{"id":4196,"date":"2005-11-23T21:34:16","date_gmt":"2005-11-23T21:34:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com.108-166-28-151.mdgnetworks.com\/wordpress\/?p=4196"},"modified":"2013-04-03T21:35:01","modified_gmt":"2013-04-03T21:35:01","slug":"the-crying-game","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-crying-game\/","title":{"rendered":"The Crying Game"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>so near in Iraq, so far at home.<\/h1>\n<p>by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<p><em>National Review Online<\/em><\/p>\n<p><b>&#8220;T<\/b>he president misled us.&#8221; &#8220;Still no WMDs.&#8221; &#8220;If I had only known then what I do now\u2026&#8221;<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>This is the intellectual level of Democratic wartime criticism about the Bush administration as we near the third Iraqi election \u2014 the one that will finally give faces to the first truly elected parliamentary government in the Arab world.<\/p>\n<p>So what is behind this crying game at home \u2014 when we are so close to achieving our goals abroad?<\/p>\n<p>Bad polls and far-worse casualties. With over 2,000 American dead in Iraq, the politicians think their own brilliant three-week war was ruined by George Bush\u2019s 32-month failed reconstruction.<\/p>\n<p>But the Democratic establishment\u2019s anger is even more complicated than that since it is not yet quite sure of the mood of the fickle American people.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #646464; font-size: large;\">T<\/span>rue, from the very beginning a small group of leftists has done its best to mischaracterize the effort to remove Saddam Hussein as some sort of Halliburton, \u201cno-blood-for oil,\u201d \u201cBush lied\/thousands died,\u201d \u201cneocon\u201d war \u201cfor Israel.\u201d But despite the occasional auxiliary efforts of the elite press, until now there were really no takers in the mainstream Democratic party for the vehement antiwar crowd\u2019s slander for at least three reasons.<\/p>\n<p>One was the crazies. By that I mean that the Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore, and Cindy Sheehan factions have a propensity to go lunatic and say or do anything \u2014 like shamefully praising the murdering terrorists who blow apart Iraqi women and children and U.S. soldiers as &#8220;Minutemen,\u201d or calling the president of the United States \u201cthe world\u2019s greatest terrorist.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A sanctimonious Jimmy Carter may sit next to the buffoonish Michael Moore at the Democratic Convention in VIP seats, but the inclusion of his name with Rep. John Murtha\u2019s is still apparently considered by liberals to be an outright slander. So up until now invoking Bush as a &#8220;liar&#8221; and our enemies as &#8220;heroes&#8221; was considered over the top.<\/p>\n<p>Two, the Democratic left wing was wrong on the Cold War and mostly wrong on Gulf War I. With minorities in the Congress, fearful that they might never again be trusted on national security, and cognizant that both Bill Clinton\u2019s campaign against Milosevic and George Bush\u2019s war against the Taliban had been relatively cost-free, they outdid themselves in calling for invasion of Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>Go back and read any of the statements of John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, or Jay Rockefeller about the dangers of Saddam Hussein and the need to take him out. Only then can you understand why the U.S. Senate voted overwhelmingly, with a strong Democratic majority, to authorize a war.<\/p>\n<p>So up until now, Democrats had an embarrassing paper trail that in the era of Google searches made it hard to claim that the war was Bush\u2019s alone and not their own. Indeed, as long as casualties were considered &#8220;tolerable&#8221; and the polls stable, most Democrats continued to talk in accordance with their own past votes and wanted to bask in the success of ending the Hussein nightmare.<\/p>\n<p>Three, most Democrats knew the history of the George McGovern pullout campaign of 1972 that ended in disaster for the party at large. It just isn\u2019t smart to lose American wars by cutting out \u2014 unless you have a Watergate for cover. Yet so far not outing a CIA employee who was not a covert agent does not make a scandal.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #646464; font-size: large;\">F<\/span>or all the media pizzazz about the peace candidate Howard Dean, the good Dr. had not a prayer of winning either the nomination or the presidency. Indeed, his tenure as chairman of the Democratic party has been a Republican godsend, since, like McGovern, he has the propensity in a single moment of heartfelt sincerity to scare the hell out of the American people.<\/p>\n<p>Thus the savvy strategy as the casualties grew was to quibble, ankle-bite, and offer empty platitudes like \u201cGet the U.N. back there,\u201d \u201cGet NATO in,\u201d and \u201cGet the Arab League on board,\u201d rather than offering an ad hoc alternative plan of leaving Iraq in the style of Vietnam, Lebanon, or Mogadishu.<\/p>\n<p>Two of those reservations have now vanished, as George Bush\u2019s flight suit; the museum looting; Saddam\u2019s public dental exam; the embalming of the Hussein boys; naked pictures from Abu Ghraib; a supposedly flushed Koran in Guantanamo Bay; rants on the Senate floor; the Scooter Libby indictment; comparisons of the U.S. military to Saddam Hussein; Nazi Germany; Stalin; and Pol Pot; the broadsides of Joe Wilson; Richard Clarke; General Anthony Zinni; Brent Scowcroft; Lawrence Wilkerson, et al.; lies that our soldiers targeted Western journalists; the\u00a0<i>meae culpae<\/i>\u00a0of prominent former war supporters from Francis Fukuyama to George Packer; white phosphorus; leaks about supposed CIA torture prisons abroad \u2014 along with mostly silence from the embattled administration and U.S. combat dead exceeding 2,000 \u2014 have changed the political calculus.<\/p>\n<p>So Democrats have overcome two caveats. First, they are beginning to sound like Michael Moore while distancing themselves from Michael Moore. Second, they have come up with a clever escape ploy from their own previous rhetoric. Yes, they voted for the war, but the intelligence they had was \u201cnot the same\u201d as the president\u2019s. And besides, they were merely senators who fund wars, while George Bush was the commander-in-chief who directs them. \u201cHe started it \u2014 not us\u201d may be the stuff of errant boys on the playground, but it apparently offers a way out of past embarrassing speeches and votes. Even more clever, they now claim that voting \u201cto authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq\u201d in October 2002 is not quite the same as actually authorizing a war in March 2003.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #646464; font-size: large;\">C<\/span>onsequently, the Democrats are now inching toward jettisoning their final reservation and embracing the Howard Dean cut-and-run position. Still, shrewd pros like a Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Dianne Feinstein, or Chuck Schumer are not quite there yet for two other understandable worries. The polls say Americans are tired of the war, but not yet ready to quit and give up on all that has been achieved, leaving brave Iraqi reformers to ninth-century beheaders and suicide-murderers.<\/p>\n<p>Second, these more astute Democrats are not sure that the Iraqi gambit might not work, especially with the December election coming up, the public trial of Saddam, the growth of the Iraqi security forces, and the changed attitudes in Europe, Jordan, and Lebanon. Many talk a lot about Vietnam circa 1967 but deep down and in silence most have mixed emotions about Saigon 1975.<\/p>\n<p>For now Democrats stammer, sputter, and go the Bush shoulda \/ coulda route \u2014 not quite ready to take the McGovern sharp turn, forever waiting on polls and events on the ground in Iraq, always unsure whether peace and democracy will come before the 2,500th American fatality.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #646464; font-size: large;\">Y<\/span>et as they hedge \u2014 on television praising Congressmen Murtha who advocates withdrawal, but making sure they vote overwhelmingly on the record to reject his advice \u2014 they should consider some critical questions.<\/p>\n<p>First, are the metrics of this war in the terrorists\u2019 or our favor? Are the Iraqi security forces growing or shrinking? Are elections postponed or on schedule? Are Europe, Jordan, Lebanon, and others more or less sympathetic to a war against Islamic terrorism in Iraq? Are bin Laden, Zawahiri, and Zarqawi more or less popular or secure after we removed Saddam? Is al Qaeda in a strengthened or weakened position? Is the Arab world more or less receptive to democracy in the Gulf, Egypt, Lebanon, and the West Bank? And is the United States more or less vulnerable to a terrorist attack as we go into our fifth year since September 11?<\/p>\n<p>I ask those questions in all sincerity since the conventional wisdom \u2014 compared to the true wisdom and compassion of those valiantly fighting the terrorists under the most impossible of conditions \u2014 is that we are losing in Iraq, our enemies are emboldened, and the Arab world has turned against us. But if we forget the banality of\u00a0<i>New York Times<\/i>\u00a0columnists, the admonitions of NPR experts, and the daily rants of a Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, or Al Gore, more sober and street-smart Democrats are in fact not so sure of these answers.<\/p>\n<p>So these wiser ones wait and hedge their wagers. They give full rein to the usefully idiotic and irresponsible in their midst, but make no move yet to undo what thousands of brave American soldiers have accomplished in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>What exactly is that? Despite acrimony at home, the politics of two national elections and a third on the horizon, and the slander of war crimes and incompetence, those on the battlefield of Iraq have almost pulled off the unthinkable \u2014 the restructuring of the politics of the Middle East in less than three years.<\/p>\n<p>And for now that is still a strong hand to bet against.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<p>\u00a92005 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>so near in Iraq, so far at home. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online &#8220;The president misled us.&#8221; &#8220;Still no WMDs.&#8221; &#8220;If I had only known then what I do now\u2026&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[783],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-15G","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":4845,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-event-of-the-age\/","url_meta":{"origin":4196,"position":0},"title":"The Event of the Age","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 24, 2003","format":false,"excerpt":"Iraq is becoming the deciding issue of our time. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Talk, yell, spin, flip, back peddle \u2014 so America's elite pundits endlessly regurgitate the debate over Iraq. Most are terrified that last week's gloomy prognosis will be proven foolish by this week's relative absence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;October 2003&quot;","block_context":{"text":"October 2003","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2003\/october-2003\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2319,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/war-what-war\/","url_meta":{"origin":4196,"position":1},"title":"War&#8211;What War?","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 2, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services The anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan headed to Martha's Vineyard this week, where President Obama is vacationing. Once again she is protesting our two wars abroad. But Sheehan is a media has-been. ABC's Charlie Gibson used to cover her anti-Bush rallies in Crawford, Texas.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;September 2009&quot;","block_context":{"text":"September 2009","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2009\/september-2009\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3561,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/surging-politics\/","url_meta":{"origin":4196,"position":2},"title":"Surging Politics","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 13, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Critics of the U.S. troop \"surge\" in Iraq, called for by President George Bush in January, early on cited American losses and then announced the plan's failure. Supporters, on the other hand, have seen progress from new tactics (which, many argue, should have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;August 2007&quot;","block_context":{"text":"August 2007","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2007\/august-2007\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4176,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-not-support-democracy\/","url_meta":{"origin":4196,"position":3},"title":"Why Not Support Democracy?","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 23, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"Our orphan policy in the Middle East. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Why still no big-font, front-page headlines screaming, \u201cMillions Vote in Historic Middle East Election!\u201d or \u201cDemocracy Comes At Last To Iraq\u201d or \u201cAmerica\u2019s Push for Iraqi Democracy Working\u201d? Besides the politics of gloom \u2014 Bush at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;December 2005&quot;","block_context":{"text":"December 2005","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2005\/december-2005\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3709,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/if-we-fail\/","url_meta":{"origin":4196,"position":4},"title":"If We Fail&#8230;","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 19, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Been there, done that. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Most Americans accept that if the United States cannot stabilize Iraq, and, in frustration and acrimony, withdraws in defeat, crises follow. The only disagreement is over how bad they will be. Some point to the aftermath of Vietnam and,\u00a0mirabile\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Janurary 2007&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Janurary 2007","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2007\/janurary-2007\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3150,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/2008-teeter-totter-our-that-was-then-this-is-now-year\/","url_meta":{"origin":4196,"position":5},"title":"2008 Teeter Totter: Our &#8216;That Was Then, This Is Now&#8217; Year","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 29, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services As 2008 comes to a close, almost nothing has turned out as was expected at the beginning of the year \u2014 whether we consider oil prices, the war in Iraq, political corruption or the collapse of the U.S. financial system. Oil For much\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;December 2008&quot;","block_context":{"text":"December 2008","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2008\/december-2008\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4196"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4196"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4197,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4196\/revisions\/4197"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}