{"id":10167,"date":"2017-05-11T15:24:44","date_gmt":"2017-05-11T22:24:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=10167"},"modified":"2017-05-11T15:24:44","modified_gmt":"2017-05-11T22:24:44","slug":"can-trump-successfully-remodel-the-gop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/can-trump-successfully-remodel-the-gop\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Trump Successfully Remodel the GOP?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\u00a0by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
If Trumpism succeeds, it could replace mainstream Republicanism.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The Republican-party establishment is caught in an existential paradox.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Without Donald Trump\u2019s populist and nationalist 2016 campaign, the GOP probably would not have won the presidency. Nor would Republicans now enjoy such lopsided control of state legislatures and governorships, as well as majorities in the House and Senate, and likely control of the Supreme Court for a generation.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
So are conservatives angry at the apostate Trump or indebted to him for helping them politically when they were not able to help themselves?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
For a similar sense of the paradox, imagine if a novice outsider such as billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban had captured the Democratic nomination and then won the presidency \u2014 but did not run on either Bernie Sanders\u2019s progressive redistributionism, Barack Obama\u2019s identity politics, or Hillary Clinton\u2019s high taxes and increased regulation. Would liberals be happy, conflicted, or seething?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
For now, most Republicans are overlooking Trump\u2019s bothersome character excesses \u2014 without conceding that his impulsiveness and bluntness may well have contributed to his success after Republican sobriety and traditionalism failed.<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
Republicans concentrate on what they like in the Trump agenda \u2014 military spending increases, energy expansion, deterrence abroad, tax and regulatory reform, and the repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act \u2014 and they ignore the inherent contradictions between Trumpism and their own political creed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
But there are many fault lines that will loom large in the next few years.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Doctrinaire conservatives believe that unfettered free trade is essential, even if it is sometimes not fair or reciprocal.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Establishment Republicans (privately) argue that cheap imports into the U.S. at least kept inflation low. If our trade partners dump state-subsidized products into the U.S., it is to their long-term disadvantage, not ours.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In this mainstream Republican view, the role of a superpower is to endure trade deficits to help its less powerful allies and keep the global order prosperous and stable. But Trump\u2019s idea of \u201cfair\u201d trade trumps \u201cfree\u201d trade.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Trump is not willing to accept a permanent Midwest Rust Belt as the price of globalization. If there are to be sacrificial lambs in world trade, for Trump it is better that they reside in China, South Korea, and Germany, nations that for a change can try finding any upside to running huge trade deficits.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Unlike doctrinaire Republicans, Trump believes that illegal immigration is a big \u2014 and bad \u2014 deal.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The Republican establishment\u2019s employer argument is that illegal immigration ensures that the sort of work \u201cAmericans won\u2019t do\u201d is actually done. Or, some establishment Republicans believe that undocumented migrants who cross the southern border will one day become conservative, \u201cfamily values\u201d voters.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Not so Trumpism. It seeks to help the working class by stopping the importation of cheap labor. It believes that secure borders will restore the sanctity of law, and that the end of illegal immigration will lead to greater integration and assimilation of Latino minority groups.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In the long run, Mexico will be a better neighbor by not counting on impoverished expatriates to prop up an often corrupt government in Mexico City and by addressing the plight of its impoverished rather than exporting its poor. Trumpism views the world abroad largely in terms of realist deterrence.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Outside the West, the world is a mess, and it will probably not change \u2014 and cannot be forced to change \u2014 because of American blood and treasure spent on trying to replicate America abroad. Instead, Trumpism seems to want to deter rivals to ensure a calm global order.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Trumpism has no illusions that there will ever be a world of liberal democracies. It seeks instead only to make sure enemies understand that any future aggression will not be worth the anticipated benefits. As for dictators such as those in the Philippines or Egypt, Trumpism argues that it makes little sense to snub autocratic friends while cutting deals with autocratic enemies like those in Iran or Cuba.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
On matters of identity politics, Republicans have often sought to play down but not actively oppose racial, ethnic, and gender pressure groups. The strategy has been to not antagonize the ethnic and race industries in hopes of receiving a greater share of the minority vote.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Trump is politically incorrect. He sees a person\u2019s pocketbook, not his outward appearance, as the key to his allegiance. Through deregulation, tax reform, immigration reform, and fair trade, Trump hopes to help the economy grow by 3 percent each year.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Such economic growth has not happened in over a decade. But if Trumpism works, then prosperity will supposedly unite Americans more than identity politics can divide them.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In other words, Trump apparently believes that if he achieves 3 percent GDP growth and avoids a major war abroad, his brand of economic nationalism, realist deterrence, and America-first chauvinism will replace mainstream Republicanism.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

If he stalls the economy or gets into a quagmire abroad, then Trump will end up like most other American populist mavericks \u2014 as an interesting footnote.<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/article\/447509\/trump-changes-republican-politics-may-remodel-party<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review If Trumpism succeeds, it could replace mainstream Republicanism. The Republican-party establishment is caught in an existential paradox. Without Donald Trump\u2019s populist and nationalist 2016 campaign, the GOP probably would not have won the presidency. Nor would Republicans now enjoy such lopsided control of state legislatures and governorships, as well […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1092,220,11,116,23,31,41,285,187,46,185,1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2DZ","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":9906,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-metaphysics-of-trump\/","url_meta":{"origin":10167,"position":0},"title":"The Metaphysics of Trump","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 1, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Paradox: How does a supposedly bad man appoint good people eager to advance a conservative agenda that supposedly more moral Republicans failed to realize? We variously read that Trump should be impeached, removed, neutralized \u2014 or worse. But until he is, are his appointments,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "McMaster"","block_context":{"text":"McMaster","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/mcmaster\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11541,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-trump-paradox\/","url_meta":{"origin":10167,"position":1},"title":"The Trump Paradox","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Today,\u00a0Jim Geraghty writes snidely: VDH writes, \u201cThe hostile reaction to Trump is a sort of proof of his success.\u201d Does it follow, then, that if Trump was widely loved, it would be proof of his failure?\u201d Geraghty creates a false either\/or binary. The hostile\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Donald Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Donald Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/donald-trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12949,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/post-trump-or-trump-redux-the-future-of-the-gop\/","url_meta":{"origin":10167,"position":2},"title":"Post-Trump or Trump Redux?: The Future of the GOP","author":"victorhanson","date":"March 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Post-Trump or Trump Redux?","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11515,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/gop-failed-to-fight-dems-health-care-scare-tactics-in-midterms\/","url_meta":{"origin":10167,"position":3},"title":"GOP failed to fight Dem’s health-care scare tactics in midterms","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Please read this piece by my colleague Paul Roderick Gregory in The Hill Exit polls showed that health care was the top factor in motivating voters in the 2018 election. Democrat candidates successfully stoked fears that the Republicans would\u00a0end\u00a0coverage of pre-existing conditions. Despite repeated\u00a0assurances\u00a0from\u00a0President Trump\u00a0that pre-existing conditions were safe, almost\u00a060\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Donald Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Donald Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/donald-trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9495,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-so-called-trump-supporterdefenderendorser\/","url_meta":{"origin":10167,"position":4},"title":"The So-Called Trump Supporter\/Defender\/Endorser","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 12, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The Corner The one and only. \u00a0by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online I think we at National Review have to be very careful in blanket condemnations of Trump \u201cendorsers,\u201d \u201csupporters,\u201d \u201cdefenders,\u201d and scare-quote \u201cconservatives\u201d as if they were a monolithic group of mindless extremists or utter fools. Many\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Trump"","block_context":{"text":"Trump","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/trump\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12403,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/biden-as-paradox\/","url_meta":{"origin":10167,"position":5},"title":"Biden as Paradox","author":"victorhanson","date":"June 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review It\u00a0is now conventional punditry that should Joe Biden win in November, his vice president, in 1944-style, will sooner rather than later become president. Biden, to reboot and secure the identity-politics base, thought he had to discriminate by sex and race in advance by selecting\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10167"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10167"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10167\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10168,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10167\/revisions\/10168"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}