by Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n
PJ Media<\/em><\/p>\n Illegal Immigration, Race, and Chauvinism<\/strong><\/p>\n There is nothing about illegal immigration that should\u00a0ipso facto<\/em>\u00a0involve matters of race, culture or ethnicity, given that it is a legal issue at heart. I think the great majority of opponents of open borders would be equally worried should 12 million illegal immigrants come here from a now bankrupt Ireland, Greece, or Portugal. That an illegal alien from a European country would claim my allegiance or empathy on the basis of ethnic solidarity would have zero currency.<\/p>\n So for most of us, the question is primarily a legal one \u2014 if federal statutes are not followed, what sanctity is left in the law itself? I am reminded of that classic exchange between Crito and Socrates, when the former urges the latter to break out of jail, disobey the law and its death sentence, and ignore what they both feel was an unfair verdict. Socrates,\u00a0inter alia<\/em>, reminds Crito that the individual cannot pick and choose his own level of compliance with those statutes he finds distasteful or inconvenient.<\/p>\n That is not to say that race hasn\u2019t become inevitably intertwined throughout the discussion. Ruben Navarrette, Jr., on these PJM pages, cited\u00a0some distasteful animal metaphors<\/a>\u00a0[1] used in the context of illegal immigration by a number of officials and would-be officials that clearly cross the line of common decency. These, I think, are not the norm, but Navarrette is right nevertheless they must be condemned as reckless and thinly veiled racist speech.<\/p>\n By the same token, however, much of the amnesty movement itself resorts to tribal chauvinism and has turned the issue of sovereignty and illegality into an implied threat: either grant the DREAM Act or face the consequences of bloc voting in the future \u2014 as if all Latinos will think and act similarly, and one issue will adjudicate a voter\u2019s electoral menu.<\/p>\n Note for example a recent essay on the eve of the DREAM Act\u00a0by Rep. Luis Gutierrez<\/a>\u00a0[2]:<\/p>\n A million more eligible young Latino voters will be in play by the time votes are cast in 2012. In every state of the union, they are becoming the newest voting constituents of every Senator and Congressman. Do you think they will forget who voted for and against the DREAM Act in two years? What about the two million newly eligible voters in four years? Believe me when I tell you they will remember who fought for \u2014 and against \u2014 deporting their sisters, cousins, best friends, boyfriends, and teammates. \u2026 This generation of immigrants \u2014 like every generation before them in US history \u2014 will become citizens and voters eventually. In the meantime, their neighbors, friends, and families are already citizens and voters and more are reaching voting age each day. They are writing down their naughty and nice lists this Christmas in pen, not pencil, and will remember what you give them this Christmas for a very, very long time.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Follow the disturbing logic that ignores principle and focuses on raw self-interest: either grant amnesty on my terms to some of those who are here illegally or we are going to punish you as enemies (perhaps channeling the president\u2019s own election-eve characterization) at the polls.<\/p>\n Note also the unfortunate ethnic appeal of Gutierrez: he does not argue for the bill on the merits that pertain to all illegal aliens per se (e.g., whether Chinese or Somali) but instead on the basis of racial affinities, as in \u201cyoung Latinos\u201d and their \u201csisters, cousins, best friends, boyfriends, and teammates.\u201d<\/p>\n One wonders, would Rep. Gutierrez be so animated an advocate for DREAM-Act amnesty should the matter involve, say, hundreds of thousands of Asian illegal aliens? And if not, why not? And are we to believe all Latino-American youth must naturally put aside concerns about the law and make those worries secondary to ethnic solidarity? Do we really wish each constituency in America to see shared problems in terms of our own ethnic \u201csisters, cousins, best friends, boyfriends and teammates\u201d \u2014 or, in the recent racist appeals of a Rep. Loretta Sanchez, to vote\u00a0according to ethnic heritages<\/a>\u00a0[3]?<\/p>\n Finally, Gutierrez offers a disturbing racialist snide remark with: \u201cI see a delightful \u2014 and at times challenging \u2014 spark of hope in the spirit of the young people fighting for this bill, whether it would help them directly or not. It is a remarkable counter-example to the stereotype of Facebook and Game Boy addicted youth who are thought to be apathetic about their nation, her laws, and society at large.\u201d<\/p>\n I think Gutierrez\u2019s implication is that those Latinos who are fighting for DREAM Act amnesty are in marked contrast with the rest of American youth (mostly non-Hispanic?) that in his view are apathetically addicted to Facebook and Game Boy and thus lack Gutierrez\u2019s admirable notion of ethnic solidarity. But then note how Orwellian his rant becomes: he characterizes those youth not supporting veritable disobedience to federal law as \u201capathetic \u2026 about her laws.\u201d In contrast, does not residing for years as an illegal alien constitute being \u201capathetic\u201d about America\u2019s \u201claws\u201d?<\/p>\n Most illegal aliens simply left Mexico for a better life in the United States, mostly on word of mouth that there was very little enforcement of immigration law, work was plentiful, and prospects were far brighter than in Mexico. Most do not wish to go back to Mexico, understanding that while Mexico is a naturally rich country, it operates on political and economic principles that do not ensure wealth, security, and dignity for its own, at least in the manner of the United States.<\/p>\n Unfortunately, a shrill elite finds, as Rep. Gutierrez implied, political capital in framing legal issues in terms of race and ethnic solidarity. In that context, they are the mirror image of those who in thinly veiled racial terms demonize illegal aliens.<\/p>\n One, for example, can still go onto a MEChA website and find separatist racial chauvinism. If most of the sites have been scrubbed of the old nonsense about a brown state for a brown people and \u201ceverything for the race\u201d nonsense, enough remains to disturb:<\/p>\n MEChA must bring to the mind of every young Chicana and Chicano that the liberation of her\/his people from prejudice and oppression is in her\/his hands and this responsibility is greater than personal achievement and more meaningful than degrees, especially if they are earned at the expense of her\/his identity and cultural integrity. MEChA, then, is more than a name; it is a spirit of unity, of sisterhood and brotherhood, and a resolve to undertake a struggle for liberation in society where justice is but a word. MEChA is a means to an end \u2026<\/p>\n The Mexican-American (Hispanic) is a person who lacks respect for his\/her cultural and ethnic heritage. Unsure of her\/himself, she\/he seeks assimilation as a way out of her\/his \u201cdegraded\u201d social status. Consequently, she\/he remains politically ineffective. In contrast, Chicano reflects self-respect and pride on one\u2019s ethnic and cultural background. Thus, the Chicana\/o acts with confidence and with a range of alternatives in the political world. She\/he is capable of developing an effective ideology through action.<\/p>\n This message of \u201ccultural integrity\u201d and opposition to assimilation is not just rehashed sixties braggadocio, but again jumps out on the opening pages of such websites. It gets much worse from the racist\u00a0La Voz of Aztlan<\/em>, an extremist and marginal publication where one can read of real hatred and talk of \u201cgringo dollars\u201d \u2014 in addition to the most overt anti-Semitism imaginable, on par with the Klan\u2019s anti-Jewish diatribes.<\/p>\n Even some mainstream Latino groups for some reason still cling to racialist terminology, as in the National Council of La Raza. In another Orwellian example, it arbitrarily has announced that\u00a0raza<\/em>\u00a0simply does not mean what\u00a0raza<\/em>means (e.g., race, from Latin\u00a0radix<\/em>). But no one would find that assertion believable anywhere in the Spanish speaking world.<\/p>\n The Concise Oxford Spanish Dictionary<\/em>\u00a0rightly defines\u00a0raza<\/em>\u00a0as \u201crace,\u201d and if one were to translate extremist English phraseology into Spanish (e.g., \u201cmaster race\u201d [raza superior<\/em>], \u201cwhite race\u201d [raza blanca<\/em>]),\u00a0raza<\/em>\u00a0would be the natural vocabulary. In short, La Raza surely understands the racial connotations ofraza<\/em>, and that they would be lost with more neutral words such as\u00a0gente<\/em>\u00a0orpueblo<\/em>\u00a0that far better convey the idea of community or people. That it tries to preempt proper criticism of its usage by declaring\u00a0raza<\/em>\u00a0does not mean race does not make it true<\/p>\n Ad hominem<\/em>\u00a0Character Assassination<\/strong><\/p>\n This exchange<\/a>\u00a0[4] was aired on Joe Scarborough\u2019s show recently (Scarborough, remember, is an advocate of the No Labels movement that pledges not to engage in name calling):<\/p>\n JOE SCARBOROUGH: I\u2019m trying to figure out though, and Dr. Sachs asked this of you Charles [Blow], who is Barack Obama at this point? What does he stand for? And Victor Davis Hanson, at the National Review, writes this about \u201cThe Obamaites About-Face\u201d:<\/p>\n For his political survival, Obama now accepts that his faith-based ideas about the environment, radical Islam, taxes, stimulus, the economy, national security, and foreign policy are not supported by any evidence in the real world . . . The wonder is not that politicians change as politics dictate, but that the most vehement leftism now accepts nonchalantly what it not long ago so ardently demonized.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n And Hanson goes through all of the things: the Bush tax cuts, the estate tax cuts, the stimulative wonders of tax cuts in general, Gitmo, NSA, tripling the number of troops in Afghanistan. We talked about [Obama saying] \u201cwe celebrate wealth,\u201d Eric Holder quoted in ABC saying \u201csome religions produce more terrorists than others.\u201d These people are sounding an awful lot like George W. Bush these days . . . [Obama] has shifted dramatically on issues of terror, on Gitmo, on taxes, on celebrating wealth: I think that\u2019s undeniable.<\/p>\n JEFFREY SACHS: Anything that Hanson says I\u2019m likely to disagree with, cause no commentator has done more harm to the American people actually than that guy who led us into all these disastrous wars. But aside from that \u2014<\/p>\n SCARBOROUGH: My God! That is serious.<\/p>\n MIKA BRZEZINSKI: OK, then!<\/p>\n SACHS: No, that is real. Because this is an extremist. So quoting him doesn\u2019t really make the point.<\/p>\n SCARBOROUGH: And I will put Victor Hanson \u2014<\/p>\n SACHS: Sorry, that\u2019s a side point, but that man \u2014 that guy\u2019s done a lot of damage.<\/p>\n SCARBOROUGH: I will put Victor Davis Hanson to the side, you obviously, you guys aren\u2019t on each other\u2019s mailing lists, Christmas card lists.<\/p>\n SACHS: That guy got us into more wars, and more militarism, than anybody.<\/p>\n Note some things about Sachs\u2019 classic demagoguery:<\/p>\n 1) Sachs simply does not refute my quoted statement that after attacking those who supported the anti-terrorism protocols of the last decade, Obama has embraced all of them, from Guantanamo to tribunals and Predators, and the same about-face now holds true on a variety of issues from the Bush tax rates to the dangers of radical Islam.<\/p>\n Instead, Sachs\u2019 answer to all that is reduced to an incoherently worded, \u201cAnything that Hanson says I\u2019m likely to disagree with, cause no commentator has done more harm to the American people actually than that guy who led us into all these disastrous wars.\u201d<\/p>\n I suppose the qualifier \u201canything\u201d excuses him from having to offer a rebuttal, which Sachs is apparently unwilling or unable to produce.<\/p>\n 2) After calling me an \u201cextremist\u201d and claiming I do more harm than any other commentator, he lists as evidence of that charge that I have \u201cled us into all these disastrous wars.\u201d Not Bush, not Bill Clinton in the Balkans, not the Senate and House that voted for both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, but I have \u201cled\u201d us. That is as pathetic a charge as it is adolescent.<\/p>\n 3) As far as \u201call these disastrous wars\u201d: There have been three recent wars. A) I supported Bill Clinton\u2019s removal of Milosevic; the world is better off without his bloodletting. B) I supported the removal of Saddam Hussein, the surge, and the fostering of the present government. The recent constitutional agreements in Baghdad and the relative calm, in the latest words of the\u00a0Washington Post<\/em>, seem to support the vision of Bush\u2019 s original intent of a consensual government. The world is again better off without a mass murdering Saddam, and millions have had a chance of some sort of normalcy which was impossible under Saddam. History will sort out the final verdict on the terrible costs versus the clear benefits; the brilliant record of brave American soldiers, however, is already enshrined. I note as well that Obama, after running on the premise of wanting troops out by March 2008, for some reason has accepted the Bush-Petraeus plan of stabilization and withdrawal without exception. Joe Biden, remember, claimed that Iraq could be Obama\u2019s \u201cgreatest achievement.\u201d<\/p>\n 4) I supported the 2001 removal of the Taliban. For all the recent setbacks in Afghanistan, I remain confident that we can stabilize the region and leave something better than the Taliban and its al-Qaeda guests.<\/p>\n I don\u2019t think much of \u201canything\u201d that Sachs has written about his theories of foreign assistance partnerships with the UN or the supposedly proper methodology of US foreign aid in alleviating poverty is very convincing. And I think the record would support that bleak assessment of Sachs\u2019 ideas; in all his various and shifting incarnations \u2014 from the erstwhile shock therapy plans for the former communist bloc to the UN\/big donor foreign aid ideas \u2014 a common theme has been chaos. URLs in this post: \u00a92010 Victor Davis Hanson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Victor Davis Hanson PJ Media Illegal Immigration, Race, and Chauvinism There is nothing about illegal immigration that should\u00a0ipso facto\u00a0involve matters of race, culture or ethnicity, given that it is a legal issue at heart.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[470],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p466Sb-gf","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":8224,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/class-race-and-illegal-immigration\/","url_meta":{"origin":1007,"position":0},"title":"Class, Race, And Illegal Immigration","author":"victorhanson","date":"February 20, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ Peregrine The driving forces behind three decades of de facto non-enforcement of federal immigration law were largely the interests of elites across the political spectrum. Employers in agriculture, construction, the hospitality industry, landscaping, and food processing wanted access to cheap, industrious foreign national laborers. So\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Peregrine"","block_context":{"text":"Peregrine","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/peregrine\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8628,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/how-illegal-immigration-finally-turned-off-the-public\/","url_meta":{"origin":1007,"position":1},"title":"How Illegal Immigration Finally Turned Off the Public","author":"victorhanson","date":"August 31, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"If there were not a Donald Trump, he would likely have had to have been invented.\u00a0 by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/ PJ Media Why did the illegal-immigration issue launch Donald Trump\u2019s campaign? Why did his recent tense press conference exchange with Univision\u2019s Jorge Ramos please even some of Trump\u2019s liberal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Politics"","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Shot and chaser: Democrat activist Jorge Ramos of Univison badgers Donald Trump; is (temporarily) deported from presser by Trump\u00e2\u0080\u0099s security. (AP Photos\/Charlie Neibergall)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/trump_ramos_8-30-15-1-500x213.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1507,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/obama-fails-to-square-the-illegal-immigration-circle\/","url_meta":{"origin":1007,"position":2},"title":"Obama Fails to Square the Illegal-Immigration Circle","author":"victorhanson","date":"July 11, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson NRO's\u00a0The Corner There was very little new in the president\u2019s speech \u2014 certainly not his tired hope-and-change trope of blending legal and illegal immigration (\u201cThe scientific breakthroughs of Albert Einstein, the inventions of Nikola Tesla, the great ventures of Andrew Carnegie\u2019s U.S. Steel and Sergey Brin\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "July 2010"","block_context":{"text":"July 2010","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2010\/july-2010\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3787,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/the-shifting-debate-over-illegal-immigration\/","url_meta":{"origin":1007,"position":3},"title":"The Shifting Debate over Illegal Immigration","author":"victorhanson","date":"October 9, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services When I wrote\u00a0Mexifornia\u00a0more than three years ago, much of the criticism came from the academic and open-borders left. The memoir was considered insensitive in our politically correct age for complaining that it was not wise or moral that millions were here illegally from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "October 2006"","block_context":{"text":"October 2006","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2006\/october-2006\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6848,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/resisting-immigration-reform\/","url_meta":{"origin":1007,"position":4},"title":"Resisting Immigration Reform","author":"victorhanson","date":"December 17, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Identity politics rejects ending illegal immigration and reforming legal immigration. by Victor Davis Hanson \/\/\u00a0National Review Online\u00a0 We are fast approaching what promises to be the year of \u201ccomprehensive immigration reform.\u201d In the manner of the \u201cAffordable Care Act,\u201d it will not be comprehensive nor will it reform immigration. All\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Immigration"","block_context":{"text":"Immigration","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/immigration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/U.S._Border_Patrol_Badge-205x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4018,"url":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/illegal-immigration-and-the-english-language\/","url_meta":{"origin":1007,"position":5},"title":"Illegal Immigration and the English Language","author":"victorhanson","date":"April 17, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"by Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Media Services In the fierce debate over illegal immigration, the particular terms used by those who argue our porous borders are not a serious problem can tell us a lot. There are somewhere between 8 and 15 million citizens from Mexico and Latin America in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "April 2006"","block_context":{"text":"April 2006","link":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/ahref=\/index.php\/categories\/angry-reader\/categorylink\/a\/archives\/2006\/april-2006\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1007"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1007"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1007\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1008,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1007\/revisions\/1008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/victorhanson.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nBut I certainly don\u2019t think being wrong or causing harm was his intent. And I wouldn\u2019t suggest that he is an \u201cextremist,\u201d and I would debate, not demonize, him \u2014 even if he has a bad habit of demagoguery, as his latest puerile outburst once again demonstrates.<\/p>\n
\n
\n[1]\u00a0some distasteful animal metaphors<\/a>: http:\/\/pajamasmedia.com\/blog\/animal-farm-the-harsh-rhetoric-of-anti-immigration-republicans\/
\n[2]\u00a0by Rep. Luis Gutierrez<\/a>: http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/rep-luis-gutierrez\/make-this-a-dream-act-chr_b_798174.html
\n[3]\u00a0according to ethnic heritages<\/a>: http:\/\/hotair.com\/archives\/2010\/09\/22\/loretta-sanchez-on-univision-the-vietnamese-are-trying-to-take-my-house-seat\/
\n[4]\u00a0This exchange<\/a>: http:\/\/newsbusters.org\/blogs\/mark-finkelstein\/2010\/12\/23\/sachs-calls-victor-davis-hanson-extremist-who-has-done-more-harm-a<\/p>\n