{"id":1549,"date":"2010-06-18T21:22:58","date_gmt":"2010-06-18T21:22:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com.108-166-28-151.mdgnetworks.com\/wordpress\/?p=1549"},"modified":"2013-03-11T21:23:43","modified_gmt":"2013-03-11T21:23:43","slug":"the-great-anglo-american-spat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-great-anglo-american-spat\/","title":{"rendered":"The Great Anglo-American Spat"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n

National Review Online<\/em><\/p>\n

Various irate British observers \u2014 from columnists like Peter Hitchens and Geoffrey Wheatcroft to parliamentarians and former cabinet officials \u2014 have recently declared the \u201cspecial relationship\u201d with America to be over. The Anglo animus, perhaps brought to a boil by the World Cup soccer match and by President Obama\u2019s handling of the BP spill, has now reached comical levels. Everything from the War of 1812 to American neutrality in 1939 is evoked to prove that the present estrangement is more typical than aberrant in our post-1776 relations.<\/p>\n

To be fair, the miffed British are reacting to two years of both perceived and real slights from the Obama administration. Who does not know the familiar litany? There was the rude return of the magnificent Churchill bust. The asymmetrical gift exchange with Gordon Brown \u2014 at the end of a visit in which the president repeatedly snubbed the prime minister \u2014 and the banal choice of gift for the queen the following month revealed a certain symbolic spite on the administration\u2019s part.<\/p>\n

The State Department\u2019s suggestion that there was nothing particularly special about American-British relations did not help, especially given the feeling that America does not fully appreciate the singular British military contribution in Afghanistan \u2014 to be seen in the light of the meager European commitment.<\/p>\n

Then there was Secretary Clinton\u2019s unnecessary preemptory announcement of American neutrality in the next round of disputes over the Falklands. All this is topped off by the constant presidential trashing of \u201cBritish Petroleum\u201d and its mess in the Gulf, with the implication that a foreign interest perhaps does not care too much for a former colony\u2019s ecology.<\/p>\n

In reaction, polls reveal that a vast majority of British citizens believe that their relationship with America has worsened since 2009. Of course, we now show the same indifference to almost all our allies, such as the Colombians, Poles, and Israelis. Yet two ancillary considerations perhaps explain why the British are especially upset at these real and hyped slights.<\/p>\n

One is embarrassment, and the second a sort of fear.<\/p>\n

First, in 2008 the British public heavily invested in candidate Obama as a long-awaited social-democratic anti-Bush. Four years earlier, in 2004, the British media had closely followed the American presidential election, with some commentators haughtily berating the voters of Ohio for giving Bush the margin of victory \u2014 as if one swing state that went conservative was responsible for ensuring a continuance of global discord. In this regard, the boorish and untrue slur against George Bush\u2019s supposed lack of interest in reading, offered earlier this month by the new court jester, Paul McCartney, as a sort of toady tip to a smiling Obama, is par for the course rather than a clumsy divot.<\/p>\n

In 2008, the British public and press both bought, hook, line, and sinker, the reset-button promises of Barack Obama to be a listener. They welcomed a sort of elegant post-racial Wilsonian multilateralist \u2014 and, better yet, a progressive who did not drawl or offend like the pink, tongue-tied bore of old, Jimmy Carter. And so the damn-Bush\/praise-Obama chorus sang on in Britain.<\/p>\n

That the supposed yokel \u201cYo, Blair!\u201d George W. Bush was strongly pro-British and that he cared deeply about his partnership with Tony Blair (who often had more influence on Bush than vice versa) were conveniently ignored. Indeed, the British were embarrassed by Bush\u2019s fondness for Blair and for the U.K. in general, as if he were some sort of Walmart Velcro that just wouldn\u2019t come unstuck.<\/p>\n

Now, of course, the British have got what they wanted, and they are beginning to rue it. They fear that they have been had. And in a way, they most certainly have.<\/p>\n

All of which brings us to our second consideration, the suspicion among some Brits that the Obama hostility is not so much the clumsiness of a raw rookie as it is the logical expression of our first \u201cPacific president,\u201d who feels no special affinity with Europe or reverence for the Western tradition \u2014 and thus especially no love for our colonial mother, Britain.<\/p>\n

Indeed, we are getting yet another round of references in the British press to the passages in\u00a0Dreams from My Father<\/a>\u00a0concerning the supposed maltreatment of Barack Obama\u2019s Kenyan grandfather for his anti-colonialist activities. When they are not doubting the truth of Obama\u2019s charges, British pundits express the fear that, in Aeschylean fashion, the sins of a pith-helmeted proconsul have earned them payback from a third-generation nemesis.<\/p>\n

For some reason, the British \u2014 perhaps na\u00efvely \u2014 believed that there was a universal brotherhood of progressives that transcended archaic national boundaries and so would trump any lingering animosity that Barack Obama picked up first from his family, and then during his odyssey from prep school in Hawaii, to Indonesia, to Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard Law, and to Chicago organizing, all of it amplified by close friendship with Bill Ayers and Rashid Khalidi, and, of course, dutiful attendance at Jeremiah Wright\u2019s Trinity United Church.<\/p>\n

What these curiously assorted places and people have in common is disdain for the Western tradition and, again, an unspoken dislike of Britain in particular. In such a network, one might hear of the Raj, of Mossadegh, of the Mau Mau revolt, but nothing of Magna Carta, the Scottish Enlightenment, the effort to stop Bonaparte, the terrible costs of defending liberal values against Prussian nationalism, Nazism, fascism, Japanese militarism, and Stalinism, or the largely peaceful withdrawal from empire \u2014 or the unmatched insight of Milton, Shakespeare, Gibbon, and Dickens, or the genius of Hobbes, Hume, Locke, and Burke.<\/p>\n

In contrast, in the formative years of Barack Obama \u2014 and millions of others on the progressive Left \u2014 evocation of the evils of imperialism, colonialism, oppression, and exploitation were simply daily rituals. Names like Trafalgar, the Corn Laws, the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society, the Somme, the Battle of Britain, and El Alamein are, well, names of no particular significance. A president who thinks Americans liberated Auschwitz would hardly care to inquire about the RAF\u2019s \u201cfinest hour,\u201d or the contribution of a man like Field Marshall Alan Brooke to the winning of World War II.<\/p>\n

In short, given the nature of American therapeutic education, the triumph of multiculturalism, and our own radically changing demography, if Barack Obama did not exist, one would have to invent him. What is strange, then, is not Obama\u2019s innate distrust of Britain, but the current surprise in Britain that someone like him is indifferent to what Britain stands for, past and present.<\/p>\n

But note, when I said an Obama would have to be invented, I did not mean to imply that Obamaism is yet the norm \u2014 only that it is a strong current in American popular culture that at some point, if only for limited duration, was bound to find resonance at the highest level of government.<\/p>\n

Obamaism is, however, not quite yet typical of American thinking.<\/p>\n

Most Americans, across racial and cultural lines, still revere our British connection. It is what helps to explain why we are more like successful Canada than failing Mexico, why we look back at our own sacrifices at the side of Britain in two world wars with pride rather than regret, and why, for all the petty squabbling and rivalries, we usually think we are doing something wrong when Britain is not our partner.<\/p>\n

What explains the way American Revolution unfolded and the success that followed is not just the courage and brilliance of our Founding Fathers but also the fact that we were revolting against Britain and not an Ottoman Empire, Russia, or China. Americans usually understand that, and so we blend our pride in American exceptionalism with acknowledgment that its font was British law, government, and culture.<\/p>\n

Even as America becomes an increasingly diverse society, even as our schools turn away from traditional learning, nevertheless millions of Americans still grasp why we owe so much to Britain \u2014 and why we must never endanger our singular friendship with it, the cornerstone of American foreign policy. Our president\u2019s cavalier indifference to Britain reflects a strain in American life, but not American life per se. We may too often take Britain for granted, but we do so because our unspoken debt to it and our appreciation for it are part of our national fiber. Barack Obama cannot change that \u2014 as we will relearn either when he shows contrition, or at such time as he leaves office.<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a92010 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Various irate British observers \u2014 from columnists like Peter Hitchens and Geoffrey Wheatcroft to parliamentarians and former cabinet officials \u2014 have recently declared the \u201cspecial relationship\u201d with America to be over.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[587],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-oZ","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3559,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/anglo-american-alliance\/","url_meta":{"origin":1549,"position":0},"title":"Anglo-American Alliance?","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 14, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The British have basically been defeated in the South.\" by Victor Davis Hanson NRO's\u00a0The Corner We've come a long way from the 2003 British lectures about American obtrusive Ray-Bans and Kevlar losing what British soft hats and smiles had won. That quote about defeat from \"a senior U.S. official\" about\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "August 2007"","block_context":{"text":"August 2007","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2007\/august-2007\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11507,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-11th-hour-of-the-11th-day-of-the-11th-month-100-years-ago\/","url_meta":{"origin":1549,"position":1},"title":"The 11th Hour of the 11th Day of the 11th Month\u2014100 Years Ago","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness The First World War ended 100 years ago this month on November 11, 1918, at 11 a.m. Nearly 20 million people had perished since the war began on July 28, 1914. In early 1918, it looked as if the Central Powers\u2014Austria-Hungary, Germany, Bulgaria and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "World War I"","block_context":{"text":"World War I","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/world-war-i\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2624,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-armchair-alliance\/","url_meta":{"origin":1549,"position":2},"title":"The Armchair Alliance","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 28, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson The New Criterion Review of Andrew Roberts\u00a0Masters and Commanders: How Roosevelt, Churchill, Marshall, & Alanbrooke Won the War in the West\u00a0(Allen Lane, 673 pp.) How did the British and the United States ever defeat the Axis in the West? Both countries were tied down in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Reviews"","block_context":{"text":"Reviews","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/opinion\/reviews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9335,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/remembering-d-day\/","url_meta":{"origin":1549,"position":3},"title":"Remembering D-Day","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online \u00a0 D-Day was the largest amphibious invasion in history since King Xerxes\u2019 480 bc combined sea and land descent into Greece. The Americans, especially General George Marshall, had wanted to invade France as early as spring 1943, still confident from their World\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "History"","block_context":{"text":"History","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/history\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12417,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/remembering-d-day-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":1549,"position":4},"title":"Remembering D-Day","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review D-Day was the largest amphibious invasion in history since King Xerxes\u2019 480\u00a0bc\u00a0combined sea and land descent into Greece. The Americans, especially General George Marshall, had wanted to invade France as early as spring 1943, still confident from their World War I experience that they\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10260,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/remembering-d-day-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":1549,"position":5},"title":"Remembering D-Day","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson National Review's \"The Corner\" D-Day was the largest amphibious invasion in history since King Xerxes\u2019 480 BC combined sea and land descent into Greece. The Americans, especially General George Marshall, had wanted to invade France as early as spring 1943, still confident from their World War\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "U.K."","block_context":{"text":"U.K.","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/u-k\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1549"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1549"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1550,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1549\/revisions\/1550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}