{"id":1324,"date":"2011-12-15T17:34:05","date_gmt":"2011-12-15T17:34:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com.108-166-28-151.mdgnetworks.com\/wordpress\/?p=1324"},"modified":"2013-03-08T17:36:41","modified_gmt":"2013-03-08T17:36:41","slug":"pearl-harbor-considered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/pearl-harbor-considered\/","title":{"rendered":"Pearl Harbor Considered"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n

NRO’s\u00a0The Corner<\/em><\/p>\n

Why did Japan attack us 70 years ago today, other than the usually cited existential reasons and the fact that they thought they could and get away with it?<\/p>\n

We sometimes forget that their expansionism in Manchuria quickly put them in collision with the Soviet Union, and for much of the summer of 1939 they waged a vicious and costly border war against the Soviets \u2014 one that they eventually lost and which led to their signing a non-aggression pact with Russia by spring 1941.<\/p>\n

The Japanese had bitterly complained that, in the midst of their ordeal, their supposedly anti-Communist ally Nazi Germany had without warning agreed to a duplicitous non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union. Indeed, the Ribbentrop-Molotov\u00a0deal<\/a>\u00a0was signed on August 23, 1939, amid some of the worst fighting for the Japanese on the Russian eastern front. If Hitler thought that he had a green light to go into Poland, Stalin was equally relieved that he too had only a one-front war and no worries about the Japanese as he gobbled up his share of Poland.<\/p>\n

The irony was, of course, that when Hitler invaded Russia the next year in June 1941, Stalin was freed up by Japanese neutrality to send critical divisions from the east; in tit-for-tat fashion, the Japanese had done to Germany what Germany had just earlier done to it. After the stall at Moscow, it is strange to read of growing Germany exasperation with the Japanese, given prior Nazi unconcern with Japan\u2019s war with Russia.<\/p>\n

As for the Japanese in spring 1941, with their own rear largely freed from worries over the Soviets and the army somewhat in disrepute after the costly and losing conventional border war and the humiliation of being loud proponents of the now dubious alliance with Hitler, the navy was able to make the argument that a one-front, primarily carrier war against the Americans made some sense, and a simultaneous one against the naturally rich colonies of the weaker European Pacific powers even more sense given their losses in Europe to Hitler.<\/p>\n

Indeed, until August 1945, it was the United States, not Japan, that had a traditional two-front war. We rarely talk of Stalin\u2019s duplicity in this regard: While we were suffering terrible casualties from the Japanese, supplying Russia, conducting bloody campaigns in North Africa, Sicily, Italy, and over the skies of Europe, and being hectored by the Soviets to open a second front in Europe, the Soviets honored their non-aggression pact with Japan, freeing up hundreds of thousands of veteran troops to be used against us on the islands. I never understood why history books focus on Stalin\u2019s exasperation with our supposedly tardy invasion of Normandy, when he was completely unwilling to open a second front against Japan \u2014 until it was utterly wrecked in August 1945 and there were easy pickings to be had in the region.<\/p>\n

It is often said that Admiral Yamamoto, the architect of Pearl Harbor, was a sort of liberal (at least in the militaristic Japan of the times) and a visionary who opposed the Tripartite Pact, who did not support the Manchuria occupation, and who had deep reservations about attacking the US. The famous quotes about awakening a \u201csleeping giant\u201d and running wild for (only) six months are often, and dubiously, attributed to him. He is also held to have been a brilliant strategist in his emphases on carriers instead of battleships.<\/p>\n

Perhaps. But it may be just as likely that Yamamoto\u2019s earlier years in the United States, at Harvard in particular, rather than convincing him of the futility of attacking such an industrial colossus had encouraged his prejudices that Western society, especially in its Roaring Twenties excesses, was decadent and lacked the martial steel for an eventual war with the Japanese. Yamamoto\u2019s failure to plan for a follow-up after Pearl Harbor, whose fuel depots and shipyards could have been neutralized for several months, and the idiotic plan to divide his Midway forces by sending valuable assets up to Alaska, don\u2019t support the image of either a brilliant thinker or a classical liberal surrounded by closed military minds.<\/p>\n

One final thought. The growth of Japan in the 1920s and 1930s and the alarm that it caused in the Pacific, its increasingly illiberality and nationalism, the enormous industrial and military progress that it had made in emulating European economies and Western armed forces, the concurrent impressions that a Depression-era America was a sinking rather than a rising power, and a general sense that the Japanese model was superior to the\u00a0alternatives offer<\/a>some general parallels to the current comparative status of China and America in the Pacific. Let us hope that we learn the lessons of Pearl Harbor, namely that anything is possible at any time, that deterrence ultimately keeps the peace, and that deterrence is a combination of known superior military strength and a certainty among concerned parties that such overwhelming power will be used in defense, and thereby will assure the aggressor that its attack will prove suicidal.<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a92011 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson NRO’s\u00a0The Corner Why did Japan attack us 70 years ago today, other than the usually cited existential reasons and the fact that they thought they could and get away with it?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[99,307],"tags":[540,177,1015,1050,323,1028,539,1019,112,1074,1032,1068,541],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-lm","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6814,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ignoring-history-the-folly-of-our-iran-pact\/","url_meta":{"origin":1324,"position":0},"title":"Ignoring History: The Folly of Our Iran Pact","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 5, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Dictatorships abandon treaties when they become inconvenient. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online\u00a0 According to our recently proposed treaty with the Iranian government, Iran keeps much of its nuclear program while agreeing to slow its path to weapons-grade enrichment. The Iranians also get crippling economic sanctions lifted.\u00a0 The agreement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Iran"","block_context":{"text":"Iran","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/iran\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7871,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/real-reason-japanese-attacked-pearl-harbor\/","url_meta":{"origin":1324,"position":1},"title":"REAL REASON JAPANESE ATTACKED PEARL HARBOR","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 17, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ WND The Japanese did not see their attack on Pearl Harbor as foolish at all. What in retrospect seems suicidal did not necessarily seem so at the time. In hindsight, the wiser Japanese course would have been to absorb the orphaned colonial Far Eastern possessions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Retrospective"","block_context":{"text":"Retrospective","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/opinion\/retrospective\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Photo via WND","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/PearlHarbor-500x301.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":11949,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-german-soviet-non-aggression-pact-a-bad-deal-80-years-ago\/","url_meta":{"origin":1324,"position":2},"title":"The German\u2013Soviet Non-Aggression Pact: A Bad Deal, 80 Years Ago","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Some 80 years ago, on August 23, 1939, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, formally known as the \u201cTreaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.\u201d The world was shocked \u2014 and terrified \u2014 by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9277,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/setting-the-record-straight-on-britain-america-and-world-war-ii\/","url_meta":{"origin":1324,"position":3},"title":"Setting the Record Straight on Britain, America, and World War II","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online While in London last week, President Obama waded into the upcoming British referendum about whether the United Kingdom should stay in the European Union. Controversy followed his lecture about the future of the Anglo-American relationship should Britain depart the EU. Obama also\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Europe"","block_context":{"text":"Europe","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/europe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8408,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-america-was-indispensable-to-the-allies-winning-world-war-ii\/","url_meta":{"origin":1324,"position":4},"title":"Why America Was Indispensable to the Allies\u2019 Winning World War II","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online May 8 marked the end of World War II in Europe 70 years ago \u2014 a horrific conflict that is still fought over by historians. More than 60 million people perished \u2014 some 50 million of them in Eastern Europe, the Soviet\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The World"","block_context":{"text":"The World","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arsenal of Democracy: B-24 Liberator plant in Fort Worth, Texas. (U.S. Air Force)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/download-2.jpeg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9322,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/president-obama-is-visiting-hiroshima-why-not-pearl-harbor\/","url_meta":{"origin":1324,"position":5},"title":"President Obama Is Visiting Hiroshima. Why Not Pearl Harbor?","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 26, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"On the 75th anniversary of Pearl Harbor, what lessons does the U.S. need to relearn? By Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online This year marks the 75th anniversary of the December 7, 1941, Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor that killed more than 2,400 Americans. President Obama is visiting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "China"","block_context":{"text":"China","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/china\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1324"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1324"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1324\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1325,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1324\/revisions\/1325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}