{"id":10089,"date":"2017-04-13T14:50:38","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T21:50:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/?p=10089"},"modified":"2017-04-13T17:33:23","modified_gmt":"2017-04-14T00:33:23","slug":"obama-is-americas-version-of-stanley-baldwin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-is-americas-version-of-stanley-baldwin\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama Is America\u2019s Version of Stanley Baldwin"},"content":{"rendered":"
\u00a0by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Both leaders put their successors in a dangerous geopolitical position.<\/p>\n

Last year, President Obama assured the world that \u201cwe are living in the most peaceful, prosperous, and progressive era in human history,\u201d and that \u201cthe world has never been less violent.\u201d<\/p>\n

Translated, those statements meant that active foreign-policy volcanoes in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and the Middle East would probably not blow up on what little was left of Obama\u2019s watch.<\/p>\n

Obama is the U.S. version of Stanley Baldwin, the suave, three-time British prime minister of the 1920s and 1930s.<\/p>\n

Baldwin\u2019s last tenure (1935\u20131937) coincided with the rapid rise of aggressive German, Italian, and Japanese Fascism.<\/p>\n

Baldwin was a passionate spokesman for disarmament. He helped organize peace conferences. He tirelessly lectured on the need for pacifism. He basked in the praise of his good intentions.<\/p>\n

Baldwin assured Fascists that he was not rearming Britain. Instead, he preached that the deadly new weapons of the 20th century made war so unthinkable that it would be almost impossible for it to break out.<\/p>\n

Baldwin left office when the world was still relatively quiet. But his appeasement and pacifism had sown the seeds for a global conflagration soon to come.<\/p>\n

Obama, the Nobel peace laureate and former president, resembles Baldwin. Both seemed to believe that war breaks out only because of misunderstandings that reflect honest differences. Therefore, tensions between aggressors and their targets can be remedied by more talk, international agreements, goodwill, and concessions.<\/p>\n

Ideas such as strategic deterrence were apparently considered by both Baldwin and Obama to be Neanderthal, judging from Baldwin\u2019s na\u00cfve efforts to ask Hitler not to rearm or annex territory, and Obama\u2019s \u201clead from behind\u201d foreign policy and his pledge never to \u201cdo stupid sh**\u201d abroad.<\/p>\n

Aggressors clearly assumed that Obama\u2019s assurances were green lights to further their own agendas without consequences.<\/p>\n

Iran routinely threatened U.S. Navy ships, even taking ten American sailors into custody early last year. Obama issued various empty deadlines to Iran to cease enriching uranium before concluding a 2015 deal that allowed the Iranians to continue working their centrifuges. Iran was freed from crippling economic sanctions. And Iran quietly received $400 million in cash (in the dead of night) for the release of American hostages.<\/p>\n

All that can be said about the Iran deal is that Obama\u2019s concessions likely ensured he would leave office with a non-nuclear Iran soon to get nuclear weapons on someone else\u2019s watch.<\/p>\n

Obama green-lighted the Syrian disaster by issuing a red line over the use of chemical weapons and then not enforcing it. When Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad called Obama\u2019s bluff, Obama did nothing other than call on Russian president Vladimir Putin to beg Assad to stop killing civilians with chemical weapons.<\/p>\n

Nearly five years after Obama issued his 2012 red line to Syria, and roughly a half-million dead later, Assad remains in power, some 2 million Middle Eastern refugees have overrun Europe, and Assad is still gassing his own citizens with the very chemical agents that the Obama administration had boasted were removed.<\/p>\n

Obama\u2019s reset policy with Russia advanced the idea that George W. Bush had unduly polarized Putin by overreacting to Russian aggression in the former Soviet republic of Georgia. But Obama\u2019s concessions and promises to be flexible helped turn a wary but opportunistic Putin into a bold aggressor, assured that he would never have to account for his belligerence.<\/p>\n

Middle Eastern terrorism? Obama assured us that al-Qaeda was \u201con the run\u201d and that the Islamic State was a \u201cjayvee\u201d organization. His policy of dismissing the phrase \u201cradical Islamic terrorism,\u201d along with his administration\u2019s weird assertions that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was \u201clargely secular\u201d and that \u201cjihad\u201d did not mean using force to spread Islam, earned the U.S. contempt instead of support.<\/p>\n

Russia and China launched cyberattacks on the U.S. without worry of consequences. Both countries increased their defense budgets while ours shrank. China built artificial island bases in the South China Sea to intimidate its neighbors, while Russia absorbed Crimea.<\/p>\n

North Korea built more and better missiles. Almost weekly, it threatened its neighbors and crowed that it would soon nuke its critics, the American West Coast included.<\/p>\n

In other words, as was true of Europe between 1933 and 1939, the world grew more dangerous and reached the brink of war. And like Stanley Baldwin, Obama was never willing to make a few unpopular decisions to rearm and face down aggressors in order not to be forced to make far more dangerous and unpopular decisions later on.<\/p>\n

Baldwin was popular when he left office, largely because he had proclaimed peace, but he had helped set the table for the inevitable conflict to be inherited by his successors, Neville Chamberlain and Winston Churchill.<\/p>\n

Obama likewise ignored rumbling volcanoes, and now they are erupting on his successor\u2019s watch.<\/p>\n

In both cases, history was kind while Baldwin and Obama were in office \u2014 but not so after they left.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Both leaders put their successors in a dangerous geopolitical position. Last year, President Obama assured the world that \u201cwe are living in the most peaceful, prosperous, and progressive era in human history,\u201d and that \u201cthe world has never been less violent.\u201d Translated, those statements meant that active foreign-policy volcanoes […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1098,275,346,375,28,124,127,59,285,46,1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-2CJ","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10151,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/angry-reader-12\/","url_meta":{"origin":10089,"position":0},"title":"Angry Reader","author":"victorhanson","date":"May 5, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"From an Angry Reader: Mr. Hanson, I don\u2019t know anything about Stanley Baldwin, but I\u2019ll assume your description of him is accurate. In that case, you have to stretch quite a bit to make Obama into Baldwin. For instance: You call Baldwin a pacifist. Obama is decidedly not a pacifist.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Angry Reader"","block_context":{"text":"Angry Reader","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/angry-reader\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8533,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-four-horsemen-of-a-looming-apocalypse\/","url_meta":{"origin":10089,"position":1},"title":"The Four Horsemen of a Looming Apocalypse","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Our Four Major Threats: China, Iran, Russia, ISIS-They could all be confronted. But by the Obama administration? by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online The U.S. and its allies are faced with four major threats, and they are as diverse and yet as akin as the proverbial apocalyptic horsemen.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "China"","block_context":{"text":"China","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/china\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"(Photo Illustration: NRO)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/four-horsemen-of-the-apocalypse-c-500x292.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9862,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-three-headed-hydra-of-the-middle-east\/","url_meta":{"origin":10089,"position":2},"title":"The Three-Headed Hydra of the Middle East","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 16, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review Trump has inherited a matrix of problems that primarily stem from Iran, Russia, and ISIS. The abrupt Obama administration pre-election pullout from Iraq in 2011, along with the administration\u2019s failed reset with Russia and the Iran deal, created a three-headed hydra in the Middle\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "ISIS"","block_context":{"text":"ISIS","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/isis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8720,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-road-to-middle-east-perdition\/","url_meta":{"origin":10089,"position":3},"title":"The Road to Middle East Perdition","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 13, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"From reset to the Iran deal, Obama\u2019s mistakes are so comprehensive they almost look deliberate. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ National Review Online How did Vladimir Putin \u2014 with his country reeling from falling oil prices, possessing only a second-rate military, in demographic free-fall, and suffering from an array of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Russia"","block_context":{"text":"Russia","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/the-world\/europe\/russia\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"(Bill Pugliano\/Getty)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/pic_giant_081814_SM_Barack-Obama-G_1-500x292.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":11420,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-won\/","url_meta":{"origin":10089,"position":4},"title":"Obama Won","author":"victorhanson","date":"September 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ American Greatness By traditional metrics, Barack Obama\u2019s presidency was mostly a failure. The economy, in a new first, never hit annualized growth of 3 percent. His signature domestic policy\u2014Obamacare\u2014caused chaos. Millions lost their coverage and doctors, and paid far more in deductibles and premiums. The stagnant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Obama"","block_context":{"text":"Obama","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/obama\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":10075,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/hall-of-mirrors-in-syria\/","url_meta":{"origin":10089,"position":5},"title":"Hall of Mirrors in Syria","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Corner The one and only. by Victor Davis Hanson\/\/ National Review \u00a0 Syria is weird for reasons that transcend even the bizarre situation of bombing an abhorrent Bashar al-Assad who was bombing an abhorrent ISIS \u2014 as we de facto ally with Iran, the greater strategic threat, to defeat\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Putin"","block_context":{"text":"Putin","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/putin\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10089"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10089"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10089\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10101,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10089\/revisions\/10101"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}