by Raymond Ibrahim<\/p>\n
Hudson New York<\/em><\/p>\n What clearer sign that Egypt is turning rabidly Islamist than the fact that hardly a week goes by without a church being destroyed, or without protesting Christians being attacked and slaughtered by the military?<\/p>\n The\u00a0latest chaos<\/a>\u00a0in Egypt \u2014 where the military opened fire on unarmed protesters, and ran armored vehicles over them \u2014 killing 35 and injuring over 300, with the count still rising \u2014originated in Edfu, a onetime tourist destination renowned for its pharaonic antiquities, but now known as the latest region to see a\u00a0church destroyed by a Muslim mob<\/a>.<\/p>\n This destruction, which spurred the unrest in Egypt, is itself eye-opening as to the situation in Egypt. To sum it up, St. George Coptic church, built nearly a century ago, was so dilapidated that the local council and governor of Aswan approved renovating it, and signed off on the design.<\/p>\n It was not long before local Muslims began complaining and making various demands, including that the church be devoid of crosses and bells \u2014 even though the permit had approved them \u2014\u00a0citing<\/a>\u00a0that “the Cross irritates Muslims and their children.”<\/p>\n Coptic leaders had no choice but to acquiesce, “pointing to the fact that the church was rebuilt legally, and any concessions on the part of the church was done for the love for the country, which is passing through a difficult phase.”<\/p>\n Acquiescence breeds more demands: Muslim leaders next insisted that the very dome of the church be removed \u2014 so that the building might not even resemble a church \u2014 and that it be referred to as a “hospitality home.” Stating that removing the dome would most likely collapse the church, the bishop refused.<\/p>\n The cries of “Allahu Akbar<\/a>!” began: Muslims threatened to raze the church and build a mosque in its place; Copts were “forbidden to leave their homes or to buy food until they remove the dome of St. George’s Church;” many starved for weeks.<\/p>\n Then, after Friday prayers on Sept. 30, some three thousand Muslims rampaged through the church, torched it, and demolished the dome; flames from the wreckage burned nearby Coptic homes, which were further ransacked by rioting Muslims.<\/p>\n This account of anti-church sentiment in Egypt leads to several sad conclusions:<\/p>\n Animosity toward churches; demands that they be left to crumble; demands to remove crosses and stifle bells; are an integral part of Islamic history anddogma<\/a>. The fact that church attacks in Egypt always occur on a Friday, Islam’s “holy day,” and are always accompanied by religious cries of “Allahu Akbar!” should be evidence enough of the Islamist context of these attacks.<\/p>\n Because there was a lull in this animosity from the colonial era to just a few decades ago, most Westerners incorrectly assume that in Islamic history church toleration is the rule, not the exception. Unfortunately Islamic tolerance toward churches has more frequently been draconian, and is back: “The\u00a0Muslim Brotherhood<\/a>\u00a0announced immediately after the revolution that it is impossible to build any new church in Egypt, and churches which are demolished should never be rebuilt, as well as no crosses over churches or bells to be rung.”<\/p>\n This is also why Muslim authorities are complacent, and even complicit. According to witnesses, security forces, which were present during the Edfu attack, “stood there watching.” Worse, Edfu’s Intelligence Unit chief was seendirecting the mob<\/a>\u00a0destroying the church.<\/p>\n As for the governor of Aswan, he appeared on State TV and “denied any church being torched,” calling it, instead, a “guest home” — a\u00a0common tactic<\/a>\u00a0to excuse the destruction of churches. He even\u00a0justified the incident<\/a>: Arguing that the church contractor made the building three meters higher than he permitted, he declared that “Copts made a mistake and had to be punished, and Muslims did nothing but set things right, end of story.”<\/p>\n Equally telling is the fact that perpetrators of church attacks are seldom if ever punished. Even if sometimes the most rabid church-destroying Muslims get “detained,” it is usually for show: they are released in days, and hailed back home as heroes \u2014 a practice that also goes back to Muslim dogma, which sides with Muslims over infidels.<\/p>\n This year alone has seen the\u00a0New Year church attack<\/a>, which left 23 dead; the destruction of the\u00a0ancient church of Sool<\/a>, when Muslims “played soccer” with its relics; the\u00a0Imbaba attacks<\/a>, where several churches were set aflame; and now Edfu, wherein, as usual “none of the attackers were arrested<\/a>.”<\/p>\n