{"id":10146,"date":"2017-05-02T11:01:55","date_gmt":"2017-05-02T18:01:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=10146"},"modified":"2017-05-02T11:01:55","modified_gmt":"2017-05-02T18:01:55","slug":"you-gotta-lie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/you-gotta-lie\/","title":{"rendered":"You Gotta Lie"},"content":{"rendered":"
\u00a0by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Oh! What a tangled progressive web we weave . . .<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Red\/blue, conservative\/liberal, and Republican\/Democrat mark traditional American divides. But one fault line is not so 50\/50 \u2014 that of the contemporary hard progressive movement versus traditional politics, values, and customs.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The entire menu of race, class, and gender identity politics, lead-from-behind foreign policy, political correctness, and radical environmentalism so far have not won over most Americans.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Proof of that fact are the serial reliance of their supporters on deception, and the erosion of language on campus and in politics and the media. The progressive movement requires both deceit and euphemism to mask its apparently unpopular agenda.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
What the Benghazi scandal, the Bowe Bergdahl swap, and the Iran Deal all had in common was their reliance on ruse. If the White House and its allies had told the whole truth about all these incidents, Americans probably would have widely rejected the ideological premises that framed them.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In the case of Benghazi, most Americans would not fault an obscure video for causing scripted rioting and death at an American consulate and CIA annex. They would hardly believe that a policy of maintaining deliberately thin security at U.S. facilities would encourage reciprocal local good will in the Middle East. They would not agree that holding back American rescue forces was a wise move likely to forestall an international confrontation or escalation.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In other words, Americans wanted their consulate in Benghazi well fortified and protected from seasoned terrorists, and they favored rapid deployment of maximum relief forces in times of crises \u2014 but, unfortunately, these were not the agendas of the Obama administration. So, to disguise that unpleasant reality, Americans were treated to Susan Rice\u2019s yarns about a spontaneous, unexpected riot that was prompted by a right-wing video, and endangered Americans far beyond the reach of U.S. military help.<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
Ditto the Bowe Bergdahl caper, the American deserter on the Afghan front. Aside from the useful publicity of \u201cbringing home\u201d an American hostage, there was an implicit progressive subtext to both his earlier flight and eventual return: Young introspective soldiers are often troubled about their nation\u2019s ambiguous role in the Middle East and so, understandably, sometimes err in their search for meaning. When they do, and when they perhaps \u201cwander off,\u201d the government has win-win resources to address their temporary lapse \u2014 in this case, killing two birds with one stone by downsizing the apparently repulsive Guantanamo Bay detention facility and returning punished-enough Taliban combatants to their families.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
What Susan Rice (ostensibly the go-to consigliere in such deals) could not say is that the Obama administration released five dangerous terrorists in order to bring home one likely deserter, whose selfish AWOL behavior may have contributed over the years to the injury or even deaths of several American soldiers tasked with finding him. Instead, we got the lie that Bergdahl was a brave solider who served with honor and distinction and was captured in mediis rebus on the battlefield, with the implication that his personal odyssey inadvertently led to the bonus of returning in-limbo foreign detainees and reducing the population of an embarrassing gulag.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
We keep learning about all sorts of disturbing and leaked secret side agreements to the Iran Deal. Without them, the progressive agenda underlying the concessions was bound to be unpalatable to the American people: secret nocturnal cash ransoms to obtain American hostages (hostage-taking is an Iranian theocratic specialty), secret side deals with international agencies to define down on-site inspections, and secret \u201cflexibility\u201d on Iran ballistic-missile development.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
But on a deeper level, the Obama administration apparently either did not believe that Iran was a truly belligerent, anti-American theocracy bent on a baleful Middle East hegemony through acquiring nuclear weapons, or else assumed that Iran\u2019s regional ambitions were understandable and morally equivalent to any large nation\u2019s desire for such strategic influence. Either way, the results were deception and lies rather than honesty about these assumptions.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The foundations for the unspoken, progressive faith in catastrophic man-caused global warming are self-evident. Many Western elites believe that modern, free-market industrial growth and consumer capitalism endanger the planet. They bring out the worst in both the bourgeoisie and the undereducated, victimized poor: greed, acquisitiveness, and shallow material values. The remedy and indeed duty for reflective and enlightened elites (who alone have transcended the rat race and by their very success have grown immune from, and wise to, the contradictions of capitalism) is to change the economic foundations of modern Western life \u2014 in a radical fashion akin to the 19th-century romantic yearning for a pre-industrial, less environmentally exploitive past.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The catch, however, is that most Americans believe that oil wells, mines, freeways, dams, cars, reservoirs, and factories \u2014 and the granite counters, stainless-steel fridges, and big-screen TVs that derive from them \u2014 are largely godsends, ensuring a good life undreamed of by their grandparents. Or they believe that most accompanying deleterious effects on the environment, such as slight and periodic changes in temperatures, are outweighed by the benefits of industry and can be soon ameliorated by rapidly advancing scientific and technological remedies.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The result is an impasse. To square the circle, progressive vocabulary adjusted. Global warming became \u201cclimate change,\u201d on the theory that when droughts naturally were followed by snow and rain, snow and rain were only further proof of man-caused rising temperatures that needed immediate redress through larger government intervention. It was not enough to warn that the industrial age might have contributed to an acceleration of natural and episodic warming of the planet (a documented cyclical pattern of the past); instead end-of-world, apocalyptic scenarios were necessary to reconfigure the very industrial base of modern life.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The result is that today, any natural climatic extremity \u2014 ice to searing heat, snow or drought, both mud and dust, receding or advancing waters, normal or abnormal temperatures \u2014 becomes media fodder for the narrative of man-caused, excessive carbon releases that can be remedied only by costly reduction of the West\u2019s modern commerce and industry that fuels extravagant, self-indulgent consumerism.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Yet imply that, and the public would revolt. Instead, it is wiser to suggest that the climate is being altered by human shortsightedness and extravagance and that the change can be stopped by altruism and moral sacrifice. Inefficient and subsidized solar and wind power therefore become ethically and culturally preferable to more practicable but retrograde nuclear power, hydroelectric, and natural-gas generation. As for a publicly green Bono, John Kerry, or Al Gore, who in his private life might gulp down an inordinate amount of aviation fuel or hoard too many square feet of living space, we appropriate the implied Soviet argument of the apparat and the dacha: Only by revolutionaries faring well can the revolution itself fare well.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
No one wishes to discuss candidly that universities are no longer free bastions of inquiry but are descending into would-be boot camps to train progressive shock troops. Careers, reputations, and lots of money are invested in stifling free expression, a project predicated on changing the nature of students, the curricula, and the very atmosphere of the traditional university.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The predicable result is again linguistic subterfuge.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
If unprepared students are frustrated that special admittance does not de facto equate to college success or graduation, the university must make the necessary Animal Farm\u2013like adjustments. Segregation by race and gender becomes \u201csafe spaces.\u201d Ancient stress, the stuff of cramming for finals and paper deadlines, gets embedded into politics, as snowflakes are \u201ctraumatized\u201d by a culturally appropriated earring or a gendered pronoun. Free speech that can be challenging and liberate young minds becomes \u201chate speech\u201d and is banned. Odious censorship is redefined as mere \u201ctrigger warnings.\u201d<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Confederate nullification that reminds us of the chaotic consequence of states\u2019 defying federal law becomes \u201csanctuary cities,\u201d as if illegal-alien lawbreakers were 21st-century versions of fugitive slaves seeking sanctuary from plantation bounty hunters.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
When \u201csexual liberation\u201d of the 1960s eventually led to a crass and crude dating atmosphere that disadvantaged young women (the male was assured that mutually consenting sexual congress demanded not even momentary commitment or even postcoital gentlemanly behavior and deference), it was recalibrated as \u201csexual assault\u201d \u2014 as if occasional female na\u00efvet\u00e9 and frequent male boorishness and selfishness in matters of sex were now criminal matters (though exempt from the bother of the Bill of Rights).<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Nowhere was the progressive project more in need of stealth than the proverbial War on Terror that followed the mass murdering on 9\/11. Apparently, it was impossible for the Obama administration to concede that terrorism and indeed global conflict in the 21st century were largely dividends of the radicalization of Islam, and fueled often by the inability of traditional Muslim societies to adjust to the radical globalization \u2014 and indeed Westernization \u2014 of the planet.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Conceding that would imply the culpability of autocratic and theocratic Muslim leaders (along with traditional and endemic gender apartheid, tribalism, anti-Semitism, religious fundamentalism and intolerance, and statism). It\u2019s far easier to fault the pernicious legacy of 19th-century European colonialism.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Empiricism would have allowed discussions of inherent differences between a post-Reformation Western Christianity and a pre-reformation Islam; instead, progressives adhered to boilerplate multicultural moral equivalencies. Identification of widespread abhorrent practices in Middle Eastern societies \u2014 female genital mutilation, honor killings, state violence against gays, and racism \u2013 would lead to difficult intellectual and political truths. But keeping the focus on the \u2019Wests supposed post-colonialism, imperialism, and exploitation provides easy fodder for the race, class, and gender appetites of careerist Western elites.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
To square that circle, terrorism then became \u201cman-caused disasters\u201d (as if Buddhist and Christians were on a rampage in Europe). Anti-terrorism was \u201can overseas contingency operation\u201d (as if hunger in Haiti was morally equivalent to the battle in Anbar Province), while jihadism became a mere personal odyssey or journey (who is to say that bin Laden was not misunderstood by followers seeking spiritual growth?). The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was rendered \u201clargely secular,\u201d as if Mohamed Morsi sought to bring what he learned at USC to good governance in Cairo. \u201cWorkplace violence\u201d was murdering 13 soldiers in cold blood at Fort Hood while shouting \u201cAllahu akbar,\u201d on the theory that deranged employees sometimes have shot many on the job, though without the loud religious proclamations.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
History got into the act as well. President Obama assured us on no evidence that a Cordoba without Muslims in the late 15th century, at the time of the Christian Inquisition, was a bastion of Islamic tolerance (and later added that we \u201chigh-horse\u201d Christians should remember the Crusades of a millennium ago). For the progressive project, history is not tragic. It\u2019s a melodrama to be used for contemporary political agendas, through separating bad people from good people of the past, as ascertained through contemporary progressive standards retroactively applied to earlier centuries.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In fairness, what is the anti-multicultural, anti\u2013morally equivalent, anti-utopian pacifist alternative? To tragically confess that religions are not mostly alike? That blowing up somebody on the pretext of ending oppression does not mean there is real oppression rather than inherent selfishness and evil? To assume that those who most damn the West are themselves the most eager to flee to the West? To accept that deterrence sways behavior more than does concession, given the unchanging nature of man?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Without ruse, there can be no progressive project \u2014 as was true in the past of any illogical and unappealing ideology.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

In short, you gotta lie.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/article\/447231\/why-progressives-lie-leftist-agenda-requires-deception<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Oh! What a tangled progressive web we weave . . . Red\/blue, conservative\/liberal, and Republican\/Democrat mark traditional American divides. But one fault line is not so 50\/50 \u2014 that of the contemporary hard progressive movement versus traditional politics, values, and customs. The entire menu of race, class, and gender […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[124,29,79,603,225,46,150,185,1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2DE","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5957,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/what-the-obama-scandals-reveal-about-progressive-ideology\/","url_meta":{"origin":10146,"position":0},"title":"What the Obama Scandals Reveal About Progressive Ideology","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 17, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPageMag.com The three scandals dominating the news this week all reveal the moral and intellectual corruption at the heart of progressive ideology. Whether or not these revelations gain enough traction to halt the country\u2019s downward spiral is the more important question. Benghazi The moment it came\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11509,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/progressive-politics-are-not-really-progressive\/","url_meta":{"origin":10146,"position":1},"title":"Progressive Politics Are Not Really Progressive","author":"victorhanson","date":"November 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness Some progressives lamented the\u00a0apparent\u00a0defeat of radical progressive African-American candidates such as gubernatorial nominees Stacey Abrams of Georgia and Florida\u2019s Andrew Gillum by blaming allegedly treasonous white women. Apparently white women did not vote sufficiently\u00a0en bloc\u00a0in accordance with approved notions of identity politics tribalism. According\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Progressivism"","block_context":{"text":"Progressivism","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/progressivism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11453,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-origins-of-progressive-agony\/","url_meta":{"origin":10146,"position":2},"title":"The Origins of Progressive Agony","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review What has transformed the Democratic party into an anguished progressive movement that incorporates the tactics of the street, embraces maenadism, reverts to Sixties carnival barking, and is radicalized by a new young socialist movement? Even party chairman Tom Perez concedes that there are \u201cno\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Kavanaugh"","block_context":{"text":"Kavanaugh","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/kavanaugh\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12201,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/reaching-peak-progressivism\/","url_meta":{"origin":10146,"position":3},"title":"Reaching Peak Progressivism","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness In 2020 we have finally hit peak progressivism. The adjective \u201cpeak\u201d\u2014apex or summit\u2014 is often used to describe something that has reached its maximum extent but thereafter will insidiously decline\u2014like supposed U.S. domestic oil production in 2000 when more oil was purportedly taken out\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5701,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-tin-drum-progressive-boomers\/","url_meta":{"origin":10146,"position":4},"title":"The Tin-Drum Progressive Boomers","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 6, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"by Bruce S. Thornton FrontPage Like the hero of Gunter Grass\u2019 novel\u00a0The Tin Drum, America\u2019s progressive Baby Boomers chose not to grow up. Why should they? They decided that their development was complete when they graduated from college. All they needed to do was affirm their magnificent, world-historical identity. No\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bruce S. Thornton"","block_context":{"text":"Bruce S. Thornton","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/our-contributors\/bruce-s-thornton\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11445,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/kavanaugh-casualties\/","url_meta":{"origin":10146,"position":5},"title":"Kavanaugh Casualties","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review When the Christine Ford saga finally ended with the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, a lot of truth had distilled out, along with the evaporation of prior pretensions and misconceptions. The Left The hearing confirmed that the traditional JFK\/Hubert Humphrey\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Kavanaugh"","block_context":{"text":"Kavanaugh","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/kavanaugh\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10146"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10146"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10146\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10147,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10146\/revisions\/10147"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}