{"id":10573,"date":"2017-09-13T11:09:18","date_gmt":"2017-09-13T18:09:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=10573"},"modified":"2017-09-14T07:53:57","modified_gmt":"2017-09-14T14:53:57","slug":"throwing-away-the-russian-card","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/throwing-away-the-russian-card\/","title":{"rendered":"Throwing Away the Russian Card"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Victor Davis Hanson
\nNational Review<\/em><\/p>\n

The love-hate relation with Putin, from the Obama-era red reset button to the current collusion hysteria, has been a disaster.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey [the North Koreans] will eat grass but will not stop their program as long as they do not feel safe.\u201d\u2014 Vladimir Putin, Beijing, China, September 5, 2017<\/p>\n

China has put the U.S. into an existential dilemma. Its surrogate North Korea \u2014 whose nuclear arsenal is certainly in large part a product of Chinese technology and commercial ties \u2014 by any standard of international standing is a failed, fourth-world state. North Korean population, industry, culture, and politics would otherwise warrant very little attention.<\/p>\n

Yet in late 2017 North Korea poses the chief existential threat to the United States. We fret over its daily assertions that it is apparently eager to deploy verifiable nuclear weapons against the U.S. West Coast, U.S. allies such as Japan and South Korea, or U.S. bases and territory abroad such as those in the Marianna Islands.<\/p>\n

Even if such offensive thermonuclear threats are ultimately empty, they continue to eat up U.S. resources, demand diplomatic attention, make us spend money on deployment and military readiness, and prompt crash anti-missile programs.<\/p>\n

Central to the strategy is China\u2019s \u201cplausible deniability.\u201d The ruse almost assumes that China\u2019s neighbor North Korea \u2014 without a modern economy or an indigenous sophisticated economic infrastructure \u2014 suddenly found some stray nukes, missiles, and delivery platforms in a vacant lot in Pyongyang. Thus China is willing to \u201chelp\u201d resolve the issue it deliberately created.<\/p>\n

As the U.S. obsesses over North Korea, China is in theory freed to do even more of what it already does well \u2014 intimidate its Pacific and Asian neighbors, in the passive-aggressive style of violating sovereign air, ground, and sea space of other nations. Its tactics are accompanied by implied quid pro quos along the lines of \u201cIf you would just join our Chinese Greater Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, there would be no need for such misunderstandings.\u201d<\/p>\n

Beijing is following somewhat the Japanese model of imperial construction of the 1930s. Chinese aims are based on similar radical increases in naval construction and air power; massive importation of Western military technology; intimidation of neighbors; assumptions that the U.S. is a spent, has-been power in decline; and reliance on morally equivalent and circular arguments that regional hegemons have a natural right to impose regional hegemonies.<\/p>\n

China does not want a pro-U.S. country on it borders. It does not wish reunification of the Korean Peninsula by South Korea. It does not want North Korea to give up its nuclear arsenal. It does not want another major land war on its border. It does not want Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan to have either a nuclear deterrent or a missile-defense system.<\/p>\n

But it does<\/em> favor the status quo, in which North Korea every few months upsets the world order, threatens chaos, wins concessions, and then behaves \u2014 for a while. So North Korea is an effective surrogate \u2014 it keeps the U.S. busy and distracted from China\u2019s aggrandizing strategies while not upsetting the commercial trajectory of the Pacific.<\/p>\n

The result of the North Korean crisis is a sort of strategic stalemate, in which both sides in the stand-off try to find advantages or new breakthroughs in technology. North Korea escalates by detonating a heretofore unknown thermonuclear weapon. South Korea responds by taking caps off its conventional missile-delivery weights. The U.S. scrambles to beef up missile defenses while ratcheting up diplomatic pressures.<\/p>\n

In this dangerous phase of escalating tensions, the United States looks to enlist and consolidate allies, neutrals, or former enemies to help balance China and its surrogate North Korea. Aside from our accustomed non-nuclear allies Japan, South Korea, Australia, Taiwan, and the Philippines, America would like far larger international powers to check China.<\/p>\n

India and Russia, of course, come first to mind. Neither in theory wants yet another nuclear power in their neighborhood, especially one that is a de facto surrogate of China, or an arms race that would end up with a nuclear Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.<\/p>\n

India is already deadlocked with China on many common border \u201cissues,\u201d a euphemism for the Chinese doctrine that anything that they can get away with is redefined as both ethical and necessary.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, Russia, which shares a short border with North Korea, is of little or no help, either in applying real pressure on China and North Korea, or in the debating-style go-arounds at the United Nations. Its hostility marks a lost opportunity.<\/p>\n

But no wonder. For the last year, we have heard little but venom about Russia \u2014 which is ironic, given that much of the rancor comes from the erstwhile architects and advocates of the Obama-era Russian reset.<\/p>\n

Have we forgotten, in this moment of critical missile defense, that in 2012 Barack Obama promised outgoing Russian president Medvedev that after Obama\u2019s own successful reelection, he would be flexible \u2014 i.e., cut back on U.S. missile programs in Eastern Europe, which were advantageous in preparing for new nuclear powers\u2019 incoming missile attacks? Such a purported concession was predicated on Putin\u2019s behaving during Obama\u2019s reelection campaign \u2014 i.e., Putin would project an image that the Russian reset had been yet another of Obama\u2019s signature diplomatic triumphs and another argument for another four years of further foreign policy coups.<\/p>\n

As of now, progressives have found no verifiable evidence that Russian skullduggery swung the election to Trump. And recall that Russia\u2019s interference was once largely ignored by Obama himself, who later reminded the nation that the 2016 election (i.e., the inevitable Clinton win) could not be corrupted by successful foreign intervention.<\/p>\n

Even the once sure-thing charge that Russia \u201chacked\u201d the Democratic National Committee emails seems increasingly problematic, given the strangeness of former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schulz\u2019s continuing refusal to let the FBI examine the DNC server \u2014 she insisted on outsourcing the investigation to private investigators paid by the DNC. Also problematic are Wasserman Schulz\u2019s inexplicable efforts to shield her IT team from ongoing Capitol Police and FBI pursuit, and the numerous statements by WikiLeaks\u2019 Julian Assange, who received the hacked (or leaked) DNC emails, that Russia was not his source.<\/p>\n

The left-wing about-face on Russia marks one of the stranger political turnabouts in recent political history. Long forgotten is the plastic-reset-button ceremony in Geneva, or the invitation to Russia to reenter the Middle East after a 40-year hiatus, or the relative exemption given periodic Russian-associated cyberattacks on U.S. concerns.<\/p>\n

Apoplexy over Hillary Clinton\u2019s loss justified not only the abrupt rejection of the Obama rush to embrace Putin, but also a schizophrenic second reset making him into Satan incarnate.<\/p>\n

What could Russia do for the U.S. in the North Korean crisis?<\/p>\n

Not a lot \u2014 but in this crisis \u201cnot a lot\u201d matters.<\/p>\n

It could vote along with the U.S. to reimpose sanctions against North Korea. It could itself stop all trade with North Korea. It could stay neutral and out of the way from U.S. ships in the region. It could defect from what is now a Russia-China alliance of convenient mutual loathing of the U.S. It could unilaterally warn North Korea not to detonate another thermonuclear bomb just a few hundred miles from Russian territory. And in a Dr. Strangelovian calculus of global nuclear power, it could remove the largest deployable nuclear arsenal in the world<\/em> from the anti-U.S. ledger. Psychologically, that is quite a lot.<\/p>\n

What would Putin wish in return for rebalancing and triangulating?<\/p>\n

Probably an informal guarantee that the U.S. would not humiliate Russia in the Middle East by seeking to bomb Bashar al-Assad out of power (which we are not likely to do). He might angle for an informal understanding not to arm Ukrainians, with an acceptance of Russian control of eastern Ukraine, and recognition that Crimea is now de facto Russian.<\/p>\n

The Trump doctrine of avoiding optional interventions probably precluded doing much anyway on Russia\u2019s borders, or another campaign in the Middle East. And the idea that we would go to war over Crimea \u2014 this year is the 75th anniversary of the Nazi capture of Sevastopol and the horrific destruction of the Russian garrison \u2014 is as if Russia would face us down over our own opposition to a move by Puerto Rico for independence (promises, promises).<\/p>\n

Or alternatively, on the stick side, we could remind Putin that the nuclearization of Asia and the Pacific on its borders \u2014 a potentially thermonuclear Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan \u2014 is less in Russia\u2019s interest than our own, given that all three nations are democratic, pro-American, and proximate to Russia.<\/p>\n

In any case, the prior schizophrenic approach to Russia from 2009 has been disastrous diplomatically. If it was a mistake to cozy up to Putin in 2009 on the mythology that a cowboyish George W. Bush had inordinately alienated Russia after its Ossetian intervention, then it has been an even greater error to go in the opposite direction and demonize Russia as some sort of uniquely evil state that allegedly prevented Hillary Clinton\u2019s sure-thing election victory.<\/p>\n

The result in both cases has been that domestic politics hampered foreign policy. We\u2019ve lost access to the realist avenue of balancing nuclear powers to prevent the current de facto alliance of China and Russia, now united in their support for the provocative thermonuclear-bomb agendas of North Korea.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The key to dictatorial Russia is to neither love nor hate it. Rather, the U.S. should win its respect \u2014 and fear \u2014 by quiet shows of strength in protecting our interests. And we should seek areas \u2014 like the menace of North Korea \u2014 where our big-power interests might merge and where we each can show China that its behavior will earn it as many worries for itself as its North Korean client now poses to others.<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/article\/451262\/red-reset-russia-collusion-domestic-politics-damage-realist-foreign-policy<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Victor Davis Hanson National Review The love-hate relation with Putin, from the Obama-era red reset button to the current collusion hysteria, has been a disaster. \u201cThey [the North Koreans] will eat grass but will not stop their program as long as they do not feel safe.\u201d\u2014 Vladimir Putin, Beijing, China, September 5, 2017 China […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1097,1092,275,346,375,846,1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2Kx","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10383,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/west-can-neither-live-with-nor-take-out-north-korean-nukes\/","url_meta":{"origin":10573,"position":0},"title":"West Can Neither Live with nor Take Out North Korean Nukes","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review \u00a0 It\u2019s time for the U.S. and its allies to prepare for a tough, messy confrontation. \u00a0 North Korea recently test-launched a long-range missile capable of reaching Alaska. \u00a0 When North Korea eventually builds a missile capable of reaching the U.S. mainland, it will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Putin"","block_context":{"text":"Putin","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/putin\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10414,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-korean-games-of-thrones\/","url_meta":{"origin":10573,"position":1},"title":"The Korean Games of Thrones","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review \u00a0 The time for pious American lectures is over. \u00a0 North Korea North Korea seeks respect on the cheap \u2014 and attention and cash \u2014 that it cannot win the old-fashioned way by the long, hard work of achieving a dynamic economy or an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "South Korea"","block_context":{"text":"South Korea","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/south-korea\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10453,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/is-kim-jong-un-an-evil-buffoon-or-an-evil-genius\/","url_meta":{"origin":10573,"position":2},"title":"Is Kim Jong-un an Evil Buffoon or an Evil Genius?","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Corner The one and only. by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review \u00a0 Kim Jong-un has accomplished something that neither his grandfather nor father pulled off during the last 70 years: bringing an existential threat to the shores of the United States. North Korea\u2019s handful of missiles that are soon\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "North Korea"","block_context":{"text":"North Korea","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/north-korea\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10870,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/will-nuclear-north-korea-survive-2018\/","url_meta":{"origin":10573,"position":3},"title":"Will Nuclear North Korea Survive 2018?","author":"victorhanson","date":"January 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review \u00a0 Given several rapidly developing geopolitical factors, North Korea may look much different by the end of the new year. \u00a0 For good or evil, we may see radical changes in North Korea in 2018. \u00a0 The beefed-up United Nations sanctions by midyear could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10457,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-does-the-left-suddenly-hate-russia\/","url_meta":{"origin":10573,"position":4},"title":"Why Does the Left Suddenly Hate Russia?","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson National Review After 70 years of accommodating and appeasing Russia, Democrats suddenly foment a red scare. Russian Realism? No one doubts that Vladimir Putin\u2019s Russia is no ally of the U.S. But rivalry is quite a different notion than returning to the Cold War, when enemies\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Media"","block_context":{"text":"Media","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/media\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10690,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/north-korea-knowns-and-unknowns\/","url_meta":{"origin":10573,"position":5},"title":"North Korea Knowns and Unknowns","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 26, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review \u00a0 We are in the middle, not at the end, of a long North Korean crisis. \u00a0 No one really knows all that much about North Korea\u2019s nuclear or conventional military capability or its strategic agenda. Are its nuclear missiles reliably lethal, are they\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Seoul"","block_context":{"text":"Seoul","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/seoul\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10573"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10573"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10573\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10577,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10573\/revisions\/10577"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}