by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
National Review Online<\/em><\/p>\n E<\/span>veryone seems to take some\u00a0joy in listening to outgoing secretary-general of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, especially during the holidays. But just as with other such ethicists as a lip-biting Bill Clinton or creased-browed Jimmy Carter, Annan is as publicly acclaimed as he is privately ignored. We like such itinerant moralists \u2014 more when they are off the job than on, and always in retrospect rather than contemporaneously. As we watch them hedge, we somehow feel apologetic rather than outraged over their latest deception.<\/p>\n The secretary-general \u2014 introduced with fulsome praise by Sen. Chuck Hagel \u2014 recently gave a remarkable farewell speech at the Truman Library. It was delivered in his customary soothing inflection with impeccable diction, and it was just as customarily predictable \u2014 the content was as historically inaccurate as it was exemplary of what we have now come to know as \u201cAnnanism.\u201d<\/p>\n In Never-Never Land<\/strong> Such a unilateral decision to use overwhelming violence to prevent far greater and inevitable violence was an example of just the sort of tragic, tough decision-making that must take place outside the never-never land of the United Nations.<\/p>\n Both North Korea and Iran have ignored U.N. warnings about nuclear proliferation as they press on to acquire bombs with which to threaten nearby democracies. Hundreds of thousands may have heard Kofi Annan\u2019s polished homilies as they perished en masse in Darfur \u2014 all this coming on the heels of the slaughters in Rwanda and the Balkans, and mass starvation in North Korea. What has the U.N. done about all of this?\u00a0 It has availed itself of its luxury of doing nothing.<\/p>\n Annan then went on to praise Truman for relying on \u201ccollective security\u201d by turning to the United Nation in the Korean crisis \u2014 in obvious contrast, apparently, to George Bush\u2019s intervention in Iraq. But Annan conveniently left out the salient fact that Truman could count on U.N. cover only because Russia \u2014 in protest over treatment of Red China \u2014 had for a time removed itself from the Security Council, ensuring veto-free resolutions for action.<\/p>\n In his veiled reference to Iraq, there was no mention of the vested interests of both France and Russia in keeping lucrative oil concessions and commerce with the Hussein regime. Nor did Annan acknowledge that the U.S. contingent in 2003 comprised a smaller percentage of the allied coalition than was true of the U.N. force in 1950, or that more nations showed up to fight Saddam Hussein than had against Kim il-Sung.<\/p>\n Annan failed to note that Bill Clinton saved the Bosnians and Kosovars only by not\u00a0<\/i>going to the U.N., where a sure Russian veto would have embarrassed the American effort to stop that genocide at Europe\u2019s doorstep. Thousands are alive today because of that decision. Yet one cannot expect a United Nations megaphone to dwell on U.N. amorality; it is a condemnation he reserves for assailing the United States.<\/b><\/p>\n The Look of Responsibility<\/span><\/strong> When has the U.N. ever \u201caccepted\u201d anything approaching a \u201cshared responsibility\u201d? Both Saddam and the Taliban murdered with impunity. Iran has not only violated U.N. non-proliferation accords, but serially promised to wipe out Israel, and thus get credit for a first Holocaust it now denies to Hitler.<\/p>\n It is precisely because \u201call nations\u201d in fact do not care when millions are butchered that the U.N. has become increasingly irrelevant and the United States has acted. It is not America that places those with blood on their hands on human rights commissions. U.S. soldiers, unlike U.N. peacekeepers, are punished if they commit mayhem and rape. A wise move would be for Mr. Annan to insist that U.N. troops are truly subject to rules of behavior fashioned on U.S. codes of military conduct.<\/p>\n The secretary-general next sermonized on American responsibility to provide global leadership in matters of trade and commerce. But he ignored entirely the role of the U.S. Navy that nearly alone keeps the peace on the world\u2019s oceans, stops piracy, and tries to adjudicate disputes in far-strung seas like the Aegean, the Persian Gulf, and the waters off Japan.<\/p>\n By any fair measure the current international renegade in matters of trademark infringement, copyright violation, or cutthroat acquisition of resources is an undemocratic China. Yet we know that Annan would not go to Beijing to lecture to that unpredictable Communist dictatorship about its felonies when he can better harangue his patient American hosts about their supposed misdemeanors.<\/p>\n If Annan is really concerned about greater equity with the former third world, a good place to begin would be the European Union\u2019s agricultural subsidies that harm the ability of impoverished nations to earn foreign income, or the amoral European policy of selling things like reinforced bunkers to Saddam\u2019s Iraq or precision machine tools to Iran.<\/p>\n Annan\u2019s third writ against the U.S. was our supposed betrayal of the rule of law:<\/p>\n That is why this country has historically been in the vanguard of the global human rights movement. But that lead can only be maintained if America remains true to its principles, including in the struggle against terrorism. When it appears to abandon its own ideals and objectives, its friends abroad are naturally troubled and confused.<\/p>\n Here, too, there is deception. Unlike a China, Russia, or even the E.U. membership \u2014 countries that all wiretap and detain much more freely \u2014 George Bush (unlike the secretary-general) is subject to the oversight of an elected Congress and an independent judiciary.<\/p>\n Nothing in the Patriot Act is antithetical to our \u201cideals and objectives\u201d or even approaches the zeal of the wartime Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, or Kennedy administrations. That the Patriot Act came in consequence to the mass murder of 9\/11 and 25 years of serial terrorism from the Middle East makes no impression on Annan, who apparently worries often about infringements on free speech. Here is a moralist who says nothing of the spread of Islamism among millions of Muslims, a fascism that is global in its ability to stifle all sorts of expression and now apparently can reach Europe in its intimidation of cartoonists, opera producers, novelists, film-makers, and high school teachers.<\/p>\n Note that nowhere in Annan\u2019s lamentations was there any remorse about the $50 billion Oil-for-Food scandal, much less his own son\u2019s murky Billy-Carter-like role in it. Nor do we hear of the Annan family\u2019s petty moral slipperiness \u2014 whether exporting luxury cars under the auspices of U.N. tax immunity or farming out government-subsidized apartments to relatives. Annan talks global and acts local.<\/p>\n The Man Who Plays to Form<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n So what is Annanism?<\/p>\n First, it is the reification of Western subliminal guilt. American and European elites feel bad about their wealth, bad about their leisure, bad about their history \u2014 but usually not bad enough to do anything that might jeopardize their present privileged positions. And so into this psychological disconnect steps an articulate handsome totem from abroad, in requisite stylish dress and aristocratic mellifluousness, to lecture Westerners with moral pieties \u2014 as they smile and snore.<\/p>\n In contrast, who wants a ruddy, uncouth, Walrus-mustached John Bolton railing about the sort of U.N. inaction that allows millions to perish and thugs to operate freely?<\/p>\n Such embarrassments might actually cause the U.N. to do something that would require sacrifices in lives and treasure for the greater good. How much better to be charmed into somnolence than awakened by horrific reality. How much better for the soul to be gently chided with moral platitudes about Western insensitivity than electro-shocked about Middle Eastern, African, or Asian genocide that will go on until someone does something very messy to stop it.<\/p>\n Second, Annanism represents the triumph of moral obtuseness: talk about threats to the rule of law or the need for transparency and honesty in global communications and commerce, while ignoring scandal and fraud on a monumental scale that not only enriches cronies and relatives, but contributes to the deaths of innocents in Iraq.<\/p>\n Third, Annanism reflects petty hypocrisy. There is a reason why Annan, like the thousands of hangers-on in the U.N., enjoys New York; there is a reason why he and his equally critical spouse prefer Western culture in places like Manhattan. He knows that the unique social, economic, and cultural life of the United States can subsidize lavish salaries at the U.N., and that with life in an affluent and safe West comes pricey luxury cars and tony apartments.<\/p>\n Annan also knows that one way to keep enjoying them is to keep reminding his hosts of their sins, in the fashion of the medieval court jester\u00a0sans<\/i>\u00a0the loud stripes, cap, and bells. So there is something very creepy about the moral poseur remonstrating from Manhattan about the lapses of the United States in general, and in particular the neglect of the world\u2019s poor. Both can be addressed more effectively and more honestly from a Rwanda, Kosovo, Kabul, or Ghana.<\/p>\n With Annanism we are witnessing the triumph of the therapeutic over the tragic. We live in a time when morality is defined by wrinkled brows, not action, and a moral sense is found in barking at a benevolent host while purring to dangerous carnivores.<\/p>\n In a society that values style over substance, rhetoric over action, and sanitized platitudes over grisly details, if Kofi Annan were not secretary-general of the United Nations we would have had to invent something very much like him.<\/p>\n \u00a92006 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The triumph of the therapeutic over the tragic. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Everyone seems to take some\u00a0joy in listening to outgoing secretary-general of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, especially during the holidays. But just as with other such ethicists as a lip-biting Bill Clinton or creased-browed Jimmy Carter, Annan is as publicly […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[764],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-Y6","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":4257,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/saddam-in-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":3726,"position":0},"title":"Saddam in 2005!","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 30, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"Just imagine a different Iraq... by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Saddam promises more bounties for suicide bombers in Rather interview In a much publicized second interview with CBS\u2019s Dan Rather, Iraqi\u2019s President Saddam Hussein insisted that continual American pressure had little effect. \u201cLook at Afghanistan. Here it is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "September 2005"","block_context":{"text":"September 2005","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2005\/september-2005\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4220,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/moralizing-in-their-sleep\/","url_meta":{"origin":3726,"position":1},"title":"Moralizing in Their Sleep","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 31, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"Why U.S. critics turn a blind eye to atrocities by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services To paraphrase the Ancient Greeks, it is easy to be moral in your sleep. Abstract ethics or soapbox lectures demanding superhuman perfection mean little without deeds. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and other global\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "October 2005"","block_context":{"text":"October 2005","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2005\/october-2005\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4432,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/move-the-u-n\/","url_meta":{"origin":3726,"position":2},"title":"Move the U.N.?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 13, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Americans grew up with kind feelings toward the United Nations. Many remain nostalgic about their childhood UNESCO Halloween buckets and UNICEF Christmas cards. Such goodwill explains why we host the organization and cover a quarter of its operating budget. The U.N. arose out\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "April 2005"","block_context":{"text":"April 2005","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2005\/april-2005\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4709,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/season-of-apologies\/","url_meta":{"origin":3726,"position":3},"title":"Season of Apologies","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 21, 2004","format":false,"excerpt":"It's time for reckless critics to own up. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online President Bush and Secretary Rumsfeld were both asked to apologize recently for the illegal and amoral behavior of a few miscreant soldiers at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. They did so without qualifications, despite\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "May 2004"","block_context":{"text":"May 2004","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2004\/may-2004\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9674,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/has-trump-nominated-too-many-military-leaders-or-not-enough\/","url_meta":{"origin":3726,"position":4},"title":"Has Trump Nominated Too Many Military Leaders\u2014Or Not Enough?","author":"Megan Ring","date":"December 15, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0By Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Choosing military men for top cabinet spots is not unprecedented, nor is it foolish given how Washington insiders have performed. President-elect Donald Trump is being faulted for supposedly appointing too many retired generals to cabinet-level jobs and \u201cmilitarizing\u201d the government. Former lieutenant general Michael\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Jim Mattis"","block_context":{"text":"Jim Mattis","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/jim-mattis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":440,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/middle-east-madness\/","url_meta":{"origin":3726,"position":5},"title":"Middle East Madness","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 24, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Last week, Muslim mobs took to the streets to murder the American ambassador in Libya and three of his staffers. American embassies were attacked from Egypt to Yemen. Embarrassed White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and US Ambassador to the United Nations Susan\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Libya"","block_context":{"text":"Libya","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/libya\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3726"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3726"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3726\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3728,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3726\/revisions\/3728"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n<\/span>
\nThe first component of Annanism is the use of distortion. How surreal to hear the secretary-general in his encomium mention that Harry Truman had ordered the first and only military use of \u201cthe bomb.\u201d<\/p>\n
\n
\n<\/b>Next the secretary-general derided interventions (like Iraq) and contrasted them with \u201cour shared responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity \u2014 a responsibility solemnly accepted by all nations at last year\u2019s U.N. summit.\u201d This was a cruel jest worthy of Tolkien\u2019s wizard Saruman.<\/p>\n