by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
National Review Online<\/em><\/p>\n Conservatives have already in the three weeks after the election come up with three competing explanations \u2014 and remedies \u2014 for their congressional defeats and the victory of the relatively unknown Barack Obama.\u00a0<\/p>\n Post-election voting patterns and statistical data can be interpreted in various ways to support any of the following three exegeses, which I understand as being roughly the following:<\/p>\n It was a sort of fluke.<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Party faithful will shrug that almost everything conspired this year against the conservative brand: two wars; the sinking economy; eight years of presidential incumbency; a biased, unethical media; Bush\u2019s low ratings; the absence of an incumbent president or VP candidate on the ticket; more exposed Republican congressional seats than Democratic ones; a charismatic path-breaking opposition candidate, etc. The stars were wrong, rather than the ideas.<\/p>\n So, the theory goes, just make McCain appear a little younger, Obama sound a little bit more like John Kerry, and take away the mid-September financial meltdown, and \u2014 presto! \u2014 a Republican would now be in the White House.<\/p>\n Remedy? Not much other than fielding younger, more charismatic candidates. The failure was people, not ideas, and best symbolized by the damage done by the creepy Jack Abramoff, Larry Craig, Duke Cunningham, Mark Foley, or Ted Stevens whose ethical lapses became the Republican bumper-sticker.<\/p>\n Even had an ethical but colorless Bob Dole or Gerry Ford run in 1980 on Reagan\u2019s identical platform, he would have most likely lost to Carter. So it\u2019s the candidate, stupid.<\/p>\n In this way of thinking, someone like Jindal, Palin, and other fresh new faces will save the party in 2012, especially as hope and change soon proves neither hopeful nor different. Democrats, after all, just replaced their 91-year-old Sen. Robert Byrd as Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee with equally entrenched 84-year-old Sen. Daniel Inouye; and are now talking about re-empowering the big unions that helped ruin Detroit, are hiring all the Clinton retreads for a second try in the Obama administration, and seem to want to use the ancient Freddie\/Fannie\/postal service model to expand the government.<\/p>\n It was too narrow a base, too exclusionary a message.<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0This second theory \u2014 favored by New York and D.C. columnists, Schwarzenegger Republicans, and \u201chelpful\u201d Democrats of the \u201cwe miss the old good McCain of 2000\u201d school \u2014 posits that all these new young, minority, and independent voters can\u2019t break through the anti\u2013gay marriage, anti\u2013illegal immigration, anti\u2013affirmative action, anti-abortion firewall, and so are diverted from the low-taxes, small-government, and strong national defense message that they otherwise might welcome.<\/p>\n Remedy? Junk the social agenda. Become more libertarian. Try to make existing Great Society programs run more efficiently, rather than shrilly barking at what you couldn\u2019t cut, even if you wanted to. Be a little more neo-isolationist abroad, a little more laid back at home. Turn off talk radio, and read more of the\u00a0Wall Street Journal.<\/p>\n It was the namby-pamby, con-lite sell-out that did us in.<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0In this view, conservatives and evangelicals didn\u2019t turn out as in the past, because the ticket and its short coat-tails abandoned a conservative message. Take away Bush\u2019s mega-deficits, and conservatives could have run on fiscal sanity. Why were right-wingers boasting about federal bailouts? Why print more money on top of the $10-trillion-and-rising national debt? No drilling in ANWR? Close down Gitmo? No talk about creepy Islamic terrorists? No more \u201cpersonal responsibility\u201d lectures about drugs, alcohol, illegitimacy, crime, and drop-out rates? Didn\u2019t the party see that gay marriage lost everywhere, and with help from minorities as well?<\/p>\n <\/em><\/strong>Remedy? Run as a true conservative, energize the base, and out-debate and outthink your liberal opponents.<\/p>\n I\u00a0supposed one could cop out, and claim that there is truth in all three explanations. But my sense is that most people \u2014 who, after all, get a job, eventually buy a house and have to maintain it, have children, and respect the traditions of their families\u2019 past \u2014 end up by necessity more conservative than liberal. The challenge is not to water down the conservative message, but to beef it up, even while making it more persuasive to those who are skeptical.<\/p>\n Take so-called Hispanics. (I say \u201cso-called\u201d since the liberal notion of millions of progressive unassimilated brown block voters is mythical, given high rates of intermarriage, mutual suspicion between Cubans, Central Americans, and Mexicans, and right-wing tendencies among Spanish-speaking minorities.) Take race completely out of the equation and start with the notion that enforcing the border is the only way to restore the respect for immigration statutes whose non-enforcement is currently an embarrassment to every citizen who believes in the rule of law.<\/p>\n Automatic Mexican-American support for open borders is simply not a given. Why wouldn\u2019t Hispanic citizens bristle should a freighter beach on the coast of Northern California each day, to unload 1,000 illegal Chinese would-be immigrants? Given historical and present geographical realities, existing levels of legal immigration already privilege Hispanics over all other groups of immigrants. Conservative should emphasize and welcome that mostly neglected fact.<\/p>\n Legal immigration must be distinguished from illegal immigration at every juncture. It is no surprise that La Raza, the Democratic Left, and the cheap-labor, open-borders Right always make charges of \u201canti-immigrant\u201d rather than anti\u2013illegal immigration, since, if they cannot both personalize the issue and conflate it with legal immigration, they lose the debate. Conservatives\u2019 chief talking point should be the deleterious effect of unchecked illegal immigration on the wages of poor workers, coupled with the employers\u2019 discrimination against Mexican-American second-generation and African-American entry-level workers in preference for off-the-books and cheaper illegal laborers.<\/p>\n If one were to talk of party betrayal, it would involve supposedly conservative corporate elites who talk disingenuously of diversity and opportunity while they lobbied to ignore the law, and get their hands on as many illegal cheap laborers as they could to the callous detriment of the working citizen poor.<\/p>\n On social issues, there has to be some conservative touchstone, like reverence for uniqueness and beauty of individual life. What unites skepticism about euthanasia, abortion on demand, or embryonic stem-cell research is fear of a sort of soulless Brave New World notion that individuals don\u2019t matter, that ease of lifestyle trumps every other difficult moral consideration, and that such thinking is the beginning \u2014 not the end \u2014 of something frightening.<\/p>\n Rather than demonizing gay-marriage, conservatives should emphasize the availability of civil unions \u2014 and then ask: What exactly is not enough protection in such current contracts, and how can such legal statutes be improved to protect the legal rights of gay couples? Civil unions should be seen as an avant-garde institution for novel times, while traditional marriage is reserved as a retrograde stuffy institution for the hopelessly straight.<\/p>\n The problem with liberal notions of high taxes and big government (besides the obvious problem that they don\u2019t work) should be that they are elitist. Those born into particular social and economic castes are frozen: the government supplies just enough subsidized housing, food, and fuel for those in untaxed lower-income brackets to remind those citizens that it is not all that bad staying there. Meanwhile, those struggling to become prosperous and leave capital behind for their children are suddenly taxed to death just as they begin to succeed \u2014 as if, once the hyper-wealthy have gotten theirs, the rules change and no one else can follow.<\/p>\n The reason why Wall Street zillionaires like a Ted Turner, Warren Buffet, or George Soros endorse Obama\u2019s tax plan is that they make so much that increased taxes don\u2019t matter, or they can hire costly consultants to find exemptions not available to most plumbers or electrical contractors. Even when they choose to endow favorite causes they prefer tax exemptions \u2014 either now with write-offs, or postmortem without estate taxes \u2014 and de facto have the taxpayer subsidize their particular take on proper policy. Unfortunately, the Republicans failed even to develop such an argument that the very poor and the very wealthy in cynical fashion support liberal policies, while those in between who struggle in entrepreneurial fashion to do even better are caricatured as unpatriotic and selfish.<\/p>\n On foreign policy and national security, the battle of ideas is already won. A more articulate, persuasive defense of existing foreign policy, without gratuitous \u201cthey\u2019re wimps\u201d lingo would help. But come January, the Left will in surprising fashion emulate most of what Bush did abroad, albeit under a fuzzy, kumbaya veneer. The removal of Saddam, the humiliating defeat of Al Qaeda in Iraq, and the creation of a constitutional government in Baghdad will seem better, not worse, as each month passes in which we see little American combat violence approaching a likely 2011 withdrawal date.<\/p>\n So for all the big talk of a cabal of Jewish neo-cons, I doubt Democrats want to promote Mubarak and the House of Saud as \u201cat least they\u2019re our SOBs.\u201d They may dream grandly of flipping Syria and Iran, but shortly will remember how Carter, Reagan, Bush 41, and Clinton utterly failed on that score. They may close Gitmo (both trials and transference home of the detainees will prove a public-relations nightmare), but I doubt we will see precipitous pullouts from Iraq, repeal of the Patriot Act, or the end of the FISA accords. \u201cShredding the Constitution\u201d is an opposition\u2019s cheap slur; in contrast, when responsible for governance or in fear of rumors of another attack, such former critics will worry more about suffering another 9\/11 on their watch.<\/p>\n Should the Left dismantle homeland-security provisions taken since 2001, and embrace therapeutic approaches to radical Islam abroad \u2014 and as a result we then see a single repeat of September 11 \u2014 the credibility of the Democratic Party will be lost for a decade. For all the campaign talk of a trumped-up, constructed war on terror, Obama\u2019s advisors \u2014 at least when they speak privately \u2014 know that keeping America safe since 9\/11 was a Bush achievement rather than a natural occurrence. They also privately advise that Obama emulate Bush on key substantive foreign-policy issues (Iran really is a big threat, and can\u2019t have nuclear weapons; current strikes on terrorists in Pakistan are necessary, etc.), while grandstanding about \u201cbeing liked\u201d again.<\/p>\n The key is not to abandon conservative positions, but to explain them in novel ways to the majority who might find them more in tune with human nature \u2014 and consequently more humanitarian than their usual caricatures of being too selfish, tough, or insensitive. The conservative message the last eight years was to support freedom abroad as an absolute value that appealed to all, regardless of culture and background; the liberal multicultural message was not to rely on universal standards to judge the \u201cother\u201d \u2014 since supposed past oppression allows the \u201cvictim\u201d to redefine morality on his own terms. The conservative message was that government without checks and balances, whether at the U.N., the E.U., or here in the massive bureaucracies of the federal government, naturally seeks to bully and stifle rather than empower the individual.<\/p>\n A final note. Conservatism also applies to bearing and comportment. There was something repugnant about greedy CEO and speculators on Wall Street wildly raking in hundreds of millions under the guise of \u201cfree-market conservatism\u201d \u2014 as if Ace hardware store owners, truck drivers, and farmers would find them kindred spirits. Conservatism\u2019s social message used to be something like \u201cDon\u2019t do all the things that you are otherwise free to do\u201d or \u201cJust because we don\u2019t make all your appetites illegal, does not mean that some are not immoral.\u201d Conservative populism is not anti-intellectualism at all, but rather a disdain for excess and arm-chair elitism.<\/p>\n In short, explain why conservatism appeals to the innate values of most ordinary Americans and the squabbling about the proper message disappears.<\/p>\n \u00a92008 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Well, it wasn’t\u00a0conservatism. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Conservatives have already in the three weeks after the election come up with three competing explanations \u2014 and remedies \u2014 for their congressional defeats and the victory of the relatively unknown Barack Obama.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[737],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-PP","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":12257,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-2018-blue-wave-that-wasnt-really\/","url_meta":{"origin":3213,"position":0},"title":"The 2018 Blue Wave That Wasn\u2019t, Really","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Editor\u2019s Note:\u00a0The following is the first of two excerpts from the revised and updated edition of\u00a0The Case for Trump, out Tuesday from Basic Books. Throughout\u00a0the summer and early autumn of 2018, election experts had often predicted a massive blue wave of radical progressive pushback\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11461,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/could-trump-win-20-percent-of-the-african-american-vote-in-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":3213,"position":1},"title":"Could Trump Win 20 Percent of the African-American Vote in 2020?","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review The provocative Donald Trump certainly seems to be disliked by a majority of African-American professional athletes, cable-news hosts, academics, and the Congressional Black Caucus. Yet there are subtle but increasing indications that his approval among other African Americans may be reaching historic highs for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Donald Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Donald Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/donald-trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1611,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/soldier-citizens-to-the-rescue\/","url_meta":{"origin":3213,"position":2},"title":"Soldier-Citizens to the Rescue?","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 10, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services Usually a handful of ex-soldiers seek political office every election cycle. But well over 20 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans are running this fall for Congress alone. Almost all are riding a wave of public anger at incumbents over a profligate government and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "May 2010"","block_context":{"text":"May 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/may-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12094,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/democrats-cannibalistic-ideology\/","url_meta":{"origin":3213,"position":3},"title":"Democrats\u2019 Cannibalistic Ideology","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Once liberalism and progressivism give way to Jacobinism \u2014 and they often do, as we have seen in revolutionary France, China, and Russia \u2014 no leftist is safe from the downward spiral to ideological cannibalism. Yesterday\u2019s true believer is today\u2019s counterrevolutionary and tomorrow\u2019s enemy\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9832,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/californias-polarization\/","url_meta":{"origin":3213,"position":4},"title":"California\u2019s Polarization","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Richard Sousa Monday, February 6, 2017 With all due respect, I believe my colleague Sam Abrams has it all wrong. He argues that when examining California voter registration data at the county level, the polarization along party lines and the partisanship in the state are not as deep as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Democrats"","block_context":{"text":"Democrats","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/democrats\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11994,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/victor-davis-hanson-trump-wages-war-on-progressive-culture-dems-respond-with-trump-derangement-syndrome\/","url_meta":{"origin":3213,"position":5},"title":"Victor Davis Hanson: Trump wages war on progressive culture \u2013 Dems respond with Trump Derangement Syndrome","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Fox News President\u00a0Trump is\u00a0waging\u00a0a nonstop, all-encompassing war against progressive culture, in magnitude analogous to what 19th-century Germans once called a \"Kulturkampf.\" As a result, not even former President George W. Bush has incurred the degree of hatred from the left that is now directed at Trump.\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3213"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3213"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3213\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3214,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3213\/revisions\/3214"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}