by Bruce S. Thornton<\/p>\n
RightNetwork.com<\/p>\n
The Democrats and their tribunes in the mainstream media weren\u2019t too happy about the House of Representatives reading aloud the Constitution. The\u00a0New York Times<\/em>\u00a0called it a \u201cpresumptuous and self-righteous act,\u201d while New York Representative Jerrold Nadler dubbed the reading a \u201ctotal nonsense\u201d and \u201cpropaganda.\u201d In general, critics of the public reading saw it as another example of how conservatives have made a fossilized fetish out of the Constitution by insisting that its plain simplicity and direct meaning be followed, instead of having it obscured by the various \u201cpenumbras\u201d and \u201cemanations\u201d that William O. Douglas in\u00a0Griswold v. Connecticut<\/em>\u00a0conjured up to justify creating the right to privacy by judicial fiat.<\/p>\n But this quarrel between \u201coriginalists\u201d and those favoring a \u201cliving\u201d Constitution is at heart about philosophical ideas. The proponents of an \u201cevolving\u201d or \u201cliving\u201d Constitution do so on the basis of progressive assumptions radically alien from those of the Founders. These modern ideas center on the notion of progress through knowledge. In this view a universal, essentially rational human nature is progressing away from the irrational superstitions and traditions such as religion that in the past organized society in unjust and inefficient ways. This progress results from increases in knowledge, which has created the \u201chuman sciences\u201d such as economics, psychology, and sociology. These \u201csciences\u201d in turn generate techniques for reorganizing and improving social, political, and economic institutions in order to create peace, equality, and justice. But to achieve these boons, laws need to be changed to reflect this new knowledge and empower those with the skills to implement these changes. Only then will people be liberated from traditional superstitions, prejudices, and traditions codified in old laws and practices we now recognize as oppressive and unjust.<\/p>\n Several consequences follow this dubious idea. First, the supreme law of the land, the Constitution, now must be reinterpreted to reflect this new knowledge unknown by the Founders. For example, ancient wisdom concerning the origins of crime and the appropriate justice due to malefactors is discarded, presumably exploded by advances in psychology and sociology, which locate crime in the social and economic environment, or in genetic predispositions, rather than in free will. The old distrust of unbridled sexuality and the fear of its destructive consequences are now dismissed as oppressive superstitions, for psychology has discovered that such controls create repression, whereas expressions of sexual variety without guilt or remorse lead to greater psychic health and fulfillment. Armed with this new knowledge, judges then tease out of the Constitution justifications for increasing criminal rights at the expense of law enforcement and social order, or for expanding the First Amendment to include pornography, or for outright inventing a \u201cright to privacy\u201d that protects ever greater and more various sexual license.<\/p>\n The second consequence is the empowerment of the elites who possess this advanced knowledge and the requisite techniques for implementing it, which necessarily reduces the autonomy and freedom of the mass of people who don\u2019t. This development in turn transforms the traditional understanding of politics, which now is limited to solving problems.<\/p>\n Liberal columnist E.J. Dionne invoked this understanding of politics in his criticism of the Constitution reading: \u201cTheir [the Republicans\u2019] rhetoric is nearly devoid of talk about solving practical problems \u2014 how to improve our healthcare, education and transportation systems, or how to create more middle-class jobs.\u201d But politics is about something more important: reinforcing, asserting, and protecting, in the clash of competing goods and interests, the core values upon which both our freedom and the Constitutional order depend.<\/p>\n Politics as solving problems, moreover, leads to an ever-expanding government that threatens the freedom and self-reliance upon which democracy depends. Massive bureaucracies, armed with the coercive power of the state, are created to implement and manage this problem-solving, their power ratified and protected by judges who are not subject to political accountability. Consequently, the Constitutional mechanism that makes elected representatives, subject to electoral audit by the people, the authority for laws must now give way to unelected government bureaucracies and judges who find their authority not in the people, but in this alleged greater knowledge that justifies changing traditional social mores and customs. After all, most of the people lack this specialized knowledge, and so still depend on religion, custom, and traditional wisdom for their morality. To the progressive, letting the people determine the law according to these outmoded irrational prejudices would be like consulting a witch doctor instead of going to the hospital.<\/p>\n The American Constitutional order, however, has been defined by a radically different assumption \u2014 that rule by citizens, in whose consent resides the authority for government in the first place, will be more efficacious at securing justice and social order and protecting political freedom. Thus the independent initiative and self-reliance of the citizenry is preferred to the dictates of government officials in managing social, economic, and political affairs. Alexis de Tocqueville early on remarked on this defining characteristic of American democracy: \u201cIf the opinion that the [American] citizen entertains of himself is exaggerated, it is at least salutary; he unhesitatingly confides in his own powers, which appear to him to be all-sufficient.\u201d<\/p>\n Moreover, de Tocqueville connected political self-reliance to the protection of freedom, anticipating the \u201cdemocracy deficit\u201d that attends the ceding of authority to a bureaucratic \u201cnanny state\u201d: \u201cIt profits me but little, after all, that a vigilant authority always protects the tranquility of my pleasures and constantly averts all dangers from my path, without my care or concern, if this same authority is the absolute master of my liberty and my life.\u201d Our Constitutional order is based on the knowledge that if rights are, like social-welfare entitlements, the gifts of government, then an ever-expanding government can take them away. For as Madison notes in\u00a0Federalist<\/em>\u00a048<\/em>, \u201cpower is of an encroaching nature,\u201d and requires limits in order for the rights and freedom of the citizens to be safe from this expansionary appetite. George Washington, in his 1796 Farewell Address, likewise linked the necessity of \u201creciprocal checks in the exercise of political power,\u201d and \u201cdividing and distributing it into different depositories,\u201d to the \u201clove of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart.\u201d<\/p>\n That\u2019s why the Constitution needs to be read aloud: to remind us of what the Constitution was created to do. Not solve our problems or create some fanciful utopia of social justice and economic equality, but protect the freedom and autonomy of the people and keep an overweening government from inhibiting them from solving problems on their own, all the while these unelected elites with their dubious \u201cscientific\u201d knowledge create even more problems. We should all rejoice any time our elected representatives remind us and themselves what the Constitution is all about: limiting government to protect our freedom.<\/p>\n \u00a92011 Bruce S. Thornton<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Bruce S. Thornton RightNetwork.com The Democrats and their tribunes in the mainstream media weren\u2019t too happy about the House of Representatives reading aloud the Constitution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[22,145,495,187],"tags":[215,66,1034,165,214,624,726,1044,1073,527],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-13M","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3308,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-unexamined-president-and-his-media-enablers\/","url_meta":{"origin":4078,"position":0},"title":"The Unexamined President and His Media Enablers","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 29, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton Advancing a Free Society As usual, the mainstream media are getting wrong the significance of President Obama\u2019s release of his actual birth certificate. In the liberal-left narrative, the \u201cbirther\u201d issue was always evidence of the Republican Party\u2019s fringe kookiness: as the\u00a0Daily Kos\u2019s Markos Moulitsas crowed, \u201cWhat\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":602,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-medias-racial-prison\/","url_meta":{"origin":4078,"position":1},"title":"The Media’s Racial Prison","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 31, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce Thornton Frontpage Magazine Two incidents last week suggest once more that our confused, hypocritical, and politicized notions of race and relations will play a huge role in the presidential election. In the first, Virginia state senator L. Louise Lucas, part of Obama\u2019s \u201cTruth Team\u201d campaigning for the president\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6693,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/for-obama-nothing-succeeds-like-failure\/","url_meta":{"origin":4078,"position":2},"title":"For Obama, Nothing Succeeds Like Failure","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 30, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/\u00a0FrontPage Magazine\u00a0 Rasmussen reported last Friday that 52% of likely voters approve of Obama\u2019s job performance. This number is both astonishing and depressing. The avalanche of Obama\u2019s failures both domestic and foreign should have buried this presidency months ago. Yet despite the slow-motion implosion of Obamacare\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6052,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-brief-history-of-media-bias\/","url_meta":{"origin":4078,"position":3},"title":"A Brief History of Media Bias","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 12, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Who said that newspapers are supposed to report the news in an objective and fact-based way? by Bruce S. Thornton Defining Ideas The revelation that the Department of Justice acquired and read the phone records of Associated Press editors and reporters does not change the obvious fact that the mainstream\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8377,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/republican-senators-and-the-battered-wife-syndrome\/","url_meta":{"origin":4078,"position":4},"title":"Republican Senators and the Battered Wife Syndrome","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 1, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"What the confirmation of Loretta Lynch really means. by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ Front PageMagazine [1]For 6 years Barack Obama in word and deed has battered the Constitution and slapped around the Republicans. Abetted by his Luca Brasi, Harry Reid, he has run roughshod over the separation of powers and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":418,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-clear-alternatives-in-the-presidential-debate\/","url_meta":{"origin":4078,"position":5},"title":"The Clear Alternatives in the Presidential Debate","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 6, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce Thornton FrontPage Magazine Forget all the pre-debate handicapping and advice about what Mitt Romney needed to do or what Barack Obama had to avoid. Last night\u2019s debate clarified the stark choice facing American voters on November 6. On the one hand, we heard a candidate who endorses limited\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4078"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4078"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4078\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4079,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4078\/revisions\/4079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4078"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThe Founding generation agreed, for they distrusted concentrated power and designed a political order that dispersed power and reserved it for the people. The people \u2014 not unelected technical elites allied to an unelected governmental bureaucracy empowered by unelected judges \u2014 are the ultimate authority whose rights come not from government but from \u201cnature and nature\u2019s God.\u201d<\/p>\n