by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
PJ Media<\/em><\/p>\n Here are a few things that I think don\u2019t quite compute.<\/p>\n 1)\u00a0The now familiar Palin\/Edwards dichotomy<\/em>. John McCain was damned for picking Sarah Palin who had not finished her first term as governor, and had previously only been elected to local political offices and served on a state commission.<\/p>\n Her middle American \u2018you betcha\u2019 twang, NASCAR persona, good looks, and occasional deer-in-the-headlines interviews with hostile anchor people, coupled with the kids, conservative creed, Christianity, and 19th-century husband, sickened \u2014 there is no other word for it \u2014 the DC-New York punditocracy. Yes, they concluded, she really was from Wasilla. Yuk!<\/p>\n So we got everything in the media from the maverick McCain suddenly as cynical sell-out who settled for third-best, to Palin, the clueless Alaskan yokel.<\/p>\n In contrast, to this day, there is no in-depth analysis of Kerry\u2019s disastrous pick of the first-term, uninformed Senator Edwards as his VP choice in 2004. And it took the National Enquirer to inform us of his later conspiratorial lying and bribery involving his illegitimate child \u2014 sordid facts apparently well known to \u2014 and hushed up by \u2014 the mainstream media. Remember, later presidential candidate Edwards was not just inexperienced, but as a confessed wonk, did not open a book. He was the owner of a mansion who preached about \u201ctwo-nations\u201d inequality, and he alternately used and humiliated his alternately heroic and conniving cancer-stricken spouse.<\/p>\n B)\u00a0The responsible Times<\/em>. For much of 2002-8, the New York Times leaked classified information about U.S. policy in the war on terror and gave up on Iraq (though John Burns, its military correspondent, was quite professional and courageous). Indeed, the serial story of Iraq was the IED, not the heroic capture of Fallujah or the stunning success of the surge. The Times gave a discount to Moveon.org to run its \u201cGeneral Betray-Us\u201d ads at a time thousands of young Americans were fighting for their lives during the surge.<\/p>\n And now? The Times admirably sat on advanced warning of the current NATO offensive in Afghanistan; its editor emphasized that the paper was \u201cresponsible\u201d in reporting matters of national security (i.e. the Times does not leak). Our current efforts in Helmand Province now are portrayed in the media in the manner of Patton\u2019s WWII offensives \u2014 thank God for that.<\/p>\n C)\u00a0The war on terror<\/em>. For much of the Bush administration, one would have thought the Constitution had been shredded. My God \u2014 Tribunals! Renditions! Guantanamo! Patriot Act! Intercepts! Wiretaps! Iraq! Predator drones!<\/p>\n Indeed, for each of those ACLU talking points, then candidate Obama reflected the media outrage and damned these protocols. Yet suddenly, there is no in-depth critical analysis of these policies. Most are now kept and apparently thought by government and media to be of both utility and morality by virtue that Obama adopted them.<\/p>\n In some cases, rhetoric suffices. Guantanamo is now \u201cvirtually\u201d closed, in the manner KSM will be virtually tried in New York. Assert rather than enact and a sort of virtual nirvana follows in the media.<\/p>\n Not long ago, we were to charge or investigate former administration and CIA officials for ordering the waterboarding of three confessed terrorists, among them Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the proud father of 9\/11. And now? The number of Predator drone assassination missions has increased enormously. Apparently in this new age of war as a criminal justice matter, somehow the Bush-era coerced interrogations of confessed mass-murderers deserved popular outrage and were to be considered crimes, while the judge\/jury\/executioner sentences passed down on suspected terrorists (again, dead men need no Miranda rights) \u2014 and anyone in their general vicinity when the hellfire missile hits \u2014 are well, like renditions and tribunals, suddenly problematic.<\/p>\n D)\u00a0Good, then bad, D.C.<\/em>\u00a0A year ago, government was at last working. Supermajorities were in both houses of congress. The Senate was filibuster proof, in a way the poor Republicans had not been able to achieve during the 2005 Bush efforts to reform Social Security.<\/p>\n Obama was on nearly every magazine cover, his visage popped up on the evening newscasts. Pundits wrote puff pieces about \u201cinside\u201d interviews. Healthcare, cap and trade, borrowing, bail-outs, more stimuli, cash for clunkers, all this and more needed no Republican input with such supermajorities in congress.<\/p>\n The system was working as it was designed; to paraphrase the president, \u2018we won and you lost\u2019. A recalcitrant liberal Senator here and there could always be bought off with a $300 million earmark. Polls hit near 70% approval. The Europeans went Ga-Ga. Government was moving again.<\/p>\n Now? Filibusters are Satanic. If one were to read the papers or listen to the administration, partisanship is toxic. The very system itself is broken. We are ungovernable.<\/p>\n Liberal pundits deride us as clueless or selfish or worse still. China\u2019s autocrats, in contrast, are at least efficient in matters of green energy compared to us. These are all to be accepted as principled observations and are apparently not predicated on a below 50% presidential approval rating, failed legislation, a nearly $2 trillion annual deficit, tea party revolts, the conservative wins in the governor races in Virginia and New Jersey, and the loss of Ted Kennedy\u2019s senate seat.<\/p>\n The weird and sudden concern about a White House summit, a national commission on the debt, and worries about filibusters have nothing to do with the specter of a Democratic catastrophe in the November 2010 elections \u2014 or so we are to believe.<\/p>\n I\u2019ll stop there. Readers, you have far more examples, no doubt.<\/p>\n So What?<\/strong><\/p>\n Is all this hypocrisy simply liberal-conservative politics, Democratic-Republican ying and yang? After all, there is a lot of hypocrisy as well on the Republican side \u2014 the traditionalists embracing nearly $3 trillion in Bush deficits over eight years, the Republican culture of corruption in the 2004-6 Congress, etc.<\/p>\n But \u201cjust politics\u201d does not quite explain the advocacy of the media, the universities, the foundations, the arts, the legal community, the judiciary, and creative communities, whose zealotry is reserved for the Left.<\/p>\n So what explains the treatment of an Edwards versus Palin, or a war as lost versus one as necessary and well conducted, or Guantanamo for confessed terrorists as gulag but execution for suspected terrorists as legitimate, or Obama as principled hyper-partisan suddenly principled bipartisan?<\/p>\n The Usual Suspects<\/strong><\/p>\n 1) Egalitarianism and equality trump all \u2014 whether freedom, individualism, or personal liberty. Usually a great deal of education, or capital tends to convince us that in a perfect world, people like us who have money or have wisdom, could make others like us, rather than allow them to continue to suffer in poverty and ignorance.<\/p>\n This drive transcends the desire to contribute to charity, or to befriend the poorer neighbor or relative, but is cosmic in nature, overarching, all powerful, all-wise, and so by needs remote. So note here \u2014 and this is critical \u2014 the anointed utopian usually lives in a world \u2014 a better world \u2014 not subject to his own strictures. (Have Sarah Palin support abortion, call for cap and trade, or talk about the need for socialized medicine, and we would see inspirational stories of her fishing in waders to feed her below-the-poverty-line noble brood, not that she makes lots of money speaking).<\/p>\n Tax avoidance, ample square footage, ample energy use, networking, insider influence, prep schools for one\u2019s progeny? All these are no more common or rare among crusading egalitarians than among elfish elitist conservatives. That raises the question \u2014 is utopianism na\u00efve, or is it a psychological mechanism that serves not just to alleviate guilt, but perhaps even to contextualize one\u2019s own privilege? E.g., \u201cmy riches are really used to help others and only incidentally provide me with an ample lifestyle, that of course, allows me to be an even more effective advocate.\u201d Angels need ample wings.<\/p>\n The anointed ends always justifies contradictory means.<\/p>\n 2) Power. The administration of mercy and compassion requires a properly gifted technocracy, often one well paid and quite influential. If hundreds of millions are to receive entitlements, millions must disperse them, and thousands must administer the millions, and hundreds must oversee the thousands \u2014 and that usually means a lot of money and power accrue to a very few. You object that those good billets only pay $150-200,000. Well, maybe, in theory, but there are perks, all sorts of tenure, and inside contacts that come with them \u2014 and none of the grief of running the furniture store or putting on braces all day. Big government can house all sorts of needy philanthropists.<\/p>\n The progressive impulse is often tied to career advancement.<\/p>\n 3) Words matter, deeds don\u2019t. The talking heads, the lawyers, the professors, the actors, the politicians, the journalists, like the background of the president and most of his cabinet, mostly all work with words. If they sound smart, presto, they must be. Take a brilliant tongue-tied engineer and he is an ignoramus compared to an idiotic smooth talker. Much of the apparent hypocrisy derives from the best and brightest being smart because they advance that impression so well. John Edwards and Barack Obama are cases in point; they exude ignorance so smoothly. And that, in this often zero-sum game, beats real intelligence and experience that are so often hidden.<\/p>\n Abstract utopianism is best advanced in theory by those who worry less about implementation.<\/p>\n 4) The tragic view is, well, tragic and hard to endure and does not excite. The notion that humans don\u2019t surprise us in their selfish appetites is nothing to become excited about. The Enlightenment notion that we are all good and prove ourselves so with education and capital is something to sing, even yell, slander, and slur for. In contrast, accepting the need for military preparedness and deterrence, or removing the incentives for humans to become idle, is not something to write enthusiastically about. What teenager wants to hear from his dour father that you can\u2019t print money, and that he must pay back his maxed out credit card?<\/p>\n It is fun and nice to be therapeutic, unpleasant and mean to accept tragedy.<\/p>\n Add all this up, hypocrisy vanishes, and revolutionary pigs walk on two legs in the farmhouse \u2014 an Edwards is mellifluous, puts his energy on behalf of those in the \u201cother nation,\u201d and is devoted to promoting a society where we are all about as wealthy as John Edwards, who uses his wealth for proper contemplation and preparation for further good deeds, and thus needs a castle of compassion. Given that, who cares that he is a congenial liar, lives one way, lectures another, helped destroy the practice of obstetrics in his home state, and took a great deal of money for doing very little? The former considerations alone count, the later are mere right wing talking points.<\/p>\n \u00a92010 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media Here are a few things that I think don\u2019t quite compute.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[609],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-tf","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3258,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/an-instructive-candidacy\/","url_meta":{"origin":1813,"position":0},"title":"An Instructive Candidacy","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 25, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"What Sarah Palin taught us about ourselves. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Soon this depressing campaign will be over, and we can reflect on what we learned from our two-month introduction to Sarah Palin. Clearly, it is more than we would have ever wished to know about ourselves.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "October 2008"","block_context":{"text":"October 2008","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2008\/october-2008\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3275,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/not-over-yet\/","url_meta":{"origin":1813,"position":1},"title":"Not Over Yet","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 11, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Reasons for hope on the first Tuesday in November. by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Of course, this is a Democratic year. The public is tired of George Bush and eight years of an incumbent administration. War, Wall Street, and the absence of a conservative Reagan-like charismatic figure should\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "October 2008"","block_context":{"text":"October 2008","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2008\/october-2008\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3267,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/jumping-ship\/","url_meta":{"origin":1813,"position":2},"title":"Jumping Ship","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 17, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media This is becoming a very strange campaign. On CNN recently both David Gergen and Ed Rollins echoed the current mantra that the \u201cold\u201d noble McCain is gone \u2014 and a \u201cnew\u201d nastier one has emerged, largely because of his attacks on Ayers, perhaps his\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "October 2008"","block_context":{"text":"October 2008","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2008\/october-2008\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3034,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-media-morality-tale\/","url_meta":{"origin":1813,"position":3},"title":"A Media Morality Tale","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 7, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson NRO's\u00a0The Corner The putative Caroline Kennedy candidacy for senator has had the odd effect of reopening the media can of worms treatment of Gov. Palin. Compared to Sarah Palin's almost immediate immersion into crowds and public speaking, Kennedy seems like a deer in the headlights before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "January 2009"","block_context":{"text":"January 2009","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2009\/january-2009\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2607,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/what-is-wisdom-sarah-palin-and-her-critics\/","url_meta":{"origin":1813,"position":4},"title":"What Is Wisdom?: Sarah Palin and Her Critics","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 8, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media They Say\/We Say The debate over Palin is sort of ossified. The Left continues to ridicule her accent, family, and middling roots. The Right enjoys such authenticity \u2014 but enjoys even more the hysteria it incurs in liberals. Will It Be Politics or Money?\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "July 2009"","block_context":{"text":"July 2009","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2009\/july-2009\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4082,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-war-against-palin-goes-on-and-on-and\/","url_meta":{"origin":1813,"position":5},"title":"The War Against Palin Goes On and On and . . .","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 20, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media We Are Civil Now In emulation of Jonathan Chait\u2019s now infamous 2004\u00a0New Republic\u00a0essay, \u201cThe Case for Bush Hatred\u201d (\u201cI hate George Bush \u2014 there, I said it\u201d),\u00a0Slate\u00a0just published an op-ed, \u201cWhy I Loathe My Connecticut Senator\u201d by one Emily Bazelon, with a detailed description\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Punditry"","block_context":{"text":"Punditry","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/opinion\/punditry\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1813"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1813"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1813\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1815,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1813\/revisions\/1815"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}