by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
National Review Online<\/em><\/p>\n I. Our Rules \/ Their Rules<\/span><\/strong> <\/b>But so far, no recent military has succeeded in defeating a radical Muslim terrorist insurgency, while subject to a constitutional government and an absolutely free media. In this regard, the United States \u2014 given its position as the world\u2019s only superpower and recognized as the most sensitive of all countries to easy criticism \u2014 is especially at a military disadvantage.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>Witness Guantanamo Bay that is demonized worldwide as the new Stalag or Gulag, when, in fact, it is the most humane detention center of jailed Muslim terrorists in the world.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>Abu Ghraib was reprehensible for its sexual roguery and gratuitous humiliation, but the real military problem of that prison has been the serial release, not American mistreatment, of Islamic murderers. In Iraq, then, the question arises \u2014 can a liberal Western government defeat a barbarous Islamist terrorist insurgency while under constant audit \u2014 and remaining true to its own democratic principles?\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>Gen. Petraeus must cope with the reality that should a half-dozen, or perhaps even one, of his some 160,000 soldiers, in the heat of combat, shoot a wounded terrorist, the damage done could rival losing an entire battle \u2014 a fact well known to a religiously zealous enemy that feels no such humanitarian constraints. Radical Islamists may be the enemy, but American forces in the field must downplay, not accentuate religious differences, if they are to keep on their side Muslim forces loyal to an elected government.<\/p>\n <\/b>II. Fighting For Democracy?<\/span><\/strong> <\/b>But well before the Cold War, the United States put realist concerns above principled idealism. That\u2019s why we generously supplied a mass-murdering Soviet Union in its war against a mass-murdering Nazi Germany or didn\u2019t restrict too much the methodology that Chiang Kai-shek employed against Japanese invaders.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>The present war, however, is again qualitatively different: We are not seeking to quell the violence in Iraq or Afghanistan by the imposition or use of a brute. Instead we expend blood and treasure in the hopes that a consensual government can fight as well as a dictatorship \u2014 while at the same time ensuring freedom for its people.<\/p>\n <\/b>So in Iraq, not only are we waging a war according to American rules of engagement, but for the idea of constitutional government run by a poor, deeply traditional, tribal, and often religiously fundamentalist population.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>General Petraeus knows that Iraq Security Forces can get information out of detained terrorists much easier than we can. But he also accepts that winking at systematic torture would be at odds with his directive to protect and promote constitutional government.<\/p>\n <\/b>III. War-loving Republicans?<\/span><\/strong> <\/b>In contrast, it is hard to recall of any war in our history \u2014 the Vietnam hysteria aside \u2014 that a sitting Senate majority leader declared it lost in the middle of hostilities. We have not previously witnessed senior opposition senators alleging that their own American servicemen were analogous to Nazis, Stalinists, Cambodian mass murders, Saddam\u2019s Baathist killers, or engaging in habitual terrorizing and killing of innocent civilians.<\/p>\n <\/b>In truth, the United States media and political culture accept different rules of military discourse that are politically governed. Had George Bush recently called for a land invasion of Pakistan, he would have incurred hysterical wrath. The same would be true had a Sen. Orin Hatch or John Warner once declared U.S. pilots analogous to Luftwaffe criminals or Soviet terror strafers, when their bombs went awry and killed civilians during the Clinton aerial campaign over Serbia.<\/p>\n <\/b>Our officers may expect that a Republican Congress and administration might give them greater latitude in determining how and how long to wage war in Iraq. Yet they also must accept that ipso facto they will be subject to far greater criticism from the American intellectual and journalistic establishment.<\/p>\n <\/b>IV. From YouTube to Cingular<\/span><\/strong> <\/b>But now an errant bomb or single rogue jailer in Abu Ghraib will be blared live \u2014 in raw and unedited fashion without much of a context \u2014 to a housewife in Frankfurt or a farmer in Anatolia. Any single untoward incident can splash across the computer screens of billions, and serve as an instant referendum on the service of tens of thousands of American soldiers.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>The result is that U.S. military officials recognize that any possible strike on the Syria border would be broadcast worldwide as carpet bombing of a wedding party or tribal reunion, while the enemy\u2019s mass beheadings and torture will often go unreported.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>My favorite example this week was a syndicated photo of a poor elderly Iraqi woman holding up two bullets with the caption: \u201cAn elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City.(AFP\/Wissam al-Okaili)\u201d. The only problem was that the bullets shown were unfired and still in their casings!<\/p>\n <\/b>Remember the operational principle of the new \u201cright-now\u201d communications: There is no news or reward in recounting that barbarous terrorists or savage governments murder innocents, but a great deal if accidental deaths can be pinned on the United States. The former earns a journalist no audience, but often real danger \u2014 the latter safety, praise, a possible award, book contract, or university guest lectureship.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>Gen. Petraeus, then, knows that an oft-handed remark by a senior officer to a \u201cfriendly\u201d interviewer in an hour could appear as a negative headline across theDrudge Report<\/i>\u00a0\u2014 or the lurid tall tales of an Army Private playacting as Seymour Hersh headlining an issue of\u00a0The New Republic<\/i>.<\/p>\n <\/b>V. The Oil Bogeyman<\/span><\/strong> <\/b>With new players like the Indians and Chinese in the Middle East oil market, and globalized hourly speculation, anything the United States military might do in the Middle East \u2014 from taking out an Iranian gunboat to accidentally hitting a pipeline \u2014 could evoke furious reaction from newly industrial oil dependents.<\/p>\n <\/b>Even the appearance of disruption may cost billions of Chinese, Indian, European, or American consumers billions of dollars. Should a military officer think it necessary at some point to request a border strike on a Syrian terrorist camp, or an Iranian IED factory, he must weigh the real possibility that oil speculators in minutes might immediately bid up the price of oil by billions of dollars \u2014 with Cabinet and banking officials screaming for his scalp.<\/p>\n <\/b>What do these new burdens all mean? In the last quarter-century American has proved that it can use military force in the Middle East, in a conventional context, to obtain desirable results \u2014 the restoration of Kuwait, the removal of the Taliban, and the end of the genocidal regime of Saddam Hussein.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>But even those successful operations did not occur in a vacuum, but immediately raised the logical question \u201cWhat next?\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>Increasingly what follows will be a liberal Western superpower, adopting rules of engagement that reflect its own idealism fighting against a primordial terrorists, in pursuit of democratic reform \u2014 sometimes under conservative Republican administrations vulnerable to charges of militarism, while being scrutinized by a global media eager for signs of either American hypocrisy or weakness, and a world jittery over world petroleum prices.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>Should Gen. Petraeus and Amb. Crocker stabilize Iraq, it will demonstrate that the United States, under the most impossible of conditions, can still defeat Islamic terrorism while fostering constitutional reform that improves the security of the region and the world at large \u2014 and due so irrespective of a hostile world media and partisan politicking at home.<\/p>\n <\/b>But if they cannot?\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/b>The ultimate irony: The seventh-century terrorists win \u2014 and those who habitually demonized American military operations will themselves lose as well.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n \u00a92007 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" No simple mission. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online I. Our Rules \/ Their Rules Several governments have defeated Islamic insurgencies, but usually only after about ten years, and adopting policies of summary executions and carpet bombing or shelling.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[755],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-Vl","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2558,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-muslim-demands-for-headscarves-are-exaggerated\/","url_meta":{"origin":3555,"position":0},"title":"Why Muslim Demands for Headscarves Are Exaggerated","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 6, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Hudson New York Islamic attire for women \u2014 the burqa and hijab \u2014 is back in the news, though with a twist: In America, where they are legal, problems and lawsuits are arising, while in France, where they are banned, Muslim women are happily complying. There is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Women"","block_context":{"text":"Women","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/women\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6773,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/muslim-blood-superior-to-infidel-blood\/","url_meta":{"origin":3555,"position":1},"title":"Muslim Blood Superior to Infidel Blood","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 21, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim \/\/\u00a0RaymondIbrahim.com\u00a0 Arguing that Muslim blood is more precious than infidel blood, Muslim clerics in and out of Sudan are outraged because a Sudanese court has condemned a Muslim man to death\u2014simply because he murdered a non-Muslim, the American diplomat John Granville on January 1, 2008. A 2009\u00a0report\u00a0offers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Islam"","block_context":{"text":"Islam","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/islam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7006,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-pentagons-bow-to-islamic-extremism\/","url_meta":{"origin":3555,"position":2},"title":"The Pentagon’s Bow to Islamic Extremism","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 12, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim \/\/\u00a0RaymondIbrahim.com\u00a0 \u201cCaving to pressure from Muslim groups, the Pentagon has relaxed uniform rules to allow Islamic beards, turbans and hijabs. It\u2019s a major win for political correctness and a big loss for military unit cohesion,\u201d said a\u00a0recent report. This new relaxation of rules for Muslims comes at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Religion"","block_context":{"text":"Religion","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/religion\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/21994.imgcache-300x217.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7218,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/taqiyya-about-taqiyya\/","url_meta":{"origin":3555,"position":3},"title":"Taqiyya about Taqiyya","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 15, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim \/\/\u00a0RaymondIbrahim.com\u00a0 I was recently involved in an interesting exercise\u2014examining taqiyya\u00a0about\u00a0taqiyya\u2014and believe readers might profit from the same exercise, as it exposes all the subtle apologetics made in defense of the Islamic doctrine, which permits Muslims to lie to non-Muslims, or \u201cinfidels.\u201d Context: Khurrum Awan, a lawyer, is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Islam"","block_context":{"text":"Islam","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/islam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/taqiyya1-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1366,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-allawi-dance\/","url_meta":{"origin":3555,"position":4},"title":"The Allawi Dance","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 29, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"The Iraqi minister's new book quivers and\u00a0vacillate\u00a0on Islamic culture. by Raymond Ibrahim Middle East Quarterly A review of\u00a0The Crisis of Islamic Civilization\u00a0by Ali A. Allawi (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2009. 304 pp.). Allawi, who at various times was Iraqi minister of trade, minister of defense, and minister\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2548,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/how-islamic-absurdities-prove-islamic-violence\/","url_meta":{"origin":3555,"position":5},"title":"How Islamic Absurdities Prove Islamic Violence","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 10, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim FrontPageMagazine.com The other day I saw a\u00a0video of a sheikh\u00a0warning Muslims against disregarding Muhammad's\u00a0sunna, or the rules and customs the prophet prescribed for Muslims. To support his point, he read a\u00a0hadith\u00a0wherein Muhammad told Muslims: \"When you wake up from sleep to pray, wash your hands before you\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Islam"","block_context":{"text":"Islam","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/islam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3555"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3555"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3555\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3556,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3555\/revisions\/3556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n<\/b>Several governments have defeated Islamic insurgencies, but usually only after about ten years, and adopting policies of summary executions and carpet bombing or shelling.\u00a0
\n<\/b>
\nThe Algerians in the 1990s finally stopped the so-called Islamic Salvation Army. The Russians decimated Chechnyan separatists. Syria\u2019s Hafez al-Assad brutally exterminated several groups loosely affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, most infamously by the thousands at the town of Hama.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n<\/b>In the Cold War, America justified supporting authoritarian regimes in Asia, South America, and the Middle East on the basis of their expressed and shared opposition to Soviet-sponsored global communism. We had some nasty SOBs on our side in the Shah, Pinochet, Somoza, and Papadopoulos. The U.S. apology was that elected socialist governments would inevitably devolve into Communist ones, either by intent or subversion. With 7,000 nukes pointed our way, we supposedly had no margin for utopianism. So America erred on the side of short-term assumed loyalty, stability, and security.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n<\/b>There is yet a third anomaly: We are presently fighting two simultaneous wars under a conservative Republican administration. And that too is fairly rare in the last 100 years, and far more challenging. Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, and Bill Clinton all at times proved bellicose, bypassed Congress if needed be, and (with the exception of LBJ) largely got a pass from the Left. World War I, Korea, and Vietnam were all controversial in their time. Apparently, the intelligentsia and media felt that no liberal Democrat could possibly have preferred war, and had only fought when forced to \u2014 despite the use of Democratic preemption in a variety of instances.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n<\/b>This is the first extended American ground war in the era of instantaneous global communications. The 1991 Gulf War was short \u2014 and in the age before on-the-scene reporting of Al Jazeera and other Middle East news agencies that ape western splashy graphics and delivery, but ultimately must slant in accordance to autocratic dictates. Even during the Serbian bombing a mere decade ago, poor civilians on the ground were not able to easily email, or cell phone daily reports, or post videos on the Internet.<\/p>\n
\n<\/b>American military options in the Middle East are also circumscribed by a global oil market \u2014 even more so than during the Cold War fear of a counter-reaction from the Soviet Union. We are in an era of seemingly perpetual petroleum scarcity, one far worse even than the oil boycotts of old that were shortages by intent and directed solely at the West.\u00a0<\/p>\n