{"id":10417,"date":"2017-07-26T13:35:03","date_gmt":"2017-07-26T20:35:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=10417"},"modified":"2017-07-26T13:35:03","modified_gmt":"2017-07-26T20:35:03","slug":"10417-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/10417-2\/","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n

\u201cPushing Back\u201d Iran<\/h1>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
by <\/span>Reuel Marc Gerecht<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/header>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/p>\n
\n
Image credit:Poster Collection, US3436, Hoover Institution Archives.<\/h5>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

On both the left and the right, there is a consensus in Washington that the United States needs to \u201cpush back\u201d against the Islamic Republic\u2019s nefarious actions in the Levant, Iraq, and Yemen. The clerical regime largely controls the ground war in Syria: Tehran\u2019s foreign Shiite militias, imported from Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, and Iranian-directed native forces lead the battle against the Sunni insurrection. In Iraq, the Islamic Republic has energetically encouraged sectarian conflict, aiding politicians and militias that have taken a hardline toward political compromise with Sunnis. Iraqi members of Iran\u2019s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have become senior officials in the government. And in Yemen, Iran has backed the Shiite Houthis in their campaign to dominate the country. What once would have seemed far-fetched\u2014Tehran trying to develop a Lebanese Hezbollah-like movement among Yemen\u2019s \u201cFiver\u201d Zaydi Shiites, who have never been close to the \u201cTwelver\u201d Jafaris of Iran\u2014is now conceivable. If such Shiite militancy becomes anchored in the south of the peninsula, Tehran will surely try to aim it northward toward the badly oppressed Shiites of Bahrain and the oil-rich Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.<\/p>\n

But among Republicans and Democrats, no one really wants to clarify what \u201cpush back\u201d means. For cause: Any serious American effort against the Islamic Republic will inevitably risk the nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which the Trump administration has signaled that it will, with increasing reluctance, keep but \u201crigorously\u201d enforce. Within the Democratic Party, the atomic accord has become sacrosanct. Yet the two objectives cannot co-exist. The sine qua non<\/em> of the agreement is to trade temporary restraints on Iran\u2019s nuclear aspirations for the lifting of sanctions against the Islamic Republic. Any serious American effort to punish Tehran will inevitably include the use of escalating sanctions. This is so even if the United States doesn\u2019t deploy more forces into the region, which would mean, among other things, that the only unilateral way Washington could painfully hit Tehran would be through sanctions. Neither Congress nor the White House is going to confront the Islamic Republic and concurrently fuel its expansion. American foreign policy can sustain severe contradictions, but this one would be too much: We would be paying for our own defeat. If we imagine scenarios where the United States actually puts more troops into either Syria or Iraq (unlikely with President Trump), or just keeps troops in the latter against Iran\u2019s wishes (not at all unlikely after the defeat of the Islamic State in Mosul), then we could rapidly find ourselves in an indirect shooting war with the mullahs\u2019 praetorians, the Revolutionary Guards, who oversee all of Iran\u2019s foreign adventures.<\/p>\n

To read more: http:\/\/www.hoover.org\/research\/pushing-back-iran#<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cPushing Back\u201d Iran by Reuel Marc Gerecht Image credit:Poster Collection, US3436, Hoover Institution Archives. On both the left and the right, there is a consensus in Washington that the United States needs to \u201cpush back\u201d against the Islamic Republic\u2019s nefarious actions in the Levant, Iraq, and Yemen. The clerical regime largely controls the ground war […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[958,1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2I1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9959,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/moving-forward-the-need-for-innovations-in-technology-and-strategy\/","url_meta":{"origin":10417,"position":0},"title":"Moving Forward: The Need For Innovations In Technology And Strategy","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kiron K. Skinner \/\/ Strategika Two broad sets of U.S. military strategies during the second half of the twentieth century combined ideas, innovation, and technology in ways that offset Soviet conventional (and later nuclear) superiority in arms and military forces. These strategies also contributed to the overall state of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Strategika"","block_context":{"text":"Strategika","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/strategika\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9949,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/its-not-just-the-technology-beyond-offset-strategies\/","url_meta":{"origin":10417,"position":1},"title":"It\u2019s Not Just the Technology: Beyond Offset Strategies","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"By Colonel Joseph (Joe) Felter (ret.) \/\/ Strategika A range of breakthrough technologies are emerging today that have the potential to radically change how we fight and deter threats across all conflict domains\u2014air, land, sea, space, and cyber. Artificial intelligence, directed energy, robotics, and machine learning are just a few\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Strategika"","block_context":{"text":"Strategika","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/strategika\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.hoover.org\/sites\/default\/files\/styles\/inline\/public\/research\/images\/poster_us_07241.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":10190,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/challenges-and-opportunities-facing-the-trump-administrations-china-policy-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":10417,"position":2},"title":"Challenges And Opportunities Facing The Trump Administration\u2019s China Policy","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Miles Maochun Yu Strategika In general, America profoundly lacks interest in communist ideology, a phenomenon Karl Marx would have called \u201cthe poverty of ideology.\u201d As a result, our China policy by and large has failed to take into sufficient consideration the primal forces that motivate Chinese communist leadership in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Strategika"","block_context":{"text":"Strategika","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/strategika\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Strategika050717.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":10186,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/a-china-policy-that-works-for-america\/","url_meta":{"origin":10417,"position":3},"title":"A China Policy That Works\u2014For America","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 19, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Gordon G. Chang \u00a0 Image credit: Poster Collection, CC 111, Hoover Institution Archives. Last March, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson attempted to set American policy toward China for the next 50 years. Washington in its dealings with the Chinese state, he said, would be guided by the principles of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Strategika"","block_context":{"text":"Strategika","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/strategika\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10634,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/two-first-quarter-cheers-for-trumps-principled-realism\/","url_meta":{"origin":10417,"position":4},"title":"Two First Quarter Cheers For Trump\u2019s Principled Realism","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 29, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Robert G. Kaufman\/\/Strategika \u00a0 Image credit: Poster Collection, US 05889, Hoover Institution Archives. The content and trajectory of Donald Trump\u2019s foreign policy have defied the expectations of many of his supporters as well as his critics across the political spectrum. The President has moved a long way from his\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Strategika"","block_context":{"text":"Strategika","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/strategika\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10304,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/state-of-the-european-union-god-bless-the-bureaucrats\/","url_meta":{"origin":10417,"position":5},"title":"State of the European Union: God Bless the Bureaucrats","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Strategika by Ralph Peters Tuesday, June 20, 2017 Image credit:\u00a0Poster Collection, INT 294, Hoover Institution Archives. In the immediate wake of the Brexit vote, a normally astute talk-show host declared, gleefully, that \u201cthe European Union is dead.\u201d One begged, and begs still, to differ. The EU is a bureaucratic monster\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Strategika"","block_context":{"text":"Strategika","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/strategika\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10417"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10417"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10417\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10418,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10417\/revisions\/10418"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}