by Bruce S. Thornton<\/p>\n
FrontPageMagazine.com<\/p>\n
President Obama\u2019s foreign policy team is built around one key idea: the neglect of diplomacy by President Bush\u2019s \u201ccowboy\u201d unilateralism has damaged American prestige, alienated our allies, and worsened our problems abroad, particularly with the Islamic jihadists. Thus the new administration will restore diplomacy to its rightful place, and its ambassadors and special envoys and the President himself will diplomatically engage our enemies \u2014 even Iran, the Taliban, and Hamas \u2014 in discussions whose goal will be to find peaceful solutions to the issues that divide their interests from ours.<\/p>\n
This narrative of \u201crenewed vigor\u201d and \u201ca new beginning for American diplomacy,\u201d as Time magazine calls it, has become the received liberal wisdom, and of course it is built on numerous distortions of the historical record, as well as relying on questionable assumptions about the behavior of states. The notion, for example, that Bush neglected diplomacy in the run-up to the war in Iraq forgets about the several months before the war began that the U.S. spent trying through diplomacy to get the U.N. Security Council to authorize the enforcement of the U.N.\u2019s 16 previous resolutions defied by Saddam Hussein. Or how about the years of multilateral diplomacy that has failed to bring North Korea\u2019s nuclear ambitions to heel?<\/p>\n
Worse, however, is the magical thinking that lies behind the mantra of \u201cdiplomacy.\u201d This faith in talk is predicated on assumptions about human nature and state behavior difficult to validate by the historical record. It reflects a Western Enlightenment idea that force is an outmoded relic of our primitive past, to be replaced by rational discussion in which give-and-take dickering, negotiation, respect for the other side\u2019s position and demands, and a mutual, sincere desire to adjudicate grievance and avoid conflict can resolve disagreements. The key assumption is that in the end all people are rational and want peace and comfort more than any other good.<\/p>\n
Thus the soon-to-be-released report from the Asia Society \u2014 the think-tank started by Richard C. Holbrooke, the newly appointed Special Envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan \u2014 \u201crecommending that the United States declare an end to President Bush\u2019s \u2018war on terror\u2019 and negotiate with Taliban members willing to separate from al Qaeda,\u201d as\u00a0The New York Times<\/em>\u00a0reported. Given that the Taliban are religiously inspired jihadists, as are al Qaeda, and given that they have both Pakistan and the NATO forces on the run, one wonders what material inducement Mr. Holbrooke could offer that would tempt the Taliban to abandon the religiously sanctioned and validated jihad against the infidels, and disobey Allah\u2019s injunction \u201cto fight the infidels until they say there is no god but Allah.\u201d<\/p>\n The problem with this faith in talk and negotiation is that it assumes all people are essentially Westerners, which means material and psychological causes are the primary springs of human and state behavior, and religion is simply an expression of these more important causes. Deprived of wealth and the opportunities to acquire it, nursing wounded national esteem or aspirations because other states have not shown the adequate respect, aggrieved states will then \u201cact out\u201d like wayward teenagers. The solution, then, lies in showing them respect, listening to their grievances, and offering material incentives that will remove the source of grievance.<\/p>\n What is curious about this point of view is that it is arrogantly ethnocentric. Whatever the jihadists say about their motives, no matter how much those motives are validated by references to the Koran, Hadith, and fourteen centuries of Islamic theology and jurisprudence, they\u2019re really angry over some sort of deprivation or insult caused by our insensitive policies. Like children, they have no motives or interests of their own other than reactions to our bad behavior. So of course, if we acknowledge our mistakes, promise to address their grievances, and offer them some material or psychological carrots, all will be well.<\/p>\n Again, where is the evidence that this reading of our enemies is accurate? We\u2019ve spent the last eight years telling Muslims how much we love their wonderful religion, inviting imams to pray in the White House, and begging their forgiveness for our alleged historical sins \u2014 and don\u2019t forget we also have spent our blood and treasure liberating millions of Muslims from a maniacal autocrat. We\u2019ve given billions in aid to Palestinians, Pakistanis, and Egyptians, bombed Serbian Christians to save Bosnian Muslims, and had our guards at Guantanamo wear gloves when they handle the Koran and put marks on the cell floors pointing the way to Mecca, all so murdering fanatics can worship in comfort. All that doesn\u2019t seem to have made Muslims like us much.<\/p>\n If we take a wider historical view, we see that autocrats bent on aggression have always furthered their aims by manipulating this desire to use diplomatic talk to resolve disputes. Aggressors know that \u201cdiplomacy\u201d often is way for the weak to substitute words and process for action. They know that promises and agreements are made to be broken, and can give them time and cover for their aggression. Moreover, every concession made in the pursuit of such agreements is taken as weakness born of fear, and encourages the aggressor to continue with his aggression. The brilliant Philip II of Macedon, who in the 4th century B.C. ended the political freedom of the ancient Greek city-states, was a master at making false promises and pleasing agreements he had no intention of honoring. He had taken the measure of the Greeks, whose political virtues had decayed since the 5th century, and he knew that Assembly speeches and the diplomatic process would give them the excuse not to take the action necessary to thwart his ambitions.<\/p>\n More recently, Germany throughout the Twenties and Thirties participated in disarmament conferences all the while the Germans were secretly laying the foundations for the rebuilding of their armed forces. Meanwhile, many Europeans, addled by na\u00efve pacifism and the faith in international diplomacy, were content to substitute diplomatic talk for action. In 1935, after Germany\u2019s violations of the Versailles Treaty had become obvious, the League of Nations Council voted to affirm the principle that treaties should not be broken by unilateral action, and referred the issue to the full League. In addition, nineteen countries formally protested Germany\u2019s actions. But as Churchill wrote of this appeasement, \u201c But how vain was all their voting without the readiness of any single Power or any group of Powers to contemplate the use of FORCE, even in the last resort!\u201d<\/p>\n And let\u2019s not fail to mention the modern master of duplicitous diplomacy, Yasser Arafat, who signed numerous agreements, attended numerous summits, chatted with numerous \u201cspecial envoys\u201d \u2014 and who continued to pursue his twin aims of enriching himself and his cronies, and destroying Israel by \u201cstages.\u201d If we failed with Arafat, who at least made the pretense of desiring coexistence with Israel, how will we succeed with Hamas, whose every word and deed displays its fidelity to the cause of Israel\u2019s destruction, a cause for which they are willing to sacrifice the lives and comfort of their own people? What can George Mitchell, Obama\u2019s new \u201cspecial envoy,\u201d offer Hamas to wean them away from fulfilling Allah\u2019s will?<\/p>\n Yet despite this history, the Obama team is anxious to talk with the jihadist mullahs running Iran, and some even talk of sitting down with Hamas. Again, what carrot can the U.S. give to the Iranians that could tempt them to abandon their nuclear ambitions? An apology for past U.S. sins? Clinton already did that, to no avail. What else can we promise that would be more attractive than the instant prestige and regional dominance in the Middle East that nuclear weapons would give Iran? What inducement is more attractive than acquiring the means to fulfill the apocalyptic goal of \u201cwiping Israel off the map\u201d? No doubt the Iranians will talk: they have studied the North Korean playbook, and have learned how negotiation, discussion, and even signed agreements will all buy time for the perfection of nuclear weaponry. Especially given that the West has made it clear that it will not use force, even as a threat, to concentrate Iranian minds, and is content to use talk as the mask for failure of nerve.<\/p>\n So far, we have heard nothing from the Obama team that suggests they will be any more successful than previous administrations in thwarting the designs of our enemies. Instead, look for more talk, more summits, even more agreements that, in the end, will leave us weaker and our enemies stronger.<\/p>\n \u00a92009 Bruce S. Thornton<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPageMagazine.com President Obama\u2019s foreign policy team is built around one key idea: the neglect of diplomacy by President Bush\u2019s \u201ccowboy\u201d unilateralism has damaged American prestige, alienated our allies, and worsened our problems abroad, particularly with the Islamic jihadists.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[22,724],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-LM","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":8544,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-iran-failure-has-many-fathers\/","url_meta":{"origin":2962,"position":0},"title":"The Iran Failure Has Many Fathers","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The dangerous belief that words alone can transcend an eternal truth of human nature. by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine Everybody knows the deal with Iran is a disaster. Why is equally obvious: Iran will get $150 billion to spend on weapons and its terrorist proxies, will keep its\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Middle East"","block_context":{"text":"The Middle East","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/sw-500x281.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6306,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/epitaph-for-a-foreign-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":2962,"position":1},"title":"Epitaph for a Foreign Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 6, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/\u00a0FrontPage Magazine If you still doubt that Barack Obama has disastrously bungled our foreign policy, check out this\u00a0video. In it Egyptian singer Salma Elmasry brutally insults Obama for supporting the Muslim Brothers and Islamists in general, her vulgar insults laced with an image of our President\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2825,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-world-likes-us-it-really-likes-us\/","url_meta":{"origin":2962,"position":2},"title":"The World Likes Us, It Really Likes Us!","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 25, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPageMagazine.com Watching Obama\u2019s recent journeys to Europe and Latin America, I was reminded of actress Sally Field\u2019s embarrassing acceptance speech at the 1985 Academy Awards: \u201cI've wanted more than anything to have your respect,\u201d she gushed to her colleagues, adding in the same needy vein, \u201cI\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2214,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-the-prize-and-political-theater\/","url_meta":{"origin":2962,"position":3},"title":"Obama, the Prize and Political Theater","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 14, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPage Magazine Giving Barack Obama the Nobel Peace Prize, after a mere nine months in office and no foreign policy achievements whatsoever, confirms that the prize is a bit of political theater in which those Americans who put the world\u2019s interests ahead of their own country\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8729,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-schizophrenic-foreign-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":2962,"position":4},"title":"Obama’s Schizophrenic Foreign Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"An analysis of a recipe for serial disasters. by Bruce S. Thornton \/\/ FrontPage Magazine What are the roots of Barack Obama\u2019s foreign policy? Some focus on the man and his flaws of character, particularly his inability to learn from his mistakes and to adjust his ideas to changing facts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Our Contributors"","block_context":{"text":"Our Contributors","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via FrontPage Magazine","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/ov-500x281.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2416,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-lovely-little-nato-intervention\/","url_meta":{"origin":2962,"position":5},"title":"A Lovely Little NATO Intervention","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 25, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPage Magazine World powers sometimes have to fight wars not for some material interest, but for bolstering a nation\u2019s prestige in order to deter more dangerous aggressors. As Margaret Thatcher said after England\u2019s defeat of Argentina in the 1982 Falklands War, the conflict showed that \u201cnow\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2962"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2962"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2962\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2963,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2962\/revisions\/2963"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}