by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
Tribune Media Services<\/p>\n
There is great hope that President-elect Obama will change the course of U.S. foreign policy, create far greater goodwill toward America, and thereby ease world tensions. Such optimism is not based on former Sen. Obama\u2019s foreign-policy experience. In essence, he has none.<\/p>\n
Nor does improvement hinge on Obama\u2019s past career in Chicago politics or his U.S. Senate tenure \u2014 the former was problematic at best, the latter cursory.<\/p>\n
Instead, our great expectations derive from four rosy, but heretofore unquestioned assumptions:<\/p>\n
1) Most of the current Bush policies are not merely wrong, but inflammatory:ipsis factis<\/em>\u00a0being against them is wise and will bring dividends overseas;<\/p>\n 2) Obama\u2019s singular eloquence, youth, charisma, and \u201cpresence\u201d will win over the world in the manner it swept the American electorate, providing a welcome change from the \u201csmoke \u2019em out\u201d Texas global turn-off of the past;<\/p>\n 3) Obama\u2019s exotic name, his multiracial background, the Muslim faith of his father, and his dalliance with hard-left politics as a student and community-organizer will all coalesce to sort of \u201cflip\u201d the image (if not the reality) of the U.S., as the world\u2019s superpower transmogrifies from an oppressive to a sympathetic international player;<\/p>\n 4) The reemergence of Clintonites such as Hillary, Emanuel, Panetta, Podesta, Susan Rice, and others will bring back successful advocates of \u201csoft power,\u201d \u201cmultilateralism,\u201d and \u201cengagement,\u201d who reflect Obama\u2019s worldview, but bring a gritty realism to the implementation of an often heretofore utopian rhetoric.<\/p>\n Let us for the sake of the country hope that such expectations prove absolutely true. But until they do, I worry that there are problems with all four assumptions. First, as we have seen, Bush\u2019s policy during 2004\u20138 was very different from the now ossified acrimony over the removal of Saddam Hussein of autumn 2002\u2013spring 2003 \u2014 when Villepin, Chirac, Schr\u00f6der, Arafat, etc. took turns on the world media stage delivering boilerplate invective of \u201chyperpower\u201d and \u201cThe German Way.\u201d<\/p>\n But since then, governments in France, Germany, Italy, and much of Eastern Europe have proven as pro-American as they could be given the realities of E.U. culture. It is hard to see many Obama alternatives to the EU3\/multilateral Bush approaches to preventing nuclear proliferation in Iran. Few have any new ideas about improving existing relatively good relations with China and India, given the liberal trade and outsourcing policies of the Bush administration. Russia is, well, Russia \u2014 an authoritarian petrol state that demands visible signs of American goodwill even as it interprets them when given as weakness.<\/p>\n Senate Democrats seem to be aping Bush\u2019s Middle East policies; their only difference on Iraq now is a weird sort of revisionism in which a Harry Reid\u2019s once serial declamations about the war being lost and a surge as lunatic are now reformulated as invaluable criticism that alone forced Bush to adopt the necessary Democratic changes that saved Iraq.<\/p>\n Obama himself on matters as diverse as the Patriot Act, FISA, NAFTA, Iran, Iraq, missile defense, and the surge seems to have gravitated away from his early Moveon.org\/ANSWR campaign rhetoric to positions almost indistinguishable from those of the present Bush administration \u2014 as the appointments of centrists like Bush veteran Robert Gates at Defense and Gen. Jones as National Security Advisor attest.<\/p>\n Second, Obama\u2019s rhetorical skills will help, especially with world opinion. We\u2019ve already seen the American media re-characterize issues such as preventative detentions, renditions, the treatment of enemy combatants, and Guant\u00e1namo from \u201cBush shredding the Constitution,\u201d to \u201cproblematic and complex inherited dilemmas that defy easy solutions, as Obama will tragically learn.\u201d<\/p>\n There is reason to believe that the world likewise \u2014 especially the international media, at least for a while \u2014 will simply about-face and assume that Obama\u2019s brand on Bush\u2019s policies makes them less objectionable. All that said, it is not clear that the likes of Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Kim Jong Il, Putin, and the rest of the world\u2019s cabal of thugs who are the likely suspects in future crises either care much for what their own people think or care whether Obama\u2019s is young, glib, and vigorous or senile, inarticulate, and decrepit. Instead, they simply have agendas that are not our own: liberal or conservative America is still America, and therefore something to challenge and test rather than cooperate with.<\/p>\n Third, Obama himself has suggested his nontraditional pedigree offers America advantages abroad. And he\u2019s right. In almost Orwellian fashion, we have seen \u2014 in the feigned outrage to past references to the tripartite Barrack Hussein Obama \u2014 that here at home to emphasize Obama\u2019s Arab\/Islamic resonance is taboo, but to emphasize it abroad to win multicultural fides is indeed welcome.<\/p>\n The problem once again, however, is that many of those who may give Obama wide latitude for his apparent more sympathetic American profile will do so for less than welcome reasons. A confounded Iran may find it harder to manufacture mass rallies with Barack Hussein Obama burning in effigy, but won\u2019t cease proliferation on that account. A Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, or Syria that instinctively might seek closer relations with an Obama will do so under the assumption that their, rather than our, agenda, might better prevail \u2014 and that poses all sorts of both foreign and domestic problems ahead. If creepy thugs abroad express hope for better relations with Obama or, contrarily, if they feel \u201cbetrayed\u201d by his surprising continuance of Bush policies, neither reaction is necessarily welcome.<\/p>\n Fourth, it is true that talented Clintonites who have experience from 1993\u20132000 will hit the ground running. That said, the world may also remember that during those eight years the United States either could not or would not reply to serial provocations \u2014 the World Trade Center Bombing of 1993, the murdering of American soldiers in their Khobar quarters, the attacks on our East African embassies and diplomats, or the bombing of the\u00a0U.S.S. Cole<\/em>\u00a0\u2014 ensuring that 9\/11 was the logical rather than aberrant denouement.<\/p>\n Risks now seen by terrorists and rogue states as unwise during the cowboyish Bush administration may once again seem worth reconsideration in a manner reminiscent of the Clinton years. Talking of soft power, multilateralism, the U.N., dialogue, and restoring our image abroad are all salutary and resonate well in Europe; but to others more nefarious, such calming assurances may send the opposite message that the U.S. is now predictable \u2014 and predictably not going to hit hard back when provoked. Deterrence is earned with difficulty and over many years, but it is easily lost in seconds.<\/p>\n What should we then expect? As some point, perhaps in his first few months in office, President Obama, as Joe Biden predicted, will be tested by the rogue oil-producing states. Most \u2014 like Iran, Russia, and Venezuela \u2014 will soon be facing bankruptcy if oil prices stay flat, as their only source of foreign exchange largely vanishes. Expect all in multifarious ways to test America, in part to humiliate the United States, but more likely simply to cause enough tension to create panic among speculators and restore their windfall profits. Anyone can dream up scenarios \u2014 a move on Georgia, a cutoff of natural gas entirely to Europe, a brazen announcement of an Iranian bomb with a dare to Israel to stop it, a suicide attack on a tanker or warship in the Straits of Hormuz, flagrant violation of the Monroe Doctrine by home porting Russian vessels in Venezuela, simultaneous rocket barrages from Lebanon, Gaza, and Syria, etc. For such countries, any disruption is good in the sense that it creates panic, and panic in turn spikes oil prices.<\/p>\n Expect Pakistani-based terrorists to renew terrorist assaults on India, on the premise that Pakistan enjoys both nuclear exemption and deniability of culpability. In the multilateral world to come, European NATO countries may praise Obama to the skies as they quietly begin to leave Afghanistan. Al-Qaeda remnants in Iraq may think even a tenth of its former suicide attacks could now pay real dividends, on the assumption that once U.S. troops leave Iraq, under no circumstances will they ever come back. \u00a92009 Tribune Media Services<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services There is great hope that President-elect Obama will change the course of U.S. foreign policy, create far greater goodwill toward America, and thereby ease world tensions. Such optimism is not based on former Sen. Obama\u2019s foreign-policy experience. In essence, he has none.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[725],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-MA","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3018,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-the-great-american-hope-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":3012,"position":0},"title":"Obama: The Great American Hope?","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 17, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services There is great hope that President-elect Obama will change the course of U.S. foreign policy, create far greater goodwill toward America, and thereby ease world tensions. Such optimism is not based on former Sen. Obama\u2019s foreign-policy experience. In essence, he has none. Nor\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "January 2009"","block_context":{"text":"January 2009","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2009\/january-2009\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10089,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-is-americas-version-of-stanley-baldwin\/","url_meta":{"origin":3012,"position":1},"title":"Obama Is America\u2019s Version of Stanley Baldwin","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Both leaders put their successors in a dangerous geopolitical position. Last year, President Obama assured the world that \u201cwe are living in the most peaceful, prosperous, and progressive era in human history,\u201d and that \u201cthe world has never been less violent.\u201d Translated, those statements\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "George W. Bush"","block_context":{"text":"George W. Bush","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/george-w-bush\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8693,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-hope-and-change-foreign-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":3012,"position":2},"title":"Obama\u2019s Hope-and-Change Foreign Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 29, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"President Obama applies the same principles abroad that he does at home. by Victor Davis Hanson\u00a0\/\/ National Review Online At home President Obama is well known for his preference for perceived parity over liberty. Most of his domestic agenda \u2014Obamacare, executive-order amnesties, open borders, near-zero interest rates, quantitative easing, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Obama Administration"","block_context":{"text":"Obama Administration","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/obama-administration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/whats-the-three-headed-monster-challenging-obamas-foreign-policy.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7117,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-new-obama-doctrine\/","url_meta":{"origin":3012,"position":3},"title":"A New Obama Doctrine?","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 18, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"With his presidency in tailspin, Carter radically changed course. Will Obama do the same? by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online\u00a0 By the beginning of 1980, Jimmy Carter was in big trouble. Almost everything he had said or done in foreign policy over the prior three years had failed \u2014\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "History"","block_context":{"text":"History","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/history\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8729,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-schizophrenic-foreign-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":3012,"position":4},"title":"Obama’s Schizophrenic Foreign Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"An analysis of a recipe for serial disasters. by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine What are the roots of Barack Obama\u2019s foreign policy? Some focus on the man and his flaws of character, particularly his inability to learn from his mistakes and to adjust his ideas to changing facts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/ov-500x281.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6631,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-failure-of-american-leadership\/","url_meta":{"origin":3012,"position":5},"title":"The Failure of American Leadership","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 16, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Obama's foreign policy of appeasement has created a dangerous void in the international order. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0Defining Ideas\u00a0 The standard critique of President Obama\u2019s foreign policy is now generally well-known\u2014mercurial, paradoxical, and passive. \u201cLeading from behind\u201d seems at odds with the traditional American commitment to ensure\u2014preferably with allies\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Foreign Policy"","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Policy","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/obama-administration\/foreign-policy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/6517253983_7f75b1906b-300x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3012"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3012"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3012\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3014,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3012\/revisions\/3014"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nAll Americans in bipartisan fashion should hope that Obama will get though successfully the perilous first six months at a time when the U.S. economy is shaky, the Commander-in-chief unproven, and our enemies eager to test our president\u2019s mettle. Yet I suspect that conservatives will more likely than liberals forgive the fact that Obama\u2019s governance at times will come to resemble just what he used to caricature in George W. Bush.<\/p>\n