{"id":3281,"date":"2008-10-08T22:42:05","date_gmt":"2008-10-08T22:42:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com.108-166-28-151.mdgnetworks.com\/wordpress\/?p=3281"},"modified":"2013-03-25T22:43:21","modified_gmt":"2013-03-25T22:43:21","slug":"osama-bin-laden-man-of-love","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/osama-bin-laden-man-of-love\/","title":{"rendered":"Osama bin Laden: Man of Love?"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Raymond Ibrahim<\/p>\n

MESH (Middle East Strategy at Harvard)<\/p>\n

In many ways, Michael Scheuer is the paradigmatic case of an otherwise knowledgeable and experienced Western adult who takes al Qaeda\u2019s word at face value. According to his book,\u00a0Imperial Hubris<\/a><\/em>, his credentials and thus authority to speak about al Qaeda and its goals are impressive: \u201cFor the past seventeen years, my career has focused exclusively on terrorism, Islamic insurgencies, militant Islam\u2026 I have earned my keep and am able to speak with some authority and confidence about Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, [and] the dangers they pose and symbolize for the Unites States\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

The remainder of his book makes several fine points, articulating well \u2014 arguably even better than bin Laden \u2014 the grievances that al Qaeda and the Muslim world have vis-\u00e0-vis specific U.S. policies. However, the book\u2019s fundamental thesis is bin Laden\u2019s own: Al Qaeda\u2019s terrorism is simply a reaction to U.S. foreign policy. Writes Scheuer emphatically: \u201cBin Laden has been precise in telling America the reasons he is waging war on us. None of the reasons have anything to do with our freedom, liberty, and democracy, but everything to do with U.S. policies and actions in the Muslim world.\u201d<\/p>\n

He then proceeds to quote and accept, rather naively, several of bin Laden\u2019s messages to the West, such as: \u201cTherefore, I am telling you [Americans], with Allah as my witness, whether America escalates or de-escalates the conflict, we will reply to it in kind\u2026.\u201d Bin Laden, of course, often begins every message directed at the West by saying \u201creciprocal treatment is part of justice\u201d \u2014 i.e., \u201cleave us alone, we leave you alone.\u201d<\/p>\n

Scheuer takes it one step further by concluding that al Qaeda\u2019s war revolves around \u201clove\u201d:<\/p>\n

Bin Laden and most militant Islamists, therefore, can be said to be motivated by their love for Allah and their hatred for a few, specific, U.S. policies and actions they believe are damaging \u2014 and threatening to destroy \u2014 the things they love. Theirs is a war against a specific target, and for specific, limited purposes. While they will use whatever weapon comes to hand \u2014 including weapons of mass destruction \u2014 their goal is not to wipe out our secular democracy, but to deter us by military means from attacking the things they love. Bin Laden et al. are not eternal warriors.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Thereafter, bin Laden is likened to heroes like Robin Hood or (of all people) Saint Francis of Assisi \u2014 a friar known for his benevolence towards animals. Surprisingly, Scheuer overlooks the theological underpinnings \u2014 offensive jihad, enforcement of \u201cdhimmitude,\u201d and enmity for non-Muslims \u2014 that dominate al Qaeda\u2019s worldview (and which are delineated over and over inThe Al Qaeda Reader<\/a>). These hostile doctrines, innate to al-Qaeda\u2019s worldview, clearly demonstrate that, contrary to Scheuer\u2019s assessment, al Qaeda and their kind do \u2014 indeed must \u2014 hate the United States for more than a \u201cfew, specific policies,\u201d and that their war transcends \u201cspecific, limited purposes,\u201d and thus that they are \u201ceternal warriors.\u201d<\/p>\n

Here is bin Laden himself explaining the \u201ctrue\u201d nature of the relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims, such as Americans, AKA, \u201cinfidels\u201d:<\/p>\n

As to the relationship between Muslims and infidels, this is summarized by the Most High\u2019s Word: \u201cWe renounce you. Enmity and hate shall forever reign between us \u2014 till you believe in Allah alone\u201d [Qur\u2019an 60:4]. So there is an enmity, evidenced by fierce hostility from the heart. And this fierce hostility \u2014 that is, battle \u2014 ceases only if the infidel submits to the authority of Islam, or if his blood is forbidden from being shed [i.e., a dhimmi], or if Muslims are at that point in time weak and incapable [in which case, bin Laden later clarifies, they should dissemble (taqiyya<\/em>) before the infidels by, say, insisting the conflict is about \u201cforeign policy,\u201d nothing more]. But if the hate at any time extinguishes from the heart, this is great apostasy!\u2026 Such, then, is the basis and foundation of the relationship between the infidel and the Muslim. Battle, animosity, and hatred \u2014 directed from the Muslim to the infidel \u2014 is the foundation of our religion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Note that, contrary to Scheuer\u2019s assurances, at no time does bin Laden indicate that U.S. foreign policy is behind such animus; it is entirely a theological argument \u2014 transcending time, space, and circumstance. In his attack against \u201cmoderate\u201d Muslims, bin Laden rhetorically asks and answers the pivotal question:<\/p>\n

Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: either willing submission; or payment of the\u00a0jizya<\/em>\u00a0[tribute], through physical though not spiritual submission to the authority of Islam; or the sword \u2014 for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

How do these quotes accord with Scheuer\u2019s statement that \u201cNone of the reasons [for al Qaeda\u2019s antipathy] have\u00a0anything<\/em>\u00a0to do with our freedom, liberty, and democracy\u201d? (My emphases.)<\/p>\n

Nor is this worldview \u201cpeculiar\u201d to bin Laden. Here\u2019s his \u201csecond,\u201d Ayman Zawahiri:<\/p>\n

Jihad in the path of Allah is greater than any individual or organization. It is a struggle between Truth and Falsehood, until Allah Almighty inherits the earth and those who live in it. Mullah Muhammad Omar and Sheikh Osama bin Laden \u2014 may Allah protect them from all evil \u2014 are merely two soldiers of Islam in the journey of Jihad, while the struggle between Truth and Falsehood transcends time.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That al Qaeda\u2019s messages to the West are being understood uncritically and taken at face value by the public is one thing; that a former CIA veteran whose expertise revolves around Islam buys into this calculated sophistry is quite another. Since, as Muhammad said, \u201cwar is deceit,\u201d Scheuer and other analysts of like mind would do well to consider that perhaps when al Qaeda sends a communiqu\u00e9 to the West, it is not necessarily sincere but meant solely to elicit a particular response; such as, that al Qaeda\u2019s war is predicated on a \u201cfew, specific, U.S. policies and actions.\u201d This is tailor-made to accord with the West\u2019s preconceived notions of \u201cjustice,\u201d \u201cequality,\u201d \u201cpoverty causes violence,\u201c and especially \u201cguilt,\u201d and is intended to demoralize Americans from, for instance, supporting \u201cthe war on terror\u201d which obviously directly affects al Qaeda.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s Osama, one more time, relying on an anecdote from Muslim history indicating what all non-Muslims can expect \u2014 even after they make concessions to Islam:<\/p>\n

When the king of the Copts of Egypt tried improving relations with the Prophet by dignifying his messenger and sending him back on a beast of burden laden with clothing, and a slave-girl, did such niceties prevent the Companions from raiding the Coptic realms, forcefully placing them under Islamic rule?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The answer is no. As both Islamic theology commands and history attests, \u201cconcessions\u201d or \u201cniceties\u201d are never enough: submission to Islam is the price for peace. Mr. Scheuer can be certain, then, that no matter how many political concessions the United States makes to the Islamic world, so-called \u201cSalafists\u201d like bin Laden \u2014 that is, Muslims who follow the letter of the law (sharia<\/em>) \u2014 will continue the jihad \u201ctill all chaos ceases and religion is all for Allah\u201d (Qur\u2019an 8:38). Instead of thinking of them as Robin Hoods and Francis of Assisis, or simply idealistic, wayward children, it\u2019s best to start seeing them as they see themselves:\u00a0mujahidin<\/em>\u00a0\u2014 warriors of Allah out to make Islam supreme, as there have been for some 1,400 years.<\/p>\n

\n

Raymond Ibrahim is the editor of the\u00a0Al-Qaeda Reader<\/a><\/i>, translations of religious texts and propaganda.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Raymond Ibrahim MESH (Middle East Strategy at Harvard) In many ways, Michael Scheuer is the paradigmatic case of an otherwise knowledgeable and experienced Western adult who takes al Qaeda\u2019s word at face value.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[227,738],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-QV","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3086,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/was-osama-bin-laden-the-chicken-or-the-egg\/","url_meta":{"origin":3281,"position":0},"title":"Was Osama Bin Laden the Chicken or the Egg?","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 18, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim PJ Media To posit the significance of Osama bin Laden's demise, we must first decide which came first \u2014 the chicken or the egg? Quaint as it is, this question is fundamentally an inquiry into the nature of cause and effect. In our context, did Osama bin\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2532,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/al-qaedas-zawahiri-bigger-threat-than-osama\/","url_meta":{"origin":3281,"position":1},"title":"Al Qaeda’s Zawahiri, Bigger Threat Than Osama?","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 17, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Bloomberg Now that Ayman Zawahiri has assumed leadership of al Qaeda, it is important to end the widespread perception that he is a dour intellectual who is disconnected from young, would-be jihadists. The fact is, Zawahiri is a wily,dangerous\u00a0and imposing leader who should be considered no less\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Egypt"","block_context":{"text":"Egypt","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/egypt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3075,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/bin-laden-and-the-eternal-hydra-of-war\/","url_meta":{"origin":3281,"position":2},"title":"Bin Laden and the Eternal Hydra of War","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 20, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Hudson New York As we ponder the significance of Osama bin Laden's death, it is well to reflect that Islamists are not the\u00a0cause\u00a0of hostilities; they are but\u00a0symptoms\u00a0of a much greater cause. Individually killing them off \u2014 which is nice \u2014 is like a doctor temporarily treating a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Islam"","block_context":{"text":"Islam","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/islam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3289,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/what-al-qaeda-wants-a-debate-with-michael-scheuer\/","url_meta":{"origin":3281,"position":3},"title":"What Al Qaeda Wants: A Debate with Michael Scheuer","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 22, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Jihad Watch I recently wrote something of a\u00a0lengthy exposition\u00a0regarding ex CIA analyst Michael Scheuer\u2019s continuous characterizations of Osama bin Laden as at once Robin Hood, Saint Francis of Assisi, and Thomas Jefferson \u2014 that is, a man fighting oppression and tyranny, that and nothing more. Mr. Scheuer\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2217,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/an-open-question-to-osama-bin-laden-or-any-other-islamist\/","url_meta":{"origin":3281,"position":4},"title":"An Open Question to Osama Bin Laden–or Any Other Islamist","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 14, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim PJ Media Ever since 9\/11, when Osama bin Laden was thrust into the spotlight, he has made it a point to occasionally submit questions to Americans \u2014 questions which he apparently thinks are unanswerable. In\u00a0his last message\u00a0[1] \u201ccommemorating\u201d 9\/11, for instance, after rehashing the storyline that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5352,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/jihad-studies-as-trivia\/","url_meta":{"origin":3281,"position":5},"title":"Jihad Studies as Trivia","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 25, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Raymond Ibrahim Private Papers This article was first published in Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard. A\u00a0new article\u00a0by Thomas Hegghammer in the\u00a0Times Literary Supplement, entitled \u201cJihadi studies: the obstacles to understanding radical Islam and the opportunities to know it better,\u201d lives up to its title \u2014 not so much by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Raymond Ibrahim"","block_context":{"text":"Raymond Ibrahim","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/raymond-ibrahim\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3281"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3281"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3282,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3281\/revisions\/3282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}