by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
Tribune Media Services<\/p>\n
J<\/span>immy Carter \u2014 a self-proclaimed champion of human rights and nonviolence \u2014 has called the U.S.’s unwillingness to accept the 2006 Palestinian election of the terrorists of Hamas “criminal.”<\/p>\n But unlike Carter, Egyptian reformer Sa’d Al-Din Ibrahim \u2014 no friend of the United States \u2014 thinks members of Hamas are real criminals.<\/p>\n In an article on the terrorist organization’s recent takeover of Gaza, Ibrahim wrote, “The Hamas fighters behaved in a barbaric, bloody manner, while repeatedly (shouting) ‘Allahu Akbar’ and religious prayers. . . . The victors executed a number of Fatah leaders and fighters, shooting them or throwing them from the roofs of buildings, with no trial \u2014 not even a mock trial.”<\/p>\n Carter is one among many Western liberals who either ignore or, worse, defend Hamas and other acknowledged enemies of free speech, due process and religious and political tolerance.<\/p>\n After the attempted jihadist bombings last month in London and Glasgow, new British Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced that his ministers were not to connect Muslims with terrorism. Then he even ordered the nomenclature of a “war against terror” dropped.<\/p>\n But a former British jihadist, Hassan Butt, argued in an op-ed in\u00a0The Guardian<\/i>of London concerning the failed plots that Islam is integral to the current epidemic of global terrorism.<\/p>\n “What drove me and many of my peers to plot acts of extreme terror within Britain, our own homeland and abroad,” wrote Butt, “was a sense that we were fighting for the creation of a revolutionary state that would eventually bring Islamic justice to the world.”<\/p>\n In anger at the Bush administration’s refusal to meet with the Assad regime in Syria \u2014 which conducts assassinations of Lebanese reformers, aids terrorists in Iraq and funds Hezbollah and Hamas \u2014 House Speaker Nancy Pelosi flew to Damascus for direct talks.<\/p>\n Yet some of her critics were liberal Syrians fighting for freedom at great risk to their lives.<\/p>\n “So much of Syria’s opposition was against Pelosi’s visit, against the E.U.’s talks with the regime,” remarked Syrian reformist Akram al-Bunni. “They believe that these offers of friendship strengthen the regime and increase its totalitarian tendencies, and they’re angry.”<\/p>\n Western liberals seek to downplay the Islamic roots of terrorism and engage in dialogue with authoritarian regimes and movements. Meanwhile, Middle Eastern dissidents find themselves in an odd, if not embarrassing marriage of sorts with the conservative Bush administration on the need to identify and confront the causes and abettors of intolerance and terror.<\/p>\n W<\/span>hat explains such strange political alliances?<\/p>\n Modern liberals \u2014 fearful of offending non-Westerners \u2014 have almost become more like old-time conservatives in their “live and let live” politics and neo-isolationism.<\/p>\n In contrast, some conservatives have gradually drifted away from their past realpolitik and easy detente with illiberal regimes.<\/p>\n Such an about-face did not start with George Bush and his now maligned neo-con advisers. It was evident earlier with Ronald Reagan. He rejected detente with the Soviet Union and instead championed religious and political dissidents, calling for the end of, not tolerance of, the tyranny of the Soviet “evil empire.”<\/p>\n Liberals, on the other hand, have embraced multiculturalism often in guilt and as a reaction against past purported Western chauvinism. We are not supposed to judge different religions and foreign cultures by imposing our own arbitrary standards of morality.<\/p>\n But the end result of multiculturalism in the real world is an insidious relativism. So Jimmy Carter turns a blind eye to Hamas’ street executions. Gordon Brown fears offending radical Muslims, and Nancy Pelosi flies to embrace Syrian President and terrorist enabler Bashar al-Assad.<\/p>\n Conservatives more often believe in universal absolutes: Some things like authoritarianism are always worse; others like freedom are always better, regardless of cultural differences.<\/p>\n At home in a freewheeling, affluent society, such rigid consistency may seem reactionary, unimaginative and unrealistic. But, abroad, it can translate into something different, as more Western conservatives than liberals have supported such troublemaking champions of individual rights as former Soviet dissident Natan Sharansky or the Somali-born former Dutch legislator Ayaan Hirsi Ali.<\/p>\n Finally, there is the matter of tactics. Liberals believe more in universal redemption through nonviolence. Evil is not so much innate as it is a result of poverty, prejudice or some sort of oppression. Its antidote then should be education, understanding, dialogue and diplomacy. So don’t give up on an Assad, demonize Islamists or isolate Hamas.<\/p>\n Conservatives are more likely to believe evil is elemental, so combating and isolating it is the necessary first step in protecting the weaker from harm.<\/p>\n Who, then, condemns religious fanaticism, terrorists and their illiberal state supporters in the Middle East? Not necessarily, as we would expect, contemporary liberals. Instead, they now more often rail about the Patriot Act at home than the jailing or killing of innocents in places like Damascus and Gaza.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u00a92007 Tribune Media Services<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Jimmy Carter \u2014 a self-proclaimed champion of human rights and nonviolence \u2014 has called the U.S.’s unwillingness to accept the 2006 Palestinian election of the terrorists of Hamas “criminal.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[756],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-VP","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3342,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ideals-trump-interests-in-obamas-libya-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":3585,"position":0},"title":"Ideals Trump Interests in Obama’s Libya Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 15, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Hudson New York President Obama's\u00a0recent explanation\u00a0for militarily engaging Libya is yetanother example\u00a0of how US leaders increasingly rationalize their policies via sentimental and idealistic platitudes, rather than reality or the long view \u2014 or just plain common sense. In a speech replete with moralizing intonations, Obama did manage\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Libya"","block_context":{"text":"Libya","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/libya\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3021,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/from-gaza-to-guantanamo\/","url_meta":{"origin":3585,"position":1},"title":"From Gaza to Guantanamo","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 14, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media A strange contrast If one can endure the creepy, multifarious Hamas recruiting videos of Gazan children with suicide belts, camouflage uniforms, and toy AK-47s shouting to \u201ckill the Jews\u201d, and then collates all that with the images of young Hamas males with hoods and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "January 2009"","block_context":{"text":"January 2009","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2009\/january-2009\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3075,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/bin-laden-and-the-eternal-hydra-of-war\/","url_meta":{"origin":3585,"position":2},"title":"Bin Laden and the Eternal Hydra of War","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 20, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Hudson New York As we ponder the significance of Osama bin Laden's death, it is well to reflect that Islamists are not the\u00a0cause\u00a0of hostilities; they are but\u00a0symptoms\u00a0of a much greater cause. Individually killing them off \u2014 which is nice \u2014 is like a doctor temporarily treating a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Islam"","block_context":{"text":"Islam","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/islam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3086,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/was-osama-bin-laden-the-chicken-or-the-egg\/","url_meta":{"origin":3585,"position":3},"title":"Was Osama Bin Laden the Chicken or the Egg?","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 18, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim PJ Media To posit the significance of Osama bin Laden's demise, we must first decide which came first \u2014 the chicken or the egg? Quaint as it is, this question is fundamentally an inquiry into the nature of cause and effect. In our context, did Osama bin\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-absurdity-of-treating-a-terrorist-gang-like-a-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":3585,"position":4},"title":"The Absurdity of Treating a Terrorist Gang Like a State","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 26, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce Thornton Frontpage Magazine The currently suspended missile duel between Israel and Hamas exposes yet again the surreal absurdity of the way the international community handles this conflict between a democratic state and a terrorist gang. Yesterday\u2019s cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas is another example of the folly\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Middle East"","block_context":{"text":"The Middle East","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":184,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/t-ball-war-in-the-middle-east\/","url_meta":{"origin":3585,"position":5},"title":"T-Ball War in the Middle East","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 5, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Classical explanations of conventional wars run something like this: An aggressor state seeks political advantage through military force. It has a hunch that the threatened target will likely either make concessions to avoid losing a war, or, if war breaks out, the resulting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Middle East"","block_context":{"text":"The Middle East","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3585"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3585"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3585\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3586,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3585\/revisions\/3586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}