by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
National Review Online<\/em><\/p>\n T<\/span>op officials of our government warn that another terrorist attack of the magnitude of September 11 is “inevitable” and “is coming” in the near future. Such realistic prognoses about everything from germs to dirty bombs are perhaps understandable to counter complacency in the mostly domestic quiet of the past ten months since the suicide murdering. The idea is that if and when the blow comes, Americans will purportedly shrug that they have had no illusions about the fragility of their security, and will be less likely to engage in recriminations. Wayward and negligent bureaucrats, of course, can then pronounce “I told you so” \u2014 as if the human endeavor of committing terrorism was more a natural phenomenon, an act of God of sorts that people can neither foresee nor prevent.<\/span><\/p>\n Yet in a time of war there are also disadvantages in the language of such calculated pessimism. The cumulative effect of dire warnings is a growing \u2014 and enervating \u2014 despair among our citizens, who insidiously lose confidence in the skill and verve of their leaders. Are we then quite fatalistically to accept that Americans are in a huge lottery of death \u2014 each of us in the near future hopelessly fated to being vaporized or incinerated by superhuman enemies in our own doomed plane, train, or stadium to come?<\/span><\/p>\n Far better for the national psyche it would be for our president or Cabinet officials to proclaim something like, “We pledge to make sure there are no more September 11ths \u2014 but if we are wrong, let the world know that this time the consequences for those who committed or abetted such murder are going to be too terrible to contemplate.” If our leaders genuinely feel it is disingenuous to promise a safety that they cannot with some certainty ensure, then at least let them convey some emotion \u2014 even if it is cloaked in the language of wrath and revenge. Great leaders from Pericles to Churchill realized the power of righteous indignation and the issuing of threats that they could and would follow through on.<\/span><\/p>\n By the same token, the public is not so blinkered that it cannot grasp a few basic elements of American foreign policy. Americans have a growing unease with Mr. Musharref, the dictator from Pakistan, who overthrew an elected government, allowed his intelligence agency and indeed his entire country to be hijacked by al Qaeda terrorists, and will now not rule out a first-strike nuclear attack against the world’s largest democracy. They also have problems with the Saudis and Egyptians, whose citizens butchered our own, whose leaders constantly lecture the United States about our policy in the Middle East, and whose governments are as illegitimate and autocratic as they are corrupt.<\/span><\/p>\n We are not dumb; we understand the calculus of Realpolitik \u2014 both the need not to provoke gratuitously such dictatorships that claim that they are tracking down terrorists, and the awareness that elections could usher in fundamentalists who would only shut down the very democratic machinery that brought them to power. That being said, however, we still thirst for some sort of democratic transcendence \u2014 some small hint that we are defeating the terrorists for some larger and more lasting purpose. We fought Japan not just to bring justice to the killers of Pearl Harbor, but to end the idea of a military dictatorship in Japan itself \u2014 for its people’s interests as well as ours.<\/span><\/p>\n So we still need to be told that our war against terror is not simply reactive and solely military in nature, but in fact is part of a larger effort to alter the very moral landscape \u2014 social, economic, and political \u2014 that allows terrorists to flourish. Americans need to be reminded again and again that we support both Israel and India not solely because they oppose terrorism, but because they do so under the aegis of democracy. Our war is not America against the terrorists, but rather a democracy’s struggle against dictatorships, gangs, thugs, and tyrants.<\/span><\/p>\n That democratic litmus allows us not to be kept in the dark as to the degree of support we are supposed to lend to despotic regimes in the Middle East based on their alleged \u2014 or even occasionally concrete \u2014 efforts in hunting down terrorists. Is the Mubaracracy in Egypt friendly, moderate, an ally, neutral, or an enemy? And on what criteria? And who says, and when and why? It is nice because it receives our best tanks to be used against \u2014 whom? Since most of its citizens do not blowup American skyscrapers with us in them? That Egypt does not threaten Israel overtly? That a minority of its citizens tells pollsters they like Americans? Any, all, or none of the above?<\/span><\/p>\n And are the oil potentates in the Gulf with us or against us \u2014 complicit in the spread of terror or aghast at its consequences? Do they ride over a restive populace yearning for secular education, elections, and a free press \u2014 or a people ever more eager to return to the Middle Ages, in which gender apartheid, floggings, amputations, and polygamy can be practiced without censure?<\/span><\/p>\n Let us allow the public to forego the suspense and simply conclude that these regimes are\u00a0all<\/i>\u00a0unfree and undemocratic, and so the ways in which they profess assistance will be forever couched in acts that are contradictory, hypocritical, and capricious \u2014 as any government must whose policy of day-to-day survival is always held captive by the terror of the frenzied but unfree Arab Street.<\/span><\/p>\n Such predictable and logical support for democracy would have a number of salutary effects almost immediately. It would lend a steadiness and coherence to America’s struggle that transcends religion or crass self-interest, affirming that the people of the United States supports the aspirations of anyone among 500 million Muslims in the Middle East who seeks freedom and democracy. It provides uniformity to our policy vis \u2014 vis Afghanistan and Iraq; the logic for our military action in both cases is not merely retribution \u2014 a good enough reason in itself \u2014 but also to metamorphosize the area’s worst regimes into those with the most potential for eventual democratic evolution.<\/span><\/p>\n Finally, democratic rhetoric is pragmatic and offers an ironic repartee to the train of Middle Eastern “moderates” who file into Washington, promising us assistance in private, but in public remonstrating and posturing against the United States for public consumption among their captive audiences back home. We should tell all of them \u2014 the assorted kings, sheiks, princes, and strongmen alike \u2014 that we favor the democratization of their countries and the fulfillment of their own people’s innate desire for freedom. That way we can far better manipulate their own public opinion than they ours \u2014 possessing as we do not guile or the arts of triangulation, but the simple power of timeless ideas.<\/span><\/p>\n The next time President Bush stands at a dais next to a Jordanian King, a Kuwaiti prince, or an Egyptian strongman, he should not have to endure the old empty advice from despots on Middle East reforms, elections, and timetables that is as irrelevant as it is hypocritical. Let him instead shoot back \u2014 without warning and without worry:<\/span><\/p>\n We are now in a great hunt to track and defeat the fleeing and scattered agents of terror. But we also are in a more profound and difficult struggle than this necessary burden of bringing to justice individual murderers and ending the enclaves that fostered their evil. For we shall never have peace in this conflict; we shall never obtain real justice from those who have aided and abetted our enemies, until we can ensure that\u00a0all<\/i>\u00a0governments pledge to their peoples the creation of open and humane societies \u2014 ultimately the only conditions under which free and vigilant citizens themselves can ensure that terrorism dies and is buried.<\/span><\/p>\n Our powerful military can and will end all those who planned the murder of our 3,000 on September 11. But out of that great evil, we can also promise the fallen that they were the catalysts for some far greater good \u2014 that they did not die in vain, but, in fact, their sacrifice was the beginning of something noble that will soon shake the very foundations of the world as we have known it. Let us remake our relationships with the states of the region into something far different and far better from those existing before September 11 \u2014 and so thereby keep faith with the dead now by a simple pact: “If you are a terrorist and kill Americans \u2014 you will suffer our terrible and swift justice. If you are a state who aids terrorists \u2014 you will experience war and wreckage undreamed of for the wickedness you have wrought. And if you are a nation of the Middle East, whose people are not free, whose media are censored, and whose elections are fraudulent, then you also have proved to be an indirect agent and abettor of this new plague \u2014 and so you too shall soon have a rendezvous with the American people and their wrath.”<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a92002 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The language of democratic confidence, not fear of terrorism, is needed by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Top officials of our government warn that another terrorist attack of the magnitude of September 11 is “inevitable” and “is coming” in the near future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[827],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1jm","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6634,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/jihad-vs-terrorism-listen-to-what-islams-authorities-say\/","url_meta":{"origin":5044,"position":0},"title":"Jihad vs Terrorism: Listen to What Islam’s Authorities Say","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 16, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim \/\/\u00a0RaymondIbrahim.com A recent Arabic article appearing in Egypt\u2019s\u00a0Al Ahram\u00a0newspaper titled \u201cIs Terrorism Jihad?\u201d written by Islamic law expert Dr. Abdul Fatah Idris offers important lessons\u2014from the fact that jihad\u00a0does\u00a0involve subjugating non-Muslims to why the Western mentality is still incapable of acknowledging it. Idris, professor and chairman of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6353,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/egyptian-military-warns-obama-supporting-terrorism-in-egypt-is-red-line\/","url_meta":{"origin":5044,"position":1},"title":"Egyptian Military Warns Obama: ‘Supporting Terrorism’ in Egypt is ‘Red Line’","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 19, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim \/\/ RaymondIbrahim.com According to a report titled \u201cSisi to Pentagon: We will not turn back, sovereignty is a red line,\u201d published in\u00a0Watan\u00a0newspaper (Saturday, August 17 edition), Egyptian Maj. Gen. Muhammad al-\u2019Assar has just issued a strongly worded letter to the Pentagon, on behalf of the Egyptian military\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Egypt"","block_context":{"text":"Egypt","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/egypt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5939,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/terrorism-as-therapy\/","url_meta":{"origin":5044,"position":2},"title":"Terrorism as Therapy","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 13, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"The Obama administration is intent on downplaying the Islamic roots of contemporary terrorism. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online One common theme emerges from the hearings over the Benghazi disaster: The Obama administration is intent on downplaying the Islamic roots of terrorists who harbor an existential hatred of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Terrorism"","block_context":{"text":"Terrorism","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/war-on-terror\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1840,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/our-top-anti-terrorism-advisor-must-go\/","url_meta":{"origin":5044,"position":3},"title":"Our Top Anti-Terrorism Advisor Must Go","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 9, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson NRO's\u00a0The Corner Partisanship, Then and Now One of the stranger behaviors of the ever-stranger Obama administration is its sudden adoption of the \"wounded fawn\" posture. No opposition was more stridently critical of a sitting president than was the anti-Bush Left. Barack Obama, as candidate and president,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "February 2010"","block_context":{"text":"February 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/february-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2439,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/how-jihad-influenced-the-norway-massacre\/","url_meta":{"origin":5044,"position":4},"title":"How Jihad Influenced the Norway Massacre","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 17, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Hudson New York In his manifesto, Anders Breivik, the perpetrator of the Norway massacre, wherein some 80 people were killed, mentioned the Crusades and aspects of it as an inspirational factor. Predictably, Western elites \u2014 especially through the MSM \u2014 have begun a new round of moral,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6383,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-terror-leader-behind-bars-in-egypt\/","url_meta":{"origin":5044,"position":5},"title":"A Terror Leader Behind Bars in Egypt","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 27, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim \/\/\u00a0FrontPage Magazine The supreme leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, the head of the Islamist snake, Muhammad Badie\u2014who had slipped security forces by traveling in and out of the\u00a0Brotherhood torture camps\u00a0(known as \u201cpeaceful sits ins\u201d by the mainstream media\u201d)\u2014has finally been arrested in Egypt and is awaiting trial.\u00a0\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Egypt"","block_context":{"text":"Egypt","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/egypt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5044"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5044"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5044\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5045,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5044\/revisions\/5045"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}