{"id":10360,"date":"2017-07-06T12:04:11","date_gmt":"2017-07-06T19:04:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=10360"},"modified":"2017-07-06T12:04:11","modified_gmt":"2017-07-06T19:04:11","slug":"lord-ismay-nato-and-the-old-new-world-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/lord-ismay-nato-and-the-old-new-world-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Lord Ismay, NATO, and the Old-New World Order"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

What has become of the prescient post-WWII dictum \u2018Russians out, Americans in, Germans down\u2019?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The accomplished and insightful British general Hasting Ismay is remembered today largely because of his famous assessment of NATO, offered when he was the alliance\u2019s first secretary general. The purpose of the new treaty organization founded in 1952, Ismay asserted, was \u201cto keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ismay formulated that aphorism at the height of a new Cold War. The Soviet Red Army threatened to overrun Western Europe all the way to the English Channel. And few knew who or what exactly could stop it.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A traditionally isolationist United States was still debating its proper role after once again intervening on the winning side in a distant catastrophic European war \u2014 only to see its most powerful ally of WWII, Joseph Stalin\u2019s Soviet Union, become the victorious democracies\u2019 most dangerous post-war foe.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A divided Germany had become the new trip wire of the free world against a continental and monolithic nuclear Soviet Union and its bloc.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Nonetheless, note carefully what Ismay did not say.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

He did not refer to keeping the \u201cSoviet Union\u201d out of the Western alliance (which the Soviets had once desired to join, a request that Ismay compared to inviting a burglar onto the police force).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ismay did not cite the need to ensure that Nazi Germany never returned.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

He did not insist that the inclusion of Great Britain was essential to NATO\u2019s tripartite mission.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Why?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ismay, a favorite of Churchill\u2019s and a military adviser to British governments, had a remarkable sense of history \u2014 namely that constants such as historical memory, geography, and national character always transcend the politics of the day.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Russians from the days of the czars have wanted to extend their western influence into Europe. Russia was often a threat, given its large population and territory and rich natural resources \u2014 and it was also more autocratic and more volatile than many of its vulnerable European neighbors.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

If alive today, Ismay might remind us that were there not a Vladimir Putin posing a threat to NATO\u2019s vulnerable Eastern European members, he might have to be invented.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ismay instinctively sensed that what made the Soviet Union dangerous in the mid 1950s was not just Stalinism and the Communist system per se, or even its possession of nuclear weapons, but rather the resources of Russia and its historical tendency to embrace anti-democratic absolutism, whether left or right.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

With that same insight, Ismay understood that a Europe caught between Germany and Russia would always need a powerful outside ally, one with resources and manpower well beyond those of Great Britain. Further, he accepted that Americans, protected by two oceans, 3,000 miles distant from Europe, and nursed on warnings about pernicious entangling alliances from their Founding Fathers, would always experience periods of nostalgia when it longed to return to its republican America-first roots.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Again, if the movement that helped propel Donald Trump to the White House had not existed, it would have to have been manufactured. Today\u2019s Americans are peeved about rich European members shorting NATO of their mandatory contributions. They do not appreciate often dependent European nations ankle-biting the U.S. as a supposedly illiberal imperial power, when that power has long subsidized the defense needs of the shaky European Union socialist experiment.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ismay apparently sensed that an engaged America would always be a hard sell, especially in the new nuclear age, given that, for less cosmopolitan Americans far from the eastern seaboard, Europe seems a distant perennial headache. For them, it might appear much easier to write off Europe as hopelessly fractious and thus not deserving of yet another bailout requiring American blood and treasure. If the U.S. came late into both World War I and II, it was because of the same sort of weariness with European internecine quarreling, albeit now in a milder form, that we currently see fracturing the EU.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Lastly in his triad of advice, Ismay referred generically to \u201cGermany\u201d \u2014 without specifying a contemporary friendly and allied West Germany, juxtaposed to the Soviet-inspired, Communist, and hostile East Germany. Again, the East\u2013West German fault line existed in Ismay\u2019s time; yet he reduced all those unique differences of his age into a generic \u201cGermany down.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ismay wrote an engaging wartime memoir from which we can extract much of his thought and experience, so we need not put words into his mouth. But nonetheless, insightful men of his generation did not necessarily look at the rise of National Socialism as entirely a historical aberration, or, in contrast, as a generic murderous ideology that just as easily might have captured the hearts and minds of Frenchmen or British subjects. That historical angst is why both Margaret Thatcher and Mikhail Gorbachev were apprehensive about the idea of German unification in 1989.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ismay apparently remembered the Franco-Prussian war of 1870\u201371, and the horrors of the First and Second World Wars. He concluded that the common denominator was Germany\u2019s strong desire to recover from its historical hurt in predictable bouts of aggression and national chauvinism \u2014 and backed by considerable skill and power.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In Ismay\u2019s time, such aggression was different from lesser Fascist movements in Italy and Spain, largely because of the central geographic position of a unified young German nation-state, its sizable population, its national wealth, and what we reluctantly in today\u2019s politically correct landscape might call \u201cGerman character.\u201d That stereotype originates from the time of Caesar and Tacitus: the ability of the German people to create economic, military, and cultural influence well beyond what one might expect from the actual size of even an impressive German population or geography. And such dynamism is often expressed by eyeing neighbors\u2019 spiritual or concrete territory.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Once again, if there were not Angela Merkel\u2019s increasingly defiant Germany, it too would have to be created. Some in the United States were troubled that Angela Merkel, from a beer hall in Munich no less, recently lashed out at the United States and promised that Germany might just have to navigate between the U.S. and Russia \u2014 quite a thought from a Germany once saved largely by the United States from its own carnivorousness and later likely Communist servitude.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Of course, what is disconcerting today about Germany is not the rise of totalitarian or nationalist movements, at least not as we usually use those terms. Indeed, in most respects, post-war Germany has been a model democracy. But there is a common denominator in Germany\u2019s most recent controversies, with disturbing historical roots that might further amplify the logic of Ismay\u2019s prescient \u201cGermany down.\u201d Germany might be pursuing a Eurocentric agenda, it might proudly declare itself an open-borders host for millions of impoverished immigrants, it might be at the vanguard of green energy, but it is doing all that in ways of Lord Ismay\u2019s Germany of old.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The central bank of Germany de facto controls European finances. It uses the euro as a weaker currency than would otherwise be true of the Deutsche Mark to conduct a mercantile export economy, providing credit to weaker European economies to buy Germans goods that they otherwise could ill afford. The impoverished southern Mediterranean economies are essentially in hock now to Germany, and Germany apparently can neither be paid back its original loans nor write off the debts. In other words, German won all the chips of the European Union poker game and it no longer need play with its broke rivals.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

No one quite knows the strange driving force behind Angela Merkel\u2019s demand that the European Union open its borders to millions of mostly young men from the war-torn Middle East and the chaotic lands of North Africa. Cynics might suggest that a shrinking Germany wants young, cheap manual laborers. Post-war guilt may play a role as Germany\u2019s cure for its past becomes nearly as obsessive as the behavior that led to the disease in the first place.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

German postmodern multiculturalism encourages a na\u00efve acceptance of millions of unassimilated Middle Eastern Muslims, and it demands the same from neighbors without Germany\u2019s resources. A largely atheistic or agnostic Germany also has few religious worries about Islamic immigrants, given that secular affluence and leisure long ago proved far more deleterious to German Christianity than did radical Islam.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Germany saw Brexit as an intolerable affront to its own leadership. Apparently the British voter saw the increasingly non-democratic trajectory of the European Union as a future challenge to its own independence. If southern Europeans are becoming serfs to Germany, and Eastern Europeans its clients, and Western Europeans anxious subordinates, then the British across the channel thought they had to get out while the getting was good.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Recent Pew international polls reveal that Germany of all the countries of the European Union is by far the most anti-American, with scarcely 52 percent expressing a positive appraisal of the United States \u2014 well before Donald Trump ran for office. Media polls show that the German press ran the most negative appraisals of Trump of all global news (98 percent of all coverage was critical). A fair summary of current German views of the United States would be not much different from the stereotypes of the 1930s: undisciplined, prone to wild swings in policy, a bastardized and commercialized culture of poorly informed and highly indebted consumers.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ismay\u2019s generation welcomed the re-creation of Germany as a positive democratic force both in the soon-to-be-created European Common Market and the nascent NATO alliance. But it did not discard Ismay\u2019s idea of \u201cGermany down.\u201d Instead, there was a wink-and-nod acceptance that a divided Germany was a safe Germany. NATO and the common Soviet threat would encourage ties of solidarity. And just in case they did not, weaker and smaller traditional rivals, France and Great Britain, would possess nuclear weapons \u2014 and stronger and far larger Germany would not.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

What would Ismay say of his current tripartite formula?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

He would warn about what happens when NATO withers on the vine: Russian is a bit in, America is somewhat out, and Germany more up than down \u2014 as Ismay feared when he helped offer the remedy of NATO at its creation.<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/article\/449226\/nato-russians-out-americans-germans-down-updated-reversed<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review   What has become of the prescient post-WWII dictum \u2018Russians out, Americans in, Germans down\u2019?   The accomplished and insightful British general Hasting Ismay is remembered today largely because of his famous assessment of NATO, offered when he was the alliance\u2019s first secretary general. The purpose of the new […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1119,1115,1097,168,113,116,154,1,34,307],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2H6","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10699,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/nato-for-the-21st-century-ensuring-liberal-democracy-in-europe\/","url_meta":{"origin":10360,"position":0},"title":"NATO For the 21st Century: Ensuring Liberal Democracy In Europe","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"NATO was originally founded after World War II to ensure that liberal democracy survived in Europe. While the fall of the Soviet Union may have led many to question whether NATO was still necessary, its mission remains vital and relevant. NATO should resist the temptation to expand its geographic focus.\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9257,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/is-nato-worth-preserving\/","url_meta":{"origin":10360,"position":1},"title":"Is NATO worth preserving?","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 25, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Tribune Media Services Donald Trump recently ignited another controversy when he mused that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was obsolete. He hinted that it might no longer be worth the huge American investment.In typical Trump style, he hit a nerve, but he then offered few details\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7749,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-end-of-nato\/","url_meta":{"origin":10360,"position":2},"title":"The End of NATO?","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 7, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Major existential problems mean the organization may soon unravel. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online Istanbul\u00a0\u2014 April marked the 65th birthday of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, formed at the height of the Cold War to stop the huge post-war Red Army from overrunning Western Europe. NATO in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The World"","block_context":{"text":"The World","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/pic_giant_080714_SM_NATO-Flag-DT-500x291.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":8011,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-end-of-nato-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":10360,"position":3},"title":"The End of NATO","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 14, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Defining Ideas Declaring the North Atlantic Treaty Organization dead has been a pastime of analysts since the end of the Cold War. The alliance, today 28-members strong, has survived 65 years because its glaring contradictions were often overlooked, given the dangers of an expansionist and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Defining Ideas"","block_context":{"text":"Defining Ideas","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/defining-ideas\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":820,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/why-nato-still-matters\/","url_meta":{"origin":10360,"position":4},"title":"Why NATO Still Matters","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 19, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Defining Ideas Germany\u2019s financial dominance may be worrisome, but is it a threat to European peace? The first Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the sober and judicious British Lord Ismay, famously remarked that the purpose of the controversial new postwar alliance would be \u201cto\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "NATO"","block_context":{"text":"NATO","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/geopolitics\/nato\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9275,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/world-war-ii-amnesia\/","url_meta":{"origin":10360,"position":5},"title":"World War II Amnesia","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Defining Ideas \u00a0 Seventy-seven years ago, Nazi Germany invaded Poland, triggering a declaration of war by Great Britain and its Empire and France. After Hitler\u2019s serial aggressions in the Rhineland, the Anschluss with Austria, the Munich Agreement, and the carving up of Czechoslovakia, no one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Middle East"","block_context":{"text":"The Middle East","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/the-middle-east\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10360"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10360"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10360\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10361,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10360\/revisions\/10361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}