by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
The Claremont Institute<\/p>\n
T<\/b>he disclosures of North Korean duplicity in acquiring nuclear weapons were disturbing for a variety of reasons, involving more than our national security. That Pyongyang had been lying and cheating all along since President Clinton’s accords of summer 1994 was most galling because it seemed to discredit a number of the comfortable American assumptions that lay behind our past bewildering trust in compliance, inspections, dialogue, and safeguard agreements. The current efforts to spin the frightening revelations \u2014 perhaps the accords prevented even more nukes being produced, perhaps otherwise we would have had a million dead in a war in 1994, perhaps President Bush knew about this for months, perhaps we should now try the same diplomatic means with Saddam Hussein that we are using to salvage the situation in Korea \u2014 only show that we have learned nothing from the past.<\/p>\n
Apparently a privileged class of men and women in the West, the beneficiaries of higher education and of ample means, share a tendency to believe that the world works according to their own Enlightenment logic \u2014 or at least that its reasoned judgment can appeal even to the uninitiated like Kim Il-Sung. And the ego of these new missionaries of wisdom is mighty.<\/p>\n
Thus Mr. Carter once gushed that the Korean dictators, who had executed thousands of their own citizens, had suddenly on his arrival been transmogrified into “intelligent and well informed” statesmen and thus worthy partners in his own Cartesian dialectics. Since his 1994 visit, he has boasted that he never ordered a single military attack during his term, that he was the first American to go to Pyongyang in 43 years, that he wished to begin his Habitat for Humanity project in the North, and that the United States had no business building a missile-defense system since North Korea had no nuclear capability.<\/p>\n
Indeed, Kim Il-Sung and his dictatorship were seen more as a symptom of poverty or ignorance. For Western idealists, it is apparently too depressing to accept that evil is a perverse desire to satisfy innate human psychic and material appetites at the expense of others. Thus Mr. Carter in his pride assumed that the gift of two multimillion-dollar light-water nuclear reactors would obviously be appreciated as a logical effort to help an impoverished society generate electricity for its people. Why would any sane state use its fissionable material to build bombs with which to blackmail humane societies abroad, when it could power water pumps for its own starving citizens at home?<\/p>\n
Yet in contrast, ordinary Americans who may have subsidized those bombs through gifts of food, fuel oil, and advanced technology \u2014 but without the education, privilege, or egos of Messrs. Clinton and Carter \u2014 would have instantly sensed that impoverished nations that cannot feed their own people have no business being given 21st-century atomic plants as bribes for not developing weapons of mass destruction \u2014 especially if they have a record of exporting ballistic missiles to other murderous regimes and firing them over the heads of their neighbors. Indeed, most normal folks would have objected that both our ex-presidents had, in fact, done something quite evil by allowing the safety of the region to hinge on the good-faith pledges of autocrats. In short, they did not believe Mr. Clinton’s statement in 1994 that “North Korea will freeze and then dismantle its nuclear program.”<\/p>\n
So there was an arrogance throughout the 1994 accords \u2014 as if Carter\/Clinton, with rare insight and intellectual deftness, had transcended the human pathologies of mere mortals. In 1998 in California there was much publicity given to some Berkeley engineers, who ostentatiously announced that they too were traveling to North Korea to install windmills. Why did they go? Because \u2014 just like residents of Marin County \u2014 North Koreans, in between nuclear plants, would now be desperately in need of non-polluting and sustainable sources of power. Millions may have been starving as a murderous regime built nukes, but California engineers could look the other way if it were a question of spreading the gospel of non-polluting energy.<\/p>\n
The problems of such utopianism are twofold: Its fuzzy rhetoric of peace and love is as unassailable as the reality of its endangering innocents is irrefutable; and its purveyors are always lauded for their noble efforts, but rarely blamed for the carnage that comes after. So too it will be in the present catastrophe. Mr. Carter returns to Plains with his Noble prize; Mr. Clinton will continue to bite his lip as he makes millions lecturing about his peacemaking and garnering sundry awards and medals. Meanwhile, less flashy diplomats will deal with their mess. The latter are already being blamed for telling the truth that North Korea really is evil \u2014 even as they’re granted little leverage over a rogue nation with the ability to vaporize a Seoul, Tokyo, or soon a Los Angeles.<\/p>\n
Moral equivalence peeps out beneath the present Korean fiasco. In the new morality, institutions and values are seen as relative concepts and not subject to absolute or unchanging criteria of evaluation. Instead, those with supposed power oppress and make the rules, while those without suffer the consequences. Thus a powerful democracy and its elected leaders are seen as not necessarily more worthy of consideration \u2014 or “privilege” \u2014 than the non-West, by any objective standard of politics or culture. In this view Israel has nuclear weapons, so why not Iraq? America stockpiles weapons of mass destruction, so what is the big deal with North Korea? Was not the United States “uncooperative” and “inflexible” in its prior stance toward North Korea, and thus simply unable to appreciate the nuances of its alternative politics?<\/p>\n
But democratic societies involve consensual government, with a free press and a political opposition that ensures that the public can chastise or throw out leaders who are neither reasonable nor sane. Not so with a Kim Jong-Il or Saddam Hussein. It is more likely that Pakistan, which is undemocratic, will use its “Islamic” bomb than will democratic India, in the same manner that a nuclear China poses a greater threat than do Great Britain or France.<\/p>\n
Accepting that acts are simply separable from their moral landscape is much easier than assessing such concepts of “preemption,” “weapons of mass destruction,” and “U.N. resolutions” on the basis of the unchanging ethical circumstances involved. If a Mr. Carter brags that he never used military force “once” (I supposed the failed Iranian rescue mission does not count), we should ask whether such restraint saved or cost lives, and then assess his self-proclaimed morality on that basis. Was the world a safer or a more dangerous place after he left?<\/p>\n
If a democratic nation is trying to stop a fascist nation from killing thousands, preemption would be as good a policy then as it would be bad were the roles and circumstances to be reversed. If WMDs are in North Korea’s hands they are frightening in a way they are not under British auspices. And if democratic states in the Security Council condemn a rogue nation, then a U.N. resolution means something more than the majority votes of totalitarians that revile a democratic state. Why? Because democratic and liberal societies by their very nature deserve more of an absolute privilege not accorded to dictators and tyrants \u2014 always. The world’s entire anthrax stockpile monopolized in storage in a Britain or Australia is a far safer proposition than the possession of just one pound of it by the likes of Iraq or North Korea.<\/p>\n
We also saw something of a condescending multiculturalism in the present tragedy. The South Korean government had recently adopted the “Sunshine” policy of open appeasement. Japan seemed equally eager to placate the madmen in Pyongyang. Perhaps the Clinton administration saw this as an Asian problem, where cultural nuance and complexity overrode the age-old common sense that you don’t give fissionable materials as blackmail awards to totalitarians either in the East or the West. A realist who believed that human values trump culture would not have seen North Korea’s neighbors as fellow Asians dealing with local problems according to specific cultural protocols. Instead, he would sigh that they were dangerously imperiling the safety of millions of their own citizens \u2014 as well as those of the 100,000 U.S. servicemen in that area.<\/p>\n
Set against those postmodern and post-heroic theories remain tragic truths that will never disappear. Unfree and totalitarian regimes like North Korea lie and always will lie, for two simple reasons. One: Without a free press and a political opposition, they can. And two: They must, because their system does not work and would collapse were their people free and able to speak freely. Second, appeasement \u2014 in the past, now, and for all time \u2014 only encourages thugs and killers, and proves far more dangerous and costly in the long run than either preemption or early resolute opposition (in the manner in which Israel took out the Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981, or we pondered the same in 1994 in North Korea). Third, culture affects the way a people fights, creates government, eats, and sleeps, but it does not trump human nature itself. Hitler, Tojo, Mussolini, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, and Kim Il-Sung may have had culturally specific preferences in their terror and mass murder, but as human tyrants of the ages they were predictable in their behavior and thus could only be opposed, never appeased. In short, Thucydides or Hobbes would know more about the North Korean leader than would the present leadership in either nearby Tokyo or Seoul.<\/p>\n
So let us beware of personable but smug men like Mr. Carter and Mr. Clinton, the prizewinners who assure us that either their ostentatious morality or their self-righteous glibness is equivalent to wisdom. It is not. I’d prefer a less nuanced and less conceited Truman or Reagan, who sensed something evil about the Sung dynasty that our present generation in its missionary pride has forgotten.<\/p>\n
\u00a92002 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
North Korea as a metaphor of the times by Victor Davis Hanson The Claremont Institute The disclosures of North Korean duplicity in acquiring nuclear weapons were disturbing for a variety of reasons, involving more than our national security.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[823],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1iu","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3721,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/beyond-the-braggadocio-irans-ahmandinejad-far-weaker-than-he-lets-on\/","url_meta":{"origin":4990,"position":0},"title":"Beyond the Braggadocio: Iran’s Ahmandinejad Far Weaker Than He Lets On","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 4, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services The Iraq Study Group, prominent U.S. Senators and realist diplomats all want America to hold formal talks with the government of Iran. They think Tehran might help the United States disengage from Iraq and the general Middle East mess with dignity. That would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Janurary 2007"","block_context":{"text":"Janurary 2007","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2007\/janurary-2007\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11065,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/leave-mcmaster-be\/","url_meta":{"origin":4990,"position":1},"title":"Leave McMaster Be","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review About every two months, there are rumors that Gen. H. R. McMaster might be let go as Trump\u2019s national-security adviser (along with many other stellar appointees). The world, however, is a much more logical and predictable place than it was 14 months ago. We\u2019ve\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10470,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/10470-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":4990,"position":2},"title":"From An Angry Reader: To:\u2026","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"From An Angry Reader: To: Prof. Victor Davis Hanson \u00a0 At the end of your interview with Scott Simon on 8 July 2017 I heard this: \u201cAnd look how they took a good man like George Bush and turned him into a monster\u201d. It caught my attention. \u00a0 One of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Angry Reader"","block_context":{"text":"Angry Reader","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/angry-reader\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12261,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-psychology-of-viral-paradoxes\/","url_meta":{"origin":4990,"position":3},"title":"The Psychology of Viral Paradoxes","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review There are a lot of known unknowns and paradoxes in these times of uncertainty. Here are a few. 1) Trump is criticized as both \u201cracist\u201d and \u201cxenophobic\u201d in his condemnations of the \u201cChinese\u201d virus, while he\u2019s also criticized for \u201cappeasing\u201d President Xi when he\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4851,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/legends-of-the-fall\/","url_meta":{"origin":4990,"position":4},"title":"Legends of the Fall","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 10, 2003","format":false,"excerpt":"More myths about the current war. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online \u201cThe war is against 'terror'.\" As a number of astute observers have reminded us, terror is a\u00a0method, not an enemy. And we are no more in a war against it than we were once fighting the scourge\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "October 2003"","block_context":{"text":"October 2003","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2003\/october-2003\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1015,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/2011-politically-incorrect-resolutions\/","url_meta":{"origin":4990,"position":5},"title":"2011 Politically-Incorrect Resolutions","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 24, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media The Pride of Solvency I think the American people are not only scared of collective state and national debt, but sick of it as well. I mean by that abhorrence in the psychological sense \u2014 of reading that their governments are broke, of seeing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "December 2010"","block_context":{"text":"December 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/december-2012\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4990"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4990"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4990\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4991,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4990\/revisions\/4991"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}