by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
PJ Media<\/em><\/p>\n On the One Hand\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n These should not be foreboding years. The US is in the midst of a veritable energy revolution. There is a godsend of new gas and oil discoveries that will help to curtail our fiscal and foreign policy vulnerabilities \u2014 an energy bonanza\u00a0despite, not because of<\/a>[1], the present administration.<\/p>\n Demographically, our rivals \u2014 the EU, China, Russia, and Japan \u2014 are\u00a0both shrinking and aging<\/a>[2] at rates far in excess of\u00a0our own<\/a>[3].<\/p>\n In terms of farming, the United States is exporting more produce than ever before at record prices. Americans eat the safest and cheapest food on the planet.<\/p>\n As far as high-tech gadgetry, the global companies that have most changed the world in recent years \u2014 Amazon\u2019s online buying, Google search engines, Apple iPhones, iPads, and Mac laptops \u2014 are mostly American. There is a reason why Mexican nationals are not crossing their border into Guatemala \u2014 and it is not because they prefer English speakers to Spanish speakers.<\/p>\n Militarily, the United States is light years ahead of its rivals. And so on\u2026<\/p>\n The New Poverty Is the Old Middle Class<\/strong><\/p>\n We have\u00a0redefined poverty itself<\/a>\u00a0[4] through government entitlements, modes of mass production and consumerism, and technological breakthroughs. The poor man is not hungry; more likely he suffers from obesity, now endemic among the less affluent. He is not deprived of a big-screen TV, a Kia, warm water, or an air conditioner. (My dad got our first color television during my first year in college in 1972, a small 19 inch portable; I bought my first new car at 39, and quit changing my own oil at 44.)<\/p>\n In classical terms, today\u2019s poor man is poor not in relative global terms (e.g. compared to a Russian, Bolivian, or Yemeni), but in the sense that there are those in America who have more things and choices than does he: a BMW instead of a Hyundai, ribeye instead of ground beef, Pellegrino rather than regular Coke, Tuscany in the summer rather than Anaheim at Disneyland, and L.L. Bean tasteful footwear rather than Payless shoes. I was in Manhattan not long ago, and noticed that my cheap, discount-store sportcoat and Target tie did not raise eyebrows among the wealthy people I spoke to, suggesting that the veneer of aristocracy is now within all our reach. When I returned to Selma, I noted that those ahead of me at Super Wal-Mart were clothed no differently than was I. Their EBT cards bought about the same foods.<\/p>\n Put all the above developments together, and an alignment of the planets is favoring America as never before \u2014 as long as we do not do something stupid to nullify what fate, our ancestors, and our own ingenuity have given us. But unfortunately that is precisely what is now happening.<\/p>\n The New Hubris<\/strong><\/p>\n These are the most foreboding times in my 59 years. The reelection of Barack Obama has released a surge of rare honesty among the Left about its intentions, coupled with a sense of triumphalism that the country is now on board for still greater redistributionist change.<\/p>\n There is no historical appreciation among the new progressive technocracy thatcentral state planning<\/a>\u00a0[5], whether the toxic communist brand or supposedly benevolent socialism, has only left millions of corpses in its wake, or abject poverty and misery. Add up the Soviet Union and Mao\u2019s China and the sum is 80 million murdered or starved to death. Add up North Korea, Cuba, and the former Eastern Europe, and the tally is egalitarian poverty and hopelessness. The EU sacrificed democratic institutions for coerced utopianism and still failed, leaving its Mediterranean shore bankrupt and despondent.<\/p>\n Nor is there much philosophical worry that giving people massive subsidies destroys individualism, the work ethic, and the personal sense of accomplishment. There is rarely worry expressed that a profligate nation that borrows from others abroad and those not born has no moral compass. There is scant political appreciation that the materialist Marxist argument \u2014 that justice is found only through making sure that everyone has the same slice of stuff from the zero-sum pie \u2014 was supposed to end up on the ash heap of history.<\/p>\n Read the News and Weep<\/strong><\/p>\n That is not conspiracy talk, but simply a distillation of what I read today. On the last day of the year when I am writing this, I offer you just three sample op-eds.<\/p>\n A journalist, Donald Kaul, in the\u00a0Des Moines Register<\/em>\u00a0offers us a three-step, presto! plan<\/a>[6] to stop school shootings:<\/p>\n Repeal the Second Amendment, the part about guns anyway. It\u2019s badly written, confusing and more trouble than it\u2019s worth. \u2026 Declare the NRA a terrorist organization and make membership illegal. Hey! We did it to the Communist Party, and the NRA has led to the deaths of more of us than American Commies ever did. \u2026Then I would tie Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, our esteemed Republican leaders, to the back of a Chevy pickup truck and drag them around a parking lot until they saw the light on gun control.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Note the new ease with which the liberal mind calls for trashing the Constitution, outlawing those whom they don\u2019t like (reminiscent of\u00a0\u201cpunish our enemies\u201d<\/a>\u00a0[7]?), and killing those politicians with whom they don\u2019t agree (we are back to Bush Derangement Syndrome, when novels, movies, and op-eds dreamed of\u00a0the president\u2019s assassination<\/a>[8].)<\/p>\n What would be the Register\u2019s reaction should a conservative opponent of abortion dare write, \u201cRepeal the First Amendment; ban Planned Parenthood as a terrorist organization; and drag Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi from a truck\u201d? If an idiot were to write that trash, I doubt the Washington Times or Wall Street Journal would print such sick calls for overturning the Constitution and committing violence against public officials.<\/p>\n Ah Yes, Still More Redistribution<\/strong><\/p>\n Turning to a column in\u00a0The New Republic<\/em>, John Judis, in honest fashion, more or less puts all the progressive cards on the table in a column titled\u00a0\u201cObama\u2019s Tax Hikes Won\u2019t Be Nearly Big Enough<\/a>[9]\u201d \u2014 a candor about what the vast $5 trillion deficits of Obama\u2019s first term were all about in the first place.<\/p>\n Here is the summation quote: \u201cBut to fund these programs, governments will have to extract a share of income from those who are able to afford them and use the revenues to make the services available for everyone.\u201d Note that Judas was not talking about the projected new taxes in the fiscal cliff talks, but something far greater to come. He understands well that the \u201cgorge the beast\u201d philosophy that resulted in these astronomical debts will require enormous new sources of revenue, funds \u201cto extract\u201d from \u201cthose who are able to afford them\u201d in order to \u201cmake services available for everyone.\u201d<\/p>\n That is about as neat a definition of coerced socialism as one can find. Implicit in Judas\u2019s formulation is that only a very well-educated (and well-compensated) technocratic class will possess the wisdom, the proper schooling, and the morality to adjudicate who are to be the extracted ones and who the new \u201ceveryone.\u201d<\/p>\n The Constitution \u2014 Who the Hell Needs It?<\/strong><\/p>\n The third item in my year-end reading was the most disturbing. A law professor (could it be otherwise?) named Louis Michael Seidman enlightens us with\u00a0\u201cLet\u2019s Give Up on the Constitution\u201d<\/a>[10] \u2014 yet another vision of what the now triumphant liberal mind envisions for us all:<\/p>\n As the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Did Madison force Obama to borrow a half-billion dollars to fund Solyndra and its multimillionaire con artists?<\/p>\n Note Seidman\u2019s use of \u201cevil,\u201d which tips his hand that our great moralist is on an ethical crusade to change the lives of lesser folk, who had the misfortune of growing up in America \u2014 a place so much less prosperous, fair, and secure than, say, Russia, China, the Middle East, Africa, South America, Spain, Greece, Italy, or Japan and Germany (in the earlier 20th century history) . When I lived in Greece, traveled to Libya, and went into Mexico, I forgot to sigh, \u201cMy God, these utopias are possible for us too, if we just junked that evil Constitution.\u201d<\/p>\n White Guys Did It<\/strong><\/p>\n The non-archaic, un-idiosyncratic, and anti-downright evil Professor Seidman presses his argument against his inferiors who wrote the \u201cevil\u201d document: \u201cInstead of arguing about what is to be done, we argue about what James Madison might have wanted done 225 years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n Ah yes, old white male Madison, who lacked the insight, character, and morality of our new liberal technocrats in our successful law schools, such as, well, Mr. Seidman himself:<\/p>\n As someone who has taught constitutional law for almost 40 years, I am ashamed it took me so long to see how bizarre all this is. Imagine that after careful study a government official \u2014 say, the president or one of the party leaders in Congress \u2013 reaches a considered judgment that a particular course of action is best for the country. Suddenly, someone bursts into the room with new information: a group of white propertied men who have been dead for two centuries, knew nothing of our present situation, acted illegally under existing law and thought it was fine to own slaves might have disagreed with this course of action. Is it even remotely rational that the official should change his or her mind because of this divination?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n I suppose\u00a0human nature changes every decade or so<\/a>[11], so why shouldn\u2019t constitutions as well?<\/p>\n I can see Seidman\u2019s vision now: Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi decides that semi-automatic handguns, not cheap Hollywood violence or sick video games, empower the insane to kill, and, presto, their \u201cconsidered judgment\u201d and favored \u201cparticular course of action\u201d trump the archaic and evil wisdom of \u201cwhite propertied men.\u201d But if we wish to avoid the baleful influence of white guys, can Seidman point to indigenous Aztec texts for liberal guidance, or perhaps the contemporary constitution of liberated Zimbabwe, or the sagacity of the Chinese court system?<\/p>\n The Law Is What We Say It Is<\/p>\n Note the fox-in-the-henhouse notion that a constitutional law professor essentially hates the Constitution he is supposed to teach, sort of like Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg warning the Egyptians not to follow our own constitutional example, when South Africa has offered so much more to humanity than did Madison, Hamilton, Jefferson, and others: \u201cI would not look to the US Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the constitution of\u00a0South Africa.\u201d<\/a>[12] Ginsburg obviously vacations in Johannesburg, goes to Cape Town for her medical treatment, and has a vacation home and bank account in the scenic South African countryside.<\/p>\n Seidman looks fondly on Roosevelt\u2019s war against the Constitution (especially the notion that law is essentially what an elected president who has proper \u201caspirations\u201d says it is):<\/p>\n In his Constitution Day speech in 1937, Franklin D. Roosevelt professed devotion to the document, but as a statement of aspirations rather than obligations. This reading no doubt contributed to his willingness to extend federal power beyond anything the framers imagined, and to threaten the Supreme Court when it stood in the way of his New Deal legislation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n No doubt.<\/p>\n Free at Last from Constitutional Chains<\/strong><\/p>\n In the age of Obama, the constitutional law lecturer who once lamented that the Supreme Court had not gone far enough by failing to take up questions of forced redistribution, Seidman writes:<\/p>\n In the face of this long history of disobedience, it is hard to take seriously the claim by the Constitution\u2019s defenders that we would be reduced to a Hobbesian state of nature if we asserted our freedom from this ancient text. Our sometimes flagrant disregard of the Constitution has not produced chaos or totalitarianism; on the contrary, it has helped us to grow and prosper.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n But I thought it was the Constitution, not the anti-Constitution or egalitarian good will, that separated us from Hitler\u2019s Germany, Mussolini\u2019s Italy, Tojo\u2019s Japan, Stalin\u2019s Soviet Union, Mao\u2019s China, and most of the miserable places that one sees abroad today, from Cuba to North Korea, which all had and have one thing in common \u2014 the embrace of some sort of national, republican, or democratic \u201csocialism\u201d guiding their efforts and plastered about in their sick mottoes.<\/p>\n The progressive mind, given that it is more enlightened and moral, alone can determine which parts of the \u201cevil\u201d Constitution should be summarily ignored (e.g., the Second Amendment) and which should not be: \u201cThis is not to say that we should disobey all constitutional commands. Freedom of speech and religion, equal protection of the laws and protections against governmental deprivation of life, liberty or property are important, whether or not they are in the Constitution. We should continue to follow those requirements out of respect, not obligation.\u201d<\/p>\n Give Real Freedom a Chance<\/strong><\/p>\n I am sure that history offers all sorts of examples where people without evil documents like our Constitution protected free speech and religious worship \u2014 out of \u201crespect.\u201d Ask Socrates, Jesus, six million Jews, 20 million Russians, orthose with eyeglasses<\/a>[13] during the days of the Khmer Rouge. Apparently, what stops such carnage is not the rule of constitutional law, but good progressive minds who care for others and show respect. I\u2019ll try that rhetoric on the next thief who for the fourth time will steal the copper wire conduit from my pump.<\/p>\n So just dream with Professor Seidman:<\/p>\n The deep-seated fear that such disobedience would unravel our social fabric is mere superstition. As we have seen, the country has successfully survived numerous examples of constitutional infidelity\u2026What has preserved our political stability is not a poetic piece of parchment, but entrenched institutions and habits of thought and, most important, the sense that we are one nation and must work out our differences. No one can predict in detail what our system of government would look like if we freed ourselves from the shackles of constitutional obligation, and I harbor no illusions that any of this will happen soon. But even if we can\u2019t kick our constitutional-law addiction, we can soften the habit\u2026 before abandoning our heritage of self-government, we ought to try extricating ourselves from constitutional bondage so that we can give real freedom a chance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n I have seen their future and it is almost here right now. Scary times, indeed.<\/p>\n URLs in this post:<\/p>\n [1] despite, not because of:http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/291806\/now-what-victor-davis-hanson<\/a> \u00a92013 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media On the One Hand\u2026 These should not be foreboding years. The US is in the midst of a veritable energy revolution. There is a godsend of new gas and oil discoveries that will help to curtail our fiscal and foreign policy vulnerabilities \u2014 an energy bonanza\u00a0despite, not because of[1], […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[11,49,47],"tags":[12,64,66,62,63,65],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-1Z","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":4396,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/energy-compromises\/","url_meta":{"origin":123,"position":0},"title":"Energy Compromises?","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 14, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Private Papers A shorter version of this essay recently appeared in the\u00a0National Post\u00a0(Toronto). We must be careful in warning about an \u2018energy crisis,\u2019 since past Cassandras-of-doom have been habitually proven wrong by new oil finds and continual fuel savings through novel technologies. Over the past thirty\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "May 2005"","block_context":{"text":"May 2005","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2005\/may-2005\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1329,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/oil-rich-america\/","url_meta":{"origin":123,"position":1},"title":"Oil-Rich America?","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 12, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services There is a revolution going on in America. But it is not part of the Tea Party or the loud Occupy Wall Street protests. Instead, massive new reserves of gas, oil, and coal are being discovered almost everywhere in the United States, due\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Energy"","block_context":{"text":"Energy","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/energy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11200,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-great-german-meltdown\/","url_meta":{"origin":123,"position":2},"title":"The Great German Meltdown","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Hoover Institution Every 20 to 50 years in Germany, things start unraveling. Germans feel aggrieved. Ideas and movements gyrate wildly between far left and far right extremes. And the Germans finally find consensus in a sense of victimhood paradoxically expressed as national chauvinism. Germany\u2019s neighbors in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Germany"","block_context":{"text":"Germany","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/europe\/germany\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1424,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obamas-economic-quackery\/","url_meta":{"origin":123,"position":3},"title":"Obama’s Economic Quackery","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 25, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson National Review Online Sometimes the wrong medicine can make a struggling patient far sicker than he would have been had he been allowed to recover naturally. Western medicine began with the premise that the physician either must know how to cure the patient or simply leave\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Energy"","block_context":{"text":"Energy","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/obama-administration\/energy-obama-administration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2442,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/what-if-the-president-liked-businesspeople\/","url_meta":{"origin":123,"position":4},"title":"What If the President Liked Businesspeople?","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 16, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services The US stock market has nose-dived. Congress just approved the highest debt ceiling in American history, allowing the government to carry over $16 trillion in national debt, and prompting the credit-rating agency Standard & Poor\u2019s to downgrade America\u2019s multitrillion-dollar debt for the first\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Debt and Deficits"","block_context":{"text":"Debt and Deficits","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/politics\/debt-and-deficits\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12144,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/victor-davis-hanson-chaos-in-europe-its-tricky-being-worlds-largest-importer-of-gas-oil-and-critic-too\/","url_meta":{"origin":123,"position":5},"title":"Victor Davis Hanson: Chaos in Europe \u2013 It’s tricky being world’s largest importer of gas, oil and critic, too","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Fox News Despite its cool Green parties and ambitious wind and solar\u00a0agendas, Europe remains by far the world\u2019s largest importer of oil and natural gas. Oil output in the North Sea and off the coast of Norway is declining, and the European Union is quietly\u00a0looking\u00a0for fossil\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":133,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123\/revisions\/133"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
\n[2] both shrinking and aging:\u00a0http:\/\/www.freerepublic.com\/focus\/f-news\/1550710\/posts<\/a>
\n[3] our own:\u00a0http:\/\/douthat.blogs.nytimes.com\/2012\/12\/04\/dont-mention-the-decadence\/<\/a>
\n[4] redefined poverty itself:http:\/\/www.heritage.org\/research\/reports\/2011\/07\/what-is-poverty<\/a>
\n[5] central state planning:\u00a0http:\/\/www.mises.org\/books\/TRTS\/<\/a>
\n[6] offers us a three-step, presto! plan:\u00a0http:\/\/pjmedia.com\/instapundit\/160679\/<\/a>
\n[7] \u201cpunish our enemies\u201d:\u00a0http:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2010\/10\/25\/obama-tells-latinos-to-punish-our-enemies-the-gop\/<\/a>
\n[8] the president\u2019s assassination:\u00a0http:\/\/michellemalkin.com\/2011\/01\/10\/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010\/<\/a>
\n[9] \u201cObama\u2019s Tax Hikes Won\u2019t Be Nearly Big Enough:http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/blog\/plank\/111486\/obamas-tax-hikes-wont-be-nearly-big-enough<\/a>
\n[10] \u201cLet\u2019s Give Up on the Constitution\u201d:\u00a0http:\/\/newsbusters.org\/blogs\/tom-blumer\/2012\/12\/31\/nyt-op-ed-let-s-give-constitution<\/a>
\n[11] human nature changes every decade or so:http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/articles\/204521\/history-dna-pollz-comin\/jonah-goldberg<\/a>
\n[12] South Africa.\u201d:\u00a0http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/topics\/south-africa.htm#r_src=ramp<\/a>
\n[13] those with eyeglasses:\u00a0http:\/\/www.torontosun.com\/2011\/12\/09\/horrifying-legacy-of-khmer-rouge<\/a><\/p>\n