkey&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Turkey","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/turkey\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Koran-cover-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":3407,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-secularist-delusion\/","url_meta":{"origin":5224,"position":5},"title":"The Secularist Delusion","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 28, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton Advancing a Free Society The dubious received wisdom rationalizing our current intervention in Libya was crystallized in Senator John Kerry\u2019s recent\u00a0essay\u00a0for\u00a0The Wall Street Journal. For Kerry, the rebels in Libya are the same as those in Egypt, \u201cpeacefully demanding freedom and dignity.\u201d Long oppressed by tyrants\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Islam&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Islam","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/islam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5224"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5224"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5224\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5225,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5224\/revisions\/5225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}